|
Post by 2018 on Aug 6, 2015 14:28:29 GMT -5
Additionally thunkerdrone,
My conclusion today, I don't trust anybody. I see concerted effort to always leave the shareholders out of the picture, when it counts, or in the real time.
Was for example Interpleader done? or not? Could it have been done and not be public, and not even by TJmoran? I think anything is possible, but certainly away from our eyes. That there was certainly intention to do something great in regards our cert pull, I can see that. But that is where our view is cut off.. for us and the public in general, and soon after the whole Tyler gang stops talking about nss or cert pull results.
Its been too many years, for the shareholders, and now most are waiting for these doj proceedings that start on September 15 to be over, concluded. and that after.. those proceedings or even through shareholders will finally see if some funds coming their way.
By the way.. there is a Restitution that can come through or from DOj proceedings, and that is not going to company but to shareholders directly and individually. So that is kind of interesting. and doj has their own system of distribution.
people don't exactly expect that much of the $$ can be found from the plaintiffs, but if somebody has intentions of paying shareholders, this certainly could be the way.. if they claim they found "this and that".
This whole story line.. is shrouded in mistery... and it seems to me its always been intentional. After all these years waiting.. and even if we wanted to speculate.. that there may be funds for shareholders, its been a long time to gage if there is any intention to give any funds to shareholders. You know that Hodges claims there are funds for shareholders.. besides the other part of his story. It seems we have to wait and see, what happens or not.. after these doj proceedings.
|
|
|
Post by thunkerdrone on Aug 6, 2015 16:52:58 GMT -5
maybe its all a runup to completing a master plan, as you suggest. Some of the main players here have been either exonerated or have died or gone to jail. I have heard this theory before, that this been done with meticulous preparation and patience etc, and that maybe its just a matter of tying up some final remaining loose ends to clear the way for something big, the real golden goose so to speak. That could be where we sit right now, as you say, fairly close to the resolution of this as it unfolds stage by stage. I wish I had more to add than that, of course. Like you said there's too many missing pieces to the puzzle and not enough pieces available to people. I am afraid , almost , of trying to piece this thing together, in case it does damage. Sometimes I wonder if my speculation on a sting a long way back was what delayed this whole thing, so.......To put it mildly this rests heavy on my mind all the time, it's one reason I follow this, but the way you laid this out gives me hope, with your emphasis on the significant effort already put in . Anyone familiar with these boards and this topic would agree.
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 7, 2015 11:33:44 GMT -5
maybe its all a runup to completing a master plan, as you suggest. Some of the main players here have been either exonerated or have died or gone to jail. I have heard this theory before, that this been done with meticulous preparation and patience etc, and that maybe its just a matter of tying up some final remaining loose ends to clear the way for something big, the real golden goose so to speak. That could be where we sit right now, as you say, fairly close to the resolution of this as it unfolds stage by stage. I wish I had more to add than that, of course. Like you said there's too many missing pieces to the puzzle and not enough pieces available to people. I am afraid , almost , of trying to piece this thing together, in case it does damage. Sometimes I wonder if my speculation on a sting a long way back was what delayed this whole thing, so.......To put it mildly this rests heavy on my mind all the time, it's one reason I follow this, but the way you laid this out gives me hope, with your emphasis on the significant effort already put in . Anyone familiar with these boards and this topic would agree. You know, as I am going over this, and other people bring stuff, and then we rehash that, I am constantly myself coming with conclusions or opinions. I am not satisfied with completeness of the story lines we have been given, or people that should have reacted or in the picture, are not reacting and not in the picture. Take a look of the following: yesterday at 9:32am silverbulletgirl said: read page's 258-260 regarding the Interpleader by faulk geez looks like Michael Williams had alot to do with that there, also strange they removed page 261 books.google.com/books?id=krzUO3gdu_AC&pg=PA258&lpg=PA258&dq=CMKX+INTERPLEADER&source=bl&ots=ATip3xDyLX&sig=-ex4jHc4XDVlHZSH0JiO5e-5Spc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CE4Q6AEwBmoVChMIx_2ao8GUxwIVgzI-Ch3mGwwW#v=onepage&q=CMKX%20INTERPLEADER&f=false page 261 is not part of this book preview Hmmmmmmmmm..... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ My response: I think I should have all the pages because I have it printed.
Now you know who is missing from all this? Maheu and Stoecklein. Not mentioned anyplace, no involvement. And those are the guys that set it up and said to sec that it is the next step. Well Frizzell is missing also, being he was the 3rd member of the Task Force.I can see the whole thing about Williams being there, which makes no sense what so ever, as to why would he be involved in any of it. If Kevin and Frizzell claim this is the truth, and nothing but the truth, and there is nothing else that we are not told about that is pertinent to the whole subject, well, then they should have involved Shareholders and also put pressure on Maheu and Stoecklein, and let shareholders also know what their responses were. This is all retelling years after. And it may be true.. or it may not be all. By not telling shareholders all the info at the time that its happening, they have taken shareholders choices out of equation, and their voices.
Frizzell was 3rd member of the task force, and Stoecklein said that Task Force had legal obligation to Shareholders. Even if Maheu and Stoecklein would claim that it is now company obligation to file the interpleader, Shareholders would not have let that get them off the hook just so easy, if they were told.
So now we have a story, where all the members of Task Force are doing and saying SQUAT. Everybody is off the Hook. No questions to Frizzell, or Stoecklein or Maheu. - from anybody. ( and shareholders are not told)
No inquiries from Frizzell to Stoecklein, as to what the heck is going on? It was Stoecklein and Maheu's job to find a legal entity - lawyer , to file this in Federal Courts. Hey if this is not working.. are you going to find another lawyer? How are you supposed to get what you stated in front of SEC, which was: that there will be payment from those that have to buy into certificates, ( naked shorty), and that task force will be paid 10% of those moneys?
Things don't fit. And if Maheu and Stoecklein were Bs-ing everybody, including Shareholders with those promises, that obviously Task Force members were aware of, Including Frizzell, then why wasn't Frizzell raising voice in regards that? - and why not tell shareholders at the time? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I will find those missing pages.. but its not only a question of who is talking.. or who are we hearing about.. but also.. WHO IS NOT TALKING HERE, AND WHO ARE WE NOT HEARING ANYTHING FROM - when they should have been involved, or being asked questions.
Nothing about Frizzell- the 3rd member of Task Force, and nothing about Stoecklein and Maheu, who's plan this was to have interpleader, and it went further, to what will be done with collections of moneys from those that had to purchase the Certs.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ And another one: Mark Faulk did not ask anything about this issue of Filling in Federal Court when he had interview with Maheu.Never asked anything about hiring TJmoran, or why he did not help, or what happened there.. etc etc. I believe that Maheu interview was in 2008. Stoecklein depo with SEC was in 2006. Sure that researchers working for Tyler, got that depo way before the rest of us on the boards. So its quite possible that Mark Faulk already had it when he interviewed Maheu. Even if he did not have it, its the owners-group that paid Mark Faulk for the book, and Frizzell was part of that group and they were all buddies, so whatever Stoecklein was talking about in regards Task Force and payment from nss, and filling in federal court, Frizzell knew about it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Basically I call BS on everybody, and every story we are told. Shareholders would have shredded everybody involved, if they were told .. the stories we are told now.. of what Supposedly happened. So either they did not want us to be told anything and meddle in, which I do think its the case..
or they made incredibly stupid choice.. of keeping shareholders out of it, and by default have also damaged the shareholders.
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 7, 2015 12:16:38 GMT -5
maybe its all a runup to completing a master plan, as you suggest. Some of the main players here have been either exonerated or have died or gone to jail. I have heard this theory before, that this been done with meticulous preparation and patience etc, and that maybe its just a matter of tying up some final remaining loose ends to clear the way for something big, the real golden goose so to speak. That could be where we sit right now, as you say, fairly close to the resolution of this as it unfolds stage by stage. I wish I had more to add than that, of course. Like you said there's too many missing pieces to the puzzle and not enough pieces available to people. I am afraid , almost , of trying to piece this thing together, in case it does damage. Sometimes I wonder if my speculation on a sting a long way back was what delayed this whole thing, so.......To put it mildly this rests heavy on my mind all the time, it's one reason I follow this, but the way you laid this out gives me hope, with your emphasis on the significant effort already put in . Anyone familiar with these boards and this topic would agree. Its all been wrapped up in a certain way, that is very appeasing to SEC and taking any mention or blame out of the market participants. Nss not mentioned, our Task force counter taken out.. etc etc.. Even though Stoecklein and Frizzell are talking about huge naked short in their depositions, even how they expect to pay the members of the Task force or the expenses for the Distribution was from that same Cert pull via $$$$$ that those that had to buy into certificates would have to pay.. of course, we do not see SEC or anybody else officially starting any investigation into possible market wrongdoing and manipulation of nss in cmkx? Of course not. Shareholders worry of course is, even if all this was kept under the wraps.. as we were unofficially told is going to be the case.. that is has to be that way.. ( "has to be that way" I guess would equal "too big to fail") however, now that they have it their way.. the way they want it, for all the world to see, is there any intention or incentive.. to release any funds to shareholders.. finally after all these years? If there are funds of course. in spite of all the shenanigan stories we have been told along the way.. does anybody's words still count? Like Maheu and Stoecklein said, that SEC and them have together a legal obligation to shareholders and need to work together on that. Stoecklein also said, if SEC does not see it that way, they need to talk some more. Extracting Value for the shareholders. So many years, and we still don't know.. and we still have to wait. Hodges did say, that "we have won the right to be paid". What the heck does that mean? What's the right? Something legal in the courts? Some judges decision? Maybe an Interpleader we don't know about. who the heck knows.. we are certainly not privy to knowing everything, and what we are told has holes in it.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 7, 2015 13:08:08 GMT -5
How dose NICOLE DURR play in all this...? Did she also own illegal shares in CMKX and if she did, that would mean the team got her in some way or another. Maybe the team is rounding all the bad shares and taking them all out off the shareholders list, so they can see how many shares are really in the float. That way, when we do trade with some value the price will be stable with a low float. UC gave stock to anyone who did work for him and if the team can prove that they never did anything for the company than the company can take back the shares or have them pay for them to keep. As for Nicole, she has many Profit and non-profit Corporations. I guess that's where AH comes in again. So no one can bring a lawsuit against the Company when we go back to trading. JMHO.
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 7, 2015 13:53:42 GMT -5
How dose NICOLE DURR play in all this...? Did she also own illegal shares in CMKX and if she did, that would mean the team got her in some way or another. Maybe the team is rounding all the bad shares and taking them all out off the shareholders list, so they can see how many shares are really in the float. That way, when we do trade with some value the price will be stable with a low float. UC gave stock to anyone who did work for him and if the team can prove that they never did anything for the company than the company can take back the shares or have them pay for them to keep. As for Nicole, she has many Profit and non-profit Corporations. I guess that's where AH comes in again. So no one can bring a lawsuit against the Company when we go back to trading. JMHO. Personally, I don't care about any story lines of trading again. Whether they will or wont, or can or cant, really intend or don't really intend to do it. Many of our shareholders will be dead before any of that would be seen if ever.. and again.. it was not why we pulled the certs. That is kind of like the Afterthought.. while they are trying their best to make us forget where we started, and what really happened or affording the shareholders the complete transparency for 11 and more years spent in here. I think the Durr case if just another one, where new cmkx company is trying to recover money. But again, its going to new cmkx. I find gusjarvis interesting. Its difficult to tap into all the contradictions of cmkx history.. but he is connecting at least for himself some things I have not seen before. Connecting who knew what when, touching on Roger glenn and how it might be connected to allowing Ameritrade to cover.. ( true thing that SEC never went after Roger glenn even though he enlarged our float, just like Dvorak.. but sec went after Dvorak), etc etc.. its a whole thread. tfant53.proboards.com/thread/7592/why-company-confirm-hodges-case
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 7, 2015 16:53:04 GMT -5
How dose NICOLE DURR play in all this...? Did she also own illegal shares in CMKX and if she did, that would mean the team got her in some way or another. Maybe the team is rounding all the bad shares and taking them all out off the shareholders list, so they can see how many shares are really in the float. That way, when we do trade with some value the price will be stable with a low float. UC gave stock to anyone who did work for him and if the team can prove that they never did anything for the company than the company can take back the shares or have them pay for them to keep. As for Nicole, she has many Profit and non-profit Corporations. I guess that's where AH comes in again. So no one can bring a lawsuit against the Company when we go back to trading. JMHO. Personally, I don't care about any story lines of trading again. Whether they will or wont, or can or cant, really intend or don't really intend to do it. Many of our shareholders will be dead before any of that would be seen if ever.. and again.. it was not why we pulled the certs. That is kind of like the Afterthought.. while they are trying their best to make us forget where we started, and what really happened or affording the shareholders the complete transparency for 11 and more years spent in here. I think the Durr case if just another one, where new cmkx company is trying to recover money. But again, its going to new cmkx. I find gusjarvis interesting. Its difficult to tap into all the contradictions of cmkx history.. but he is connecting at least for himself some things I have not seen before. Connecting who knew what when, touching on Roger glenn and how it might be connected to allowing Ameritrade to cover.. ( true thing that SEC never went after Roger glenn even though he enlarged our float, just like Dvorak.. but sec went after Dvorak), etc etc.. its a whole thread. tfant53.proboards.com/thread/7592/why-company-confirm-hodges-caseIf we don't trade we can't force a cover.. That is where the NSS money comes from.. We will lose everything. That's what this is all about.. IMO
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 9, 2015 11:31:47 GMT -5
Personally, I don't care about any story lines of trading again. Whether they will or wont, or can or cant, really intend or don't really intend to do it. Many of our shareholders will be dead before any of that would be seen if ever.. and again.. it was not why we pulled the certs. That is kind of like the Afterthought.. while they are trying their best to make us forget where we started, and what really happened or affording the shareholders the complete transparency for 11 and more years spent in here. I think the Durr case if just another one, where new cmkx company is trying to recover money. But again, its going to new cmkx. I find gusjarvis interesting. Its difficult to tap into all the contradictions of cmkx history.. but he is connecting at least for himself some things I have not seen before. Connecting who knew what when, touching on Roger glenn and how it might be connected to allowing Ameritrade to cover.. ( true thing that SEC never went after Roger glenn even though he enlarged our float, just like Dvorak.. but sec went after Dvorak), etc etc.. its a whole thread. tfant53.proboards.com/thread/7592/why-company-confirm-hodges-caseIf we don't trade we can't force a cover.. That is where the NSS money comes from.. We will lose everything. That's what this is all about.. IMO Ok I don't know if you are missing what Stoecklein and Frizzell said about "shorty" having to pay into a "program" .. which is where the money is going to come from..- which is kind of core part of this thread. imo that is the only place where cover and $$ can come from. Personally I do not believe in any possibility of going back trading and any cover happening. ( if it was not covered already and paid for) No I absolutely don't believe in any "cover" from Kirkpatrick going back trading. imo he is just saying that.. because there is nothing else he can say to shareholders that ask such questions. I 100% do not believe that there is any more enforcement on such issues in the markets.. like it was not there before, bunch of electronic shares have been erased from people's accounts, SEC is not making market participants open their books, and finally, we had DTC order already which said that all the shares will be out of their system, and that market participants have to distribute it in cert form. I asked Kirkpatrick about DTC order.. of course he said he does not know about it.. lol its good to be "once" removed.. don't think that Kevin or Frizzell would be able to avoid questions using that excuse. ~~~~~~~~~~~ All and all.. cover from going back trading .. to me is a joke. I mean.. its a sentence that means nothing basically.
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 9, 2015 11:36:40 GMT -5
Of course we have this in picture also but I would have to look for it... DTC order re cmkm diamonds inc, 2013-06-27 07:18 ragingbull.com/forum/topic/235610The Depository Trust Company IMPORTANT B#: 9516-06 DATE: April 05, 2006 TO: All Participants CATEGORY: Reorganization FROM: John Carvalho, Operations Division ATTENTION: Cashiers and Reorganization Managers SUBJECT: Distribution of 50,000,000 Common Shares of Entourage Inc. Upon Surrender of CMKM Diamonds Inc. Common Shares On November 17, 2005 participants were advised via The Depository Trust Company’s (DTC) Reorganization Inquiry for Participants (RIPS) envelope ID 93-125809103-01 that according to CMKM Diamonds, common shares of Entourage Inc. would be distributed to " bona fide" holders of CMKM Diamond shares upon physical presentation of CMKM Diamond Inc. shares to the CMKM Diamonds Task Force established to handle the distribution. As per CMKM, this action requires that participants with shares of CMKM Diamonds Inc. on deposit at DTC submit withdrawal by transfer instructions (WTs) to have the shares registered accordingly for presentation to the Task Force. A deadline of December 31, 2005 was initially established by CMKM for the presentation of the certificates. Participants are advised to refer to the RIPS envelope for more details concerning the distribution. The deadline for the presentation of the CMKM Diamonds certificates has since been extended by CMKM to 5:00 PM PST May 15,2006. However, in order to ensure sufficient turnaround time for WTs submitted to the transfer agent, DTC plans to chill WT activity on April 14. Although DTC will continue to provide Direct Mail by Depository (DMD) services to participants for WTs submitted by April 14, all CMKM items in the "hold" feature of DMD after that date will be forwarded directly to participants. After April 14, DTC will commence exiting any certificates remaining on deposit. The certificates will be submitted to the transfer agent with instructions to issue CMKM Diamond Inc. shares in participants' name or their nominee name as applicable. Upon receipt of the shares DTC will make a secure delivery of the shares to each participant. Participants with questions regarding this notice can contact their Relationship Manager or the undersigned at (212) 855-3660. BONA FIDE POSITI (Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long)
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 9, 2015 11:42:00 GMT -5
www.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/id620bpm.pdf1. On April 28, 2005, CMKM Diamonds requested a subpoena to the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) requiring it to produce for the period April 1, 2003, to April 5, 2005: all National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) automated customer account service reports for receipt and delivery of CMKM Diamonds; all reconciliation clearing sheets for CMKM Diamonds; all documents that show the daily closing position for each “Participant”; stock borrow activity reports and all records related to borrowing of CMKM Diamond shares under the NSCC Automated Stock Borrow Procedures; reports monitoring “Participant’s” unsettled positions in CMKM Diamonds; reports monitoring “Participant’s” short selling activity in CMKM Diamonds; and reports “that compare monthly short interest in securities to the actual number of shares at the DTCC, The Depository Trust Company, NSCC and/or elsewhere.” On May 2, 2005, I received a request by CMKM Diamonds for a subpoena to Annette L. Nazareth (Nazareth), Director of the Commission’s Division of Market Regulation, requesting production of materials similar to those being requested of DTCC. 2. On April 27, 2005, CMKM Diamonds filed two motions. The Motion for Inspection and Copying of Documents and Witness Statements Pursuant to Rule 230 and Rule 231 asserts that the Division of Enforcement (Division) has gathered extensive materials in U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc., LA-2937, a separate, ongoing investigation, and these materials were not made available to CMKM Diamonds. CMKM Diamonds claims it is being treated unfairly because the Division has subpoenaed witnesses it has already deposed in the U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc., LA-2937, investigation and that the materials that these people will bring to the hearing will be new to CMKM Diamonds but not new to the Division. CMKM Diamonds requests that I order the Division to make available: (1) copies of all documents and witness statements that it will tender into evidence; and (2) any documents it has in its files that it intends to use in this proceeding. In the Motion for Discovery of Exculpatory Evidence (Motion), CMKM Diamonds requests that I order the Division to produce any evidence the Commission has that is favorable to CMKM Diamonds. Specifically, CMKM Diamonds seeks documents filed with the Commission that show the daily list of failed deliveries in CMKM Diamonds stock since January 5, 2005, and “any other evidence in the [Commission’s] files which indicate there have been sales of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock that exceed the known authorized and issued common stock.” (Motion at 2.) CMKM Diamonds wants the Commission to review all its files and provide it with any evidence that is exculpatory or favorable. 1. Subpoena to DTCC and Nazareth I DENY the subpoenas to DTCC and to Nazareth because they concern matters that are not at issue in this proceeding and, therefore, they are unreasonable and excessive in scope. See 17 C.F.R. § 201.232(b). 2. Motion for Inspection and Copying of Documents and Witness Statements Pursuant to Rule 230 and Rule 231 and Motion for Discovery of Exculpatory Evidence I DENY CMKM Diamonds’s request that I require the Division to search through all the Commission’s files for exculpatory evidence because it is excessive and impractical. Brenda P. Murray Chief Administrative Law Judge
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 9, 2015 12:13:42 GMT -5
Of course we have this in picture also but I would have to look for it... DTC order re cmkm diamonds inc, 2013-06-27 07:18 ragingbull.com/forum/topic/235610The Depository Trust Company IMPORTANT B#: 9516-06 DATE: April 05, 2006 TO: All Participants CATEGORY: Reorganization FROM: John Carvalho, Operations Division ATTENTION: Cashiers and Reorganization Managers SUBJECT: Distribution of 50,000,000 Common Shares of Entourage Inc. Upon Surrender of CMKM Diamonds Inc. Common Shares On November 17, 2005 participants were advised via The Depository Trust Company’s (DTC) Reorganization Inquiry for Participants (RIPS) envelope ID 93-125809103-01 that according to CMKM Diamonds, common shares of Entourage Inc. would be distributed to " bona fide" holders of CMKM Diamond shares upon physical presentation of CMKM Diamond Inc. shares to the CMKM Diamonds Task Force established to handle the distribution. As per CMKM, this action requires that participants with shares of CMKM Diamonds Inc. on deposit at DTC submit withdrawal by transfer instructions (WTs) to have the shares registered accordingly for presentation to the Task Force. A deadline of December 31, 2005 was initially established by CMKM for the presentation of the certificates. Participants are advised to refer to the RIPS envelope for more details concerning the distribution. The deadline for the presentation of the CMKM Diamonds certificates has since been extended by CMKM to 5:00 PM PST May 15,2006. However, in order to ensure sufficient turnaround time for WTs submitted to the transfer agent, DTC plans to chill WT activity on April 14. Although DTC will continue to provide Direct Mail by Depository (DMD) services to participants for WTs submitted by April 14, all CMKM items in the "hold" feature of DMD after that date will be forwarded directly to participants. After April 14, DTC will commence exiting any certificates remaining on deposit. The certificates will be submitted to the transfer agent with instructions to issue CMKM Diamond Inc. shares in participants' name or their nominee name as applicable. Upon receipt of the shares DTC will make a secure delivery of the shares to each participant. Participants with questions regarding this notice can contact their Relationship Manager or the undersigned at (212) 855-3660. BONA FIDE POSITI (Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long) That deal was shot down.. I don't want to go looking for back PRs any more or I would show it to you.. As far as the NSS goes.. You tell me why we have the shares accounted for at Transfer On Line.? The SEC has a site where funds go to damaged shareholders.. We really don't want them to take our money and give it out, now do we...? Last but not least, Where does this Nicole Durr play in all of this..? That's what you should be looking for and not this old crap..
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 10, 2015 10:20:39 GMT -5
You posted: "You tell me why we have the shares accounted for at Transfer On Line.?"
Well what does that mean? It could mean many things.. was everybody covered already?- brokerage houses paid up already in order to send us certs? And how do we know what is accounted for at Transfer Online? We don't have transparency in regards anything in our cert pull or share count. How much do we or you really know?
Nicole Durr does not play at all imo, in any of the subject raised by Stoecklein thread, as I said before. Completely different subjects. Durr case is recovering assets for New cmkx, And Stoecklein thread is about what we started with, Task force, pulling the certs, payment for nss. Other Assets.
Its a personal choice and opinion what you find important for you as a shareholder. Maybe there is another thread about recovering assets for new cmkx, where Durr case would fit in , and be discussed.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 10, 2015 12:42:50 GMT -5
Lets say they did collect money.. And they gave some of that money to foundations to put into trust funds. I would think that Nicole Durr had some of that money and who knows who else may have that money in their trust funds.. JMHO
|
|
|
Post by str8biodiesel on Aug 10, 2015 13:15:46 GMT -5
All I can say is keep your eyes on the bouncing ballz. When one GATES close, another GATES opens. Keep the faith. It has been said many times in the past and im sure we will hear it more. IF YOU'RE IN YOU WIN! WE WON THE WAR! I'm looking forward to a fulfilling next couple months. Im really liking September of this year Will the stars and planets finally align for all the CMKX longs ? I sure have my hopes GO CMKX CHEERS CMKX LONGS STR8
|
|
|
Post by cmkx4ever on Aug 10, 2015 19:15:13 GMT -5
Ok I don't know who str8biodiesal is but let me go on the record here, the statement about September is a JOKE, so let me say this out loud for all to hear, you will not only receive anything this Sept 2015, but you won't receive anything by Sept 2016 either. I don't know what your agenda is, but I have no agenda's only FACTS !
|
|