|
Post by gabbyhayes on Aug 12, 2015 11:53:17 GMT -5
Supposedly…the 1010 claims ended up in the arms of Shore Gold..and according to OldPro we are somehow aligned with them…this would be a great happening for us as the claims show great promise…only problem,no one has produced any evidence indicating that we are associated with Shore Gold…..just more bs speculation….imho………..
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 12, 2015 12:40:15 GMT -5
Supposedly…the 1010 claims ended up in the arms of Shore Gold..and according to OldPro we are somehow aligned with them…this would be a great happening for us as the claims show great promise…only problem,no one has produced any evidence indicating that we are associated with Shore Gold…..just more bs speculation….imho……….. Gabby, I talked to Manny yesterday on the phone and he wants me to go out to the Hamptons and kick your ..
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 12, 2015 12:44:35 GMT -5
Supposedly…the 1010 claims ended up in the arms of Shore Gold..and according to OldPro we are somehow aligned with them…this would be a great happening for us as the claims show great promise…only problem,no one has produced any evidence indicating that we are associated with Shore Gold…..just more bs speculation….imho……….. Right, so that would be that other part we were told about. The claims or conglomerate. Again, Stoecklein and Maheu show how they clearly planned not to have anything left in cmkx after revocation except the reason for our cert pull. I think even sec wanted to clarify what they meant by Enteourage and "other assets", and asked them, "are you looking for other assets?" Stoecklein said no. But then he explained what Other Assets are.. from those that have to purchase into certificates. clearly.. there was no claims or other value left in that shell to look for anything else. ~~~~~~~~ there was something else in that Stoecklein depo.. I think in his depo, that SEC asked about, some kind of deal, maybe with Entourage, that was part of the deal, but Stoecklein declined to know anything about it. It caught my mind when I was reading it, but I guess I have to read it all again. Certainly everything is a big chess board.
|
|
|
Post by gabbyhayes on Aug 12, 2015 13:53:10 GMT -5
Boogie….no…you heard it wrong…what Manny said was HE was going to go out to the hamptons and……………….. ….my ….. ……………….
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 12, 2015 16:51:57 GMT -5
Boogie….no…you heard it wrong…what Manny said was HE was going to go out to the hamptons and……………….. ….my ….. ………………. I have to admit, I have been doing things backward lately. It may be the Radiation..
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Sept 21, 2015 13:54:06 GMT -5
Stoecklein talking about cash needed for distribution of Entourage shares, once we have the shareholders list from Task force.. and also litigation expenses .. he mentioned about going to federal courts and state court of Nevada but it works really with just source of $$$ for distribution, payment to Stoecklein and Maheu and Frizzell for their time on Task force and $$$ (OTHER ASSETS) to shareholders >> Well, ultimately it may be financed by the certificate pull itself.
If there are people holding electronic certificates that have to buy in certificates, there may be cash available for distribution.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 22, 2015 6:41:58 GMT -5
Thanks Ines.... for points highlighted from the depos. Very interesting. And a lot of reading. It is appreciated ! Here is a link where these depositions can be found , just in case anyone else would like to indulge. cmkx.info/This link will take you to the original thread (from July 2010) .... there you will find a few comments regarding the depositions. cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/thread/5928imSINGLEruRICH Diamond Wiz (Moderator) Jul 1, 2010 at 9:48pm Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 1, 2010 at 9:48pm
and other info..... Interesting... something to do while we wait. Depos may take awhile to download...... just be patientcmkx.info/ SEC Deposition of Bill Frizzell (01-06-06) SEC Deposition of Donald Stoecklein (01-24-06) SEC Deposition of D. Roger Glenn (07-19-06) SEC Deposition of D. Roger Glenn (10-23-07) AND (added on) SEC Deposition of Robert Maheu (04/20/06) From July 2010Until I read Stoecklein's depo and his testimony was....... "that this expert analysis of CMKX trading brought HIM to a conlusion that CMKX was NSS on basis of 14-1, meaning for every 1 share legit or proper, there were 13 others not." So the expert who anaylzed the NSS in CMKM.... was Jim DeCosta? ( I believe that was the name..... will check notes) . Funny I always assumed or thought it to be Susan Trimbath, whenever it was mentioned. It also states that HE has been involved with another ongoing NSS case. So who is DeCosta? and what other case is he involved in? Maybe Overstock? Eagletech ? anyone?? Single
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Sept 22, 2015 6:56:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by gabbyhayes on Sept 22, 2015 8:42:06 GMT -5
Boogie…that is a massive amount of information Duc put out….wow…...
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Sept 22, 2015 19:11:00 GMT -5
Thanks Ines.... for points highlighted from the depos. Very interesting. And a lot of reading. It is appreciated ! Here is a link where these depositions can be found , just in case anyone else would like to indulge. cmkx.info/This link will take you to the original thread (from July 2010) .... there you will find a few comments regarding the depositions. cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/thread/5928imSINGLEruRICH Diamond Wiz (Moderator) Jul 1, 2010 at 9:48pm Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 1, 2010 at 9:48pm
and other info..... Interesting... something to do while we wait. Depos may take awhile to download...... just be patientcmkx.info/ SEC Deposition of Bill Frizzell (01-06-06) SEC Deposition of Donald Stoecklein (01-24-06) SEC Deposition of D. Roger Glenn (07-19-06) SEC Deposition of D. Roger Glenn (10-23-07) AND (added on) SEC Deposition of Robert Maheu (04/20/06) From July 2010Until I read Stoecklein's depo and his testimony was....... "that this expert analysis of CMKX trading brought HIM to a conlusion that CMKX was NSS on basis of 14-1, meaning for every 1 share legit or proper, there were 13 others not." So the expert who anaylzed the NSS in CMKM.... was Jim DeCosta? ( I believe that was the name..... will check notes) . Funny I always assumed or thought it to be Susan Trimbath, whenever it was mentioned. It also states that HE has been involved with another ongoing NSS case. So who is DeCosta? and what other case is he involved in? Maybe Overstock? Eagletech ? anyone?? Single I know that Overstock had massive effort with companies and people working on identifying his shareholders. I would not be surprised if all these people were connected behind the scenes. Its not exactly a big field of people dedicated to this kind of thing.
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Sept 25, 2015 10:17:49 GMT -5
Original announcement in USA Today newspapers of our cert pull. If you have not seen it, there it is. Came out in the newspapers pictured below. 2006.
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Sept 25, 2015 10:29:05 GMT -5
this is the newspaper that add came in.
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Sept 25, 2015 10:56:56 GMT -5
Original announcement in USA Today newspapers of our cert pull. If you have not seen it, there it is. Came out in the newspapers pictured below. 2006. Message: 88826 Reply To: Message Date: 12 Jan 2006, 09:54 AM EST Message : Remember that some things are not as they appear on the surface. For the Master, some things are intentionally diversionary, better known as smoke and mirrors. Think back on the life of this security and segregate the smoke and mirrors events. Ask yourself what the true purpose of the cert pull is. Is it to obtain Entourage shares? Some things are not as they seem. And some things are purposely concocted and implemented as a diversionary tactic. Happens all the time in war. Of course, imo. Jay Adobe post: Message: 97827 Reply To: 97820 Message Date: 19 Jan 2006, 02:31 PM EST Message : allthatsparkles, No. Think about this. Suppose the Entourage certs were distributed with an open NSS on CMKX. Then more certs or markers for certs would appear to exist above the real number (such as exists with our current dividends). Suppose then, that Entourage called for a cert pull too. Suppose tomorrow a cert pull was called on CIM, GEMM, and USCA. Trouble? Sure. One can quickly see how the snowball effect would occur, and it would become public. We will patiently let Mr. Maheu deal with fixing this particular NS and then we can move on to bigger and better things. He has the leverage, I believe. Good thoughts. Keep it up. Of course, IMO. Message: 97802 Reply To: 97779 Message Date: 19 Jan 2006, 01:58 PM EST Message : nigel, It is not ''date'' specific, but ''event'' specific. I believe you will know for sure that the NSS has been cleaned up and handled satisfactorily when word is released (by whatever means deemed necessary) that the physical exchange of Entourage certificates is completed.
Entourage shares will not be distributed until the NSS is cleaned up totally, however, the threat of the distribution remains a powerful leverage tool to ensure the NSS problem is fixed. The shorters were caught in a bind with the other dividends, but they are forced to clean it up this time. Of course, IMO.[/b] Message: 87996 Reply To: 87985 Message Date: 11 Jan 2006, 01:53 PM EST Message : moby, I''m feeling great. Thanks for asking. The truth is you will be a wealthy person if you own this stock, imo. Remember, there are no coincidences. For now - RB site is down, TF site is down, GEMM website is down, USCA website is down, SGGM website is down, AZTM website is down, MCIO website is down....... There is more. And there is more to come. You just have to get off this board and dig. Too bad NITE site is not down ......... yet. Enjoy your day. imo Message: 93993 Reply To: 93981 Message Date: 16 Jan 2006, 03:04 PM EST Message : samuel, Something to ponder: No one ever stated that the TF counter had to get to 703 billion, did they? I wonder at what number it will stop. Consider the AS increases of the past and when and why they occurred. I believe the counter is getting close to the target. imo Message: 96208 Reply To: Message Date: 18 Jan 2006, 09:58 AM EST Message : 203,518,875,000 A very important and critical number. imo Message: 96627 Reply To: 96593 Message Date: 18 Jan 2006, 12:54 PM EST Message : abad, "keep control of the company". Now you''ve got it. Take that and couple it with your previous theory of a takeover, factor in the timeframes this might have occurred, and you can now see that we just passed the critical number, showing now that everything in the counter above that number is true NSS. imo Message: 97660 Reply To: 97645 Message Date: 19 Jan 2006, 12:12 PM EST Message : nascent, I concur. Imagine the impact of planting a seed of doubt, internationally, that there was some sort of weakness in the U.S. financial markets. Because of dollarization, many countries'' currencies are backed by the dollar, thus each is intimately involved in the need for stability among the U.S. financial markets. Scandal and corruption leaked out would undoubtedly cause a shiver in many countries. Yes, silence is golden. Of course, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Sept 25, 2015 11:12:30 GMT -5
Jay adobe posts.. adding to convo with Stoeckleins depo. all happening in 2006
Message: 103504 Reply To: Message Date: 26 Jan 2006, 03:49 PM EST Message : Something to ponder: Suppose the company receives money to legitimize the NSS, so that the NSS goes away. Suppose this cannot totally become public. Suppose the TF is there to issue any assets of the company to the existing and bonafide shareholders.
Does not the money received to legitimize the NSS become an asset of the company, thus allowing an avenue for distribution without using the word "settlement"?
Enjoy your evening. If you are a long, try to start acting like one of Mr. Casavant''s million millionaires and treat others with respect, even if they don''t deserve it. Good night.
Message: 110308 Reply To: 110290 Message Date: 02 Feb 2006, 01:38 PM EST Message : 07, You are right on track. The magic number is upcoming. No, it can not change. 49% is 49%. That will not change.
203.5 was the "critical" number, and yes upcoming is the "magic" number, where we all will see, right before our very eyes, the bad guys begin to unravel.
And can you think of any reason during this particular phase of the cert pull that after we reach the magic number we cannot begin issuing or distributing certain assets of the company? Just sit back and watch what is in store for all to see pretty soon. Oh, and keep hammering me. It''s okay.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
( sounds like somebody has 51% of the company shares, re mentioning that 49% that can not change )
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 9, 2015 8:10:09 GMT -5
Just happen to come across these posts by Dr. Jim DeCosta, on a "Deepcapture Website".. HIs posts start appx 1/4 of the way down the page.... and there are many by him. Something to read on a boring Friday?? www.deepcapture.com/2009/03/do-i-live-in-a-synthetic-reality-do-it-yourself-home-test/Dr. Jim DeCosta says: March 24, 2009 at 9:03 am If you get a moment you might read this paper. I think that it might be the most important paper I’ve written in the last 29 years of researching abusive naked short selling. A LITTLE BIT ABOUT CLEARANCE AND SETTLEMENT SYSTEMS AND THE ROLE OF “CENTRAL COUNTERPARTIES” OR “CCPs Dr. Jim DeCosta When many hundreds of brokerage firms are trading securities amongst themselves there is a dire need for the use of a “central counterparty” (CCP) to intermediate these trades. The lack of a CCP in the “credit default swap” market nearly wiped out our financial system recently. What most investors, SROs and regulators don’t appreciate is that equally risky is a CCP that has been hijacked by the financial interests of its owners. In the absence of a “CCP” the individual brokerage firms would have to constantly assess the “counterparty risk” of a trading partner’s defaulting on its payment or delivery obligations. The use of a CCP allows the issuance of a “trade guarantee” that implies to the investing world that it is safe to trade securities in this particular clearance and settlement system and that which you purchase will indeed be delivered in a timely manner. There is, however, a catch to these greatly enhanced efficiencies. The risks within the entire system are intentionally “concentrated” onto the shoulders of this CCP (the U.S.’s NSCC subdivision of the DTCC) such that any conflicts of interests between the corporations whose shares are being traded, the investors taking equity positions in these “issuers” and the “securities intermediaries” within the clearance and settlement system must be removed from the system in order for it to function effectively. The CCP has to fulfill its newly acquired fiduciary duties of care to manage these “concentrated risks” which it voluntarily took off of the shoulders of its individual NSCC participants and accepted onto its own shoulders. The primary risk to be managed is making sure that the seller of securities delivers that which it sells in a timely manner due to the incredibly damaging nature of readily sellable but mere “securities entitlements/IOUs/”placeholder securities” and that the buyer of the securities pays for that which it purchased also in a timely manner. This is referred to as “Delivery versus payment” and all of the worldwide authorities on clearance and settlement systems from the Bank for International Settlements or “BIS” to the “Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems Technical Committee of the International Organization of Securities Commissions” (IOSCO) agree that “Delivery versus payment” forms the foundation for any clearance and settlement system and that the seller of securities should not gain access to the funds of the buyer UNTIL “delivery in good form” is achieved. The following quote is from this “Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems Technical Committee of the International Organization of Securities Commissions”: “CCPs occupy an important place in securities settlement systems (SSSs). A CCP interposes itself between counterparties to financial transactions, becoming the buyer to the seller and the seller to the buyer. A well designed CCP with appropriate risk management arrangements reduces the risks faced by SSS participants and contributes to the goal of financial stability. (Comment: Note that financial stability is the result of implementing “appropriate risk management arrangements” and the inference that the lack of appropriate risk management arrangements regarding delivery and payment obligations might predictably lead to financial instability.) CCPs have long been used by derivatives exchanges and a few securities exchanges. In recent years, they have been introduced into many more securities markets, including cash markets and over-the-counter markets. Although a CCP has the potential to reduce risks to market participants significantly, it also concentrates risks and responsibilities for risk management. (Comment: Onto the shoulders of the CCP). Therefore, the effectiveness of a CCP’s risk control and the adequacy of its financial resources are critical aspects of the infrastructure of the markets it serves.” 1.2 A CCP has the potential to reduce significantly risks to market participants by imposing more robust risk controls on all participants (Comment: regarding delivery and payment obligations) and, in many cases, by achieving multilateral netting of trades. It also tends to enhance the liquidity of the markets it serves, because it tends to reduce risks to participants and, in many cases, because it facilitates anonymous trading. However, a CCP also concentrates risks and responsibility for risk management in the CCP. Consequently the effectiveness of a CCP’s risk controls and the adequacy of its financial resources are critical aspects of the infrastructure of the markets it serves. 1.3 A risk management failure by a CCP has the potential to disrupt the markets it serves and also other components of the settlement systems for instruments traded in those markets. The disruptions may spill over to payment systems and to other settlement systems. Because of the potential for disruptions to securities and derivatives markets and to payment and settlement systems, securities regulators and central banks have a strong interest in CCP risk management. (Comment: In layman’s terms the above basically says that the NSCC subdivision of the DTCC as the “CCP” in the U.S. plays an unfathomably important role in our overall financial system due to the associated “concentration of risks” and that proper “risk management arrangements” center on making sure that any securities sold must be promptly delivered. Unfortunately in the U.S. this critical role of the NSCC has been undermined by the insatiable greed of certain abusive NSCC participants and their co-conspiring usually unregulated hedge fund “guests”. The systemic risks incurred by all Americans whether investors or not is not the least bit appreciated by the SEC, the NSCC management, FINRA and the exchanges otherwise they would treat any failure to deliver older than perhaps T+6 as the emergency it truly embodies. As it turns out CCPs are necessary but they can easily become hijacked by the financial interests of the owners and administrators of the CCP with a vastly superior knowledge of, access to and visibility of the clearance and settlement system they have been entrusted to administer. The theft of investor funds associated with abusive naked short selling is obviously a heinous concept but this crime spree goes a whole lot deeper than that.)
|
|