Was CMKX an OMEGA STING???...

[hundredtoone]

06 January: Associates inform AmeriTrust Groupe,
Inc. that the Vatican is a major shareholder of
the naked shorted stock “CMKX” and that there are
parallel activities relating to AmeriTrust
Groupe, Inc.’s efforts regarding the release of
the diverted, delayed and stolen $4.5 trillion
Settlement and “CMKX” stock valuation and payment.

In other words, AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. et
al are being set up by CIA/OMEGA to take the heat
when these parties are not paid. The senior
present and former operatives masquerading as top
office-holders behind these and innumerable other
financial scams against the American people had
better complete their rumoured immunity
negotiations without delay, and in any case may
find that they are unable to avoid the ‘lamp
post’ solution that they richly deserve. [*Note:
‘Broken hearted’ is language used by one of our
correspondents, suffering as victims of CIA financial scams].

mail.psychedelic-library.org/pipermail/theharderstuff/20070114/001855.html

[glow=red,2,300]"Hello, Central!" What Are Thse Bank "Packages", And What Is Their Relevance?[/glow]So, the bank packets or packages containing instructions on how to access their money are being delivered to the investors at this time. When this process is completed, the NESARA Announcement can be made publicly, which enacts that law in the U.S. , the benefits of which shall spread throughout the world.

I shall not explain that law, as you have knowledge about it. There are some seventy-two Prosperity Programs, including "O" or Omega, the largest one and Freedom, the one that is to be funded first. UPS stands for United Parcel Service, a worldwide private company delivery service. CH means Clyde Hood and MK means Mike Kadoski, alias Les Cruse, two of the trustees of these Prosperity Programs. Renminbi means the people's currency or "yuan", the official currency of the People's Republic of China. Finally, FC stands for the Farm Claims, a program in the U.S. in which a class action lawsuit was brought against the government for banking and tax fraud. I shall not discuss that further, here.

May this help your understanding,and know that the Light has won on Planet Earth.

www.fourwinds10.com/NewsServer/ArticleFunctions/ArticleDetails.php?ArticleID=17527


...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)

[imSINGLEruRICH]

100-1

Although i have not followed this Nesara thing.....

I just hope (as the article states) that there are indeed some "White Knights" out there fighting to restore "good" and wipe out the "evil" doings of the crooks!

I still believe there is hope for us ,CMKX, shareholders

What a ride !!

Single

[hundredtoone]

Poof Questions and Answers Sept. 24, 2007

September 25, 2007

Subject: "Poofness" Q & A 9/24 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:02:45 -0400

"Poofness"

"Poofness" is an Omega person.

His information may or may not apply to the Dotson Project.

Question to "Poofness":

Hi again Poof,

Couple of questions, even though you updated yesterday. Has anyone been delivered to today? YOu mentioned that this would happen FAST. Also, is the new banking system still schedule to be online Oct 1

st? If that's the case, seems that this thing SHOULD happen this week?? - D

Response from "Poofness":

My guy said on friday that he expected they'd be hitting the rest of us enmasse the beginning of this week since the us bankers were ready to go online with the new system. GH called today and said the 'white hats' were coming thru for us and that folks in europe were 'livid' at the white house. No pings yet. P

www.fourwinds10.com/NewsServer/ArticleFunctions/ArticleDetails.php?ArticleID=17616

...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)

[soonerlew]

Isn't someone somewhere always "livid" regarding the "white" house?

[hundredtoone]

NESARA/ Dove/ Omega Scam Yields Millions
by URI DOWBENKO

One of the most pernicious and long-running consumer frauds in recent history has been the NESARA scam, evidently an outgrowth of the Omega fraud, which promised exorbitant returns while defrauding thousands of unsuspecting US citizens.

Shaini Goodwin, who uses "Dove of Oneness" as a pen name, has claimed that a “secret” law called NESARA (National Economic Security and Reformation Act) will supposedly bring about changes in the US financial system including the forgiving of mortgages, credit card debts, as well as abolishing the IRS.

Goodwin’s mythology describes Illuminati factional fighting in which allegedly one group called the "White Knights" is fighting against the dominant group. This is also reminiscent of another mythology promoted by Rumor Mill News, in which Faction 1 of the Illuminati is supposedly engaged in a global power death struggle with Faction 2.

Goodwin’s NESARA scam is based on the gullibility and naivete of US citizens who had been suckered into previous cons like the investment scam called Omega, operated by Clyde Hood of Mattoon, Illinois in the mid 1990s which yielded more than $20 million from thousands of people.

www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=102&contentid=1416&page=1


...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)

[hundredtoone]

In the memo, Crittenden said Shohet will oversee a new, centralized North America treasury operation, the structure of which will be outlined in the next 30 days. Citigroup plans to review international treasury operations in the coming months and may reorganize them based on that review, Crittenden wrote.

www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN2043605220070920

Looks like CASPER/POOF/NESARA were RIGHT about a new TREASURY...IMO...NOW for the PACKETS...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)

[hundredtoone]

This is the low calibre of the madness that infects the sick minds of the criminal operatives, who are individually and collectively reported to be ‘terrified’ of the consequences of these exposures of their criminal behaviour.



** Either there will be no currency with which to make the payment, given that the US dollar has been reduced to limited value thanks to the antics of the disgraced US Treasury Secretary and the Central Banks that have needed to protect their positions by dumping their US dollar holdings (see above)…



** OR the US economy begins to recover and the Federal Reserve (Central Bank)/US Treasury alleges the existence of inflationary pressures arising from the devaluation and the vast overhang of ‘funny money’, and raises US interest rates, thereby causing the re-rating of the real estate mortgages, in a near-precise replay of the scam which triggered the 1929 depression,,,



** ENDING IN A SEVERE DEPRESSION ACCOMPANIED BY HYPERINFLATION, as predicted in the ‘worst-case scenario’ segment of our posted report dated 2nd September 2006 [see ARCHIVE on the Home Page] a.k.a. ‘the mortgage weapon’.



If the criminal operatives holding power wish to trigger a social upheaval in the United States, they have carefully prepared the ground for such an outcome. We are dealing here with true representatives of the Darkness. How best can these operatives hide their criminality? Answer: in an environment of pitch black chaos. And chaos is already present at the White House.

www.planetaryascension.net/Darkworkers/WORST-EVER%20TREASON%20BY%20OFFICE%20HOLDERS%20AGAINST%20AMERICA.htm

...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)

[hundredtoone]

FROM: Patrick H. Bellringer

TO: WA

DATE: Sept. 26, 2007

SUBJECT: Reply

Dear WA:

Thank you for your letter. This game being played with the Prosperity Program and Farm Claim funding packets in the U.S. is only a very small part of the worldwide scene and the changes that are presently occurring. There is a Global plan for bringing goodness to our planet. On September 19, 2007 the Global gold-backed banking system was established, and the U.S. Treasury is now a part of that system.

In the U.S. we now have a dual banking system, but the Federal Reserve will continue to operate until the NESARA law is implemented by public announcement and abolishes the Fed. I expect that to happen prior to the beginning of the new U.S. fiscal year which begins October 1, 2007.

It is true that we have been fed rumors of delivery of these bank packets to their recipients for many years, and we have been told that the evil bankers, politicians, judges, military, etc. have tried to gain control by chasing these bank packets all over the planet. Essentially, this was a giant stalling tactic because there was no true value money available to back these accounts. The Fed money is fiat or fake money, worthless paper, created out of thin air by the stroke of a pen in a banker's ledger. By International Law to deliver these bank packets to the people without true value money to back them is fraud.

As you may know U.S. President Roosevelt took the U.S. off the gold standard in 1933, and U.S. President Nixon took the U.S. off the silver standard, leaving no value backing the currency. Therefore, we must now return to a hard asset base to pay out the Prosperity Programs and Farm Claims.

www.fourwinds10.com/NewsServer/ArticleFunctions/ArticleDetails.php?ArticleID=17636

...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)

[hundredtoone]

GLOBAL BANKING: THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS...

www.newswithviews.com/Wood/patrick4.htm


...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)

[hundredtoone]

"Poofness" is an Omega person.

His information may or may not apply to the Dotson Project.

Question to "Poofness":

Hi Poof: Well, of course, we're all pretty, much going crazy out here. I don't suppose that there's anything you could tell us that would give us some "peace of mind." Like maybe, deliveries will be completed by the end-of-the-month (October 2007), or something of the sort?

(from xxxxx)
Response from "Poofness":The head trustee has signed off on everything, world wide deliveries will now commence.p

www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/nesara/news/news.php?q=f4c55616ef45bc21fb953be4cfc0e9b8

...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)

[hundredtoone]

Lawsuits in Securities Lending, Part 1:
A Primer on the Current Hedge Fund
Legal Action against the Major Prime Brokers
Josh Galper
Managing Principal
Vodia Group LLC
April 17, 2006
“Whether or not the hedge fund lawsuit against Prime Brokers is
successful or not, it will have major consequences for creating
transparency in securities lending.”
A class action lawsuit was filed on April 12, 2006 against 11 major Prime Brokers
alleging illegal practices in securities lending. Whether or not the lawsuit is proven in
court, what we are seeing today is the beginning of a seismic change in the securities
lending business. This change will ultimately kill the high margin business of securities
lending for the Primes while creating a more equal distribution of lending fees across
Primes, custodians and asset owners, including pension plans and mutual funds. Hedge
funds might even wind up getting fairer treatment too. In this report we discuss the
reasons for the lawsuit and the mechanics of the alleged abuses. We also give our
predictions for the growth of open electronic marketplaces in securities lending and the
next, even bigger lawsuit against the Primes.
©2006 Vodia Group LLC 2
The Value Chain for Securities Lending
To understand the lawsuit it is important to get a sense of how securities on loan move
through the financial services infrastructure and who makes money at which points. The
chain starts at a beneficial asset holder, which may be a pension plan, mutual fund or
retail account holder. These firms all represent the little guy in one form another, because
even as large institutions with clout, they have aggregated the savings of the average
worker who dreams of retiring one day. These asset holders keep their money and
securities held with a custodian such as State Street, Mellon or Northern Trust.
With assets in hand, the custodian looks at their total portfolios, bunches them together so
that no one can cherry pick the hard to borrow securities and leave the securities that no
one wants, and gives the right to borrow the portfolio to a Prime Broker. With the right to
borrow securities in hand, Prime Brokers then turn to their hedge fund clients and tell
them which securities are available for loan. Hedge funds take the securities they want
and short the stock. The critical language here is right to borrow, because while the
Prime may legally and commercially access the security, they may or may not do it in
practice.
In each step of this chain a rebate rate is paid to the lending party (see Exhibit 1). The
rebate rate is actually an annual interest rate that the lender pays in interest on the
collateral that the borrower puts up to borrow the stock. If typical collateral is 102% of
the value of a security, and a margin rate is 3%, then the lender will pay the borrower 3%
annual interest on that 102% cash left with them in exchange for borrowing the security.
The lender then turns around and invests that 102% cash in a very low-risk investment,
say treasury bonds, that hopefully are earning 3.5% or greater. The lender pockets the
spread on the cash collateral, the borrower gets interest on the cash in the lender’s bank,
and the borrower gets the stock. As stocks get harder to borrow, the rebate rate that is
charged moves from positive, where the lender pays the borrower, to negative, where the
borrower pays the lender. For a hard to borrow stock, a borrower may both give a lender
102% of the value of the stock in cash plus pay the lender a hefty interest rate.
©2006 Vodia Group LLC 3
The Lawsuit
The lawsuit alleges that Prime Brokers have allowed their clients to illegally short stock
without having the security in hand, also called naked shorting. Naked shorting is agreed
to be a bad thing by pretty much every regulated participant in the industry, at least in a
public forum. Typically hedge funds are made into the bad guys in naked shorting
because they are the holders of the shorted positions. Not to shed tears for the hedge
funds, but in fact they can not short stock illegally without their broker’s consent.
The lawsuit says that the 11 Prime Brokers named effectively told their clients that they
had stock, allowed their clients to short the stock, then did not deliver the stock as
promised, leading to a naked short position. By naming all 11 major Primes as
defendants, the plaintiffs are effectively saying that broker-driven naked shorting is an
established industry practice.
Exhibit 1
Securities Lending Participants and Revenue Example
Hedge Funds
Prime Brokers
Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns
Custodians and Other Intermediaries
State Street, Northern Trust
Beneficial Asset Holders
Pension Plans, Mutual Funds, Wealthy Individuals
Participant
Pays $100
Keeps $50
Keeps $25
Keeps $25
Revenues on a negative
rebate security
Source: Vodia Group
©2006 Vodia Group LLC 4
In addition to simply allowing naked shorting, the hedge funds allege that the Primes
charged for services they did not deliver. The funds allege that while they were charged,
often up to 25% in interest for the right to borrow rare or in-demand securities, they did
not receive any services in return. If they did not receive services such as delivery of the
actual stock available to borrow, then, they say, they should not have been charged. The
allegation is that the brokers used their positions of influence to manipulate the securities
lending system for their own benefit.
The Mechanics of Naked Shorting and Borrowing Stock
While it is not our place to comment whether or not the lawsuit has merit, or if and who
is responsible for naked shorting, there are some facts that are clear. For example, if
broker-sanctioned naked shorting is or was occurring, how it is done can be explained.
In a naked short, a broker allows a fund to short a stock without having the stock in hand.
This creates a failure in clearing and settling a stock and is frowned on by the SEC.
Recently the SEC strongly suggested that naked shorting is bad practice by passing
Regulation SHO. Among other things, Reg SHO gave firm deadlines for when excessive
naked short positions had to be bought in (closed out) in the form of a Threshold List.
Notably, SHO does not address the reasons that brokers fail to locate shorts or deliver
stock. It simply mandates that brokers must get the stock delivered in certain timeframes.
In shorting a stock, there is a concept known as an affirmative or guaranteed locate. This
means that before shorting, a hedge fund must know concretely who holds the stock that
it wants to short and be approved by that firm for shorting their position. In practice, most
hedge funds call their Prime Broker Securities Lending desk (known in equities as “Stock
Loan”). This back office trading desk tells the fund whether or not they have their stock
for shorting. In the lingo, they confirm whether or not a “locate is good.” If a locate is
good, even verbally, the hedge fund is cleared to trade. It is the Prime’s responsibility to
ensure that they make good on the verbal agreement to deliver the lendable security to the
hedge fund’s account.
www.rgm.com/articles/VodiaGroup.pdf


...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)

[hundredtoone]

`Phantom' stock shares lead to civil suit(Investors - Good Naked Short read)
PasadenaStarNews.com ^ | 06/16/2006 | Wayne Jett


Posted on 06/19/2006 12:17:01 PM PDT by devane617


Two class action lawsuits filed by hedge funds in Manhattan federal court indicate major problems in U.S. stock markets. The hedge funds blame big brokerage firms for failing to deliver shares of stock "sold short" by the hedge funds. The problem: buyers who paid for shares didn't get the stock, but don't know it.

[glow=red,2,300]The hedge funds - Electronic Trading Group LLC and Quark Fund LLC - say they were swindled by their "prime brokers," including Merrill Lynch, Banc of America Securities, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Citigroup, Bear Stearns and Morgan Stanley. ETG and Quark allege their prime brokers conspired to charge very high fees for securities lending services and to fail-to- deliver (FTD) shares required by law for "short sale" purposes. [/glow]
In separate suits, ETG and Quark allege the conspiracy also defrauded other hedge funds in the same way over a period of years. They ask the court to certify a class of all such hedge funds so all may recover damages.

The prime brokers may implicate the hedge funds in the FTDs. But filing of the suits is unlikely unless many shares sold remain undelivered.

If that is true, many buyers have paid for shares they never received from short-selling hedge funds. Some of these buyers have resold the shares to others, not knowing they had no shares to deliver. Hedge funds have billions in assets and are active traders. The number of "phantom" shares may be very large.

How this could occur in the heavily regulated U. S. securities markets is unclear. SEC regulations require shares to be delivered within three days after trade (T+3), when funds are paid (cleared) and shares delivered (settled). Most clearing and settling is done through Depository Trust & Clearing Corp. (DTCC), a private firm organized and controlled by the securities industry.

SEC regulations permit shares to be "sold short" only if the seller has access to borrow shares and does so after the sale, meeting the T+3 deadline. The hedge fund suits allege that DTCC clears funds to short sellers without actual delivery of shares, and that the prime brokers have exploited this flaw in procedures to create many FTDs.

Evidence shows T+3 often is not met. Regulations allow the seller to be "bought in" by the receiving brokers if delivery is not made within ten days after the trade. But the hedge fund plaintiffs say brokers seldom do this when large hedge fund clients are involved.

DTCC has been asked how many FTDs are occurring, but refuses to disclose FTD data, either for particular companies or for the general market, citing concerns for possible trading volatility.

Despite its professed fears of trading volatility if FTD data is known by the public, DTCC says FTDs are minor matters. But DTCC frequently uses discretion to transfer pending FTDs to private brokerages involved for resolution "ex-clearing" among them. The number of FTDs in ex-clearing is unknown to the public.

Issuers of shares affected by FTDs have complained to DTCC regarding its failure to enforce the "buy in" rule to cover FTDs ten days after the trade. DTCC states it has no authority to "buy in" brokers or their delinquent clients.

The SEC has received related complaints for years, but public enforcement actions have been minimal. The SEC adopted Regulation SHO effective Jan. 1, 2005, requiring brokerages to report FTDs in certain stock trades after that date. When the total FTDs in a stock reach a "threshold" level, the stock is named on a Reg SHO list.

The Reg SHO list names several hundred firms, most of them small, but provokes no public enforcement actions by the SEC. FTDs existing prior to 2005 were left unresolved by Reg SHO, and their present status is unknown.

Last year, SEC chairman William Donaldson was asked about FTDs, or "naked short selling," by Sen. Robert F. Bennett of Utah during Senate hearings. Donaldson asked to discuss the subject in closed session, which is out of character with information transparency sought in U.S. financial markets.

Christopher Cox became SEC chairman in 2005. In 2006, the agency provided FTD data to a NYSE-listed firm, Novastar Financial Inc. (NFI). The data covered daily trading in NFI shares during 2004 and 2005, revealing that on certain days as much as 40 percent of NFI shares traded were FTDs. On days with high FTDs, NFI's share price fell sharply.

Small investors call this fraudulent market manipulation and ask why the SEC does little to enforce "buy in" provisions of law. Some institutional investors report extended delays or no success at all in getting delivery of large lots bought.

In Utah, the governor recently signed into law a novel requirement that brokers report every FTD affecting the shares of any company organized or headquartered in the state. The Securities Industry Association lobbied hard against the measure that imposes liability of $10,000 for each day of violation.

On June 20, the U. S. Senate Judiciary Committee convenes a hearing on "short selling activities of hedge funds and independent analysts." No witness list is yet available, but may include the hedge funds and prime brokers named in the Manhattan class actions. The Committee may also invite (or subpoena) DTCC, SEC, NASD, NYSE and SIA.
www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/1651981/posts

Merrill Lynch reports billions in losses amidst growing signs of US recession

Japan and China Lead Flight From the Dollar
Social Inequality in US Hits New Record
Hedge Funds Pile Into Commodities
As Currency Speculation Skyrockets 70%, Reason Drops at Similar Speed
Deutsche Bank to Write Off About $3.12B
Barry Grey
wsws.org/articles/2007/oct2007/merr-o26_prn.shtml

Merrill Lynch & Co., the world’s largest brokerage firm, reported a net third-quarter loss of $2.4 billion Wednesday and acknowledged writing off $8.4 billion in assets from failed investments in subprime mortgage-linked securities.

The massive write-off exceeded the Wall Street giant’s net earnings for all of 2006. It equals about one-eighth of the investment bank’s total market capitalization.

The announcement sent shock waves through Wall Street, setting off a sharp decline on the New York Stock Exchange that was only reversed when data showing a continuing decline in the housing market persuaded traders that the Federal Reserve Board would impose a further cut in interest rates when it meets next week.

The impact of Merrill Lynch’s bleak report was magnified by the fact that only two-and-a-half weeks before Chairman and CEO Stanley O’Neal had estimated that the firm’s write-off resulting from the meltdown in the housing and credit markets would total $5 billion—a huge sum, but considerably less than the $8.4 billion the company reported on Wednesday.

www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/business/economy/news.php?q=e5dd94fd4cf7bd57da6aaad161c95c1c

There is definately a pattern developing here IMO...I doubt the end of the GF clause is another COINCIDENCE...that would be just a little too coincidental IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)

[hundredtoone]

[glow=red,2,300]Billions have been written off by the biggest banks: $5.9 billion by Citigroup, $3.4 billion by USB, $2.4 billion by Morgan Stanley, $1.7 billion by Goldman Sachs, $1.6 billion by Bank of America, and $1.6 billion by JP Morgan Chase.[/glow]
Merrill has suffered the biggest hit because, of all the Wall Street firms, it was the biggest underwriter of so-called collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs. These are bank loans, usually tied to subprime mortgages [glow=red,2,300]and other highly risky investments, that are divided up, bundled, repackaged and resold to big investors.[/glow]

Annual issuance of CDOs, which was just $52 billion in 2001, hit $388 billion in 2006.

www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/business/economy/news.php?q=e5dd94fd4cf7bd57da6aaad161c95c1c

Compare those banks to the banks being sued by the Hedge Hogs ...it sure is similar IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)

[hundredtoone]

Here Comes Santa Claus

Here comes Santa Claus, here comes Santa Claus,

Right down Santa Claus lane

Vixen and Blitzen and all his reindeer

Pullin' on the reins

Bells are ringin', children singin'

All is merry and bright

Hang your stockings and say your prayers

'Cause Santa Claus comes tonight!

Here comes Santa Claus, here comes Santa Claus,

Right down Santa Claus lane

He's got a bag that's filled with toys

For boys and girls again

Hear those sleigh bells jingle jangle,

Oh what a beautiful sight

So jump in bed and cover your head

'Cause Santa Claus comes tonight!

Here comes Santa Claus, here comes Santa Claus,

Right down Santa Claus lane

He doesn't care if you're rich or poor

He loves you just the same

Santa Claus knows we're all Gods children

That makes everything right

So fill your hearts with Christmas cheer

'Cause Santa Claus comes tonight!

Here comes Santa Claus, here comes Santa Claus,

Right down Santa Claus lane

He'll come around when the chimes ring out

That it's Christmas morn again

Peace on earth will come to all

It we just follow the light

So lets give thanks to the lord above

That Santa Claus comes tonight!

Greetings and Salutations,

There's some really clean, straight, and true info floating about but none of it has the sensationalism that many in these positions, have come to crave, in a certain way. Thus such gems get missed. Some kind gentleman was kind enough to actually share his legal opinion on the use of all those weird ways of signing for the package. It's signed by a person named 'Bubba', read it and get the facts, then decide to buy a rubber stamp or not. This is an international 'thing' and for whatever reasons, that fact keeps getting dropped from the core of any argument. The bulk of what is being published out here as fact is some of the wildest sci fi, I've ever seen in print, and I started with asimov, norton, and such. You must forgive me for taking none of it seriously. I've heard so much of it before, it's just going thru a repackaging that makes it look like it's the 'latest', then you get hooked on the soap opera, 'As the Stomach Turns'. One second you're up dancing, then comes

another message, and wham...you're carreening sideways into the maw of an open pit of darkness, with harpies flying around you screaming insane messages in your ears....'abandon all hope you fool, the gov owns your soul'.

Sorry but that's they way it looks from where I'm sitting. None of the info and intel, I've been given, gives a nod at any of it. Am I naive, perhaps? I just don't 'get it', maybe. Perhaps, no one in 'position' is telling anyone to abandon their posts and go on holiday. No one I'm looking at has stopped doing anything, matter of fact, actions tell me they are moving as quickly as they can. Which wipes out the myth of some fwd date, 'asap' doesn't have a date. None of us know precisely the things that have to be done to move a mountain, and since it hasn't been done before, everybody 'works with it'. That's why it's been impossible to nail a 'date done' for anyone. The truth is, all we're looking for is, whomever it is, get to my house, and let me outta here. What I'm trying to get across here, it's in action and is moving, like a really good virus. The faster the trustees have completed their contracts, the sooner they get to play, too. If you are not living under a rock,

they will find you. so stop worrying about how manytimes you've moved. Americans are nomads, moving all the time, these days....gotta know these folks knew that along time ago and factored in the actions necessary, as long as, this has taken.

My best advice right now is to remain 'cautiously optimistic', when the nice person stops by, you'll know it is your turn, act accordingly. When you look inside and see what you do, I hope you remember what I've told you all these years, and don't waste time cussing somebody out because they imagined something else. Simple is best. Then silently walk away because this time the journey is all about you and your decisions.

I wish you All a Very Merry Chrismas and a Happy New Year and Bon Voyage!

I'm still doing consultations, available by emailing this address. Donations needed and accepted at www.paypal.com account [e-mail]

Love and Kisses,

"Poofness"

www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/nesara/news/news.php?q=1198468369

Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)

[hundredtoone]

THE ‘PROGRAMS’, OMEGA PONZI SCAMS, ETC.
Exotic investment schemes marketed by scamsters promising sky-high returns into which many Americans entered and ploughed their savings a number of years ago, and which have not paid out, may have purported to be exempt from registration under the Securities Acts of 1933 et seq. [see Glossary below] and in terms of State securities registration requirements.

Such unregistered schemes, unless narrowly they are exempt from registration in conformity with relevant stringent statutory restrictions (such as being confined, for instance, to no more than 35 subscribers nationwide), are all illegal and violate the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and SEC regulations, and were/are also further illegal as they may not have been registered with the relevant State Securities Commission.

When considering such participations, such US investors, in conformity with the Prudent Man Rule under the 1933 Act [see Glossary] should, in performing their Due Diligence, have been in receipt, and should have reviewed, the necessary registration and prospectus documents meeting the requirements of the NASD, the SEC and State Regulators.

In cases where the issuer was a bank, the participants have undoubtedly been victimised. In all other instances, they will have acted on the basis of fraudulent documents which made them co-conspirators. The issuers were and remain engaged in Ponzi schemes, as we have several times reported [see Glossary and Appendix] and are all co-conspirators and open to prosecution under R.I.C.O. and other relevant US legislation, including multiple anti-money-laundering legislation.

Furthermore, it is likely that some American participants will have signed Non-Disclosure forms or agreements, a fatal error which will have meant that they can have no recourse to US authorities for relief from being scammed, not least because in having participated in any of these schemes and signing such forms, they became co-conspirators themselves, as indicated.

They cannot therefore seek protection from the relevant regulators, and neither can they disclose their participations, especially where money-laundering will likely have been intended, since this presupposes tax evasion: and under the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) of 1982, US taxpayers are required to report all sources of income, wherever it was earned anywhere in the world. It follows that all receipts by US taxpayers since the passage of this Act which have not been reported to the Internal Revenue Service are taxable, which means that all US taxpayer holdings in offshore accounts that are not declared for tax are vulnerable to payment of the tax and penalties. Imprisonment is also dished out to tax evaders in the United States with abandon.

But the participants in these programs have received nothing and have so far forfeited 100% of their investments. Having signed Non-Disclosure documents purporting to protect the program organisers or distributors from the consequences in the United States of their criminality, and the participants from the consequences inter alia of prospective tax evasion and of co-conspiring in a felonious transaction, some participants have been left dangling and are at the mercy of ruthless MK-ULTRA-style perception manipulators who have been managing their expectations for years.

Under the regular securities laws of the United States, investors and participants have to show source of funds. How can they take receipt of the proceeds of these ‘program’ and Omega-type Ponzi schemes without exposing themselves to US authorities, in many cases with prospectively grievous consequences?

These participants need to ask themselves: are the websites that may have been managing their expectations for years disclosing both sides of the equation, or have they simply been expressing justified anger and frustration at the brazen evil of the high-level, well-connected perpetrators of these scamming programs, thus deceiving their intended readerships by failing to look at the other side of the issue, namely the possibility that the scamsters may have compromised the investors?

They also need to consider whether it is likely that the hitherto ‘protected’ perpetrators of these scams have, all along, also been relying upon their knowledge that their victims may be impotent because they may be engaged in prospective tax evasion, as a rationale for the integrity of the Greenspan-Bush Sr. ‘Never-Pay’ model. In this connection, it is axiomatic that crooks always seek to compromise their victims, thereby ensuring, for instance, that they cannot testify against them.

In the case of the Swiss banks that marketed such participations, their first priority is understood to have been to obtain the targeted investor’s signature on the coveted Non-Disclosure document. Then the participant was typically asked to prove his or her funds. Thirdly, the participant may have been requested to travel to Europe, or to courier funds to the bank’s European address, where their account would have been be opened. In cases where very large amounts were put up, the bank’s aircraft was actually dispatched to collect the participant and his funds..

Participants in these schemes may be caught, if any of these unfortunate conditions apply to their circumstances. Co-conspiracy is a function of motive. If the motive was to receive inordinately high yields and/or to evade taxes in breach of the Prudent Man Rule, TEFRA and/or Internal Revenue Service regulations, it is not at all clear on what basis expectations of repayment of principal with interest may be predicated. The fact that the perpetrators (‘principals’) of these scams are indeed despicable, ruthless snakes is no comfort for the participants because the perpetrators may have taken care to ensure that those whom they have scammed are co-conspirators as well as victims.

Even more disconcertingly, the professional perpetrators of these fraudulent finance operations were fully aware of what they were doing from the outset, and may have deliberately ensured, in these cases, that their participants became co-conspirators and would therefore become impotent to recover their funds, which the perpetrators always intended to steal.

Their evil intentions will have been based upon extensive experience of the psychological reality that victims of financial Ponzi and Pyramid scams often collapse into a state of permanent denial, unable to move beyond the mental barrier that they have lost everything. This attitude is typically associated with embarrassment at the fact that the victim has been scammed, a state of mind akin to the humiliation of being mugged or the victim of common theft.

What has been achieved to date as a direct consequence of these exposures, though, is that life has been made extremely uncomfortable for the professional and official sector perpetrators of all categories of fraudulent finance, and will most certainly become more uncomfortable day by day – as official enforcement procedures, which grind slowly but surely, bring more and more decisive pressure to bear on these snakes. Despite everything that has had to be said above, this may still provide some minimal degree of comfort, no doubt, for the victimised participants; but it may not alleviate their problems or their suffering.

What we can say with confidence is that the prevailing sense of pessimism in the United States is misplaced. Perceptions are often slow to catch up with reality. We are being bombarded with data which has almost no bearing on the current environment, which can be summed up as follows: the crooks are on the run, are being hounded day and night, have nowhere to turn, did not anticipate what was about to hit them, and have been caught completely unprepared for the onslaught.

www.worldreports.org/news/150_u.s._financial_market_revamp_is_false_prospectus

...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)