|
Post by theotherside on Apr 8, 2014 18:22:18 GMT -5
I agree with Briwadd as well as Cat. Shareholders will want to know the validity of Al's past claims. Was it for real, or simply a red herring case to buy time? On the other hand, there is any number of scenarios that are possible in this situation, not the least of which are the daisy chain pumpers who thought or think they're protected by the 1st Amendment. I am getting feedback from a group that intend to file a civil action of their own. Other than satisfaction, I have no idea why because nothing will come of it. Most of the daisy chain pumpers are not terribly well off anyway... Wait'll the Feds start knocking on doors though. They'll wish they had kept their borderline delusional little mouths closed. Or, maybe three squares is what they were hoping for in the first place... Mike There's a lot of truth in your last line. Prison just might be a lifestyle bump to some of the lower tier CMKX pundits.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Apr 8, 2014 18:51:06 GMT -5
Al Hodges first...
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Apr 8, 2014 19:03:21 GMT -5
Acca first, flipps second and we go overseas to Harv's hut. =^ .". ^=…MBC Private Eyeball, we always get our, our, whatchamacallits!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2014 20:25:33 GMT -5
Acca first, flipps second and we go overseas to Harv's hut. =^ .". ^=…MBC Private Eyeball, we always get our, our, whatchamacallits! Ed Zachary! To them, anyhow... Harv's hut... Awesome! An NSA decoy of sorts, I assume. Mike
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Apr 8, 2014 20:37:55 GMT -5
Acca first, flipps second and we go overseas to Harv's hut. =^ .". ^=…MBC Private Eyeball, we always get our, our, whatchamacallits! Ed Zachary! To them, anyhow... Harv's hut... Awesome! An NSA decoy of sorts, I assume. Mike Stick with me kid and we'll get you your very own....... =^.".^=....MBC Private Eyeball
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 9, 2014 5:37:28 GMT -5
Seems many are agreeing with Briwadd's statement...
Briwadd......... Brings me to question the alleged "Wells Fargo" employee and friend's, (a shareholder) claim to have knowledge & and claimed to have seen proof, of a trust and or monies. Bhollenegg handed over the information to you....... The same day you said "forget it"...... yet you also stated that the supposedly informed were very insistant and was sticking to the same story told to Bhollenegg. So my question is ... Are you STILL in contact with this individual/individuals ?? If so, what are your thoughts today and now, regarding this matter .... months and months later?
SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by e362 on Apr 9, 2014 11:48:14 GMT -5
Seems many are agreeing with Briwadd's statement... Briwadd......... Brings me to question the alleged "Wells Fargo" employee and friend's, (a shareholder) claim to have knowledge & and claimed to have seen proof, of a trust and or monies. Bhollenegg handed over the information to you....... The same day you said "forget it"...... yet you also stated that the supposedly informed were very insistant and was sticking to the same story told to Bhollenegg. So my question is ... Are you STILL in contact with this individual/individuals ?? If so, what are your thoughts today and now, regarding this matter .... months and months later? SINGLE If that claim had any validity it would have been proven by now. The sheer fact that WFs total reported assets were well below the supposed trust value proved it was a waste of time from the start and another red herring from BH. If they wasted all the their time chasing down everyone that claimed knowledge, the funds gathered would be wasted, unless that is what some would prefer. The only one that consistantly and legally pushed this trust theory was AH and his band of plaintifs on his direction. To start anywhere else is a waste, just as Briwadd stated. Although if correctly reported by granny, getting in touch with him might prove difficult since the #listed on his re-established website is disconnected.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Apr 9, 2014 12:10:08 GMT -5
Seems many are agreeing with Briwadd's statement... Briwadd......... Brings me to question the alleged "Wells Fargo" employee and friend's, (a shareholder) claim to have knowledge & and claimed to have seen proof, of a trust and or monies. Bhollenegg handed over the information to you....... The same day you said "forget it"...... yet you also stated that the supposedly informed were very insistant and was sticking to the same story told to Bhollenegg. So my question is ... Are you STILL in contact with this individual/individuals ?? If so, what are your thoughts today and now, regarding this matter .... months and months later? SINGLE If that claim had any validity it would have been proven by now. The sheer fact that WFs total reported assets were well below the supposed trust value proved it was a waste of time from the start and another red herring from BH. If they wasted all the their time chasing down everyone that claimed knowledge, the funds gathered would be wasted, unless that is what some would prefer. The only one that consistantly and legally pushed this trust theory was AH and his band of plaintifs on his direction. To start anywhere else is a waste, just as Briwadd stated. Although if correctly reported by granny, getting in touch with him might prove difficult since the #listed on his re-established website is disconnected. A good F.B.I. man can find anyone, anywhere.... They have many connected friends.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 9, 2014 16:22:01 GMT -5
Another "Red herring" from BH?? From what I remember ...... the supposed info came from others & BH was trying to follow up on the information received... but then handed it over to Briwadd.?? 1. A manager & employee of Wells Fargo 2. A friend of the mananger & a shareholder.... who insisted/insists that this person was a very good friend & trustworthy.....
MY QUESTION was to BRIWADD...... Not asking if true or false..... I just wanted to know if Briwadd found enough "reason" , regarding this matter, to STILL be in contact with these people? Actually not very difficult, at all, for some...... Surely everyone has heard of cell phones.
Now back to basics...... Briwadd, care to share??
SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Apr 9, 2014 18:22:18 GMT -5
Seems many are agreeing with Briwadd's statement... Briwadd......... Brings me to question the alleged "Wells Fargo" employee and friend's, (a shareholder) claim to have knowledge & and claimed to have seen proof, of a trust and or monies. Bhollenegg handed over the information to you....... The same day you said "forget it"...... yet you also stated that the supposedly informed were very insistant and was sticking to the same story told to Bhollenegg. So my question is ... Are you STILL in contact with this individual/individuals ?? If so, what are your thoughts today and now, regarding this matter .... months and months later? SINGLE Single, I find it hard to believe that a post of mine from September brings you to question the Wells Fargo situation once again. In fact, it is more likely you bring to question Wells Fargo based on a PM of mine to 3Bid that he has obviously passed on to you. I do maintain contact with that individual...and nothing has changed regarding that situation. And if it did, I wouldn't share it without his permission. The only information regarding CMKX is solely owned by Al Hodges, but Al Hodges is off limits to his loyal followers. Al is the one who stirs the pot every 6 months and keeps this never ending saga never ending! The investigator hired to track down information is in a win/win situation. He literally has to produce NOTHING and yet he still gets paid. It will be the easiest 15,000 he ever made. The government is saying this was a scam and the company itself is saying this was a scam. So don't be surprised if he comes back and defers to the government and the company. IMO Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by e362 on Apr 9, 2014 18:42:26 GMT -5
Another "Red herring" from BH?? From what I remember ...... the supposed info came from others & BH was trying to follow up on the information received... but then handed it over to Briwadd.?? 1. A manager & employee of Wells Fargo 2. A friend of the mananger & a shareholder.... who insisted/insists that this person was a very good friend & trustworthy..... MY QUESTION was to BRIWADD...... Not asking if true or false..... I just wanted to know if Briwadd found enough "reason" , regarding this matter, to STILL be in contact with these people? Actually not very difficult, at all, for some...... Surely everyone has heard of cell phones. Now back to basics......Briwadd, care to share?? SINGLE Single,if you are going to use one of my lines in your post to respond I ask that you put the whole sentence in for actual context of the sentence. My full sentence was " The sheer fact that WFs total reported assets were well below the supposed trust value proved it was a waste of time from the start and another red herring from BH." Yes, imo, another red herring from BH. As for the bank mgr, the bank employee, the friend of the bank mgr and the shareholder, funny how when filings proved the bank didn't have the assets to cover that trust the group of them were never heard from again. But hey, someone was told they were a friend and trustworthy....was that someone acca?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2014 20:25:54 GMT -5
Another "Red herring" from BH?? From what I remember ...... the supposed info came from others & BH was trying to follow up on the information received... but then handed it over to Briwadd.?? 1. A manager & employee of Wells Fargo 2. A friend of the mananger & a shareholder.... who insisted/insists that this person was a very good friend & trustworthy..... MY QUESTION was to BRIWADD...... Not asking if true or false..... I just wanted to know if Briwadd found enough "reason" , regarding this matter, to STILL be in contact with these people? Actually not very difficult, at all, for some...... Surely everyone has heard of cell phones. Now back to basics......Briwadd, care to share?? SINGLE Single,if you are going to use one of my lines in your post to respond I ask that you put the whole sentence in for actual context of the sentence. My full sentence was " The sheer fact that WFs total reported assets were well below the supposed trust value proved it was a waste of time from the start and another red herring from BH." Yes, imo, another red herring from BH. As for the bank mgr, the bank employee, the friend of the bank mgr and the shareholder, funny how when filings proved the bank didn't have the assets to cover that trust the group of them were never heard from again. But hey, someone was told they were a friend and trustworthy....was that someone acca? e362, Good point, ALL! Mike
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Apr 9, 2014 21:00:48 GMT -5
As long as there is 1 cmkx shareholder following this nightmare, there will be lies delivered.
meow
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 9, 2014 21:30:32 GMT -5
Bri if you check back you will see that I have been involved in discussing, asking and/or remarking about this WF thing almost every month since this "alleged info" was posted. .... exclude this past Feb and March as I was not around much then. Yes I did ask 3bid if there were any new developments, and was surprised when I heard that there was still some sort of ongoing contact.... Made me curious to know if you thought that you had "good reason" to keep the communication open?? A simple yes or no could have been sufficient. I did not ask you to share anything from the individual, nor did I mention any other subject, but I appreciate your opinion on current happenings, regarding Mr. Gates..........Seems you are saying.... it will be a repeat of what Mr. Fryar accomplished... win/win?? Thanks for answering my question........" I do maintain contact with that individual". And as for "good reason" ..... I don't believe you would waste your time... or you could just be keeping all bridges in tact.
SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Apr 9, 2014 21:49:40 GMT -5
I'm hoping this isn't a "repeat" of Fryar.
This Gates fellow is suppose to have a mystery contact, or was this BS?
And this investigation is suppose to be quite different than a legal mumbo jumbo fryar was doing, what little he was doing that is.
We'll find out I hope.
|
|