|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Dec 11, 2010 8:08:46 GMT -5
Good morning, Mr. Hollenegg, I believe it was you that said we won the war. We don't want anyone taking that out of context either, but how can you ask georgie the question with an exclamation mark? What does that mean? typo? Did we win the War!we're going into 2011 unpaid from this ordeal aren't we? come on you can tell us  Georgie18...That comment by Lt.Col Reynolds was taken out of context. It was in response to Koolmoney who misunderstood the situation after communicating by text with Lt.Col Reynolds. Koolmoney was informed earlier, not by Attorney Hodges or any of the plaintiffs, that the ER was received. When Koolmoney texted Lt.Col Reynolds for verification, Lt.Col Reynolds replied the ER was not received, Koolmoney misunderstood and thought it was all over, all was lost. The reason why Lt.Col Reynolds put out a message was to clarify that the ER was not received, but could happen any moment. Did we win the War! When all sides agree to release the CMKX Distribution Funds to the Shareholders...an agreement has been made, then we won. It is prudent to take precautions and install preventive measures wherever possible to ensure that everyone upholds their part of the agreement or else. The 'else' in our case is an Appeal. My understanding, from all I read, it is a matter of sorting out the logistics aspect, then when ready, permission(ER) is granted to go ahead with the release. Read what Attorney Hodges said on the courthouse steps. Does Attorney Hodges sound like he lost the war? Not for a CMKX minute. Thank you, BHollenegg You seem to bring up the most nip picky items to deviate from the most important point. We are going to be paid. Please quit trying again to create or insinuate a problem between Shareholders when there isn't one. Thank you, BHollenegg |
|
|
|
Post by scorpion on Dec 11, 2010 8:21:17 GMT -5
Thanks for the reply. I'm not trying to be nit picky , maybe just trying to decipher any possible meaning that you bring to us, it is important that during this uneasy time that we have some form of communication. I apologize if I am trying to dig too deep, but you have to understand that while I/we go unpaid our emotions remain fluid as well. Good morning, Mr. Hollenegg, I believe it was you that said we won the war. We don't want anyone taking that out of context either, but how can you ask georgie the question with an exclamation mark? What does that mean? typo? Did we win the War!we're going into 2011 unpaid from this ordeal aren't we? come on you can tell us You seem to bring up the most nip picky items to deviate from the most important point. We are going to be paid. Please quit trying again to create a problem when there isn't one. Thank you, BHollenegg |
|
|
|
Post by smitty33 on Dec 11, 2010 9:23:55 GMT -5
Howdy Bob , er , Robert . Good to see you back . Was curious , who left ?
|
|
|
|
Post by georgie18 on Dec 11, 2010 11:30:13 GMT -5
This is a statement from LT.COLONEL REYNOLDS a plaintiff that has remained virtually silent through out this entire process who decides to come out and make this statement this late in the game....I do not get it ....that he has remained silent until this point and just had the urge to talk......but that's just me..... We should not take the statement "WE HAVE WON THE WAR"for anything more than a simple analogy.... Here is a statement by LT.COLONEL REYNOLDS that states other wise.... FACT....we just don't have ER (this is not due to anything bad/intentional/etc)....when we receive ER, we are finished. When....Al Hodges will tell us! Could be tonight....could be? ??
Sorry if it is misconstrued any other way....when the funds are disbursed and there are no more families in dire straits that require financial assistance from fellow shareholders then "WE HAVE WON THE WAR" until then we are still fighting the war....it is my hope that the war will come to an end before 2010 does....we shall see..... Georgie18...That comment by Lt.Col Reynolds was taken out of context. It was in response to Koolmoney who misunderstood the situation after communicating by text with Lt.Col Reynolds. Koolmoney was informed earlier, not by Attorney Hodges or any of the plaintiffs, that the ER was received. When Koolmoney texted Lt.Col Reynolds for verification, Lt.Col Reynolds replied the ER was not received, Koolmoney misunderstood and thought it was all over, all was lost. The reason why Lt.Col Reynolds put out a message was to clarify that the ER was not received, but could happen any moment. Did we win the War! When all sides agree to release the CMKX Distribution Funds to the Shareholders...an agreement has been made, then we won. It is prudent to take precautions and install preventive measures wherever possible to ensure that everyone upholds their part of the agreement or else. The 'else' in our case is an Appeal. My understanding, from all I read, it is a matter of sorting out the logistics aspect, then when ready, permission(ER) is granted to go ahead with the release. Read what Attorney Hodges said on the courthouse steps. Does Attorney Hodges sound like he lost the war? Not for a CMKX minute. Thank you, BHollenegg Mr Hollenegg...let me first state and as you are aware of ,I have always defended you're stance...I have always remained positive and have defended the Hodges and Associates group with that being said. What I have stated is FACT and please, and in you're own words..PLEASE DO NOT TAKE IT OUT OF CONTEXT... I am not attacking you I am merely stating the facts.. I know exactly how the conversation went... .The bottom line is LT. COLONEL REYNOLDS STATED THE FACTS "when we receive ER, we are finished. When....Al Hodges will tell us! Could be tonight....could be???"[/color] [/b] So I will ask you Robert...DO WE HAVE ER..my answer is NO...what is you're answer? Do we need ER to allow the release..YES...what is you're answer? Is the appeal a possibility...YES..what is you're answer? Have the logistics been sorted out..NO...what is you're answer? I have not only read but I heard it directly ....Mr.Hodges stated the following on the courthouse steps"If I was a betting man...which I am... I would bet that we will receive payment by Christmas.” That statement is absolutely MEANINGLESS.. .see bets can be won or they can be lost...Now if he was confident and certain we will be paid by XMAS..HE WOULD HAVE SAID YOU WILL GET PAID BEFORE XMAS AND I HAVE IN MY POSSESSION THE SIGNED DOCUMENTS TO PROVE PAYMENT WILL BE IN THE SHAREHOLDERS HANDS BY 12/25/10........ I do not know Attorney Hodges personally although I hear he is a great man as well as a great Attorney...I applaud and appreciate the battle he has undertaken on the behalf of all the shareholders with that being said... Attorney Hodges has been confident about our case since he made this statement on the week of APRIL 26,2010..."By what date will we have Economic Receipt, you ask. We will have it when this initial battle phase comes to a successful conclusion. That will be in the very near future in my opinion; the current schedule based on advice I received this afternoon is that it should all be finished, with funds in the Trustee’s hands, by week’s end."
Robert I know all have been working furiously but Attorney Hodges has been confident in securing the funds for the shareholders of CMKX for the past 7 1/2 months...this is not about confidence...I am confident about many things that does not mean that I will succeed ....it means I am confident...no more no less... On December 8,2010 I began a thread on this board... WHAT HAPPENED TO ER....no one including your self was able to put forward a definitive conclusion..to be quite frank...that in itself gave me the clear answer.... Now you have in this very reply to me stated "My understanding, from all I read, it is a matter of sorting out the logistics aspect, then when ready, permission(ER) is granted to go ahead with the release." I am not taking it out of text these are you're words.... How could those words uttered on the courthouse steps have any validity to them...when we require ER to release the funds....and on DECEMBER 6,2010 that was not in Attorney Hodge's possession. That statement was candy coated...MEANINGLESS... That is exactly why I started the THREAD...WHAT HAPPENED TO ER... I knew the answer before I started the thread..I was waiting for somebody....maybe even you to prove me wrong...nobody was able to... SO I ASK YOU ROBERT HAVE WE WON THE WAR...IS THE WAR OVER.
IT IS 10 BUSINESS DAYS TILL XMAS WE ARE WITHOUT ER AS FAR AS THE SHAREHOLDER BASE KNOWS..CAN WE RECEIVE ER AND EXPEDITE THE FUNDS INTO THE SHAREHOLDERS HANDS IN 10 BUSINESS DAYS IF WE CAN DO THAT... THEN.."WE HAVE WON THE WAR" Robert thank you for all that you have done and continue to do on our behalf...it is greatly appreciated...Thank you Attorney Hodges and Associates for fighting this uphill battle on our behalf... This is all IMHO no more no less........ |
|
|
|
Post by georgie18 on Dec 11, 2010 11:34:52 GMT -5
Any booty involved with winning this war? This definition not the slang version. 1.Plunder taken from an enemy in time of war. 2.Goods or property seized by force or piracy. 3.A valuable prize, award, or gain Anything you can share at this point? tia I will donate my booty to win the war....it's a tiny price too pay... ;D Again,your incite 'you lost the case' conveys your lack of insight. In case you are lost, we won the war. |
|
|
|
Post by georgie18 on Dec 11, 2010 11:41:37 GMT -5
Howdy Bob , er , Robert . Good to see you back . Was curious , who left ? mojo.... moby...dljazz...three extremely good hearted caring people.... |
|
|
|
Post by humbledd on Dec 11, 2010 13:10:37 GMT -5
NICE george,we as shareholder should not have to read between the lines to get straight answers.the fact is they CAN NOT ANSWER OUR QUESTIONS PERIOD.its all beat around the bush answers that are worthless,just a little advice i am involved in another stock that they tryed to short out BUT it was able to get it together and restucture there company now not only do i own those share they gave me common stock in the new one with NO restictions.my point with all this.SINCE I AM A SHAREHOLDER I HAVE RECIEVED EVERY COURT TRANSCRIPT AND DOCUMENT WITH OUT ASKING,it just showed up in the mail 'first class.SO FOR THESE PEOPLE ON THE INSIDE OR WHERE EVER THEY ARE IF THEY DONT KNOW OR HAVE REAL EVIDENCE WHY SPREAD IT ON THE BOARDS.you tell us we dont have to be here or read the posts.WELL WITH ALL DUE RESPECT WERE THE HELL ELSE ARE WE GONNA HEAR ANYTHING?THE LAWYER DONT TALK TO THE SHAREHOLDERS AND THE COMPANY WONT ANSWER ANYTHING EITHER SO KEEP IN MIND PEOPLE ARE STRUGGLING TO KEEP FAITH IN THIS.
|
|
|
|
Post by hacksawjim on Dec 11, 2010 13:13:11 GMT -5
NICE george,we as shareholder should not have to read between the lines to get straight answers.the fact is they CAN NOT ANSWER OUR QUESTIONS PERIOD.its all beat around the bush answers that are worthless,just a little advice i am involved in another stock that they tryed to short out BUT it was able to get it together and restucture there company now not only do i own those share they gave me common stock in the new one with NO restictions.my point with all this.SINCE I AM A SHAREHOLDER I HAVE RECIEVED EVERY COURT TRANSCRIPT AND DOCUMENT WITH OUT ASKING,it just showed up in the mail 'first class.SO FOR THESE PEOPLE ON THE INSIDE OR WHERE EVER THEY ARE IF THEY DONT KNOW OR HAVE REAL EVIDENCE WHY SPREAD IT ON THE BOARDS.you tell us we dont have to be here or read the posts.WELL WITH ALL DUE RESPECT WERE THE HELL ELSE ARE WE GONNA HEAR ANYTHING?THE LAWYER DONT TALK TO THE SHAREHOLDERS AND THE COMPANY WONT ANSWER ANYTHING EITHER SO KEEP IN MIND PEOPLE ARE STRUGGLING TO KEEP FAITH IN THIS. good points. we certainly do rely on alot of faith with this thing... especially with the case dismissed and no cheque in hand. hack |
|
|
|
Post by tripper on Dec 11, 2010 13:59:26 GMT -5
Good morning, Mr. Hollenegg, I believe it was you that said we won the war. We don't want anyone taking that out of context either, but how can you ask georgie the question with an exclamation mark? What does that mean? typo? Did we win the War!we're going into 2011 unpaid from this ordeal aren't we? come on you can tell us You seem to bring up the most nip picky items to deviate from the most important point. We are going to be paid. Please quit trying again to create or insinuate a problem between Shareholders when there isn't one. Thank you, BHollenegg Bob, I feel inclined to respond to the above comment you have made. You have made 2 grievous errors IMO. 1. Pointing out contradicting statements does not constitute "Nip Picking" as you put it. Bob, with all due respect, you did contradict yourself by stating the war was won in one breath and admitting ER hasn't been received with another. The truth of the matter is that in most shareholders, if not all, believe the "war is won" only after money is in OUR hand. IMO even proof of ER doesn't win the war completely if we have no cash in hand. The above point is of very little consequence to me. Its worth pointing out, but its no big deal people fire off statements that contradict themselves all the time. It not a sign of any devious intention so please don't take it that way. I know you have a lot of people trying to squeeze you for every drop of info you have. Not a comfortable position to be in. However, the next point kind of pi$$es me off about your statement. 2. Your words, and I quote..."....to deviate from the most important point. We are going to be paid. Please quit trying again to create or insinuate a problem between Shareholders when there isn't one. " This is bad form. This is paramount to accusing a person of being an enemy of the shareholders. Please explain how pointing out a contradiction of statements is, as you put it, "Trying to insinuate a problem..." This is beneath the dignity of the position you have put yourself in. You would better serve the shareholders and yourself by meeting any DESERVED reservations by clear and concise reasoning or clarifications. Not personnel attacks. This board does not stand for personnel attacks against you. Why you think you are above these rules is beyond me. If we get paid 2 seconds after this post is posted, my points still stand because that which is right should be beyond compromise. With that said I do appreciate the info you bring to the board. Do not take this chastisement the wrong way. Even Moses needed a good sit down from time to time. Sincerely, tripper |
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Dec 11, 2010 14:12:28 GMT -5
Georgie18...That comment by Lt.Col Reynolds was taken out of context. It was in response to Koolmoney who misunderstood the situation after communicating by text with Lt.Col Reynolds. Koolmoney was informed earlier, not by Attorney Hodges or any of the plaintiffs, that the ER was received. When Koolmoney texted Lt.Col Reynolds for verification, Lt.Col Reynolds replied the ER was not received, Koolmoney misunderstood and thought it was all over, all was lost. The reason why Lt.Col Reynolds put out a message was to clarify that the ER was not received, but could happen any moment. Did we win the War! When all sides agree to release the CMKX Distribution Funds to the Shareholders...an agreement has been made, then we won. It is prudent to take precautions and install preventive measures wherever possible to ensure that everyone upholds their part of the agreement or else. The 'else' in our case is an Appeal. My understanding, from all I read, it is a matter of sorting out the logistics aspect, then when ready, permission(ER) is granted to go ahead with the release. Read what Attorney Hodges said on the courthouse steps. Does Attorney Hodges sound like he lost the war? Not for a CMKX minute. Thank you, BHollenegg Mr Hollenegg...let me first state and as you are aware of ,I have always defended you're stance...I have always remained positive and have defended the Hodges and Associates group with that being said. What I have stated is FACT and please, and in you're own words..PLEASE DO NOT TAKE IT OUT OF CONTEXT... I am not attacking you I am merely stating the facts.. I know exactly how the conversation went... .The bottom line is LT. COLONEL REYNOLDS STATED THE FACTS "when we receive ER, we are finished. When....Al Hodges will tell us! Could be tonight....could be???"[/color] [/b] So I will ask you Robert...DO WE HAVE ER..my answer is NO...what is you're answer? Do we need ER to allow the release..YES...what is you're answer? Is the appeal a possibility...YES..what is you're answer? Have the logistics been sorted out..NO...what is you're answer? I have not only read by I heard it directly ....Mr.Hodges stated the following on the courthouse steps"If I was a betting man...which I am... I would bet that we will receive payment by Christmas.” That statement is absolutely MEANINGLESS.. .see bets can be won or they can be lost...Now if he was confident and certain we will be paid by XMAS..HE WOULD HAVE SAID YOU WILL GET PAID BEFORE XMAS AND I HAVE IN MY POSSESSION THE SIGNED DOCUMENTS TO PROVE PAYMENT WILL BE IN THE SHAREHOLDERS HANDS BY 12/25/10........ I do not know Attorney Hodges personally although I hear he is a great man as well as a great Attorney...I applaud and appreciate the battle he has undertaken on the behalf of all the shareholders with that being said... Attorney Hodges has been confident about our case since he made this statement on the week of APRIL 26,2010..."By what date will we have Economic Receipt, you ask. We will have it when this initial battle phase comes to a successful conclusion. That will be in the very near future in my opinion; the current schedule based on advice I received this afternoon is that it should all be finished, with funds in the Trustee’s hands, by week’s end."
Robert I know all have been working furiously but Attorney Hodges has been confident in securing the funds for the shareholders of CMKX for the past 7 1/2 months...this is not about confidence...I am confident about many things that does not mean that I will succeed ....it means I am confident...no more no less... On December 8,2010 I began a thread on this board... WHAT HAPPENED TO ER....no one including your self was able to put forward a definitive conclusion..to be quite frank...that in itself gave me the clear answer.... Now you have in this very reply to me stated "My understanding, from all I read, it is a matter of sorting out the logistics aspect, then when ready, permission(ER) is granted to go ahead with the release." I am not taking it out of text these are you're words.... How could those words uttered on the courthouse steps have any validity to them...when we require ER to release the funds....and on DECEMBER 6,2010 that was not in Attorney Hodge's possession. That statement was candy coated...MEANINGLESS... That is exactly why I started the THREAD...WHAT HAPPENED TO ER... I knew the answer before I started the thread..I was waiting for somebody....maybe even you to prove me wrong...nobody was able to... SO I ASK YOU ROBERT HAVE WE WON THE WAR...IS THE WAR OVER.
IT IS 10 BUSINESS DAYS TILL XMAS WE ARE WITHOUT ER AS FAR AS THE SHAREHOLDER BASE KNOWS..CAN WE RECEIVE ER AND EXPEDITE THE FUNDS INTO THE SHAREHOLDERS HANDS IN 10 BUSINESS DAYS IF WE CAN DO THAT... THEN.."WE HAVE WON THE WAR" Robert thank you for all that you have done and continue to do on our behalf...it is greatly appreciated...Thank you Attorney Hodges and Associates for fighting this uphill battle on our behalf... This is all IMHO no more no less........[/quote] Georgie....my response was to the portion of your post, which was the beginning of your message that you did not get why Lt. Col. Reynolds made a statement at this late in the game. I explained why? Georgie wrote: "This is a statement from LT.COLONEL REYNOLDS a plaintiff that has remained virtually silent through out this entire process who decides to come out and make this statement this late in the game....I do not get it ....that he has remained silent until this point and just had the urge to talk......but that's just me....." BHollenegg response: "That comment by Lt.Col Reynolds was taken out of context. It was in response to Koolmoney who misunderstood the situation after communicating by text with Lt.Col Reynolds. Koolmoney was informed earlier, not by Attorney Hodges or any of the plaintiffs, that the ER was received. When Koolmoney texted Lt.Col Reynolds for verification, Lt.Col Reynolds replied the ER was not received, Koolmoney misunderstood and thought it was all over, all was lost. The reason why Lt.Col Reynolds put out a message was to clarify that the ER was not received, but could happen any moment." Again, as far as, whether we won the war or not. Work was being done to have the Shareholders funds released Thanksgiving week. Everyone was on board to get it down. It did not happen. It wasn't because some one was against the release. It is still being worked. There are no more battles...just the logistics. Imo, the war is over. Thank you, BHollenegg |
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Dec 11, 2010 14:36:39 GMT -5
You seem to bring up the most nip picky items to deviate from the most important point. We are going to be paid. Please quit trying again to create or insinuate a problem between Shareholders when there isn't one. Thank you, BHollenegg Bob, I feel inclined to respond to the above comment you have made. You have made 2 grievous errors IMO. 1. Pointing out contradicting statements does not constitute "Nip Picking" as you put it. Bob, with all due respect, you did contradict yourself by stating the war was won in one breath and admitting ER hasn't been received with another. The truth of the matter is that in most shareholders, if not all, believe the "war is won" only after money is in OUR hand. IMO even proof of ER doesn't win the war completely if we have no cash in hand. The above point is of very little consequence to me. Its worth pointing out, but its no big deal people fire off statements that contradict themselves all the time. It not a sign of any devious intention so please don't take it that way. I know you have a lot of people trying to squeeze you for every drop of info you have. Not a comfortable position to be in. However, the next point kind of pi$$es me off about your statement. 2. Your words, and I quote..."....to deviate from the most important point. We are going to be paid. Please quit trying again to create or insinuate a problem between Shareholders when there isn't one. " This is bad form. This is paramount to accusing a person of being an enemy of the shareholders. Please explain how pointing out a contradiction of statements is, as you put it, "Trying to insinuate a problem..." This is beneath the dignity of the position you have put yourself in. You would better serve the shareholders and yourself by meeting any DESERVED reservations by clear and concise reasoning or clarifications. Not personnel attacks. This board does not stand for personnel attacks against you. Why you think you are above these rules is beyond me. If we get paid 2 seconds after this post is posted, my points still stand because that which is right should be beyond compromise. With that said I do appreciate the info you bring to the board. Do not take this chastisement the wrong way. Even Moses needed a good sit down from time to time. Sincerely, tripper Tripper....I appreciate your comments. There is a history of Scorpion's comments of making jabs. He is aware of it and has stated he would stop if I returned...he even offered his membership. You are right, I should let him continue and not comment, since there are two standards conveyed in your message. On the personal attack, there was not one. Thank you, BHollenegg |
|
|
|
Post by scorpion on Dec 11, 2010 15:16:41 GMT -5
I may have made some comments that could be perceived as jabs or maybe something that would come from a snot nosed spoiled kid, nothing I can do about it. It is what it is. I'm human Again, while the cmkx situation remains fluid so will the emotions and JABS by the shareholders, most of them not necessarily on purpose, maybe just shooting from the hip. I can't be that bad compared to what you've gone up against on RB or one of those guys from F4D's board, I get emotional, what can I say. I have learned to appreciate the info that you've brought to us shareholders. When you decided to return here, I did not realize that it was because of my proposed resignation here, although you did not acknowledge that was the reason for the return. I saw that the shareholders were reaching out for your return and decided to try and do a selfless act and sacrifice my membership here. I can no longer close my account here for two reasons 1) I am one of the State coordinators for the AG action and need outlets for communication. 2) As long as this situation remains fluid, so will the questions that others are scared to ask. I like you, but to slap me this morning for simply asking a bold question was wrong. I can get past it. It's O.K. I'm going to fall back into line with the rest of the foot soldiers. Bob, I feel inclined to respond to the above comment you have made. You have made 2 grievous errors IMO. 1. Pointing out contradicting statements does not constitute "Nip Picking" as you put it. Bob, with all due respect, you did contradict yourself by stating the war was won in one breath and admitting ER hasn't been received with another. The truth of the matter is that in most shareholders, if not all, believe the "war is won" only after money is in OUR hand. IMO even proof of ER doesn't win the war completely if we have no cash in hand. The above point is of very little consequence to me. Its worth pointing out, but its no big deal people fire off statements that contradict themselves all the time. It not a sign of any devious intention so please don't take it that way. I know you have a lot of people trying to squeeze you for every drop of info you have. Not a comfortable position to be in. However, the next point kind of pi$$es me off about your statement. 2. Your words, and I quote..."....to deviate from the most important point. We are going to be paid. Please quit trying again to create or insinuate a problem between Shareholders when there isn't one. " This is bad form. This is paramount to accusing a person of being an enemy of the shareholders. Please explain how pointing out a contradiction of statements is, as you put it, "Trying to insinuate a problem..." This is beneath the dignity of the position you have put yourself in. You would better serve the shareholders and yourself by meeting any DESERVED reservations by clear and concise reasoning or clarifications. Not personnel attacks. This board does not stand for personnel attacks against you. Why you think you are above these rules is beyond me. If we get paid 2 seconds after this post is posted, my points still stand because that which is right should be beyond compromise. With that said I do appreciate the info you bring to the board. Do not take this chastisement the wrong way. Even Moses needed a good sit down from time to time. Sincerely, tripper Tripper....I appreciate your comments. There is a history of Scorpion's comments of making jabs. He is aware of it and has stated he would stop if I returned...he even offered his membership. You are right, I should let him continue and not comment, since there are two standards conveyed in your message. On the personal attack, there was not one. Thank you, BHollenegg |
|
|
|
Post by gusjarvis on Dec 11, 2010 15:21:01 GMT -5
bob has al informed the company of the facts you have put on the board from al's own update to the plaintiffs, ie the doj has signed off on the distribution of the money and that it is only logistics now, and that the senators have been informed of the situation.
It is al's duty to fill in the company on these relevant facts, and it is the companies duty to pr these facts is it not.
Thanks to the team of course, but to listen to acca one more time made me sick, to know we still have to deal with the games to the end. It is time to end the games now and have some truth put out by our own company given they worked with al and urban after having the classified banking records. It is time to our company stop pretending this doesn't exist
|
|
|
|
Post by scorpion on Dec 11, 2010 15:24:44 GMT -5
You're not supposed to ask tough questions. Now back in line soldier!! bob has al informed the company of the facts you have put on the board from al's own update to the plaintiffs, ie the doj has signed off on the distribution of the money and that it is only logistics now, and that the senators have been informed of the situation. It is al's duty to fill in the company on these relevant facts, and it is the companies duty to pr these facts is it not. Thanks to the team of course, but to listen to acca one more time made me sick, to know we still have to deal with the games to the end. It is time to end the games now and have some truth put out by our own company given they worked with al and urban after having the classified banking records. It is time to our company stop pretending this doesn't exist |
|
|
|
Post by humbledd on Dec 11, 2010 15:34:18 GMT -5
amen gus! and scorpion theres nothing wrong with questioning all these rumors brother keep on keep on...we are not SHEEPLE here.the company or the lawyer needs to open up some kind of direct communication dont WE ALL DESERVE THAT AS SHAREHOLDERS?
|
|
