|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Mar 25, 2015 16:10:19 GMT -5
March 25, 2015
RE: Update on Court Hearing on March 24, 2015, Webinar #41
To All CMKM/NHHI Shareholders:
Another hearing was held yesterday, March 24, 2015 in Clark County District Court with regard to a large judgment obtained by CMKM over two years ago. In simplified terms, Judge Cadish granted our Motion to Compel yesterday and gave the judgment debtor three days to provide requested evidence that had been withheld using questionable tactics (claiming attorney/client privilege).
We believe that the withheld evidence will provide additional confirmation of the fact that our judgement is valid and should be allowed to stand. The court has scheduled another hearing for April 21, 2015 and we expect the judge to issue a final ruling on that date.
Our attorneys, Bill Frizzell and Jay Shafer have done an excellent job in this case to overcome numerous obstacles presented by the two law firms representing the judgment debtor. We remain optimistic that the judge will uphold our judgment and allow it to proceed to a collection phase.
Webinar #41
I will host Webinar #41 on Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at 8 PM CDT using the Paltalk room designed for NHHI. Here are instructions for joining the meeting:
1. Download Paltalk Messenger (free download) and log into Paltalk.
2. Look under the heading “Business and Finance” rooms and under the subheading “Investments”.
3. When the room is open you will see the name “New Horizons Holdings, Inc.”.
4. Click on the room to join the meeting.
I will discuss all current CMKM/NHHI business, and answer shareholder questions as always during the Webinar. I hope many of you are able to attend. Thank you.
Steve Kirkpatrick
|
|
|
|
Post by portrush on Mar 25, 2015 16:50:08 GMT -5
Thanks.
Pin for you!
pr
|
|
|
|
Post by gabbyhayes on Mar 25, 2015 17:52:38 GMT -5
  )Sorry Steve…you forgot to say God Bless…..
|
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Mar 25, 2015 18:04:21 GMT -5
)Sorry Steve…you forgot to say God Bless….. God Bless you Steve and the team and Thank You with all our Hearts. Moving forward.. |
|
|
|
Post by skoondog on Mar 26, 2015 6:35:52 GMT -5
A very slow process, but we are getting more done these past few years. I know that AL must be getting ready to give the shareholders an update on his status. And what he thinks, the future holds on his case...
Skoondog
|
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Mar 26, 2015 7:46:00 GMT -5
A very slow process, but we are getting more done these past few years. I know that AL must be getting ready to give the shareholders an update on his status. And what he thinks, the future holds on his case... Skoondog A little more input please.. Al will be what..? And how do YOU know that..? |
|
|
|
Post by skoondog on Mar 26, 2015 8:07:26 GMT -5
Lol John A little more input? Don't read to hard into my comments please.
Skoondog
|
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Mar 26, 2015 8:17:15 GMT -5
Lol John A little more input? Don't read to hard into my comments please. Skoondog LOL, why even make a comment like that..? You know we are all hurting for some good news one way or another. LOL (Not Funny at all) |
|
|
|
Post by skoondog on Mar 26, 2015 22:05:17 GMT -5
Lol John A little more input? Don't read to hard into my comments please. Skoondog LOL, why even make a comment like that..? You know we are all hurting for some good news one way or another. LOL (Not Funny at all) Hang in there, you'll be a rich man soon. Soon!!! |
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2015 5:29:44 GMT -5
Mar 25, 2015 at 5:14pm curtisRV said:
What is this court hearing about? Is it about Wells Fargo or some other?
Thanks!
Mar 25, 2015 at 5:25pm vngntn2 said:
We have been told shareholders cannot know because some interfere with process.
bigdaddie
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER
Mar 25, 2015 at 6:22pm carlos, TazGhost and 1 more like this.
sounds familiar, the most "Transparent Administration" uses an excuse similar for denying FOIA requests, the general public may know too much. Wouldn't want the Shareholders to get any answers to their questions, would we?
cfdtrk35
DIAMOND JEDI
Post by cfdtrk35 on Mar 25, 2015 at 6:37pm
I believe it is in reference to some PROPERTIES / LAND obtained with company funds . I also believe it is a considerable amount and not the only objects sought for recovery....
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2015 5:34:37 GMT -5
dyemenz
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER
An answer that is evasive or incomplete is the same as a failure to answer. In most cases, the party filing the motion to compel must show the court that he or she made a good faith effort to convince the other party to answer the question or produce the item that was requested.
Once a court grants a motion to compel, the party must obey the order. If a party refuses to obey the order, the court may sanction the refusing party by
1. ruling that certain facts in the case will be viewed in favor of the requesting party and against the refusing party;
2.preventing the refusing party from supporting or opposing certain claims or defenses in the case;
3.entering judgment against the refusing party; and
4.holding the refusing party in civil contempt. Through a contempt ruling, a court can order a party in jail until that party obeys the court's order.
Looks like the defendant has until end of business day, this Friday to produce. if I remember correctly this defendant was sued before by other entities, didn't end in settlement & documented financial info was used in lawsuit, which was similar to ours. Don't think attorney/client privilege holds up in this case, conversations yes, documents, no. Especially if they were produced in another public case, not sealed but not available to the public by online services, but could be obtainable. The defendant seems trapped to me & perhaps why Steve sounds confident about a favorable ruling.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Mar 27, 2015 5:38:34 GMT -5
Mar 25, 2015 at 5:14pm curtisRV said:What is this court hearing about? Is it about Wells Fargo or some other? Thanks! Mar 25, 2015 at 5:25pm vngntn2 said:We have been told shareholders cannot know because some interfere with process. bigdaddie
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER
Mar 25, 2015 at 6:22pm carlos, TazGhost and 1 more like this. sounds familiar, the most "Transparent Administration" uses an excuse similar for denying FOIA requests, the general public may know too much. Wouldn't want the Shareholders to get any answers to their questions, would we?
cfdtrk35
DIAMOND JEDI
Post by cfdtrk35 on Mar 25, 2015 at 6:37pmI believe it is in reference to some PROPERTIES / LAND obtained with company funds . I also believe it is a considerable amount and not the only objects sought for recovery.... I'm thinking Edwards planted some money overseas and we won the court hearing 2 years ago.. They won't release the money to us. I could be wrong here.. |
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2015 8:17:14 GMT -5
yesterday at 6:20am capten said:
Verry good
"You have the noose around his neck" ;-)
dyemenz
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER
That is absolutely correct Capten because CMKM can & will if need be, produce testimony to the judge & with that comes documentation from an ex plaintiff party, regarding their suit, (due to whom it is) where privilege isn't an issue. Very integrated in our case where defendant has gone to even illegal methods to evade. I very much like this trap & the new pairing of our legal counsel.
Most of CMKM things were won by default & am happy to see this team isn't afraid & can litigate, having a few bucks now to do so. We might even call this finally, balance within the company & it's working. Steve making the decisions, as it should be & attorneys are in their rightful place, legal advisors working on contingency. It's never been able to happen before. Frizzell is no longer forced to wear so many different hats. No offense to Bill. I like it!
|
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Mar 27, 2015 9:25:53 GMT -5
In English and American law, a judgment debtor is a person against whom a judgment ordering him to pay a sum of money has been obtained and remains unsatisfied. Such a person may be examined as to their assets, and if the judgment debt is of the necessary amount he may be made bankrupt if he fails to comply with a bankruptcy notice (in US, Law, an involuntary petition) served on him by the judgment creditors.
In the past, the judgment debtor could have been committed to prison or have a receiving order made against him in a judgment summons under the Debtors Act 1869.[citation needed]
Specific debts are "non dischargable" such as debts for fraud, and civil judgments that are obtained in a civil Adversary proceeding in bankruptcy. During such proceedings (US LAW) the judge whom presides over the bankruptcy declairs that a specific debt be deemed as Non Dischargeable, in that the bankruptcy will not dismiss the debt, and the debtor is obligated for the full amount of the judgment, for life.
Examinations, referred to as Judgment Debtor Exams or a (JDX) of the debtor are conducted in front of a district court judge, and the debtor is required to make the debtor answer questions about his or her assets, or face the possibility of imprisonment for contempt of court. The moving attorney of judgment holder is able to request that the court issue an order, during the exam that forces the debtor to answer questions or be jailed.
The debtor is not allowed in the law to use the fifth as a response to any questions as the debtor is already deemed as convicted and he/she must answer any question put forth to them or face an order to comply or be jailed for non compliance.
The JDX is considered[according to whom?] to be in many civil actions the most effective manner to collect judgments as the debtor's potential incarceration is used as a motivating factor for then to answer questions of pay off the judgment.
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 3, 2015 5:51:58 GMT -5
mullahpaloozer
Diamond Cutter Level 2
Post by mullahpaloozer on Mar 24, 2015 at 8:14pm"Bill Frizzell and our local counsel Jay Shafer have done an excellent job representing the interests of CMKM/NHHI" ... " representing the interests of CMKM/NHHI". really? QUESTION? SHOULDN'T IT READ .... "REPRESENTING THE INTEREST OF THE SHAREHOLDERS OF CMKM/CMKX"? Read more: cmkxunitedforum.proboards.com/thread/15391/best-joke#ixzz3WF3QexjOkranker
Administrator
Post by kranker on Mar 27, 2015 at 10:28pm
Splitting hairs? mullahpaloozer
Diamond Cutter Level 2
... best joke ever Mar 30, 2015 at 6:30am No Mr Kranker, there is no splitting of hairs just as there is no splitting of funds awarded by the courts from the Company, it's management or Legal Team. To date the only thing shared with the Shareholder Base is a continued NOYB/MYOB response/attitude from the present management, John Steven Kirkpatrick. And speaking of present management, there is not much that he has done either. There is NO viable Business Plan. Oh there is talk from SK about the Company getting into the Oil Production Business. And Spindle Top is her name! ... B ... I ... N ... G ... O, ... and BINGO was her name! Spindle Top has been and is at present day a LOW production facility. Some DD on Spindle Top might be in order. I suggest Google or Wik-a-pedia as reliable sources for such. There has been NO RETURN to TRADE. The Company Website was already established. Mr Kirkpatrick's ONLY contribution was the creation of 'portals' for Amazon and AMWAY ... big whoop! Big Money return there!?!? The WEBINARS are a stipulation from a settlement with a Shareholder Group lead by Jerry Koziac (sp) aka 'wolfbella'. The remaining concessions have yet to be honored by SK as agreed. SK spends 'more' time with the opening prayer and criticism of the Shareholders than current Company affairs. The duly elected Shareholder Reps have yet to be seated on the Company BOD as directed by Company By Laws and election of such, even though funds are available for the required bonds to do so. Need I continue? The facts speak for themselves. But then, I could be just another disgruntled shareholder who takes the time to share facts as facts and my opinions as such. But then, you are free to view what I post as you will ... fabricated garbage perhaps or as you say, splitting hairs. Last Edit: Mar 30, 2015 at 6:32am by mullahpaloozer PRIDE 84 Read more: cmkxunitedforum.proboards.com/thread/15391/best-joke#ixzz3WF59o5OU. |
|
