|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 27, 2014 10:10:07 GMT -5
He also doesn't believe in a trust Fund for shareholders or CMKM..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2014 10:51:35 GMT -5
Pay the US Patriot Jack Lew | do the right thing! www.oneworldofnations.com/2014/08/pay-us-patriot-jack-lew-do-right-thing.htmlthick as thieves One World of Nations 26 August 2014 It has been brought to our attention that Obama allegedly directed Jack Lew during 25th July, to again delay the Private Placement redemptions into 3rd September, or later, if we leave them wriggle time, to help prop up ailing US Banks and create a stronger base asset impression. This is denying long overdue failed redemptions yet again and more promised settlement lies. More delays, projects lost and families distraught. When will the games stop? Why won't Lew honor what is due? Long overdue. A good Patriot did the right thing, so now Jack, how about you? As the world is now watching and judging. In 1981, a Principle party, a real US Patriot known to us, was approached to help return Global Sovereign Accounts and Trust funds to appropriate owners. At the end of that year and January of 1982 he wrote a plan to help correct deficiencies in the system. In March, 1983, the same Patriot was approached to help certain well connected individuals to assist with implementation of the financial plan and the general well being plan for the Third World countries concerned. He arranged a meeting in Europe in May, 1983 accompanied by Commercial and Government Banking representatives, as well as the usual contingent of attorneys, et al. After the May meeting, he went back to Europe in June, 1983 at which time he gave access to a large receivable to the "CONNECTED" leader for the US to act as a bond for them. They assured him this would only be needed for a few weeks, and they would then clear it for his personal use, with a tax exoneration for a great amount of it. When they began to drag on the return, they agreed on a royalty of one percent on every cent of business conducted by them and any related activities until such time as they could compensate him. They have reneged on this agreement since 1984 and have never compensated him, as they do with all others. There are large funds visible in England with him as a Beneficial Principal, due to the Banks of England being their primary trading institutions. Also with cross accredited amounts propping up the US banking system. In November, 1983, he personally met with a representative of the Chinese Banking Group, first in Holland and then in Luxembourg. The purpose of the meeting was to facilitate an account in Luxembourg where a large amount of funds could be transferred for their needs outside of China. The amount decided on for that account was 18B USD (a huge amount at the time) which was to be structured as a 90% emission loan for the usual 20 years and one day period at an annual rate of 7% due to the less than 100% emission. This was one of a further series of accounts he facilitated. The US Patriot never received his promised compensation nor even expenses on this. Though he would occasionally overlap into "deals" involving the Far East, it was not until 2002 and 2004 that he spent a great deal of time, attention and expenses to try and settle some accounts that had, and continue, to drain him beyond his capabilities. He, like all others, is a good Patriot we work closely with, who wishes only to do good things for his country and other nations. He and his co-Investors are now owed vast Billions. In fact, post Bank Trading Programs of c35 years, it's now trading into Trillions. This savage betrayal is perpetrated every time against trusting allies and good US Patriots. It has to stop, the game is now up. This US Patriot has stood assurances for these funds and has sustained huge personal costs and sacrifices. They reneged on the deal. They betrayed his trust and let down the investors. As they continued to amass vast profits from them for themselves, they continued to renege. From Rubin, to Paulson, to Geithner, now Lew, and always under the spiders overview of Greenspan this vicious scam continues. This Patriot is a good American, loyal to his country and proud of America. A man who means well and wishes only good. He wants these funds to: •assist in the redeveloping of US Infrastructure •for Global education •vast array of both US and Global projects •for US jobs and State Tax help •to make a difference The Patriot is owed a huge debt. He came good for his country at a time of need. He is a good American. He is frustrated at continuing delays and obfuscations. So are his long term trusting Asian Allies. Conned, lied to and deceived, still waiting to get their money back and for the Patriot to get paid back for his service to his nation. For Jack Lew, the case is clear. Pay the Patriot what is due, Lew. When? When does decency get restored to an American promise? We know you only picked this up Jack, but you need to clean it up and pay up. Your name is now in the frame. We need to help rebuild America with those funds. Restore trust and integrity. The world is now watching and taking note. Pay him back.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 29, 2014 6:43:21 GMT -5
latteplease
I believe the company sent Jay Adobe as well as other messengers with tidbits along the way to equip us with information and knowledge of what to do if need be. If we needed to know more or do something in advance, we would have been told. Steve Oshins came into paltalk and offered Dynasty Trusts to the shareholders at a significant discount. What does that tell everyone?? This is a great Adobe post that talked about Trusts and other items. He mentions "CIM rights." By: jay_adobe 05 May 2006, 05:02 PM EDT Msg. 231933 of 710603I see a lot of discussion about the trusts. All this discussion is very good cognitive calisthenics. One of the major purposes of presenting the information, allowing it to be recorded and reproduced, and ultimately distributed, is so that each person can have the necessary information so that when the time comes and the resources are available, you can make the right decision for your own personal wealth and asset protection. This is a good discussion and exercise.Ponder this. Suppose that you will get paid in multiple installments. Suppose that you will be given a proportionate amount of money to enable you to exercise all of your allotted CIM rights. Suppose that you may even have money left over should you choose to purchase all your CIM rights. Suppose you have, let's say, ten days to two weeks to make the decision to either exercise the right by buying shares or selling rights. Suppose during that short time, while money is in your possession, you choose to set up a dynasty trust first, and then purchase the rights at a discounted rate, prior to IPO. If you were, in this example, to sell your CIM shares into the trust prior to the IPO, would it not be protected once it IPOs?Just something to ponder. The decision is an individual one, but you are being fed the information and the path to follow should you choose it. Watch the tidbits, discuss them, and then back up and look at the whole forest.I hope you all, even the naysayers like burnie, have a great and wonderful and prosperous weekend.--------------------------------------------------- (Thanks for finding this post Goldengriff!) And another... By: jay_adobe 08 Nov 2005, 12:53 PM EST Msg. 1215049 of 1308040 Jump to msg. #
max, I believe the settlement is for a fixed amount per share, so it doesn't matter how many shares are out there above the OS or the AS. Pick a number, any number, and afix that to each share, then multiply that out by the total number of shares that are in existence, both valid and naked shorted . That will be the total amount.
noahltl1.proboards.com/post/23728
Jay posts on Millionaires----> millionaires.proboards.com/post/740448
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 29, 2014 7:25:29 GMT -5
8+ years later. We still wait for our Trust funds to mature..
|
|
|
Post by cmkx4ever on Aug 29, 2014 8:13:47 GMT -5
Hi Jay Adobe, if I may ask, did your brother UC really pass away ? I know you might not be able to answer that directly, but maybe you can give us a hint like you know " sitting on the front porch drinking your tea " or The train is getting ready to leave the station, or the plane is ready to land, something along those lines so to speak ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2014 8:51:01 GMT -5
Talked to Jay for ya 4ever.... He said... "The snow this year is better at Innsbrook" "But not at St. Moritz." Agent jboydwv--out!
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 29, 2014 9:04:28 GMT -5
Talked to Jay for ya 4ever.... He said... "The snow this year is better at Innsbrook" "But not at St. Moritz." Agent jboydwv out! That means the trains and planes are grounded... Now what do we do..?
|
|
|
Post by cmkx4ever on Aug 29, 2014 9:51:05 GMT -5
I got it thanks so UC is in Innsbrook or St. Moritz ... thank you jboy
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 30, 2014 7:55:25 GMT -5
Hi Jay Adobe, if I may ask, did your brother UC really pass away ? I know you might not be able to answer that directly, but maybe you can give us a hint like you know " sitting on the front porch drinking your tea " or The train is getting ready to leave the station, or the plane is ready to land, something along those lines so to speak ? Hi Cmkx4ever, It has been a couple of times now that you have insinuated that JayAdobe was , in fact, UC's brother Ron Casavant (I am assuming RON). If I may ask.... what leads you to believe it to be him?? Is it your own personal "guess" or do you have some kind of proof to substantiate the claim?? Seems I remember, from a long time ago.... other DD'ers identified JayAdobe as some one different. I just cannot remember who though or the name, whatever........ but it definitely was not UC's brother. Just wondering ?? Thanks in Advance SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by theotherside on Aug 31, 2014 21:30:49 GMT -5
Didn't Jay turn out to be a hick who was living in a dilapidated shack somewhere in southern Louisiana? It's been a long time since that information surfaced so I too could be thinking of someone else but he definitely was "outed" and he wasn't a Casavant.
|
|
|
Post by cmkx4ever on Sept 1, 2014 10:44:34 GMT -5
Hi Single, just saw your question, there is one thing I never do and that is to lie, so let me answer your question, I have been around Ron and UC but never knew their handles or alias's on the boards. I was told from a very close source that ran in the same circles of Ron and they told me Ron was Jay Adobe, so I took it that it was, am I sure, that I can say I really don't know. If it is not and someone knows for sure that it is not then I was mistaken. HAGD
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Sept 1, 2014 11:32:10 GMT -5
If it is Ron, is that a good thing or a bad thing....?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2014 12:49:14 GMT -5
Back in 2003 there was one of the first rooms for CMKX on yahoo.... Jay was in that room with some folks I know.... at that time Jay was NOT Ron.... I do think different Jays have used the same handle over the years though.... I still don't think it was Ron at any time but that is just me.... .. circus from hell with the scary clowns still rolls on.... according to AL not very much longer though!
|
|
|
Post by skoondog on Sept 1, 2014 17:47:27 GMT -5
Now lets see, about every two years someone comes in and says that If I was betting man??? Then good old ACCA comes in and gets everyone all happy!!! Then BOOM we all don't hear anything for months!!!! But you all get madd at the ones who told you so... I love this game... Well good luck to us all!!!! AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SKOONDOG
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 3, 2014 11:37:33 GMT -5
So what is REALLY going on?? Evidently this poster does not know........ goforit Tuesday, 09/02/14 04:18:10 PM Re: None Post # of 342303 When in the hell are they going to lock up Urban? Guy got away with the crime of the century. Janice Shell you said years ago they were going to get Urban and lock him up! Right? Well he's still at large. What a freakin farce. The SEC locks up Martha Stuart who hurt no one and they can't even find the guy who fleeced 60,000 shareholders out of their hard earned money. What a joke. goforit
|
|