|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 21:46:35 GMT -5
Post #1
I know we all have heard it all throughout this journey up to this point but of late with all that keeps getting dished out that counters that there ever was a naked short or proof of such....there is no way there was as it seems like that is what is and has been pushed up to this point.
So since there seems to be so much lately "that there was no naked short" said to be calculated or what ever, I came across many old points or posts that really bring up great life to the point that supports in a big way why we could of been naked shorted to the moon and how this all could of been hidden and even despite shareholders who have said to of either tracked the shares being sold on a daily basis and they say there is no naked short from what they calculated or they called the SEC or whomever and no one has admitted the truth of such topic.
Of late in different threads of different topics, some of these posts that I intend to post in this "CMKM's Naked Short Story" thread, have been posted in other thread topics and I figured to bring them all over here in this thread's topic so the many posts that speak of this message, "of our CMKM naked short topic," are all in one place/thread.... to build up the collective support in thought of how and why the chances of us being naked shorted to the moon and back, are most likely the case.
------------------
The first post I wanted to touch on was Attorney Friar quoting Bill Frizzell about "the CMKM naked short is a very private matter and could not be let out no matter what." So here is a previous post that has in there the topic of Attorney Friar quoting what Bill Frizzell said about the naked short being a very private matter----->
....................does it not seem interesting that when Steve K. came on board and we the shareholders were still taking about our naked short situation and Steve then needed to get on that page of thought with the naked short BY ASKING BILL FRIZZELL who was one of the heads of the task force.....Bob Maheu, Don Stocklien and Bill Frizzell. So anyway when Bill Frizzell got back to Steve K. about the naked short issue.... Bill Frizzell gave Steve the evidence of Bill Frizzell's ........." MAIL IN YOUR BROKERAGE FIRM STATEMENT"... which many may remember that movement BEFORE the OFFICIAL COMPANY REQUESTED CERT PULL. This mail in your brokerage firm statement by Bill Frizzell was not an official movement by the company.... was not PRed to do so but those that decided to, could.
So the results of that mail in your brokerage firm statement had results ...something like..... 4 thousand shareholders participated.... and the results of their shares combined with this little UNOFFICIAL BILL FRIZZELL MOVEMENT ..... said something like " with these 4 thousand shareholders that did participate in this movement combined to 250 billion shares and THERE WERE 48,000 OTHER SHAREHOLDERS WHO DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN THIS MOVEMENT." So obviously one can assume that with 4 thousand shareholders combining to 250 billion shares....almost a third of the shares allowed to be sold in the open market..... and there were still 48,000 shareholders that were not counted because they did not participate in Bill Frizzell's little movement.... can really have the mind understand the great chance there was a naked short.
Anyway, I know..... I am not giving the Bill Frizzell movement credit of proving or not proving a naked short.... but just posting that because it was part of this journey and obviously when really looking at those numbers....it really draws attention to an almost obvious conclusion with the numbers there is definitely a naked short.
What I find interesting is the quietness of the cert pull movement but yet once again, these brokers like E-trade flying down in a PRIVATE PLANE and delivering their boxes of CMKM client's 5,000 certs ON THEIR FIRST TRIP DOWN and then E-trade 3 days or 4 days later was going to fly down again in A PRIVATE PLANE to deliver 4,000 more certificates of their CMKM shareholder clients. Why the seriousness E-trade? Why the private plane trips with personally delivering 9,000 certificates in a weeks time if this was just some bogus thing as the surface picture tries so hard to of done. And then the DTCC on April 1st through the 14th of 2006 gave all the brokers that window of time to give up their certificates to the shareholders requesting them.... and then the DTCC gave an extension from April 14th through the 28th for the brokers to continue. So for 28 days in the month of April 2006, the DTCC came all the way down to our little CMKM company scam ( as this article with Deli says CMKM is .... a scam.... but yet the DTCC found some importance to come down and force all the brokers and parties alike to give up their certificates for our little what looks like in hindsight.... of a useless and unsuccessful cert pull. And also lets not forget the Sandia Group also doing their 62,000 hits on our cert pull website in a 14 day window of time. Why is all of this going on especially with something that seems to be nothing in hindsight? And Kevin said somewhere in an update or something that at the end of the cert pull that a CD-ROM was being sent to the FBI and DOJ that would show the end results of the cert pull evidence. So that alone should be understood on the secrecy and why we have not heard "boo" about the cert pull.
And lastly.... and most importantly.... the Attorney Fryar situation.... I was not part of that movement but obviously this quote from Attorney Fryar about Bill Frizzell came out on the boards and I am grateful for it because this here says a lot too---->
We asked Frizzell about whether the company has any evidence of naked short selling. Frizzell has guarded this information as extremely private and claims that the company is not allowed to release this information. Attorney Fryar
So yes I like you would love to have thee exact facts but I also realize that if I or you and us all on these boards knew thee exact proof of this, then so would so many other stocks that are naked shorted like us but that are not getting thee attention we have been said to of gotten. Well Suzanne Trimbath said there were thousandS of companies just like us. Can you imagine that if Bob Maheu pulled this so called mission off.... and could open Pandora's box on all the manipulation with this? And how many small naked shorted companies have been denied in the court system with they trying to have a court rule in favor of their naked shorted situation and yet the court system seems to of really been sensitive with not allowing this truth of naked shorting existence to gain life in the judicial branch of the government.... or at least not yet.
So I too, once again, would love the facts of what really was..... but will settle for extreme obvious points and when using common sense and the parties attached like the Bob Maheu and all else and his Rolodex of connections attached.... I will give light to the understanding that for some great reason we are still here almost a decade in revocation with a heart beat? Really? That alone should say something. But I too can not wait for this thing to be done to where I with never have to go into a proboard again and wonder what the heck is going on. Anyway, despite this wait, I am grateful to still be a part of this shareholder base and am looking forward to whatever the rewards will be.
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 21:47:43 GMT -5
Post#2
And the next post is by sixfootfour and touches on a post by Steve Walker and his great work---->
sixfootfour DIAMOND DIGGER Posts: 146
threw the chance to enter the brokers fraud into the sec hearing:
Steve Walker:
"SOOOOOOOO,in Oct 2004, when I called FINRA about the negative volume numbers in CMKX, I asked the agent if he was aware of CMKX. He replied yes. I asked why. He chuckled and said 'we sit here and watch the volume numbers all day.'
And in May 2005, when the Great Leslie asked Christopher Wall 'trading in CMKX exceeded 2 billion share numerous times.' He replied, 'it exceeded 2 billion 6 or 7 times.' The Great Leslie, on a silver platter, offered Bill Frizzell and Donald Stoecklein the chance to blow this thing wide open. Frizzell responded 'no questions for this witness your honor.' And Stoecklein said 'we pass on this witness your honor.' Remember you history. This is at a time, when leading up to the Hearing, CMKM AVERAGED 3 BILLION shares a day.
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 21:48:35 GMT -5
Post#3
This third post is of Don Stocklein in sworn testimony under oath to the SEC and below Don Stocklein here in this post is SEC Deposition of D. Roger Glenn added to it. But the Don Stocklein testimony speaks of his "naked short expert" Jim Decosta who said our naked short was 14:1. If folks really grasp that outrageous number of naked shorted shares..... that is then very believable of how historically naked shorted we really were. And if common sense is really allowed to sink in on this thought, if you really caught these bad guys shorting our stock 14:1 with a 800 billion share base..... everyone do the math, and it is mind blowing on what those numbers really reach to. Once again, if these bad guys really shorted this to this level does it really seem understandable on why as Bill Frizzell said to Attorney Friar why the CMKM naked short was a private company matter and could not be let out?
So here is sworn testinmony by Don Stocklein under oath to the SEC----->
SEC Deposition of Donald Stoecklein (01-24-06) (this is sworn testimony by Stocklein under oath to the SEC)
The [Entourage and other assets] distribution - Page 118 Line 13 Stocklein: "once a proper method of distribution is decided upon." Page 120 Line 7 Page 121 Line 1 Stocklein: "a system has to be designed to determine how those shorts will be covered".
Page 122 ... q and a regarding short position -
expert from Oregon (Stocklein says he can't remember the expert's name) Page 123 ... the 14:1 short mentioned 128 Line 5 ... Line 13 Page 136 ... Line 19 Page 137 ... Line 15 Page 138 ... Line 18 Stocklein remembers the expert's name (Jim DaCosta)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC Deposition of D. Roger Glenn (10-23-07)
The fishing trip - (Roger Glenn's deposition Page 33 Line 22) -
Q: Who went on that trip?
A: I was there. Ed Dhonau was there. Urban was there. Ed Williams was there. Dave DeSormeau was there, and a bunch of other people who were there. There were a couple of shareholders that were there.
Page 34 Line 24 - Q: While you were on that trip, you testified before you had a conversation with Urban Casavant one evening when (Page 35 Line 1) you were at the fishing camp. A: Back at the camp. Yep, yep.
Q: Please tell me about that conversation. A: In that conversation, I sat down with Urban, and he began telling me about his career in mining. And he talked about all the various claims he had staked out. He talked about taking samples from his claims to have them staked, and that they were very rich. He talked about taking a sample from, I have forgotten now what the mineral was, but he took it to a lab, and they tested it, and they told it was the richest find they had ever tested. And he talked about the procedure for staking out territory in Canada.
Q: Did he say that he had ever found any diamonds? A: Diamonds? I don't remember specifically diamonds, but he talked about other kinds of minerals that he had struck.
cmkx.info/Deposition-D-Roger-Glenn-2007-10-23.pdf
Page 39 Line 1) Q: Did you ever have any reason to doubt that Urban Casavant was telling you the truth in Canada when he told you about his mine manger history? A: No
Page 39 Line 11) Q: Do you think he ever lied to you?
A: No, I don't have any basis for thinking that, as a matter of fact.
Other Resources Millionaire's ProBoards
Bivens Action (Video)
Phantom Shares Naked Shorting (Video)
COALITION Interview (Video)
Matt Taibbi Article - 'Wall Street's Naked Swindle'
RonPaul
Peter Schiff - Predicts Economic Collapse (Video)
Petitions - Politics and Government
CMKX USA ACTION
Important Documents and Other Information Attorney Files Appeal Brief (12-05-11) COALITION COMPLAINT AGAINST THE FBI/SEC/DOJ (07-17-11) BRIEF HISTORY OF SEC CORRUPTION COALITION EVIDENCE AGAINST THE SEC (11-06-09) Ex Parte Letter to Judge (10-26-09) Ex Parte Letter to Judge (10-26-09) PDF File COALITION PR (11-06-09) PDF File COALITION PR (08-24-10) PDF File COALITION LEGAL NOTICE (11-06-09) PDF File CMKX Shareholders Coalition (11-06-09) Letter to the current CMKM management (11-20-09) REQUIREMENT LETTER (04-23-10) INTERIM COMPLAINT (05-11-10) COALITION EVIDENCE AGAINST CURRENT CMKM MANAGEMENT (05-24-10) COALITION EVIDENCE AGAINST CMKM MANAGEMENT-ADDENDUM (06-24-10) COALITION's Response to Kevin West's June 25th, 2010, Letter SEC Deposition of Bill Frizzell (01-06-06) SEC Deposition of Donald Stoecklein (01-24-06) SEC Deposition of Robert Maheu (04-20-06) SEC Deposition of D. Roger Glenn (07-19-06) SEC Deposition of D. Roger Glenn (10-23-07) Hodges and Associates Lawsuit, Bivens Action (01-08-10) Hodges and Associates First Amended Complaint (09-16-10) Hodges and Associates Revised First Amended Complaint (09-21-10) Opposition to Defendants'Motion to Dismiss (11-08-10) Hodges and Associates FILE APPEAL (01-27-11) Hodges and Associates INTERIM UPDATE (4-27-2010) Hodges and Associates UPDATE (09-16-2010) Hodges-Obama Letter (05-14-2010) Hodges-Obama Letter (05-19-2010) Hodges-Obama Letter (05-20-2010) Hodges-Obama Letter (05-27-2010) Letter to Canadian Parliament (06-2-2010) Letter to Lawrence Cannon (template) Letter to the Honourable Vic Toews Complaint to Force Governmental Agencies to Perform Mandated Duties Coalition Canadian Complaint CMKX Shareholders Coalition for Justice vs. SEC CMKM Diamonds and the $3.87 Trillion Lawsuit THE STAND (08-24-09)
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 21:49:46 GMT -5
Post#4And here is now probably one of the best posts ever in CMKM history where oldepro un-covered why most never really see how many real shares are sold in a day on the OTCBB stocks in the market.
And there have been many shareholders who have said there wasn't any proof when they went looking through the SEC side of things or whatever else....here is OLDEPRO's awesome post explaining the system in the OTCBB realm of their COUNTER of shares being bought on a daily basis only goes up in the 2.1 billion mark and then comes back down and resets and then goes back up and follows the same routine throughout a whole day's buying. So at any point of a day when a person checks in to check this chart of how many shares were sold/bought.... no one knows how many times this cart has gone up and down and really how many billions of shares were bought/sold that day.
Here is Oldepro's awesome post from back in June 25th, 2012 and I recommend people re-read this amazing post and get the great understanding of how billions and billions of shares or 10's of billions of shares could be over looked to the average eye with the system that has been in place for most people not being able to notice. Once again, enjoy one of the best posts ever by oldepro as are so many of his history of posts. So enjoy this AGAIN about our naked short and how we could of been easily naked shorted billions of shares a day or tens of billions of shares a day or whatever more in amount per day to then really ending up to the crazy numbers of TRILLIONS OF SHARES BY THE END WHEN ALL WAS COLLECTIVELY DONE AND LOCKED INTO REVOCATION ----->
oldepro
DIAMOND JEDI Posts: 533 Titled: Proof of SEC False Data Jun 25, 2012 at 6:48pm Post by oldepro on Jun 25, 2012 at 6:48pm Honorable Senators Boxer and Feinstein and Congresswoman Capps and Most Honorable Fellow Citizens of America, I am Steve Walker from Oxnard Ca. I have been involved in stock market reform, with particular attention to Abusive Naked Short Selling (Phantom Shares), for over ten years. On June 7, I filed two separate Whistleblower Complaints with the SEC. On June 11, from a previous Freedom of Information Act request, the SEC sent me a copy of Exhibit 17 from the SEC Administrative Hearing in Los Angeles involving CMKM Diamonds May 10. 2005. File No. 3-11858. The contents in this document are startling. I ask for a complete investigation. CMKM Diamonds is the largest case of abusive naked shorting in history. Proof can be obtained by comparing two Documents. Exhibit 17 from File No. 3-11858 and Exhibit A from the Koch Declaration, filed 04/27/2007 by David Koch on behalf of CMKM Diamonds. www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/Koch%20Declaration.pdfPlease read my SEC-OIG Complaint filed June 7, before I received Exhibit 17 under the FOIA, The SEC and the DOJ are using false volume numbers in two major cases involving CMKM Diamonds. During an SEC Administrative Hearing involving CMKM Diamonds, Christopher Wall presented testimony regarding volume in CMKX stock. The numbers he relied on are FALSE. It was a result of a computer "glitch" : "One of the problems with this exponential rise in popularity occurs in tracking share volumes. The Pink Sheets and OTCBB are limited by binary reporting systems that 'max out' at 4.295 billion shares, and the largest number a binary system can display is 32 digits. If it reports volumes larger than that, the data gets distorted. Counters either revert back to zero or provide incorrect volume data. Only a new reporting system could rectify this problem."
Read more: www.investopedia.com/articles/trading/04/072804.asp#ixzz1x1rLg1EXNote: I contacted the author Matt Blackman yesterday by email. Look at his charts and imagine what the total could be (Naked short shares), if he is correct.
From Steve Walker to Matt Blackman: "Thank you so much for responding. I assume the numbers in the charts came from the exchanges. If the OTCBB and Pinks had faulty reporting systems, these chart numbers would be suspect. Actually all OTCBB and PInks data would be. Correct? Am I missing something?
Thanks so much for your help. Matt Blackman mattblackmancmt@gmail.com 4:04 PM (17 hours ago) to me Suspect only on issues that have maxed out at 4.295 billion shares (more than 32 digits) which is a very small subset of all PS and OTCBB stocks. But the growth bars since they are relative accurately depict growth rates which is what I was trying to show." If he is correct and I agree with him 100%, if the "very small subset" is 5 stocks (we have documents for 3), you are then looking at 700 Billion X 5= 3.5 Trillion phantom shares. At .0001 = 1 billion shares is $100,000. *Not in Original filing (Added for clarity) "from Lee Webb Stockwatch,' "As Judge Murray wrote, 'the investing public has received only self-serving statements from persons promoting CMKM Diamonds.'" Ms. Hakala goes on to remark that despite the lack of reliable information, "CMKM Diamonds' stock trades at exceptionally high volumes." In fact, CMKM has traded at even higher volumes than perhaps realized by the SEC, which relied on flawed data provided by Bloomberg.As previously reported by Stockwatch, CMKM has traded such massive volumes that many quote services, evidently including Bloomberg, have not been able to accurately report the daily totals.In simple terms, the volume counters used by many quote services "turn over" much like a vehicle odometer once they hit a certain point. In more technical terms, most software uses a 32-bit signed integer to represent volumes, therefore the maximum possible value is 2,147,483,647.CMKM regularly traded more than 2.15 billion shares per day, topped 10 billion shares on many occasions and once notched an astounding 39.6 billion shares. Those whopping volumes were not accurately reported in the Bloomberg data relied upon by the SEC. www.stockwatch.com/swnet/newsit/newsit_newsit.aspx?bid=B-471798-U:CMKX&symbol=CMKX&ne.. It's a bit confusing at first, but what happens is when the total reaches 2,147,483,647; it then resets and counts backward to zero. Then it restarts at zero and goes up. At the end of the day, it ends in either a positive or negative number below 2,147,483,647, and it may have reset 5-10 times (if 10 times, real volume was roughly 20 billion).If you look at Exhibits 17 and 61 from the SEC Hearing, you will see many NA. Approximately 50% of the time. Every NA would be a negative number.I have documented proof and I alerted Agent Vasquez two years ago. www.capwiz.com/politicsol/bio/userletter/?id=3181&letter_id=4046781356Both the SEC and the DOJ are prosecuting major cases relying on FALSE NUMBERS.
I make no accusations about the character of those involved. I think it is a case of a computer "Glitch". No matter what, it must be resolved. Here are the volume figures from CMKM, www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/Koch%20Declaration.pdf See exhibit A. Take special note, until June of 2004 the company records show negative numbers. I believe they switched systems at this time. Mr. Wall testified the volume went over 2 billion shares "six or seven times". This is ludicrous. It is much higher. In February of 2004 it averaged 3 billion per day from Knight Trading ALONE, per Carol Remond Dow Jones. Which begs the question, are these naked shorted shares? In my opinion, yes. I believe the phantom shares are held by Major Brokerages, in individual Roth/Ira Accounts. Please take swift and decisive action. I will provide documents upon request.My Canadian counterpart has evidence this was done to other pink sheet stocks as well. He has documents on QBID and FFGO specifically. He will provide upon request. If applicable, ask for whistleblower protection under Dodd Frank. I am filing with the SEC Office of the Whistleblower today. Finally, I petition for a Congressional Investigation. Sincerely, Steven Walker filed 6-7-2012 IWF_CD064A5BB3 Here's the smoking gun, Mr. Wall testified the period was between January 2003 to April 2005. Confirmed by Ms. Hakala. The first 2 pages of the exhibit show the price volume chart for this period. Next were daily time and sales. Shockingly the time and sales charts stop 3/19/04. The CMKM reports are showing every other day (average), a negative number. So are Bloomberg from exhibit 17, but they are left blank. Question is who blanked them out and why? If they had shown a negative, pages 1 and 2 would look like CMKM"S Exhibit pages 7 and 9. It would show negative volume. If the SEC had shown Judge Brenda Murray 14 months of negative volume, in BILLIONS of shares, I doubt she would make this ruling, www.sec.gov/alj/aljorders/2005/3-11858-1.pdfCMKM stopped showing negative numbers after changing Tranfer Agents in June of 2004. These numbers are the best reference to true trading, available to the pubic. In his deposition with the SEC Donald Stoecklein testified an analysis by Dr. Jim DeCosta, showed the naked short could be 14-1. A meeting was held between the SEC and CMKM Attorneys and management.---->Among others, this meeting consisted of Andrew Petillion (AP), Branch Chief of Enforcement at the Pacific Regional Office, Leslie Hakala (LH), SEC Enforcement Attorney, , Gregory Glenn, SEC Chief Litigation Counselobert Maheu (RM), Donald Stoecklein (DS), and Bill Frizzell (BF), Owners Group (OG) representive for CMKM shareholders. Donald Stoeckein states Jim DeCosta presented evidence of 14-1. During the Hearing, no one objects to or disputes the false numbers of the SEC, who play 'hide in plain sight' with Judge Brenda Murray. What is needed is to look at the original Bloomberg Reports. With my whole heart and hopes for those in the future, I beg you to investigate. A naked short pays no income tax. From CMKMDiamonds June 20, 2012: There is apparently a new controversy among shareholders about the actual CMKX share counts, so here are the numbers as of today, 6/20/12 per the records at Transfer Online: Shareholder Count: 50,407 Issued Shares: 695,969,515,522 Outstanding Shares: 695,933,015,522 Non-Restricted Shares: 672,250,114,879 Restricted Shares: 23,682,900,643 Authorized Shares: 800,000,000,000 www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/There are 633 Billion certed by the TaskForce There needs to be an immediate ,audit through the DTCC, of all brokers still holding shares , including ROTH/ IRA Accounts. CMKM still exist today and has a preliminary agreement with the holder of what may possibly be valuable claims. We deserve to know the TRUE number of shares. There are claims by Attorney Al Hodges that CMKM was involved in "support foreign terrorist organizations." "The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice, with assistance from the Department of Homeland Security, believed and developed evidence that said short sellers were utilizing their activities to illegally launder moneys, wrongfully export moneys, avoid payment of taxes, and to support foreign terrorist operations. To fulfill the plan to criminally trap such wrongdoers, the Securities and Exchange Commission, with assistance from the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security" cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=mofo&action=display&thread=4385. Oh, where's the sex? While this was all going on, "One senior attorney at SEC headquarters in Washington spent up to eight hours a day accessing Internet porn, according to the report, which has yet to be released. When he filled all the space on his government computer with pornographic images, he downloaded more to CDs and DVDs that accumulated in boxes in his offices." abcnews.go.com/GMA/sec-pornography-employees-spent-hours-surfing-porn-sites/story?id=10452544#.T-euxfW3FNg In October 2009, I contacted SEC Chairwoman Mary Shapiro, SEC Director of Enforcement Division Robert Khuzami, David Kotz at the time, Inspector General of the SEC, about this very subject, and nothing was done. This was before I had possession of Exhibit 17. Exhibit 17 screams for a full Congressional Investigation. I have no doubt many insiders of CMKM were corrupt and should pay for their crimes. But I believe the SEC came into this case with tunnel vision. Naked short selling in CMKX was not addressed at the May 2005, when it should have been. Why did the SEC fight so hard to exclude evidence of naked shorting BEFORE the Hearing? Why was Judge Brenda Murray not shown the REAL trading in CMKX? How many other companies were victims? Someone was gaming the system and so far, they have gotten away with it. Why? It's time for all these and other questions to be answered. I leave you with the words of the late Robert Maheu, former aide to Howard Hughes and one time Chairman of the Board of CMKM Diamonds. Conversation with Mark Faulk March 2007, "FAULK: I agree with that completely. I think in the end that will be the only way that the truth comes out is for them to push it into the courts and the judge to step up and say enough is enough now let's get it all out there. What about the SEC? What was your involvement with them? What are your feelings on how they've dealt with this? MAHEU: Well, I don't quite get this question. FAULK: I've covered the issue of stock market fraud and naked short selling and stock counterfeiting over the last three years quite a bit and I've always had the impression that many times the SEC would just as soon kinda bury the companies and make it go away and I very much had that feeling in this particular issue but again from your viewpoint, do you feel like they were operating in the best interest of the shareholders? MAHEU: I kept saying at that same hearing that I felt that they and we, and by we I mean those that were at the so-called management level at the time, had an obligation to protect the stockholders, and I was inferring that sometimes I get the impression that that was not what they were doing. I hope that answers your question. FAULK: Yeah, it does. Sometimes it's hard to tell if they are doing it maliciously or are they just kind of following the letter of the law. That's a gray area where I obviously have my own opinions about how, not just in this case but how they've dealt with.¦ MAHEU: Why was the SEC put in place in the first place? I thought the first obligation they had was to protect the stockholders. FAULK: Exactly. And theoretically that is true. I haven't always seen it play out way and not just in this instance but in hundreds of companies. Very many times I've had them just say the easiest approach is to just make it go away. MAHEU: I don't know if you have the same feeling as I do, but my youngest son is the number 2 man on the police force in San Diego. He and I and Peter, who of course runs the Global Intelligence Network, we talk about certain things, about how things were handled in the past and how we feel that there is a tendency today to handle it differently. We feel that there are too many people in law enforcement or regulatory bodies today who begin with a conclusion. They do not logically arrive at one. FAULK: So in other words you think they have a conclusion and then they try to find the facts to back up their preconceived… MAHEU: They've got to rationalize their fallacious conclusion, and when you do that, Mark, and I don't give a d**n, you may be the smartest thing since 7-up, but you're on a collision course. FAULK: You've already clouded your objectivity, basically. MAHEU: Exactly." www.thefaulkingtruth.com/Articles/Investing101/1089.htmlFellow Honorable Citizens of America and the World, In my life, I have never 'taken a shot'. My wife raised our boys with Wayne Gretsky's quote "you miss every shot you don't take.". Please help me with my shot, spread this to anyone you know and urge them to take action, by emailing and calling the offices of the Senators Boxer and Feinstein and Congresswoman Capps . And then, contact your Representatives and ask them to become involved. Alert the Senate Banking Committee. If a member is from your State, it makes a big difference. Working together we can create a reverse Ponzi scheme, and hold someone responsible. Please help me make this go viral, email and post it everywhere on the web. If you have invested in the stock market in the last ten years, you have been a victim of abusive naked short selling. Let's see some justice for a change. Thank you, Steve Walker docs.google.com/file/d/1uMBzM9NB5NsAlSPwdlWmfG4c22zBUXDcZf3CeKVc7MF7RflV6Otauo6zfUMQ/edit www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/Koch%20Declaration.pdf
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 21:51:01 GMT -5
Post #5
So with now reading this post above by Oldepro/ Steve Walker.... and UNDERSTANDING IT.... if folks do not get it.... then I guess they do not get it. With this chart so to speak only topping out at 2.1 billion shares a day and then resetting once it hits the 2.1 billion mark and then every time it hits there is goes back down to reset again...... the question as Oldepro states... how many times has it reset in a day? And when the average mind only sees it reaching in any point between the 2.1 billion share mark... no one really knows with what ever time of day they look in at this, on how many times already this might of reset.
So good luck to those who have thought when contacting the SEC or any other organization who people might think would be credible and or truthful with giving real numbers but with what Oldepro posted in this post... shows the perfect loop-hole to where the market was able to hide their naked shorts and bury the understanding or keeping track there of with the possibility of losing track also to thee amount of times these shares reset themselves after reaching the 2.1 billion mark. Once again, if folks really catch this, it is very obvious on how we could of been shorted when all was collectively done and locked into revocation.... we have heard many times and I have heard this number of being shorted "9 times our authorized share structure" with equals 7.2 trillion shares. Once again, with exactly what Oldepro is talking about here with this rigged stock market tracker of shares being sold and resetting after 2.1 billion shares were sold.... this is VERY BELIEVABLE of being shorted to the 7.2 trillion share mark.
And if we calculate Don Stocklein's numbers from his naked short expert who said we were shorted 14:1 as I have up in the Don Stocklein testimony post which I believe is post#4 in this thread..... that when multiplying the 14:1 with the 800 billion authorized shares then that number calculates with being shorted 11.2 trillion shares. Hey just posting what Don Stocklein's naked short expert said and once again, that testimony was under oath so just calculating those numbers and lets not forget, Don Stocklein was one of the 3 heads of the CMKM Taskforce and who also brought in his accounting firm Opus Point ( I think was their name ) and I am sorry, I do not think they were brought in to help count certificates. I truly am of the personal belief and or opinion that if there was money collected for the naked short, I would bet they were there to deal with these like transactions of the money collected and marked to the shares of the bona fides/ we the shareholders.
Also I heard there webinar last night and I heard Steve K. say there was no trust or money collected and all of that noise. Really Steve? And you know this how? What because you are the CMKM or New Horizon Holdings Inc CEO and you know this for absolute fact? I say this completely respectfully, but when Steve said Bill Frizzell was going to give him the evidence of CMKM's naked short.....what evidence did Steve Kirkpatrick say that Bill Frizzell gave him? BILL FRIZZELL GAVE STEVE K. THE EVIDENCE OF BILL FRIZZELL'S "MAIL IN YOUR BROKERAGE FIRM STATEMENTS" which was the movement where IT WAS NOT AN OFFICIAL MOVEMENT BY THE COMPANY AND IT WAS A VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT BY SHAREHOLDER THAT WANTED TO PAY $25 PER PERSON TO HELP FUND THIS OBJECTIVE. AND BILL SAID ONLY 4 THOUSAND participated AND BASED ON THIS UNOFFICIAL MOVEMENT THAT DID NOT ADD ANYTHING EXCEPT A THIRD OF THE A/S STRUCTURE ......WHY WOULD THAT COUNT AS ANYTHING MEANINGFUL OR NOT WITH NOT PROVING THE POINT OF THE REAL NAKED SHORT SITUATION THAT THE CMKM TASK FORCE HAS coincidentally KEPT QUIET ABOUT. Does anyone see the strong possibility that if Don Stocklein's numbers from his expert of the 14:1 naked short.... 11.2 trillion shares.... or the said 9:1 naked short..... and the 7.2 trillion shares..... does anyone really not see why Bill Frizzell would tell attorney Fryar why the naked short was a very private company matter and could not be let out? Right so Bill is going to allow a CEO of CMKM... a company official so to speak...allow him to admit or speak a truth of the real naked short results of the cert pull.... yeah sure.
Once again, no disrespect intended but there is far more evidence through the history of this journey than a shareholder who was not said to be around that specific time of the journey and conveniently fit a great role of taking the former cert pull heads out of the spotlight of company head positions. Now with Steve K. being in his said position and being somewhat of a new shareholder with getting his 2 million shares in 2010 as he said.... it could not be more perfect for Bill and Kevin not being stuck in the company seat when they were attached to thee ole zipped lipped operation of thee official cert pull movement. For the 3rd time, no disrespect meant to Steve K. but really now with what has been posted through the years adds up a lot more than your unofficial evidence of Bill Frizzell's mail in your brokerage firm statement movement and also what ever else Bill Frizzell knows he can only feed you with your compartmentalization of saying what really is.
Also the other comment said about not one diamond has been drilled out with the Fort-a-la-Corne project what is a fact with what ever part has the Cree attachment to it, that info does not have to be let out or made public. And as far as Shore Gold, they are waiting on their mining agreement to go through or with how it looks that they are going broke now or whatever the surface perception really is.... if someone else comes in to buy them out and take over and then mine that land, we will then see what really is when that time comes. But as far as we are lost and have nothing... no trust fund or no collected naked short money or whatever, the CMKM compartment was never designed to be allowed to officially state such and make that official because if a CEO of CMKM stated such proof... what about the thousands of other companies as Suzanne Trimbath said were just like us ( with naked short issues) but they were not getting thee attention we were. So IF the CMKM CEO said officially that there was a historic naked short caught with our cert pull, then those thousands of other companies could run to the court system and use us as evidence to prove there was such a thing as a naked short if they got the blue-print of proof with whatever our zipped lipped CMKM cert pull uncovered. SO I will take the silence of the results of the cert pull as a success, I will take what Oldepro posted here above as very tangible proof of how we were shorted billions of shares on a daily basis and some days in the tens of billions and a few days hitting close to the 40 billion share mark in a day especially with what Knight admitted what they said or it was released or seen years later of what they admitted that they shorted CMKM 84% or something like that in the summer of 2004. And who knows about all the other parties who contributed to this historic shorting spree? But once again, to also add the likes of a Roger Glenn and a Bob Maheu and other alike and their abilities, I seriously give that more credence than what appears to be a compartmentalized CMKM CEO would be allowed to say or know. No offense but just putting that out there for us shareholders who have been riding this ride and have been fed all that we have and it really is not fair.
And if I am crazy for believing the strong possibility here with all posted in this thread then I will be glad to except the crazy title. Also if I am on the crazy side of the fence of belief here with seeing the believable side of this big stuff really happened, then for those who are on the other side of the fence who believe there is nothing or a compartimentalized CEO of CMKM is not allowed to say or know about, then what is really crazy in this thought here?
The Jefferies letter of 111 billion shares that Bill Frizzell mentioned in the court hearing and Jefferies responded back that it must of been a fat fingered accident situation. Yeah Right. And E-trade flying down in a private plane with 5 thousand certs during the cert pull and a few days later flying down again in a private plane to deliver 4,000 more certificates to the task force. Yeah right .... nothing to see here.... nothing going on..... the whole issue is these darn insiders.... yeah right. And what about Bill Frizzell mentioning in 2006 about a "Bulk cert situation" and when he uncovers all of those, they will be deleted. Right, once again.... nothing to see here. All of my shares have a green active box above my certs and all the people in my group have the same on theirs. Hmmm? Could those "bulk certs" been more uncovered Brokerage firm shares or brokerage personal shares for themselves and these 7.2 trillion shares or the 14:1 example..... the 11.2 trillion shares.... now minus the 633 billion cert pull bona fide shareholder shares... could the rest leading up to either the said 7.2 trillion shares or the 11.2 trillion shares.... be more or all the markets shares? And as Bill Frizzell said, "when they are uncovered, they will then be deleted." So if these were the markets hidden shares...... could these share before they were deleted.... since they were created not by the company.... would these have to of been paid for with a covered price? And then they were deleted, but where would that money go? Hmmmm? in the shareholder piggy bank for when ever the distribution was supposed to happen. Didn't Al say that we were owed $6 dollars a share... because of the $3.87 we were owed and that money going towards our 633 billion shares of the cert pull tally?
This topic will now lead me again into the next topic about the DTCC.... and based on the DTCC having a vault of companies shares.... and if ours was 800 billion and lets use the 7.2 trillion share example..... if we were shorted 7.2 trillion shares and our authorized shares were 800 billion shares.... and the DTCC allowed the one share after the 800 billion shares were sold..... then in this example.... that means that out of the 7.2 trillion shares..... the DTCC made money on 6.4 trillion shares because the DTCC gets paid on every buy and sale of all stocks so they the DTCC made money on the 6.4 trillion shares after the 800 billion authorized shares which means the DTCC WAS CAUGHT IN PROFITTING OFF THE NAKED SHORT of the 6.4 trillion after the 800 billion authorized. And I am not even including the 11.2 trillion share example.... gee wiz. Point being, it looks like the DTCC got caught and they are the money bags and especially when they are tied to the Fed Res. So this will be the next post when I get to it.
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 21:51:57 GMT -5
Post #6 Now we know in Bob Maheu's history he was said to be a master at being a trap setter. When the revocation happened that locked in the naked short obviously. And really the only way to get rid of a naked short is to pay for it. So as I posted above about the DTCC allowing 6.4 trillion shares to get sold over the 800 billion authorized shares from their vaults... then it would make sense that the main trap was on them and these posts are very believable especially when a Bob Maheu and his Roladex of connections could of been in place to at least accomplish such a task. By: abadgoodgirl 09 Nov 2005, 12:35 PM EST Msg. 1217521 of 1308040 (This msg. is a reply to 1217475 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # jay_adobe, why is cmkm task force website putting up old and outdated articles from 2003 regarding the DTCC? There is some old link at the bottome of the dtcc description? This 2003 link does not appear to be "credible" or from a "credible" source even though the veterans here know that this is the case. Why is cmkm making it look so X-Files 'ish? tia Also, why is Andy putting a 703 billion limit on shares in cert form when the t/a is insinuating everybody will get their certs [thus unlimited supply]? tia ---------------------------- By: jay_adobe 09 Nov 2005, 12:47 PM EST Msg. 1217559 of 1308040 (This msg. is a reply to 1217521 by abadgoodgirl.) Jump to msg. # ABGG, The Master knows you will research current topics. All he really needed to do was put 'DTCC' up there by itself. The Master has now thrown a crumb and leaked a little bit of information. He knows you will find the rest. Obviously the intent is for shareholders to dig information about DTCC. Makes you wonder who the target is when the cert pull is complete, doesn't it? Makes you wonder who has the capability of liquidating tens of trillions of dollars of assets, doesn't it? Mr. Hill is no longer with the company, and as a shareholder, he has his opinions too. I cannot speak for why he might have posted that. imo ------------------------------------------------------------ So once again, obviously what makes great sense here is the target being the DTCC especially with they knowing after the 1st share after 800 billion...so 801 and beyond the DTCC would be caught and profiting on. So this next post makes a ton of sense and the money said to be collected at the times said---->By: jay_adobe 04 Apr 2006, 02:17 PM EDT Msg. 184023 of 781870 (This msg. is a reply to 183992 by snuffer.) Jump to msg. # snuffer, Of course. I've nothing to say at this point. Await the PR. IMO Remember . - We are in good hands. - Tidbits will be strategically released almost daily for you to find. - The SEC and other regulatory agencies strictly control foreign buying transactions. - Interest rates have been increased 15 times since last summer. - M3 is no longer required to be published to the public. - If a naked shorting scandal is presented to the public it will probably collapse the financial markets, thus causing our superpower status to be in jeopardy due to dollarization in many countries. - Some believe it is approaching the time for our stock market to crash according to the business cycle, (and historically speaking). - The counter speed can be increased or decreased or stopped at will. - There are no coincidences at this point. - $1.2 trillion of FED money was misplaced last September. - $2 trillion was ordered last month. - Mr. Maheu s triumphs. - Mr. Casavant could have easily walked away. - Mr. Glenn s brilliance with SEC law and tactics. - Dividends becoming unrestricted. - Locked up shares becoming unlocked. - The richest land in the world. - The shares held by close friends and family. - The existence of the secured warehouse and its holdings. - Big money travels internationally on weekends. - Many international accounts have not been tallied. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ So now what I like about the first set of money mentioned was the September 2005 of the "$1.2 trillion of FED money was misplaced last September." So if this post were dated April 2006, this means that last September was September 2005, obviously. The key wording I like is "WAS MISPLACED".... yeah right because they are not going to label what it went to..... that would crate exposure to the issue of why such money would of been collected.
And the next post brings alive the "$2 trillion was ordered last month."
-------------------------------------------------------------- By: jay_adobe 15 Feb 2006, 09:11 AM EST Msg. 123524 of 784577 Jump to msg. # February 15, 2006 (Financial Wire) Financial Wire has learned from a highly-placed informed source that the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. appears to be a target of an enforcement action by the multi-state task force formed by the North American Securities Administrators Association.--------------------------------------------------------------- So if Financial Wire puts out on Feb 15,2006 that the DTCC is under investigation by a multi-state task force formed by NASAA does anyone find it interesting that 2 weeks later that a said...$2 trillion more was ordered to be printed? The Jay post above this one says "$2 trillion was ordered last month." And that post was done in April 2006 which would of meant that "last month" would of been March that the $2 trillion more was ordered to be printed. So as I have posted right above here.... in the middle of Feb 2006 there is an investigation into the DTCC and 2 weeks later is March 2006 to where it was said that "$2 trillion more was ordered to be printed." Wow I wonder what that mult-state task force uncovered... and coincidentally $2 trillion more was added to the said pie. And obviously if we add the said $1.2 trillion from September 05 and the $2 trillion from March 2006 that would obviously calculate to $3.2 trillion. So here is an actual post in the month of March 2006 and look at those numbers---->By: jay_adobe 22 Mar 2006, 09:08 AM EST Msg. 168127 of 782187 Jump to msg. # Today's Point to Ponder: Nowhere on your certificate does it refer to CMKX. It only refers to CMKM. The company that currently holds the symbol CMKM is parked at $4 per share. If the company's (CMKM Diamonds) value is $3.2 trillion and there are 800 billion authorized shares, then is not the company worth $4 per share? Enjoy your day. ------------------------------------------------------------------ As said about Jay referring to March 2006 "when $2 trillion more was ordered to be printed.... here is a post of Jay saying the first week of march is very important to the shareholders which fits the thought that there is a good chance that that was when the " $2 trillion more that was ordered to be printed was paid----> By: jay_adobe 09 Mar 2006, 10:18 AM EST Msg. 148867 of 782188 (This msg. is a reply to 148859 by canitocano.) Jump to msg. # canitocano, The first week of March was absolutely remarkable! Remarkable! Especially for the shareholders. Just wait and watch. Can't say more. Be kind to each other. Ignore those that are becoming vile. Let them wallow amongst themselves. Enjoy your day. Read more: noahltl1.proboards.com/thread/3401/compilation-previous-jay-adobe-posts?page=7#ixzz2sH9Ye5rq------------------------------------------------------------------- And one more thought/ post to add for thought--->
By: jay_adobe 05 Jul 2007, 12:13 PM EDT Msg. 571567 of 779307 (This msg. is a reply to 571558 by waterdog85.) Jump to msg. # waterdog, presume that I am not in the know. I am merely a shareholder with an opinion who enjoys discussing potential outcomes. I do not know what your bank account will look like, but if I had that number of shares, I would expect to retire when the final bell rings. When will it happen? It's happening all around you right now. The cogs are turning, the resignations have and are happening, laws are changing, countries are realigning their economic systems, new leaders are being put in place, bad guys are being rounded up in record numbers, lights are shining where lights haven't shined before, NSS has been admitted and reforms are occurring, our funds are drawing interest prior to payout.....and on and on and on. When the master deems the atmosphere is properly conditioned, it will occur. And to think that you were one of a group of 60K+ powerful enough to move the world for a split second......It's history in the making; a legacy; a heritage. Hmmmmmm. of course, imo. --------------------------------------------------------------- Right so this is all crazy talk right? So as of these examples said by March 2006 ..... $3.2 trillion was said to be collected. And does anyone find it interesting that Al Hodges shows up in Jan 2010 saying we are owed $3.87 trillion? Really? Al compliments Jay Adobes numbers because if $3.2 trillion were collected in March 2006 and as the post above says "our funds are drawing interest prior to payout".......... and in Jan 2010 Al comes up with a number that appears to of grown 600 billion dollars more than Jay Adobe's $3.2 Trillion number.... which a good guess would be that that $600 billion extra was the interest growing up to Jan 2010. So Al's numbers with the bivens brings up the believable understanding that Jay's said money was collected and the DTCC was the big money and here is another post of Jay saying so----> By: jay_adobe08 Oct 2005, 10:59 PM EDT Msg. 1149602 of 1308044 (This msg. is a reply to 1149593 by sportsman93306.) Jump to msg. # sportsman, The liquidation of assets will be insignificant to the settlement. Insurance is in place. The DTCC is worth a tremendous amount.. .I personally do not believe that a bunch of brokers in a room could of covered $3.2 trillion dollars but they meeting in a room and being shown that they were caught and then the money bags/ DTCC .... the twin brother of the Federal Reserve.... since the Fed is the controller of printing the money.... it is very believable how and where the money really came from, imo.
______________________________________________________________________ So one last thought here: Lets say Jay's numbers and dates of when the money was paid were as he said..... "September 2005 1.2 trillion went missing from the Fed".......... and "Feb 15, 2006 a multi-state task force was investigating the DTCC" and two weeks later was March 2006 when " $2 trillion more was ordered to be printed."
The connection of thought I get now is hindsight where it is always said to be 20/20..... so April 1st was when the DTCC came down to our cert pull level and gave a timeframe from April 1st, 2006- April 14th, 2006 for the brokers to give up all of the certificates that the shareholders were requesting. And the DTCC also gave an extension from April 14th- April 28th for the Brokers to give up the certs. So basically the DTCC gave from April 1st- 28th of 2006 for the brokers to give up the certificates to us the shareholders. Basically..... why would the DTCC come down to our level and really push this?
Well for one, look at the dates above and if the DTCC got caught with the said $3.2 trillion by march 2006..... and there was an investigation by a multi-state task force revealed on Feb 15, 2006.... which was before the second payment of the said $2 trillion in March 2006.... then at this point by April 1-28th, 2006.... THE DTCC WAS COMPLETELY CAUGHT AND MOST LIKELY PAID UP EVERY WHICH WAY AND THESE LAST TWO POSTS REALLY SPEAK A FIT TO WHY THE DTCC TOLD THE BROKERS TO GIVE UP THE SHARES FOR CERTS ESPECIALLY IF THE DTCC PAID THE BILL FOR THE BROKERS----> By: velvet172 23 Feb 2006, 03:27 PM EST Msg. 132915 of 784286 Jump to msg. # 2smelt - cert pull was to remove the electronic shares from the brokerage houses and remove their liability. Receive your golden ticket! By: jay_adobe 23 Feb 2006, 03:29 PM EST Msg. 132921 of 784286 (This msg. is a reply to 132915 by velvet172.) Jump to msg. # velvet, Bravo! You are the first to announce such. How else could the brokers have gotten the shares out of their hands? There is not another way. All part of the deal. Bravo! Anyway, just posting because this all really adds up and once again as I posted in another thread about the psychology of a Jay Adobe like character is a perfect loop-hole for the team to deny knowing anything about.... you hear no voice... can't tell who he or she is.... and if the SEC were to get ticked especially when it was PRed that the company would not communicate to the shareholders through PRs.... the power of denying a poster named Jay Adobe who's name was created on Raging Bull 6 days after Bob Maheu showed up as co-chairman of CMKM.... and on Feb 5th a person could of played ordinary poster but as now in hindsight has shown.... the really isn't anything ordinary on the many claims said by this character that he or she said that no one could of known... especially Lehman Bro's collapse ... Jay called that out 6 months before that happened... How could he of known that? The newspapers still say today...."No one could of known that Lehman Brothers was going to collapse and send shockwaves through the financial system." Really? Some poster on a stock proboard who many think of this person as not knowing anything, called this out in March 2008 and reclaimed it again May 2008. Right so pay not attention to Jay, he or she knows nothing. Anyway, all in this thread is in my opinion and have a nice day. -Duc
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 21:54:28 GMT -5
11/04/2005 - Press ReleaseCMKM Diamonds Provides Corporate Update Nov 4, 2005 2:50:00 PM Copyright Business Wire 2005 LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 4, 2005-- CMKM Diamonds Inc. today announced a corporate update to its stockholders by disclosing the following information: Status of Entourage Agreements. On Oct. 28, 2005, Entourage Mining Ltd. completed a private placement of $1,050,000, which effectively removed all contingencies from the agreements disclosed in the Oct. 21, 2005, CMKM Form 8-K. CMKM is awaiting final receipt of the 50,000,000 shares of Entourage Mining common stock. Upon receipt of the 50,000,000 share certificate, the certificate will be held in trust by Stoecklein Law Group in the firm's bank deposit box pending distribution. Revocation of 34 Act Reporting. On or about Oct. 28, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission, in response to CMKM's withdrawal of its appeal, declared Administrative Law Judge Brenda Murray's initial decision final. This effectively revoked CMKM's reporting status under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As such, it is currently unlawful for any broker dealer to effectuate a trade in CMKM's common stock. Distribution/Dividend of Entourage Common Stock and all other assets of CMKM. CMKM's board of directors, through the distribution Task Force described below, has resolved to distribute the 50,000,000 shares of Entourage common stock to all CMKM bona fide stockholders. In order to be considered a bona fide stockholder of CMKM, a physical stock certificate issued in his/her/its name will need to be presented to the distribution Task Force for confirmation on or before Dec. 31, 2005, or as extended at the sole discretion of the Task Force.
Electronic and/or other forms of ownership (i.e. -- brokerage statements) will not be accepted by the Task Force as evidence of ownership. Therefore, CMKM stockholders who hold their shares in "street name" will need to demand physical certificates from their broker in order to be considered a bona fide CMKM stockholder and be entitled to their proportionate share of the Entourage common stock and any other assets of CMKM to be distributed to its bona fide stockholders.
At the time of CMKM's revocation, CMKM had 703,518,875,000 shares of common stock validly issued and outstanding. Urban Casavant, CMKM's sole officer and director, has informed the distribution Task Force that neither he nor his immediate family members will receive any of the Entourage shares in the distribution. Distribution Task Force. As previously released, CMKM has established a distribution Task Force consisting of Robert A. Maheu, Bill Frizell and Donald J. Stoecklein. The distribution Task Force will be entrusted to ensure the shares of Entourage common stock, and any other assets of CMKM, are distributed to only CMKM bona fide stockholders. The Task Force has been given full and complete authority to use all means necessary, including bringing federal or state court legal action, to make certain all bona fide CMKM stockholders receive their proportionate allocation of the Entourage common stock and any other assets of CMKM available for distribution.Maheu, former CMKM co-chairman and the designated trustee of the Task Force, stated, "I am fully committed to protecting the interests of bona fide CMKM stockholders, including if necessary, bringing appropriate federal or state court actions to ensure the appropriate distribution of the Entourage shares is made. When I initially took on the assignment of assisting CMKM with its compliance needs, of primary concern was doing the right thing for the stockholders. We faced a tremendous number of hurdles, including the trading halt, administrative hearing and let down of numerous professionals. However, with the continued commitment of Urban Casavant and diligent professionalism of Stoecklein Law Group, we are trying to overcome the obstacles of the past and look forward into the future towards distributing value to CMKM's bona fide stockholders. I want to commend Urban and his immediate family for deciding not to share in the distribution of the Entourage shares. This goes a long way towards showing the Casavant family's continued commitment to the CMKM stockholders." Maheu further stated, "This is a time for the CMKM stockholders to look forward towards the future and forget the past. Working as a united front will allow us to extract all available sources of value for distribution."
The Task Force will be establishing a fax line where all CMKM bona fide stockholders can fax a copy of their certificates to be matched to a certified stockholder list. All CMKM bona fide stockholders will need to be identified on or before Dec. 31, 2005, or as extended at the sole discretion of the Task Force. Once CMKM's bona fide stockholders are identified, the Task Force will issue further instructions on how and when the distributions will be made. Management. As CMKM is effectively a non-operational company holding only the Entourage shares and intangible assets, Urban Casavant will remain as the sole officer and director of CMKM until the Task Force identifies all bona fide CMKM stockholders and all of the affairs of CMKM are wound up. Again, neither Casavant nor any of his immediate family members will receive any of the Entourage shares in the distribution. Nevada Minerals Default. Effective Oct. 29, 2005, CMKM was unable to cure the ongoing default with Nevada Minerals under the Operation Agreement for The American Shaft in Portovelo, Ecuador. Therefore, all of CMKM's right, title and interest in The American Shaft has been relinquished to Nevada Minerals. Future Correspondence. CMKM stockholders are being asked to please refrain from contacting Maheu and the Stoecklein Law Group. All corporate updates will be made in press releases or other forms of distribution media as they become available. The Task Force is in the process of establishing a Web site, www.cmkmtaskforce.com, for posting of all corporate updates and other relevant information as and when it becomes available. Source: CMKM Diamonds Inc. ---------------------------------------------- CMKM Diamonds Inc. Las Vegas Investor Relations 702-966-6328 _______________________________________________________________________________ " I feel here that we have a partnership of sorts, I mean the government and we have a partnership to save these stockholders, and I will do my best to do that." Robert A. Maheu
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 21:56:30 GMT -5
11/04/2005 - Press ReleaseCMKM Diamonds Provides Corporate Update Nov 4, 2005 2:50:00 PM Copyright Business Wire 2005 LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 4, 2005-- CMKM Diamonds Inc. today announced a corporate update to its stockholders by disclosing the following information: Status of Entourage Agreements. On Oct. 28, 2005, Entourage Mining Ltd. completed a private placement of $1,050,000, which effectively removed all contingencies from the agreements disclosed in the Oct. 21, 2005, CMKM Form 8-K. CMKM is awaiting final receipt of the 50,000,000 shares of Entourage Mining common stock. Upon receipt of the 50,000,000 share certificate, the certificate will be held in trust by Stoecklein Law Group in the firm's bank deposit box pending distribution. Revocation of 34 Act Reporting. On or about Oct. 28, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission, in response to CMKM's withdrawal of its appeal, declared Administrative Law Judge Brenda Murray's initial decision final. This effectively revoked CMKM's reporting status under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As such, it is currently unlawful for any broker dealer to effectuate a trade in CMKM's common stock. Distribution/Dividend of Entourage Common Stock and all other assets of CMKM. CMKM's board of directors, through the distribution Task Force described below, has resolved to distribute the 50,000,000 shares of Entourage common stock to all CMKM bona fide stockholders. In order to be considered a bona fide stockholder of CMKM, a physical stock certificate issued in his/her/its name will need to be presented to the distribution Task Force for confirmation on or before Dec. 31, 2005, or as extended at the sole discretion of the Task Force.
Electronic and/or other forms of ownership (i.e. -- brokerage statements) will not be accepted by the Task Force as evidence of ownership. Therefore, CMKM stockholders who hold their shares in "street name" will need to demand physical certificates from their broker in order to be considered a bona fide CMKM stockholder and be entitled to their proportionate share of the Entourage common stock and any other assets of CMKM to be distributed to its bona fide stockholders.
At the time of CMKM's revocation, CMKM had 703,518,875,000 shares of common stock validly issued and outstanding. Urban Casavant, CMKM's sole officer and director, has informed the distribution Task Force that neither he nor his immediate family members will receive any of the Entourage shares in the distribution. Distribution Task Force. As previously released, CMKM has established a distribution Task Force consisting of Robert A. Maheu, Bill Frizell and Donald J. Stoecklein. The distribution Task Force will be entrusted to ensure the shares of Entourage common stock, and any other assets of CMKM, are distributed to only CMKM bona fide stockholders. The Task Force has been given full and complete authority to use all means necessary, including bringing federal or state court legal action, to make certain all bona fide CMKM stockholders receive their proportionate allocation of the Entourage common stock and any other assets of CMKM available for distribution.Maheu, former CMKM co-chairman and the designated trustee of the Task Force, stated, "I am fully committed to protecting the interests of bona fide CMKM stockholders, including if necessary, bringing appropriate federal or state court actions to ensure the appropriate distribution of the Entourage shares is made. When I initially took on the assignment of assisting CMKM with its compliance needs, of primary concern was doing the right thing for the stockholders. We faced a tremendous number of hurdles, including the trading halt, administrative hearing and let down of numerous professionals. However, with the continued commitment of Urban Casavant and diligent professionalism of Stoecklein Law Group, we are trying to overcome the obstacles of the past and look forward into the future towards distributing value to CMKM's bona fide stockholders. I want to commend Urban and his immediate family for deciding not to share in the distribution of the Entourage shares. This goes a long way towards showing the Casavant family's continued commitment to the CMKM stockholders." Maheu further stated, "This is a time for the CMKM stockholders to look forward towards the future and forget the past. Working as a united front will allow us to extract all available sources of value for distribution."
The Task Force will be establishing a fax line where all CMKM bona fide stockholders can fax a copy of their certificates to be matched to a certified stockholder list. All CMKM bona fide stockholders will need to be identified on or before Dec. 31, 2005, or as extended at the sole discretion of the Task Force. Once CMKM's bona fide stockholders are identified, the Task Force will issue further instructions on how and when the distributions will be made. Management. As CMKM is effectively a non-operational company holding only the Entourage shares and intangible assets, Urban Casavant will remain as the sole officer and director of CMKM until the Task Force identifies all bona fide CMKM stockholders and all of the affairs of CMKM are wound up. Again, neither Casavant nor any of his immediate family members will receive any of the Entourage shares in the distribution. Nevada Minerals Default. Effective Oct. 29, 2005, CMKM was unable to cure the ongoing default with Nevada Minerals under the Operation Agreement for The American Shaft in Portovelo, Ecuador. Therefore, all of CMKM's right, title and interest in The American Shaft has been relinquished to Nevada Minerals. Future Correspondence. CMKM stockholders are being asked to please refrain from contacting Maheu and the Stoecklein Law Group. All corporate updates will be made in press releases or other forms of distribution media as they become available. The Task Force is in the process of establishing a Web site, www.cmkmtaskforce.com, for posting of all corporate updates and other relevant information as and when it becomes available. Source: CMKM Diamonds Inc. ---------------------------------------------- CMKM Diamonds Inc. Las Vegas Investor Relations 702-966-6328 _______________________________________________________________________________ " I feel here that we have a partnership of sorts, I mean the government and we have a partnership to save these stockholders, and I will do my best to do that." Robert A. Maheu Read more: noahltl1.proboards.com/thread/4192/cmkm-press-releases-updates?page=1#ixzz2sGMzkiwy By: tramp1950 05 Feb 2006, 08:06 PM EST Msg. 113653 of 785115 Jump to msg. # jay..a question again for you..
something we are discussing on our board, pb57, going back to the, "intangible assets", something that cmkx has, and shareholders owns rights to, like a patent..i'm thinking the 'got cmkx' but its a stumper, has to be more than that.. and here is the def. for intangible..oh, by the way, this ought to drive the bashers nuts..
Main Entry: in·tan·gi·ble Pronunciation: in-'tan-j&-b&l Function: adjective : incapable of being touched : having no physical existence : not tangible or corporeal
Main Entry: intangible Function: noun : something intangible; specifically : an asset (as goodwill or a patent right) that is not corporeal
adj 1: (of especially business assets) not having physical substance or intrinsic productive value; "intangible assets such as good will" [ant: tangible] 2: incapable of being perceived by the senses especially the sense of touch; "the intangible constituent of energy"- James Jeans [syn: impalpable] [ant: tangible] 3: hard to pin down or identify; "an intangible feeling of impending disaster" 4: lacking substance or reality; incapable of being touched or seen; "that intangible thing--the soul" [syn: nonphysical] n : assets that are saleable though not material or physical [syn: intangible asset] By: jay_adobe 05 Feb 2006, 09:13 PM EST Msg. 113703 of 785115 (This msg. is a reply to 113653 by tramp1950.) Jump to msg. # tramp, You are correct that a right, but not a patent (it's tangible), knowledge, conviction, shareholder beliefs, privileges, and many other examples would constitute an intangible asset. But how could one make those intangibles tangibles? Something to ponder: Could the "intangible asset" be a naked shorted share? One cannot touch it, taste it, see it, smell it, or hear it. It is intangible. And prior to Mr. Maheu bringing out his big stick, the naked shorted shares were just fabrications, counterfeits, non existent shares, air shares, or "markers". But they didn't really exist - theoretically and practically, that is. After Mr. Maheu brought out his big stick, those intangibles turned into a "tangible" asset, which is what we have in the trust today. Once legitimized, or fixed, or paid for, or whatever one wants to call it - the NSS goes away and one is left with a tangible asset. That is why I said 203.5 was the critical number. The PR came out after 203.5 was reached, which made our "intangible" "tangible". Of course, this is IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 21:57:37 GMT -5
By: 07isback 27 Jun 2007, 03:38 PM EDT Msg. 567263 of 779307 (This msg. is a reply to 567255 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. #
OT} jay you sir are here to stroke the weak minded/stall/drag out this saga until urban has had the time to move the money around enough into enough different accounts untill it cant be trace`d,, oh and also giving urban/and others a chance to FADE INTO THE SUNSET, with the loot
PERIOD
-------------------------
By: jay_adobe 27 Jun 2007, 03:40 PM EDT Msg. 567267 of 779307 (This msg. is a reply to 567263 by 07isback.) Jump to msg. #
07 Get your facts straight. The money cannot be moved. Period. It is safely locked away. imo
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 21:58:23 GMT -5
By: jay_adobe 05 Jul 2007, 12:13 PM EDT Msg. 571567 of 779307 (This msg. is a reply to 571558 by waterdog85.) Jump to msg. #
waterdog, presume that I am not in the know. I am merely a shareholder with an opinion who enjoys discussing potential outcomes. I do not know what your bank account will look like, but if I had that number of shares, I would expect to retire when the final bell rings. When will it happen? It's happening all around you right now. The cogs are turning, the resignations have and are happening, laws are changing, countries are realigning their economic systems, new leaders are being put in place, bad guys are being rounded up in record numbers, lights are shining where lights haven't shined before, NSS has been admitted and reforms are occurring, our funds are drawing interest prior to payout.....and on and on and on. When the master deems the atmosphere is properly conditioned, it will occur. And to think that you were one of a group of 60K+ powerful enough to move the world for a split second......It's history in the making; a legacy; a heritage. Hmmmmmm. of course, imo.
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 21:59:21 GMT -5
By: mjl62 26 Apr 2007, 10:18 AM EDT Msg. 533548 of 779575 Jump to msg. #
I have on question. And this one really puzzles me. WHERE ARE THE CRIMINAL CHARGE'S? Am I the only one to find this kinda odd? Are they not usually first to surface? Then civil suites?
GM C! Go Sox!
By: jay_adobe 26 Apr 2007, 10:26 AM EDT Msg. 533556 of 779575 (This msg. is a reply to 533548 by mjl62.) Jump to msg. #
mjl62, Because criminal charges are not in order at this phase of the plan, IMO. Right now we must complete actions in a certain order for it all to work accordingly. Just sit back, relax, and watch it unfold. I believe you will be astonished, ultimately.
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 22:00:10 GMT -5
By: restripe2007 17 Jul 2007, 08:40 PM EDT Msg. 577619 of 778953 Jump to msg. #
jay iyo where will any of these funds come from to pay the shareholders
By: jay_adobe 17 Jul 2007, 08:43 PM EDT Msg. 577621 of 778953 (This msg. is a reply to 577619 by restripe2007.) Jump to msg. #
restripe, I believe it will come from a trust. imo, of course
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 22:01:36 GMT -5
And just a heads up.... I updated post #6 with a Jay post that I could not find but spoke about the first week of March 2006 was VERY significant for the shareholders and obviously that was when the post collectively pieced together say that $ 2 trillion more was ordered to be printed so here is what that added and edited section says in post #6 ----->
------------------------------------------------------------------
As said about Jay referring to March 2006 "when $2 trillion more was ordered to be printed.... here is a post of Jay saying the first week of march is very important to the shareholders which fits the thought that there is a good chance that that was when the " $2 trillion more that was ordered to be printed was paid---->
By: jay_adobe 09 Mar 2006, 10:18 AM EST Msg. 148867 of 782188 (This msg. is a reply to 148859 by canitocano.) Jump to msg. #
canitocano, The first week of March was absolutely remarkable! Remarkable! Especially for the shareholders. Just wait and watch. Can't say more. Be kind to each other. Ignore those that are becoming vile. Let them wallow amongst themselves. Enjoy your day.
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 22:02:42 GMT -5
By: brookea1 03 Mar 2006, 11:27 AM EST Msg. 140748 of 782188 (This msg. is a reply to 140732 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. #
Jay, thank you for not disappearing. I have been intrigued by the way you have framed your thoughts in words. It has been uplifting. I hope you are right and I would like to believe it too. However there has been much discouragement. Nevertheless, I feel embolden to ask you to be so kind as to give us your thoughts as to the creation of a portfolio for retirement.
By: jay_adobe 03 Mar 2006, 11:44 AM EST Msg. 140781 of 782188 (This msg. is a reply to 140748 by brookea1.) Jump to msg. #
brook, I appreciate the opportunity to respond to such an inquiry, but I must imperatively state that I am in no way closely qualified to answer that type of question. I can tell you that, personally, my portfolio has, and will have more in the future, investments in companies associated with our JVs and with what is going on in Canada and South America related to mining and exploration. That's all I'll say about that, as I desire to remain nonspecific at this time. Additionally, I am in favor of a structured trust with monthly revenue flow for my family, based on the money we will be receiving associated with our stock. Enjoy your day.
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on May 30, 2014 22:04:28 GMT -5
I will post these 2 post first then comment with a thought, after.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
By: onlythetruthtoday0 22 Mar 2006, 09:10 AM EST Msg. 168136 of 782186 (This msg. is a reply to 168124 by onlythetruthtoday0.) Jump to msg. #
The Task Force continues to receive notice of
significant rumors pertaining to the receipt of funds and erroneous agreements reached with brokerage firms short in CMKM's stock. Other than the funds received from Casavant to pay for certain of the costs associated with the Task Force's operations, there have been no funds received from brokers/dealers or any other sources. However, Frizzell has been in communication with firms as to issues pertaining to the inability to produce CMKM stock.
By: jay_adobe 22 Mar 2006, 09:13 AM EST Msg. 168141 of 782186 (This msg. is a reply to 168136 by onlythetruthtoday0.) Jump to msg. #
only, Is there any particular reason that you would think that the Task Force would have anything to do with receiving any money other than money to continue the operation they are charted to complete? Of course the TF hasn't received any funds. Why would they?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now my comment and or thought to these post:
Ok, to start off lets look at what the CMKM PR said on November 4, 2005. "Distribution Task Force. As previously released, CMKM has established a distribution Task Force consisting of Robert A. Maheu, Bill Frizell and Donald J. Stoecklein. The distribution Task Force will be entrusted to ensure the shares of Entourage common stock, and any other assets of CMKM, are distributed to only CMKM bona fide stockholders."
And another line of that same PR, THE NEXT paragraph down says...... "Maheu, former CMKM co-chairman and the designated trustee of the Task Force.
So the point is obviously, that this PR stated that Bob Maheu was the designated trustee of the Task Force, THE HEAD OF IT. I know we all know this, but just showing what the official PR stated. So if Bob Maheu was the head of this Task Force who was to lead us to a distribution of "ANY OTHER ASSETS, INTANGIBLE ASSETS/ THE NAKED SHORT COVERING..... wouldn't HE, Bob Maheu be the one to set up a trust fund separate from what the great efforts of the Tyler group were doing with collecting the certificates in Bill Frizzell's law firm?
Here is the point of thought, as these 2 posts above talk about is that Bill Frizzell is admitting that no funds were being paid to cover the shares on certificate as many may think would be the case but Bill and Tyler always admitted that they had no dealings in such and they would deny knowing anything about such.
So now we get into the topic of a trust fund. What is a trust fund? A trust fund is its own separate living, breathing entity that can be held separate from a person or group or entity..... with having protection for what ever assets are being held by a trust fund or trust funds with how they were designed in being set up of course. So in this example, we have this CMKM situation of a said historic amount of money that was collected through a CMKM cause. With a trust fund, as said above, it is its own living and breathing entity and can be designed as separate from the cause it was attached to. So yes this was or is a CMKM naked short issue..... BUT you do not have to publicly name a trust fund "CMKM...or CMKM collected naked short money." Of course not, why would Bob Maheu do such a thing especially when this CMKM journey has revealed there is an immense amount of secrecy to where proof has to be shed from.
So as there has been many post in this thread that says Bob Maheu created a trust and Al Hodges admitted that our money was in a trust or trustS..... the point relating to these post above and Tyler doing their great efforts with their efforts in the cert pull COLLECTION PART..... they were only their to tally the certs, most likely. And after they most likely collected a certain amount of certificates, common sense would say that they then reported in communication to the HEAD OF THE TASK FORCE BOB MAHEU..... what their collections were in certificates.
So as these collections were going on, Bob Maheu most likely had a trust or trustS in place where those trusts had or was receiving the naked short money from the bad guys. So does anyone think that as smart as Bob Maheu was that he would call the trust or trustS.... anything with the name CMKM attached to it? Here is the deal, when you create a trust for yourself lets say, the last thing you would want to do is have the trust in your personal name. That would be kind of light a firework display saying..."HEY LOOK OVER HERE LOOK AT THIS" and that would draw too much attention. So as a smart person would do or should do is name a trust fund something way out in left field away from the association of the direction it came from and as in this case.... keep it away from association of CMKM. So Bob Maheu could of called this trust "Armadillo" for example. Is there any association with the name armadillo and CMKM? Definitely not. So that would be an appropriate route and was most likely a route that the Master Bob Maheu chose to do with hiding the connection of the said trillion$ that collected below the radar.
So while Tyler during the cert pull was doing their great efforts of collecting the certs and filtering them most likely as well, Bob Maheu was able to be the HEAD with the trust and he being the bull-dog and as the November 4th PR said that Maheu said...." to extract all available sources of value for distribution." Why would Tyler know thee exact operation of Bob Maheu's trust fund money collection when they were supposed to be about collecting the certs? As the Nov 4th PR says that Maheu was ..... " former CMKM co-chairman and the designated trustee of the Task Force." So with Bill Frizzell and Kevin West and Faulk and Steve K...... how in the world can they know about a trust fund that they were never a part of in with that process or whatever? So especially Steve K. with he says so admittley...." there is no trust fund and there is nothing of the sort." Really Steve? And after being here in since 2010 you know this to be fact as well in thought.... your compartment will allow you to know about this and sound so confident when you say this?
Anyway, the main points I wanted to make were why Tyler really had no right to know about Bob Maheu's said created trusts when it appears that was Bob Maheu's role in this not theirs so no need to know especially when this old saying from World War II comes into play..... " LOOSE LIPS, SINK SHIPS." And the other point I wanted to make is about trust funds and if you are smart you do not name it in the entity that it is for.... you call it something completely different and as far as an association away from what it is linked to as like I used thee example name of "Armadillo," with showing no relationship to.
________________________________________________
And one last and very important point here with this March 22, 2006 post with Jay Adobe and this topic. If people have been really following this thread.... and I mean really following the points of thought of when Jay said money was collected, ( as to the posts in post #6 in this thread of "CMKM's Naked Short Story," which is on the first page of this thread) has anyone noticed date of this post and the connection of thought of this Jay post and the timing of when he claimed we were paid the total of the $3.2 trillion? Well for those that paid attention to the dates and the date of the Jay post in this actual post above, Jay said that $1.2 trillion went missing from the Fed in September 2005.... and March 2006 was when the $2 trillion more was ordered to be printed...... and as I recently just updated and edited .... I put in another found post of Jay's where he said " The first week of March was absolutely remarkable! Remarkable! Especially for the shareholders...... Can't say more." So if we were to imply that the first week of March 2006 was when the $2 trillion more was collected, then that would mean with this post above dated March 22, 2006...... the money was already collected...lol. Hindsight is a beautiful thing. Anyway, take care and all the best.
|
|