February 03, 2016 U.S. Department of Justice

[portrush]

February 03, 2016 U.S. Department of Justice
District of Nevada
333 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 5000
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]



Re: United States v. Defendant(s) Ginger Gutierrez
Case Number 2004R01639 and Court Docket Number 09-CR-00132

Dear CMKX Shareholder

The enclosed information is provided by the United States Department of Justice Victim Notification System (VNS). As a victim witness professional, my role is to assist you with information and services during the prosecution of this case. I am contacting you because you were identified by law enforcement as a victim during the investigation of the above criminal case.

A pretrial motion(s) hearing has been scheduled for February 17, 2016, 01:30 PM at LV Courtroom 6D, Lloyd D. George U.S. Courthouse, 333 Las Vegas Blvd South, Las Vegas, NV 89101 for defendant(s) Ginger Gutierrez before Judge Jennifer Dorsey. The purpose of this hearing is to clarify any outstanding issues prior to trial. A prior hearing was held in September 2015, at this hearing the Government indicated that they were considering severing two of the defendant (Turino) and there were issues with competency of Edwards. Counsel has contacted the US Attorney and they are not opposed to having a status check to determine who is going to trial and when. Counsel requests a hearing to determine whether the upcoming trial will encompass Gutierrez.

Because of the Court's schedule, hearing dates could change on very short notice. If you plan on attending, you may want to call the VNS Call Center or check the website to confirm the date and time. Please note, there is a 24-hour delay in information transfer to the website.

Through the Victim Notification System (VNS) we will continue to provide you with updated scheduling and event information as the case proceeds through the criminal justice system. You may obtain current information about this case on the VNS website at www.notify.usdoj.gov or from the VNS Call Center at 1-866-DOJ-4YOU (1-866-365-4968) (TDD/TTY: 1-866-228-4619) (International: 1-502-213-2767). In addition, you may use the Call Center or Internet to update your contact information and/or change your decision about participation in the notification program.

You will use your Victim Identification Number (VIN) and Personal Identification Number (PIN) anytime you contact the Call Center and the first time you log into VNS on the website. If you are receiving notifications with multiple victim ID/PIN codes please contact the VNS Call Center. In addition, the first time you access the VNS website, you will be prompted to enter your last name (or business name) as currently contained in VNS. The name you should enter is your own.

Remember, VNS is an automated system and cannot answer questions. If you have other questions which involve this matter, please contact this office at the number listed above.

Sincerely,

Daniel G. Bogden
United States Attorney



Edits in yellow. -pr

[portrush]

A pretrial motion(s) hearing has been scheduled for February 17, 2016, 01:30 PM at LV Courtroom 6D, Lloyd D. George U.S. Courthouse, 333 Las Vegas Blvd South, Las Vegas, NV 89101 for defendant(s) Ginger Gutierrez before Judge Jennifer Dorsey. The purpose of this hearing is to clarify any outstanding issues prior to trial. A prior hearing was held in September 2015, at this hearing the Government indicated that they were considering severing two of the defendant (Turino) and there were issues with competency of Edwards. Counsel has contacted the US Attorney and they are not opposed to having a status check to determine who is going to trial and when. Counsel requests a hearing to determine whether the upcoming trial will encompass Gutierrez.

Sure hope this doesn't indicate more delay.

pr

[johnlocke3]

ME TOO,,,, JOHN IN TN

[imSINGLEruRICH]

Feb 3, 2016 at 1:06pm gmbudwrench said:
About 15 years ago, a guy I work with got a DUI. His attorney kept getting the court date moved ahead every 6 months. This went on for years. When he finally had his day in court, the judge threw the case out. That was his second or third DUI. I'm wondering if the same thing will happen to all the CMKX characters.





portrush
Administrator
Feb 3, 2016 at 1:19pm TazGhost, guymccool and 2 more like this.
Man I hope not. I posted on Tramp's (in response to someone saying there's nothing to this DOJ email)...For those that think this is a scam...the legal trials mean the end of the road and justice against those that caused it. For those that think this is a sting...comments have been made for years that the old company must go away and will be made to look like a failure.

Either way you choose, the court cases against the former insiders pave the way for closure--if only a step in an apparently unknown (non-public) process.

So I'm hoping these aren't delayed ad infinitum as happened to the guy you work with. We've had years and years already. I would love for these to actually happen this time--with definitive result, regardless of what that may be.

Here's hoping.

pr





smeagle
DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
Isn't there a legal process for someone to step in and demand these trials take place? What happened to "the right to a speedy trial".





habs2014
DIAMOND MINER
speedy trial
Also found in: Wikipedia.


Speedy Trial

The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees all persons accused of criminal wrongdoing the right to a speedy trial. Although this right is derived from the federal Constitution, it has been made applicable to state criminal proceedings through the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of the due process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The right to a speedy trial is an ancient liberty. During the reign of henry ii (1154–1189), the English Crown promulgated the Assize of Clarendon, a legal code comprised of 22 articles, one of which promised speedy justice to all litigants. In 1215 the Magna Charta prohibited the king from delaying justice to any person in the realm. Several of the charters of the American colonies protected the right to a speedy trial, as did most of the constitutions of the original 13 states.

The Founding Fathers intended the Speedy Trial Clause to serve two purposes. First, they sought to prevent defendants from languishing in jail for an indefinite period before trial. Pre-trial incarceration is a deprivation of liberty no less serious than post-conviction imprisonment. In some cases pretrial incarceration may be more serious because public scrutiny is often heightened, employment is commonly interrupted, financial resources are diminished, family relations are strained, and innocent persons are forced to suffer prolonged injury to reputation.

Second, the Founding Fathers sought to ensure a defendant's right to a fair trial. The longer the commencement of trial is postponed, the more likely it is that witnesses will disappear, memories will fade, and evidence will be lost or destroyed. Of course, both the prosecution and the defense are threatened by these dangers, but only the defendant's life, liberty, and property are at stake in a criminal proceeding.






**RUNNINGRICH**
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER
I recall after a meeting with USXP's Richard Altomare, (Universal Express in Boca Raton 2005), that even within a year of meeting, and after a $700 million law suit win against the SEC, they put the company in receivership, liquidated all of his personal assets, and if I recall he served a sentence, under the assumption of selling unregistered shares, all within about 6 months. Not sure if he did or the exact charges, but ummm yeah, we've been stewing on the backburner quite some time, surely we could have been expedited if the wasn't a "PLAM!"

Just sayin

Regards
RUNNINGRICH






portrush
Administrator
Post by portrush on yesterday at 10:29am

Thank you habs. Nice to know I've not completely gone insane.

Thank you running. It is nice to think that there is more to this and it will bode well for our wait like so many have said.

pr

[John Winston Lennon O'Boogie]

Feb 5, 2016 19:11:17 GMT -5 imSINGLEruRICH said:

Feb 3, 2016 at 1:06pm gmbudwrench said:
About 15 years ago, a guy I work with got a DUI. His attorney kept getting the court date moved ahead every 6 months. This went on for years. When he finally had his day in court, the judge threw the case out. That was his second or third DUI. I'm wondering if the same thing will happen to all the CMKX characters.





portrush
Administrator
Feb 3, 2016 at 1:19pm TazGhost, guymccool and 2 more like this.
Man I hope not. I posted on Tramp's (in response to someone saying there's nothing to this DOJ email)...For those that think this is a scam...the legal trials mean the end of the road and justice against those that caused it. For those that think this is a sting...comments have been made for years that the old company must go away and will be made to look like a failure.

Either way you choose, the court cases against the former insiders pave the way for closure--if only a step in an apparently unknown (non-public) process.

So I'm hoping these aren't delayed ad infinitum as happened to the guy you work with. We've had years and years already. I would love for these to actually happen this time--with definitive result, regardless of what that may be.

Here's hoping.

pr





smeagle
DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
Isn't there a legal process for someone to step in and demand these trials take place? What happened to "the right to a speedy trial".





habs2014
DIAMOND MINER
speedy trial
Also found in: Wikipedia.


Speedy Trial

The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees all persons accused of criminal wrongdoing the right to a speedy trial. Although this right is derived from the federal Constitution, it has been made applicable to state criminal proceedings through the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of the due process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The right to a speedy trial is an ancient liberty. During the reign of henry ii (1154–1189), the English Crown promulgated the Assize of Clarendon, a legal code comprised of 22 articles, one of which promised speedy justice to all litigants. In 1215 the Magna Charta prohibited the king from delaying justice to any person in the realm. Several of the charters of the American colonies protected the right to a speedy trial, as did most of the constitutions of the original 13 states.

The Founding Fathers intended the Speedy Trial Clause to serve two purposes. First, they sought to prevent defendants from languishing in jail for an indefinite period before trial. Pre-trial incarceration is a deprivation of liberty no less serious than post-conviction imprisonment. In some cases pretrial incarceration may be more serious because public scrutiny is often heightened, employment is commonly interrupted, financial resources are diminished, family relations are strained, and innocent persons are forced to suffer prolonged injury to reputation.

Second, the Founding Fathers sought to ensure a defendant's right to a fair trial. The longer the commencement of trial is postponed, the more likely it is that witnesses will disappear, memories will fade, and evidence will be lost or destroyed. Of course, both the prosecution and the defense are threatened by these dangers, but only the defendant's life, liberty, and property are at stake in a criminal proceeding.






**RUNNINGRICH**
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER
I recall after a meeting with USXP's Richard Altomare, (Universal Express in Boca Raton 2005), that even within a year of meeting, and after a $700 million law suit win against the SEC, they put the company in receivership, liquidated all of his personal assets, and if I recall he served a sentence, under the assumption of selling unregistered shares, all within about 6 months. Not sure if he did or the exact charges, but ummm yeah, we've been stewing on the backburner quite some time, surely we could have been expedited if the wasn't a "PLAM!"

Just sayin

Regards
RUNNINGRICH






portrush
Administrator
Post by portrush on yesterday at 10:29am

Thank you habs. Nice to know I've not completely gone insane.

Thank you running. It is nice to think that there is more to this and it will bode well for our wait like so many have said.

pr

One thing about this DWI statement.. It was about 15 years ago.. I can tell you that's a state traffic law.. These types of cases go to the system fast. Once you get locked up, the next day you are before the judge and he gives you the court date. It could be up to 6 months. You hold your Lic until that date. Because you are not Judged yet.. I can't see anyone beating the system when it comes to DWI or DUI these days.. If you have more then one DWI you will see Jail time.. MADD and SADD and so on... The awareness is out there now.. CMKM case will see the day light in court.

[marbearcat]

The only "Plam" what a stupid word, was the "plam" the
scammers like Urban had. I believe the constant delays
only show the HUGE MESS the scammers made here.

>"<

[marbearcat]

Feb 5, 2016 20:10:59 GMT -5 John Winston Lennon O'Boogie said:

Feb 5, 2016 19:11:17 GMT -5 imSINGLEruRICH said:

Feb 3, 2016 at 1:06pm gmbudwrench said:
About 15 years ago, a guy I work with got a DUI. His attorney kept getting the court date moved ahead every 6 months. This went on for years. When he finally had his day in court, the judge threw the case out. That was his second or third DUI. I'm wondering if the same thing will happen to all the CMKX characters.





portrush
Administrator
Feb 3, 2016 at 1:19pm TazGhost, guymccool and 2 more like this.
Man I hope not. I posted on Tramp's (in response to someone saying there's nothing to this DOJ email)...For those that think this is a scam...the legal trials mean the end of the road and justice against those that caused it. For those that think this is a sting...comments have been made for years that the old company must go away and will be made to look like a failure.

Either way you choose, the court cases against the former insiders pave the way for closure--if only a step in an apparently unknown (non-public) process.

So I'm hoping these aren't delayed ad infinitum as happened to the guy you work with. We've had years and years already. I would love for these to actually happen this time--with definitive result, regardless of what that may be.

Here's hoping.

pr





smeagle
DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
Isn't there a legal process for someone to step in and demand these trials take place? What happened to "the right to a speedy trial".





habs2014
DIAMOND MINER
speedy trial
Also found in: Wikipedia.


Speedy Trial

The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees all persons accused of criminal wrongdoing the right to a speedy trial. Although this right is derived from the federal Constitution, it has been made applicable to state criminal proceedings through the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of the due process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The right to a speedy trial is an ancient liberty. During the reign of henry ii (1154–1189), the English Crown promulgated the Assize of Clarendon, a legal code comprised of 22 articles, one of which promised speedy justice to all litigants. In 1215 the Magna Charta prohibited the king from delaying justice to any person in the realm. Several of the charters of the American colonies protected the right to a speedy trial, as did most of the constitutions of the original 13 states.

The Founding Fathers intended the Speedy Trial Clause to serve two purposes. First, they sought to prevent defendants from languishing in jail for an indefinite period before trial. Pre-trial incarceration is a deprivation of liberty no less serious than post-conviction imprisonment. In some cases pretrial incarceration may be more serious because public scrutiny is often heightened, employment is commonly interrupted, financial resources are diminished, family relations are strained, and innocent persons are forced to suffer prolonged injury to reputation.

Second, the Founding Fathers sought to ensure a defendant's right to a fair trial. The longer the commencement of trial is postponed, the more likely it is that witnesses will disappear, memories will fade, and evidence will be lost or destroyed. Of course, both the prosecution and the defense are threatened by these dangers, but only the defendant's life, liberty, and property are at stake in a criminal proceeding.






**RUNNINGRICH**
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER
I recall after a meeting with USXP's Richard Altomare, (Universal Express in Boca Raton 2005), that even within a year of meeting, and after a $700 million law suit win against the SEC, they put the company in receivership, liquidated all of his personal assets, and if I recall he served a sentence, under the assumption of selling unregistered shares, all within about 6 months. Not sure if he did or the exact charges, but ummm yeah, we've been stewing on the backburner quite some time, surely we could have been expedited if the wasn't a "PLAM!"

Just sayin

Regards
RUNNINGRICH






portrush
Administrator
Post by portrush on yesterday at 10:29am

Thank you habs. Nice to know I've not completely gone insane.

Thank you running. It is nice to think that there is more to this and it will bode well for our wait like so many have said.

pr

One thing about this DWI statement.. It was about 15 years ago.. I can tell you that's a state traffic law.. These types of cases go to the system fast. Once you get locked up, the next day you are before the judge and he gives you the court date. It could be up to 6 months. You hold your Lic until that date. Because you are not Judged yet.. I can't see anyone beating the system when it comes to DWI or DUI these days.. If you have more then one DWI you will see Jail time.. MADD and SADD and so on... The awareness is out there now.. CMKM case will see the day light in court.

I agree 100%.

I'm 54 now and I remember the daze of cops telling our drunk azz's to get in our car and get home.

Never see that again.

>"<

[imSINGLEruRICH]

A pretrial motion(s) hearing has been scheduled for February 17, 2016, 01:30 PM at LV Courtroom 6D, Lloyd D. George U.S. Courthouse, 333 Las Vegas Blvd South, Las Vegas, NV 89101 for defendant(s) Ginger Gutierrez before Judge Jennifer Dorsey.

[imSINGLEruRICH]

Feb 17, 2016 18:31:36 GMT -5 imSINGLEruRICH said:

A pretrial motion(s) hearing has been scheduled for February 17, 2016, 01:30 PM at LV Courtroom 6D, Lloyd D. George U.S. Courthouse, 333 Las Vegas Blvd South, Las Vegas, NV 89101 for defendant(s) Ginger Gutierrez before Judge Jennifer Dorsey.

RoughCut
DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
Post by RoughCut on 6 hours ago

Anyone wanting to know what happened today in court can call Debra Waite tomorrow and ask her. I have called her several times and she is quite accommodating (if you are nice--actually that works with just about anyone). Her direct number is [phone]. I'm busy tomorrow or I would call.