|
Post by bjenkins on Jun 1, 2013 12:20:25 GMT -5
Crazy
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Jun 1, 2013 13:58:53 GMT -5
Strawberry
|
|
|
Post by crajaraman on Jun 1, 2013 14:00:07 GMT -5
I like it berry much..
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2013 6:47:38 GMT -5
23 hours agodizardos said: These games of semantics can go on forever, but Harv has an important link to Hodges and Associates as his contact is extremely closely linked to Hodges (I would refer to Robert Hollenegg´s writings on this matter). So it is only logical that he would have support from the direction of Hodges and Associates, but that still would not mean that he would be speaking on their behalf (not assuming liability seems common sense). Maybe Hodges and Associates would not agree with everything Harv says.
portrush Administrator Post by portrush on 12 hours ago
Dizardos,
I am sorry to tell you that you are mistaken. I was hopeful that Harv would address this directly. Perhaps he has not seen this yet. However, both myself and Showme communicated directly with Al Hodges and Dennis Smith on this issue just the other day. I also reached out directly and privately to Harv because I genuinely believe he wishes to help shareholders when he can and wishes the best for all.
Here is the direct response from Mr. Hodges: "As I've said, now on many occasions, Harv does not speak for me nor even to me [in years]."
Here is the direct response from Mr. Smith: "He's blowing smoke up everyones ass, including his own. No connection whatsoever to Hodges & Assoc. You may quote me and print on board(s) if you like."
Show and I didn't wish to post these specific quotes, hoping instead that people would accept the comments that we made previously. We do not wish to see this perpetuated further, so I am asking members here take this for what its worth and keep your comments to yourself. This is not an opportunity to rail on Harv. He is a member here as well, so please regard the rules. I am willing to give him the benefit of doubt for a misunderstanding--I hope you can as well.
pr
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Jun 7, 2013 7:28:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by axis on Jun 7, 2013 8:31:57 GMT -5
23 hours agodizardos said:These games of semantics can go on forever, but Harv has an important link to Hodges and Associates as his contact is extremely closely linked to Hodges (I would refer to Robert Hollenegg´s writings on this matter). So it is only logical that he would have support from the direction of Hodges and Associates, but that still would not mean that he would be speaking on their behalf (not assuming liability seems common sense). Maybe Hodges and Associates would not agree with everything Harv says. portrush Administrator Post by portrush on 12 hours agoDizardos, Here is the direct response from Mr. Hodges:"As I've said, now on many occasions, Harv does not speak for me nor even to me [in years]."Here is the direct response from Mr. Smith:"He's blowing smoke up everyones ass, including his own. No connection whatsoever to Hodges & Assoc. You may quote me and print on board(s) if you like."pr So I'd like to know who spoke or speaks for them
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Jun 8, 2013 8:32:51 GMT -5
Talking about Harv
yesterday at 2:36amskibuff said:
Is there a chance that they are protecting him?
portrush Administrator Post by portrush on 10 hours ago
Sorry, but NO--there is not. And this thread has come to a repetitive end.
(click)
pr
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 15, 2013 13:55:25 GMT -5
thanks luci.....
Jul 13, 2013 at 8:56 pmbillsoj said: So Harv is now posting on another board
Previously he was homeless(can't remember if this is real)
Walking around with a laptop to keep in touch with AH
Now he has received info that we are being paid
No one else has received this info
The question is REALLY?
Bill
Jul 13, 2013 at 9:07pm harvscorvette said:
So Harv is now posting on another board. Why is that so shocking?
Previously he was homeless(can't remember if this is real) Have you ever tried to communicate with me and know my situation? NO!!!!!!
Walking around with a laptop to keep in touch with AH. Mr. Hodges is his own man, there are others that I keep in touch with just as informed.
Now he has received info that we are being paid. YES!!
No one else has received this info. Actually other shareholders also know this just not vocal about it.
The question is REALLY? Why is that so hard to believe. Just be thankful when you receive your package you will have KNOWN I SPOKE THE TRUTH.
Harv
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 15, 2013 14:06:14 GMT -5
Don't believe that good ole harv is homeless line. If much of what he says isn't true, why would the homeless line be?
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 18, 2013 14:33:10 GMT -5
By Harv via tramp's board NDA is a big deal for Global Currency Reset & Prosperity Programs, it will be monitored & audited--has to go for the humanitarian programs--money not "free & clear" Prosperity Programs, but with lots of strings attached. The amount of money that is being used for the GCR is more than most could ever comprehend. Funds that were retaken back/reclaimed from--illegal activities, clandestine, stolen, hidden, etc. Gov & others don't want to admit they did anything wrong--don't want details out in public--too much dirty laundry. For shareholders, your payment you can do whatever you want with. ALTHOUGH the Non Disclosure Agreement is necessary because Government & others don't want to admit they did anything wrong--don't want details out in public--too much dirty laundry--don't want info about sting getting out--NSS brokers want to remain unseen, unnamed. That was deal with Robert Mahue pay up & you won't be prosecuted, punished. NDA for the shareholders means they can't write detailed book, go on TV with CMKX story, sting, NSS, or details about how much money we received/paid and why. The government will not enforce the NDA UNLESS a shareholders does something foolish and publicly. The real issue is risk & danger. Most shareholders are not used to wealth. Brings alot of trouble--lawsuits, audits, charities bugging you, following you--also possible swindlers, scam artists, blackmail, kidnapping, safety issues for shareholders and their family & kids. People need to keep a low profile. Most shareholder will want to be showy and that needs to be nipped in the bud. We all want to have fun & nice things--like car(s) you want, nice house, etc., but no big talk, MUST stay off boards--they should be closed for a while or restricted. Shareholders must never post or throw around, "personally identifiable information". Big No No. Hackers, identity thieves, computer, bank, credit card fraud, all will be lurking about big time. No big parties that are advertised lay low and party with those you know, lots of new, naive rich people all together out-in-the-open. Shareholders need to get training, courses in personal safety & security--lots of it out there for rich people to buy. attend. Somebody will post copy of TA letter, packet docs, bank statement, check, etc... That has to be nipped in the bud. Also possible liability of boards if people get hurt, killed, cheated & claim boards did not protect confidential info. ANY SHAREHOLDER who breaches the NDA within the package WILL HAVE ALL THEIR FUNDS REMOVED FROM THEM and THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS. NEVER TO BE RETURNED. Time to begin preparing yourselves now because our time is upon us to receive our first payment. Harv Harv, why do you do us like you do do do? =^.".^=
|
|
|
Post by gabbyhayes3 on Jul 18, 2013 14:56:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Jul 18, 2013 15:01:44 GMT -5
Sure would be nice if the dude was right for a change...just once... What if he was always right..?
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 18, 2013 15:30:31 GMT -5
Sure would be nice if the dude was right for a change...just once... What if he was always right..? Now THAT'S funny! =^.".^=
|
|
|
Post by gabbyhayes3 on Jul 18, 2013 15:55:49 GMT -5
JWLoB...Hey man ..I'd love to give the guy benefit of the doubt..but he stretches credulity very very thin...don't you think....
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 18, 2013 16:03:54 GMT -5
Nothing any of them have written has amounted to anything for us.
|
|