Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2013 10:38:26 GMT -5
Who is the " sources source "? and why did Bob run with it so hard since it was 3rd hand info? ...... Manny, call me when you are ready! I have a big bat! .....
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 19, 2013 10:42:40 GMT -5
Transparency for ALL shareholders? That sounds like a great concept. Problem is, it only applies to a few, right. Few were demanding transparency when Bob made his initial comments. Few demand transparency from Al Hodges and once again, he is now the only person claiming knowledge of a trust. Steve did in fact talk to Bob. Steve did in fact talk to Bob's source. But Steve did not and likely will not talk to Bob's source's source. It ends there. Once again the shareholders need to turn their attention to Hodges. He is the only person on this planet that reportedly has info. But for someone reason, transparency doesn't apply to him. Al Hodges is no longer acting as an attorney for any shareholder. So, he is nothing more than a shareholder like you and me. Well Briwadd,There were and are many who have asked or still ask for transparancy, in every aspect of this stock, despite what you say. There are still shareholders who search constantly trying to uncover truth. And then again, there are shareholders who take all with a grain of salt because the information rec'd was never accompanied by proof. But despite the difference in opinon........I take your answer as yes ?? , that you did have private communication with SK and this is what you were told ?? That... what you state as fact came directly from SK ?? SK needs to address ALL shareholders ASAP !!...... not just those who call or email !! Yeah I have been on the private side of communication also, but rejected...then ceased & desisted the "keep a lid on things" type of play, because I felt it was not fair or in the best interest of ALL shsareholders. But thanks for the clarification Bri...... much appreciated. There ya have it folks out of the mouth of CEO Steve Kirkpatrick Briwadd. SINGLE
|
|
iboughtit2
Dr. Of Diamonds
4119 Days-still trusting the team but not the Banksters
Posts: 157
|
Post by iboughtit2 on Sept 19, 2013 10:46:54 GMT -5
Transparency for ALL shareholders? That sounds like a great concept. Problem is, it only applies to a few, right. Few were demanding transparency when Bob made his initial comments. Few demand transparency from Al Hodges and once again, he is now the only person claiming knowledge of a trust. Steve did in fact talk to Bob. Steve did in fact talk to Bob's source. But Steve did not and likely will not talk to Bob's source's source. It ends there. Once again the shareholders need to turn their attention to Hodges. He is the only person on this planet that reportedly has info. But for someone reason, transparency doesn't apply to him. Al Hodges is no longer acting as an attorney for any shareholder. So, he is nothing more than a shareholder like you and me. Briwald, is that Steve's board name? Or, are you just Steve's appointed spokeperson? Maybe his UNappointed spokesperson? You certainly seem to think you know what Steve is thinking...... Steve, what say YOU???
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Sept 19, 2013 10:49:34 GMT -5
Transparency for ALL shareholders? That sounds like a great concept. Problem is, it only applies to a few, right. Few were demanding transparency when Bob made his initial comments. Few demand transparency from Al Hodges and once again, he is now the only person claiming knowledge of a trust. Steve did in fact talk to Bob. Steve did in fact talk to Bob's source. But Steve did not and likely will not talk to Bob's source's source. It ends there. Once again the shareholders need to turn their attention to Hodges. He is the only person on this planet that reportedly has info. But for someone reason, transparency doesn't apply to him. Al Hodges is no longer acting as an attorney for any shareholder. So, he is nothing more than a shareholder like you and me. Well Briwadd,There were and are many who have asked or still ask for transparancy, in every aspect of this stock, despite what you say. There are still shareholders who search constantly trying to uncover truth. And then again, there are shareholders who take all with a grain of salt because the information rec'd was never accompanied by proof. But despite the difference in opinon........I take your answer as yes ?? , that you did have private communication with SK and this is what you were told ?? That... what you state as fact came directly from SK ?? SK needs to address ALL shareholders...... not just those who call or email !! Yeah I have been on the private side of communication also, but rejected...then ceased & desisted the "keep a lid on things" type of play, because I felt it was not fair or in the best interest of ALL shsareholders. But thanks for the clarification Bri...... much appreciated. There ya have it folks out of the mouth of CEO Steve Kirkpatrick Briwadd. SINGLE Assumptions..?
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Sept 19, 2013 11:30:04 GMT -5
Lol, don't you just love this stock?
There are two separate rules for posting. There are the good news rule and the bad news rule. If you post good news, you are well received. There may be follow up questions, but the thread remains upbeat. If you bring bad news, look out! You better have proof! And pictures to substantiate your negative content. Lol
Disregard my previous posts. Packets are in the mail and you should receive them this afternoon.
Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Sept 19, 2013 11:39:01 GMT -5
Lol, don't you just love this stock? There are two separate rules for posting. There are the good news rule and the bad news rule. If you post good news, you are well received. There may be follow up questions, but the thread remains upbeat. If you bring bad news, look out! You better have proof! And pictures to substantiate your negative content. Lol Disregard my previous posts. Packets are in the mail and you should receive them this afternoon. Briwadd And what was your news..? good or Bad..?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 19, 2013 11:40:54 GMT -5
Lol, don't you just love this stock? There are two separate rules for posting. There are the good news rule and the bad news rule. If you post good news, you are well received. There may be follow up questions, but the thread remains upbeat. If you bring bad news, look out! You better have proof! And pictures to substantiate your negative content. Lol Disregard my previous posts. Packets are in the mail and you should receive them this afternoon. Briwadd Naw.... not 2 different rules for posting. When Bob posted he told us he was making arrangements to have the "information" confirmed with the help of the CEO of CMKM Diamonds, Steve Kirkpatrick . We shareholders are sitting here waiting for SK to either confirm or deny . You come along , do a drive by post and state as FACT that the rumor is "OFFICIALLY" dead. And you take offense because you are asked how you know "OFFICIALLY". ?? Really..... ?? And now you are taking your ball and going home?? Cut me a break !! Whatever....... SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Sept 19, 2013 11:40:56 GMT -5
We need more Follow ups... Just can't post and run.. Can't post without IMO. Can't post with Assumptions..
|
|
|
Post by portrush on Sept 19, 2013 11:44:45 GMT -5
Once again Bob, you have caused nothing but problems. This rumor is officially dead! Problems? Really? Has anyone actually acted upon this or any other rumor for that matter? Did people really get their hopes up and let go of their emotions this time? Quit a job or buy a car? Seems to me it was pummeled from the start and there was no substantiation at any step. 10 years is a long time--everyone who has stuck in here is frustrated beyond relief, or so it seems. No one holds the patent on disappointment that's for certain. But surely folks have come to grips with mastering the ability to allow any rumor to roll off like water from a duck's back. Bob didn't create any problem as far as I can see. I admire his tenacity considering the continual "roadblocks to fruition"...or whatever it may be. October 28(?) marks 8 years since revocation. I have certainly learned first-hand by experience...until something official happens, there's no sense arguing the indefensible nor the unsubstantiated. Maybe that's just me, but I don't think so. Yesterday I happend to catch Huckabee's radio piece. He mentioned that the combined net worth of the Forbes 400 was just over $2Trillion. Two trillion--NET--from just 400 people. $3.87T for 50,000 shareholders? One Trillion at WF? Sure why not. Just the same, like everything else...until it officially happens, its all talk and we're still waiting. Good on you for calling SK. I hope you advised him to just keep working to resurrect the company he's leading. If this was a sting and there is a Trust (an individual decision to believe or not)...most ought to agree, it would be out of Steve's hands anyway. He has enough on his plate if you ask me. pr
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2013 11:53:38 GMT -5
The "daisey chain of toxicity" has always been a given since CMKM was birthed, well at least since I have been involved with CMKX. BUT My statemnet was specifically addressing the CEO of the company, revealing "Information" in private communications with shareholders and than....... they told to keep a lid on it. Been there, done that..... removed myself from the situation. It is about transparancy for ALL shareholders. ROE Prime example of what I am talking about.......citybear59 Global ModeratorPost by citybear59 on 2 minutes agoOk Bob, seeing you didn't answer my question in another thread maybe you'll respond in this one: Ok Bob, straight up question. Did Steve Kirkpatrick say he believed you regarding the 1 trillion dollar trust? Also did he make ANY sort of offer to assist you? Be careful with your answer Bob. You have a unique way of diverting direct questions and providing 1/2 information. Trouble is Bob I already know the answers to the questions I posed to you. Careful CityBear.... F4D thought he had ALL the answers (from SK) too !! Single, How you keep track of this stuff is amazing. If I had your memory I'd... Hold up, I lost my train of thought. ;D Mike
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2013 11:55:45 GMT -5
Lol, don't you just love this stock? There are two separate rules for posting. There are the good news rule and the bad news rule. If you post good news, you are well received. There may be follow up questions, but the thread remains upbeat. If you bring bad news, look out! You better have proof! And pictures to substantiate your negative content. Lol Disregard my previous posts. Packets are in the mail and you should receive them this afternoon. Briwadd Bri, Thanks for cutting to the chase. That's exactly what I was waiting to hear. Mike
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2013 12:15:56 GMT -5
king10009 minutes ago 1 2 3 4 5 Since flyinj posted an e-mail from Steve K. I don't see any reason why I can't post his e-mail to me concerning Bob's comments. Just trying to keep it real folks. I would like to qualify this by stating I still appreciate what Bob has done and is continuing to do on behalf of the shareholders. My intent is to be transparent as to what is and or has transpired with what Bob has posted without being ambiguous. We deserve to whole story without embellishment. These are the facts as I know them at present. I'm on my way out of town this afternoon thru Monday and won't be able to respond to any questions posted to me. Best regards, JRSwails _______________________________________________ From: Steve Kirkpatrick Date: 9/19/2013 1:11:20 AM To: jswails@xxxxxxx Subject: RE: BHollenegg Jerry: Bob gave me the name of the shareholder who told him about the “trust”. This shareholder has a buddy that works at Wells Fargo. His buddy told him that he had seen something on a screen showing a $1.2T trust marked CMKX. The shareholder has never seen the info – its hearsay from a friend that he knows and does not believe would lie to him. Bob has not seen any evidence firsthand. The shareholder asked Bob not to discuss it or post anything about it. He is shocked that Bob has run wild with this and it has gone viral. The bank employee never said anything about payment – just that he had seen something on the bank’s computer. The shareholder would not provide the name of the bank employee – I gave him my number and asked him to ask the bank employee to call me. He said he would, but doubted that I would get a call. I plan to e-mail Bob about this when I have time. This fiasco has cost me several hours/day for three or four days now. I need to be working on funding – not more “payment soon” rumors. Thanks, Jerry. Steve K ragingbull.com/forum/topic/969496
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 19, 2013 12:41:08 GMT -5
Thanks Jboy.. for bringing this over....
There ya have it again Folks !! This time From the hand of CEO Steve Kirkpatrick.....although not addressed to ALL shareholders, but addressed to only one.
Seems to me SK could have taken some of the time he used to address JRSwails' email ... to post a quick note on the company website for ALL shareholders to read. Would have avoided a lot of drama. Unbelievable to me is......... HE will email Bob when he has time?? Really?? Dear lord....... !!
Another "Rumor" down the drain...... SINGLE
ps..... Another Prime example exactly what I am talking about.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Sept 19, 2013 12:43:02 GMT -5
It's nice to know we have 1.2T in a bank and we're not sure why it's there Steve.. Maybe that would make a nice start up for the Co... Or better yet a nice payback to the shareholders.. I would say if anyone can look into this it would be the CEO.. We have Lawyers who are working with Wells Fargo.. Telling me that we have no connections.. We shouldn't stop now. Go for the Gold.. Give us the truth..
|
|
|
Post by jonathonanders on Sept 19, 2013 12:55:46 GMT -5
It sure doesn't sound like this Wells person is an EXEC as stated. In fact, wasn't this info out years ago? I remember something almost identical to this. I certainly thought all the info that had been provided was a lot stronger than it now seems to be, especially considering the Big Announcement it got. Once again, led down the merry path.
|
|