OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY DOJ IN OUR CASE

[str8biodiesel]

These points from Roger Summers (board of directors member of CMKM Diamonds Inc) in a letter to Judge Murray of the SEC caught my attention when I got a hold of the real trading data in cmkm. He stated that during Feb 2004 there were no more than 14.2 billion shares of cmkm stock available to trade. Here is the highlights.

The definitive 14c filed by CMKX in Feb 2003 was a contract. In that contract there are a group of people listed as "the sellers". These people hold not more than 4.9% of CMKX individually and a total of 85.8% of CMKX collectively. What I find interesting is that these shares are deemed "unaccessable" according to the contract until registered with the SEC. That means to me that 85.8% cannot even trade.

Knight Trading group stated in Feb 2004 they traded 3.6 billion CMKX shares a day, which accounted for 44% of their average trading volume. 19 trading days in Feb 2004 at 3.6 billion shares is a total of 68,480,000,000 shares At that time the o/s was 100 billion.

When I read this I found it interesting that during that time frame (Feb-March 9 2004) well over 100 billion shares traded. In that time frame John Kinney was given 8.3 billion certs per exhibit 17. In FINRA's report JE trading account through NevWest sold 11,704,999,996 in Feb 2004 and only 50,000,000 shares in all of March.

It appears to me that the trading data that was entered was entered knowingly false like was reported to Timothy Vasquez of the DOJ.

This was from Steve Walker who alerted the DOJ to the evidence: "In my original conversation with DOJ Special Agent Timothy Vasquez in 2009, we spoke about the volume glitch and we spoke naked short selling in CMKM. He said he would investigate, but as far as he knew, the DOJ would rely on the SEC Bloomberg numbers (which is the normal course) in the upcoming criminal trial. I have heard nothing since. If the DOJ uses the SEC Bloomberg numbers in the criminal trial , they will be entering false evidence. If they enter the REAL numbers, a naked short/fail to deliver is proven."

Steve appears to be right and here is just a small example of what looks to be obstruction of justice to me



Real Trading Data above and false data entered " to the DOJ " below.


2 /2 /2004 CMKM 781,624,994
781,624,994
2 /3 /2004 CMKM 1,153,513,247
1,153,513,247
2 /4 /2004 CMKM 384,340,458
384,340,458
2 /5 /2004 CMKM 1,809,464,207
1,809,464,207
2 /6 /2004 CMKM 12,232,526,391
-69,055,673
2 /9 /2004 CMKM 28,704,831,709
-1.869,871,912
2 /10/2004 CMKM 20,252,681,693
-602,427,832
2 /11/2004 CMKM 9,378,831,060
1,807,012,312
2 /12/2004 CMKM 4,852,764,618
1,115,798,998
2 /13/2004 CMKM 6,792,529,276
-1,900,489,965
2 /17/2004 CMKM 3,902,623,182
-178,854,414
2 /18/2004 CMKM 2,284,740,166
0
2 /19/2004 CMKM 2,162,481,979
-2,103,985,308
2 /20/2004 CMKM 2,178,332,681
-2,076,634,615
2 /23/2004 CMKM 3,864,585,837
0
2 /24/2004 CMKM 2,452,793,847
-1,163,224,320
2 /25/2004 CMKM 3,629,079,691
-1,967,160,570
2 /26/2004 CMKM 1,579,750,436
1,639,850,431
2 /27/2004 CMKM 1,641,573,245
1,862,323,279


3 /1 /2004 CMKM 10,504,164,995
-1,840,388,845
3 /2 /2004 CMKM 2,206,868,020
0
3 /3 /2004 CMKM 2,459,979,904
-1,805,687,391
3 /4 /2004 CMKM 16,837,475,997
1,637,766,909
3 /5 /2004 CMKM 6,217,904,035
-973,310,212
3 /8 /2004 CMKM 3,765,380,550
0
3 /9 /2004 CMKM 4,833,986,614
0


Kinney in Feb 2014 was given 3.3 billion certs. March 1-9 2004 given 5 billion certs.

John Edwards CMKM transactions in 2004
Feb 11,704,999,996
Mar 50,000,000




CHEERS CMKX LONG !!

[cano1]

The DOJ have more power than our President! They can do whatever and nothing happen! they cover up their tracks ! Just look what is been going on lately! they are openly out of control! They are untouchable!The Law of the land is just for little people like us! IMO

[str8biodiesel]

We have the right to confer with the government attorney in our case. We just need to ask if they are using 32 bit FAKE data or 64 bit REAL data which proves the NAKED SHORT !!

Seems to me if they are knowingly using FAKE data they are violating our rights as victims in some way !!

www.justice.gov/usao/resources/crime-victims-rights-ombudsman/victims-rights

[cano1]

I'm with you 100%! but we need a lawyer for that! and lawyers don't want to touch this for a second! Maybe Al Hodge? Sorry!I lost hope with this after so many tries and lies!

[str8biodiesel]

janice shell Member Level Tuesday, 09/11/18 07:39:36 PM
Re: mretgnol post# 351224 0
Post #
351231
of 351249


You have not posted any facts, you have reposted Steve Walker heresy that was debunked years ago.

You continue to allege the government lied when the government has access to data that you do not. Data that was audited and turned over by brokerages, etc.

Okay. You aren't going to like this, but in fact ABInvestor is correct as far as his data are concerned, but it has nothing to do with naked shorting.

You and everyone else should recall that for a time--I no longer remember for how long--volume in CMKX was incorrectly reported. Depending on the source, the volume counter would run up to 2 billion, or 4 billion, and then it would start counting in reverse--up to 2 billion, or 4 billion--until it got to zero, and then it'd reverse and move forward once again.

Leslie explained in her complaint that the SEC relied (at that time) on Bloomberg for things like volume information. I and a friend both wrote to her, explaining what was wrong. It was either by then or shortly after that the Stockwatch guy offered his analysis of the problem. And he was entirely correct.

But in the end, what it all showed was that volume was much higher than had been reported by--at first--every source but Stockwatch. There's really nothing very surprising about it, as CMKX was the first stock that had ever had a float in the hundreds of billions of shares.

But it certainly doesn't proof some mythical NSS.

[str8biodiesel]

estor1 Wednesday, 09/12/18 11:20:32 AM
Re: janice shell post# 351231 0
Post #
351245
of351249
Janice you aren't going to like this but

what you just posted is true, the sec, doj, and our company all used 32 bit trading data they knew was inaccurate. Steve Walker was right, and it does show a massive naked short. This small sample below of real data compared to false data is off by a staggering 140 billion shares or so. 150 billion shares traded in less than 30 days, and insiders only sold 10 billion. And save the wash trade crap, knight was selling for ameritrade who just happen to end up with 180 billion certs on the master shareholders list.

Here is what's worse. In the hearing Leslie Hakala asked Mr. Wall how many times cmkx traded over 2 billion and he said six or seven times when in this tiny sample they traded over two billion 20 times but that fact was covered up by using the false data, sounds like obstruction of justice. The judge, Leslie, Mr. Wall, Bill Frizzell, cmkx lawyers all knew the data was false.

So Mr. Wall lied in court, Leslie Hakala knew he lied in court and just let it happen. Worse Bill Frizzell knew Wall lied and didn't cross examine him. Steve Walker was right Bill had his silver platter but didn't use it to correct the data which would have shown the sec lied in court. Bill had his naked short proof on a silver platter if he would have made the sec fix the false data, he just didn't bother.

Real Trading Data above and false date entered below


2 /2 /2004 CMKM 781,624,994
781,624,994
2 /3 /2004 CMKM 1,153,513,247
1,153,513,247
2 /4 /2004 CMKM 384,340,458
384,340,458
2 /5 /2004 CMKM 1,809,464,207
1,809,464,207
2 /6 /2004 CMKM 12,232,526,391
-69,055,673
2 /9 /2004 CMKM 28,704,831,709
-1.869,871,912
2 /10/2004 CMKM 20,252,681,693
-602,427,832
2 /11/2004 CMKM 9,378,831,060
1,807,012,312
2 /12/2004 CMKM 4,852,764,618
1,115,798,998
2 /13/2004 CMKM 6,792,529,276
-1,900,489,965
2 /17/2004 CMKM 3,902,623,182
-178,854,414
2 /18/2004 CMKM 2,284,740,166
0
2 /19/2004 CMKM 2,162,481,979
-2,103,985,308
2 /20/2004 CMKM 2,178,332,681
-2,076,634,615
2 /23/2004 CMKM 3,864,585,837
0
2 /24/2004 CMKM 2,452,793,847
-1,163,224,320
2 /25/2004 CMKM 3,629,079,691
-1,967,160,570
2 /26/2004 CMKM 1,579,750,436
1,639,850,431
2 /27/2004 CMKM 1,641,573,245
1,862,323,279


3 /1 /2004 CMKM 10,504,164,995
-1,840,388,845
3 /2 /2004 CMKM 2,206,868,020
0
3 /3 /2004 CMKM 2,459,979,904
-1,805,687,391
3 /4 /2004 CMKM 16,837,475,997
1,637,766,909
3 /5 /2004 CMKM 6,217,904,035
-973,310,212
3 /8 /2004 CMKM 3,765,380,550
0
3 /9 /2004 CMKM 4,833,986,614
0


Kinney in Feb 2014 was given 3.3 billion certs. March 1-9 2004 given 5 billion certs.

John Edwards CMKM transactions in 2004
Feb 11,704,999,996
Mar 50,000,000

[str8biodiesel]

HMMMM This is a GREAT re read in my opinion... THINK about what is said.. THINK about what is being re said !! THINK !!

WHERE WE GO ONE WE GO ALL !!!

CHEERS CMKX LONGS

GO CMKX !!

cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/thread/9751/proof-sec-false-data

[cano1]

Nobody is going to pay attention till a high rank politicians get involved! what if we send a letter to Trump's campaign Website! maybe we get lucky! www.donaldjtrump.com/contact/

[str8biodiesel]

Re: janice shell post# 351262
Post #
351292
of 351330

Janice Your memory is faulty, and your understanding of how this stuff works is badly impaired. Actually your memory isn't faulty and you know how this stuff works you are just doing your job trying to confuse the issue.

You know that Gingers shares were given in very late 2004, in fact after the silver state bank was subpoenaed and the fraud was detected. So she has nothing at all to do with the post you were responding to.

Most of them were to edwards you posted, again you are trying to deflect away from the point, edwards dumped huge amounts of stock from June 2004 on, not before. Before that it wasn't insiders dumping huge amounts of stock it was brokers like ameritrade naked shorting huge amounts of stock.

Here is john edwards sales prior to june 2004 to refresh you faulty memory:

All of 2003 4,338,850,000
Jan 2004 895,000,000
Feb 2004 11, 704,999,996
Mar 2004 50,000,000
Apr 2004 1,940,000,000
May 2004 2,269,800,000


So I hope that helps your memory, remember 150 billion shares traded in feb 2004-march 9 2004 alone. If you want I could add up the real trading data to show the trades before feb 2004 but I'm sure you got my point. If you need help here's a hint, more shares traded on December 8th 2003 alone 5,015,778,653 than John Edwards sold the WHOLE YEAR.

[imSINGLEruRICH]

oldepro2 Friday, 09/14/18 08:45:43 PM
Re: None 0
Post # of 351415


Dum De Dum Dum Anniversary Coming Tuesday
Market wide audit and accounting for financial firms, due to naked short selling. Threw a net over all of them. www.sec.gov/rules/other/2008/34-58592.pdf
Hmmmmmm. Happy Anniversary.
10-year T-notes ??

Rue the day they allowed Sponsored Access.

What is sponsored access trading? - Quora
www.quora.com/What-is-sponsored-access-trading
Sep 5, 2017 - Sponsored Access refers to the practice in which a bank or brokerage firm offers a client direct market access to an exchange without any pre-trade risk management present. Sponsored access allows high frequency traders to access low-latency markets with pre-execution controls provided by the exchange.

You deniers are liars. The CMKX Naked Short was HUGE and perpetrated by not just insiders, but many on the SEC's EMERGENCY List. Trapped with nowhere to go. What do you do???

[ivegotanace]

Sept 15, 2018 7:51:57 GMT -5 imSINGLEruRICH said:

oldepro2 Friday, 09/14/18 08:45:43 PM
Re: None 0
Post # of 351415


Dum De Dum Dum Anniversary Coming Tuesday
Market wide audit and accounting for financial firms, due to naked short selling. Threw a net over all of them. www.sec.gov/rules/other/2008/34-58592.pdf
Hmmmmmm. Happy Anniversary.
10-year T-notes ??

Rue the day they allowed Sponsored Access.

What is sponsored access trading? - Quora
www.quora.com/What-is-sponsored-access-trading
Sep 5, 2017 - Sponsored Access refers to the practice in which a bank or brokerage firm offers a client direct market access to an exchange without any pre-trade risk management present. Sponsored access allows high frequency traders to access low-latency markets with pre-execution controls provided by the exchange.

You deniers are liars. The CMKX Naked Short was HUGE and perpetrated by not just insiders, but many on the SEC's EMERGENCY List. Trapped with nowhere to go. What do you do???

This is a duplicate post that really provides nothing of value.

We wanna see some meat and bones after 14 years.
Anybody have anything good??
I don't otherwise I would surely share ;-)

[mygirlwantsarock]

Pizz poor answer ace. Oldepro is on the right track. All you who ate the gold backed garbage forgot about May 2005. Congress critters love CMKX shareholders. So easy to manipulate. Shareholders followed the wrong pied piper so now wait until the finale

D Dan

[mygirlwantsarock]

Bonds and notes and warrants oh my. It’s all in the Panama Papers. Beneficial owners. Have a cert?

D Dan

[str8biodiesel]

A little birdie said,

There could be more news coming about this topic !!

Something we Shareholders can use!!

Stay tuned LONGS !!

GO CMKX

GO CMKX LONGS !

[ivegotanace]

Jan 9, 2020 19:40:02 GMT -5 str8biodiesel said:

A little birdie said,

There could be more news coming about this topic !!

Something we Shareholders can use!!

Stay tuned LONGS !!

GO CMKX

GO CMKX LONGS !

Nice. ;-)

We're ready for anything...