|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 20, 2007 14:16:52 GMT -5
By: DrillBit 19 Apr 2007, 10:02 PM EDT Msg. 527534 of 527673 Jump to msg. # I don't give a flying ##### what it is named or how it arrives BUT money needs to be sent. We have endured enough IMO and have invested much money but moreso time and anticipation/promises via at least one race, Denver, in which Urban Casavant STATED $.54. By: oil.ipo 20 Apr 2007, 06:39 AM EDT Msg. 527665 of 527672 (This msg. is a reply to 527534 by DrillBit.) Jump to msg. # BRAVO,..... As far as I am concerned "THEY" all know about the "ACCA DACCA's" and the agenda, as well as what shareholders have been expecting. If some, part, most, or all of these expectations were so convoluted KW should have stopped this when he first took his oath and not allowed it to manifest until 2 days ago. WHY? An obvious conclusion or deliberate as planned (?). Do the Belgians have part of this correct? We are going to find out today. JMO. Oil
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 20, 2007 14:18:24 GMT -5
By: leowanta 20 Apr 2007, 10:06 AM EDT Msg. 527725 of 527736 Jump to msg. # Clarity for Kevin and all>>>
Big Head Fred told you there were 2 issues before shareholders:
1. The Company owes us royalties, payment for lost claims that we paid for, all that they promised in prs.....(This is Kevin's problem)
2. The FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD known as the FED DTCC owes SHAREHOLDERS for all the counterfeited "air shares" they passed on to us through CEDE: (That's were jay comes in.... that's where money is that a "few" of us have been deligently working on to get paid...... those of us who are in a position to do so, which is NOT A LAWYER! So Kevin, you want to send out lawyers and waste your money on this project, you'll find out what you do not know.... maybe.
>>>>> THE COMPANY IS NOT PART OF THIS ISSUE AND IS NOT INVOLVED SO KEVIN DOESN'T HAVE A CLUE ABOUT THIS NOR SHOULD HE, BECAUSE THE COMPANY DID NOT TRADE ONE SHARE THROUGH THE FED<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
now, Big Head Fred didn't explain it, but HE IS FULLY AWARE OF IT...and he indicated this job was done when he posted he was ready for the next project..... KEVIN I THINK YOU OWE JAY ADOBE A PUBLIC APOLOGY...ADMIT YOU HAVE NO CLUE ABOUT THIS ISSUE..... THANK YOU
leowanta
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 20, 2007 14:22:51 GMT -5
By: leowanta 20 Apr 2007, 11:09 AM EDT Msg. 527842 of 527843 Jump to msg. # one more point of clarity....
the SEC "Hearing".... most don't realize or know this, but that ALJ hearing was on the same level as Federal District Court...
Stoecklein should've been aware that once he had the "Initial Decision" from this hearing he could have filed his Petition for Review in FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT.... immediately putting this on the path to the U.S.Supreme Court.... since he pulled the PFR, i am certain at the request of the SEC, is another signal that the SEC would HONORABLY take care of ALL of the damages without further court action.......
AND for the record, the white house is held accountable for their commissioner's actions......
We saw our government at work yesterday over the Gonzales hearings.... that's the way it works when a regulator falls out of step with our laws..... with the President at the helm....it's up to him to hold the country together in a democracy.....
The SEC was created by a president to ensure investor's would not be defrauded by the markets as in the crash of 1929...... so far the SEC has failed to prevent this same kind of fraud....in 1929 it was phoney shares "ON MARGIN".... caused a panic and a crash....today naked shorting is the same song, only it's the second version, WHICH THE SEC WAS MANDATED TO PREVENT.....
NOW, President Bush is held accountable for the payment to correct the fraud, and to abolish or overhaul his cabinet member to adhere to the law.....stay tuned.... i think we are there at the finish line..... after Gonzales goes....and the world bank changes hands....this should be resolved...we'll see
leowanta
---------------------
By: leowanta 20 Apr 2007, 11:19 AM EDT Msg. 527849 of 527853 (This msg. is a reply to 527842 by leowanta.) Jump to msg. # oops...correction
once the initial decision was in hand...Stoecklein could've filed his pfr in Federal CIRCUIT court (3 judge court and one court below the U.S. Supreme Court)...... (i said district which is wrong...since the ALJ hearing is on the same level)....
leowanta
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 20, 2007 14:23:50 GMT -5
By: big_head_fred 20 Apr 2007, 11:05 AM EDT Msg. 527833 of 527848 Jump to msg. # Talk about why Maheu was brought in.
------------
By: leowanta 20 Apr 2007, 11:12 AM EDT Msg. 527843 of 527848 (This msg. is a reply to 527833 by big_head_fred.) Jump to msg. # Maheu was brought in after the Davos Summit by President Bush to resolve this huge problem.... the taskforce was set up to PROVE the counterfeiting by CEDE, that was satisfied April 5, 2006 when the DTCC admitted it, and was ready to pay.
leowanta
------------
By: leowanta 20 Apr 2007, 11:15 AM EDT Msg. 527844 of 527849 (This msg. is a reply to 527843 by leowanta.) Jump to msg. # The Davos Summit (Bill Gates was there as well as SEC Donaldson) that i refer you too was held January 2005 around the 27th... Maheu was assigned after that time....
leowanta
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 20, 2007 14:24:51 GMT -5
By: big_head_fred 20 Apr 2007, 11:29 AM EDT Msg. 527864 of 527874 Jump to msg. # Somebody collected a lot of money for those protected shares.
---------------------
By: leowanta 20 Apr 2007, 11:31 AM EDT Msg. 527871 of 527873 Jump to msg. # for the record...most here who were posting July-August of 2004 may have seen the SEC posting the percentages of buys to sells.... they were posting on the CMKM board posting just the figure...the percentages as they occurred daily, so they had first-hand information and have been on top of all of this counterfeiting from June 2004 until we ended trading on the grey sheets.... even delidog... the SEC has the facts and they know the deal....
so big head fred, you are right... the deals are done.... now it's time for a those two changes and i think we'll get paid...we'll see...
leowanta
---------------------
By: big_head_fred 20 Apr 2007, 11:32 AM EDT Msg. 527874 of 527886 Jump to msg. # The truth will never be exposed. Take that to the bank!
---------------------
By: leowanta 20 Apr 2007, 11:45 AM EDT Msg. 527895 of 527902 (This msg. is a reply to 527864 by big_head_fred.) Jump to msg. # yeah, and i think that cash resides in the world bank at the moment...
leowanta
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 20, 2007 14:25:08 GMT -5
By: jay_adobe 20 Apr 2007, 11:57 AM EDT Msg. 527916 of 528095 Jump to msg. # Today's word - anticipation.
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Apr 20, 2007 14:25:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 20, 2007 14:27:04 GMT -5
By: kevinw777 18 Nov 2004, 05:16 PM EST Msg. 120615 of 339680 Jump to msg. # .54 pps theory..... Hello everyone. I have something to share with you today. A good friend of mine, that posts under the name Habitualspender, was over at my house today and we were talking about some things. We thought about the .54 rumor that came out of one of the races this summer and found a way to re-think about what message may have been in that figure. Here is what we discovered: If it is true that UC really made a comment that our CMKX shares were worth 50-60 cents per share without a squeeze, and we believe it is... then here is a possibility that gives food for thought. This is only IMO and not intended to be taken as fact in any way. The price of CMKX was trading around .0003 to .0004 at the time of the rumor, lets take .0004. With that said, how is CMKX worth 50-60 cents without a squeeze? Simple, trading at it's then current price (we are using .0004)you would take .54 and divide it by .0004 and you will get 1350. This would mean that the current share price was 1350 times lower than the .54 mark. So, if one were to take the worst possible case o/s figure of 800 billion and divide it by 1350, you would get a figure of 592,592,592 shares actual o/s. This is how CMKX could have actually been worth .54 at that particular time without any news and without a squeeze. Or it could be the 684 million shares listed on the tinyurl.com/4av6d with the price in between the .50-.60 range. This would be reading between the lines and coming up with a possible revelation. All for fun in search of something to discuss. God Bless Everyone, KW tinyurl.com/yoww2h
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 20, 2007 14:27:56 GMT -5
By: sparkysantos 20 Apr 2007, 02:57 PM EDT Msg. 528133 of 528135 Jump to msg. # Some Stuff to Ponder ...
Tidbits to Ponder ...
As speculation builds regarding the content of Kevin's next PR or CEO Update, Sparky is of the opinion that we should all expect the unexpected. And while the formulation of this opinion was influenced at least in part by the company's past history of surprises, the following items - the hardest to reconcile - were the most influential.
1) Attorney Bill Frizzell verbally assaulting Attorney Roger Glenn - Since the day RG's involvement was announced over two years ago, his competence and credentials have been viewed by many - including Sparky - as a very good reason to believe that there must be much, much more to CMKM Diamonds than just a penny stock scam.
But over that same span, many shareholders - again including Sparky - have also come to respect Bill Frizzell very much.
So who's right here, Frizzell or Glenn? IMHO, the only thing certain is that one of them is not. And how will it ultimately be determined who's right, a law suit?
2) Robert Maheu cancelling his recently-scheduled radio address - As far as Sparky can decipher, IBM has not made any "public" remarks since almost a year ago; and back then he did a radio show that pretty much focused on his book about his years working with Howard Hughes
Now Sparky's got to seriously wonder not only why IBM ever even agreed to such a radio spot (particularly since he must know d**n well that 99% of all listeners will be hoping only to learn what his most private views are on the SEC, naked shorting, Etc), but also why he suddenly cancelled it.
3) Urban stepping down - It isn't so much the event that catches Sparky's attention here; rather it's the specific timing of the event. Also, the sudden emergence of this New versus Old theme; IMHO that seemed to follow UC's departure awfully closely.
Now going back to Roger Glenn for a moment, Sparky has a real hard time imagining how an attorney of his reputation could be publicly chastised the way he was, without offering at least some sort of explanation in his own professional defense.
Moreover, Attorney Frizzell does not strike Sparky - at all - as the type who would carelessly make such accusatory statements about such a well-respected attorney's performance if IMHO he wasn't sitting on something quite large, convincing, and indisputable.
But since RG was representing UC at the time, and since RG was supposedly working hand in hand with IBM and with Attorney Donald Stoecklein, who was also representing UC; Sparky thinks we may be looking at an "attorney-client privilege" situation that effectively gags Glenn and Stoecklein. And if that is the case; then it would not only explain the timing of UC's exit, but it would also leave IBM in a very awkward predicament.
Summing all this up, in Sparky's humble opinion a huge divide between the OLD management and the NEW that will seem insurmountable is about to be exposed; and IMO don't be surprised if the bashers enjoy the next PR a lot more than most shareholders.
But on the bright side, in CMKX world things are seldom as they appear on the surface ~
Sparky
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Apr 20, 2007 14:45:01 GMT -5
I think he knows something:
portrush DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
( + )
Member Info Status: online Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,929 Karma: 34
Contact Icons
What if you’re wrong? « Thread Started on Today at 1:52pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What if you’re wrong?
What if everything you have believed along this journey is wrong? Can you handle it?
Regardless of what the PR says today (if it still comes) one thing is for certain—someone will be right, another will have missed it by a long shot. What will be important, IMO, isn’t debating who had the best guess either way…rather it will be assessing what to do going forward.
All this time I have read countless posts from people who have said “I don’t care what the outcome is, just tell us the truth” and others who have said “we will never know the truth” for a sundry of reasons. Today, when the news from the company is made public I think we can rest assured it will be truth and it won’t be “in code.” Once they release a public statement they will be liable for its content and you can bet no one understands this more than Bill Frizzell.
Along the way we have probably all taken shots at the players involved with this stock, not to mention shots at each other. Many of those that post on various boards are not as sophisticated when it comes to investing as others. They bought a lottery ticket, rather than a risky stock. “You can’t lose” was mentioned time and time again…and so they never considered the idea that they just might.
As Swmiller stated in another thread, it isn’t the messenger (for the most part) that brought people down—it is the messages they chose to cling to. Dismissing that which might seem more balanced for the want of the promise of instant wealth.
I encourage you to read the PR with an opened mind and an open heart. Consider that the company is, in fact, being led by people who have the same goals as any other bonifide shareholder—to see a return on their investment. Everyone knows the shareholder has been wronged. Kevin, Bill and their team understand this more than anyone on the boards. So do those that did the wrongdoing. It will be important to lay our differences aside and join with the company to do as asked—so that together we can fight the fight worth fighting, and bring those that ruined our investments to justice.
I’m in—how about you?
pr portrush DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
( + )
Member Info Status: online Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,929 Karma: 34
Contact Icons
Re: What if you’re wrong? « Reply #3 on Today at 2:01pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today at 1:58pm, elrac wrote:"I’m in—how about you?"
Do I have a choice
Absolutely. You can choose to call it a day. Leave the cert in the sock drawer and walk away forgetting the whole thing until somewhere down the road. You can choose to continue to rant against the company (not that YOU have) rather than work with them to keep every shareholder focused and working in unison to bring the "evildoers" to justice and return the company to trading so that we can realize a return on our investment.
pr
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Apr 20, 2007 17:24:24 GMT -5
(6:22 PM) burg_lar: I want Urban back (6:22 PM) burg_lar: UC loves his shareholders
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 20, 2007 23:46:28 GMT -5
From a thread on millionaires!!!!!! By: bxtlbxtl 20 Apr 2007, 10:52 PM EDT Msg. 339737 of 339743 Jump to msg. # question for kevin west......according to information that you have bestowed upon us....CMKX has NOTHING but a large base of shareholders...no money, no claims, no assetts, no records to speak of....you omitted mentioning whatever debt we have incurred, but one must assume it is large and growing...yet you implore us to stay the course and rebuild.....wouldn't we be much better off as a group, to leave this sinking ship and get ourselves involved in something that might have a future?....come on man...it would make much more sense for everyone here to chip in 20 bucks and buy a mcdonald's franchise or something of that nature...you ask us to stay together to rebuild...rebuild WHAT? ...thank you By: nyawadira 20 Apr 2007, 09:20 PM EDT Msg. 339716 of 339724 Jump to msg. # No assets, no claims, no money. Means we have been scammed. I hope the SEC is serious about punishing the criminals involved. Why did KW take the job and lead us on like UC and the pumpers. What a travesty. We need to sue all involved.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 20, 2007 23:50:58 GMT -5
Re: Gossip Column 4/20/07 « Reply #14 on Today at 4:50pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: abadgoodgirl 20 Apr 2007, 05:47 PM EDT Msg. 528346 of 528348 Jump to msg. # By: kevinw777 13 Apr 2005, 03:28 PM EDT Msg. 194078 of 339694 Jump to msg. # We are writing the DTCC, SEC, the Senate Banking Committee among others today! The link for today, and everyday, is www.ahandup.us/NSS_Abuse_Plan.htm We are supporting a boycott of all NBC, Dateline and GE products and services. There is a Dateline link at www.ahandup.us/dateline.htm where we have email merges to send many letters at once, samples of letters to send and thoughts to include in your letters. Protected by the SEC, naked short selling is one of America s biggest frauds. www.ahandup.us/protected_by_the_sec.htm We have a new url www.ORB.us which stands for Our Revolution Begins Please contact me via e-mail with any responses received from officials, media execs or anyone (lol) other than form letters. kevinw777@ahandup.us Thank you for all of your dedication to this cause! Blessings, KW So how is the battle going Kevin West? You getting anywhere? I see a lot of deliveries were made to stockholders of their purchase. As I exercise my freedom of speech, I will say, that, imo, you were bought off. I don't know by whom... but imo, you have become the enemy.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 21, 2007 9:15:28 GMT -5
Gossip is still rolling in on the millionaires board:
Re: Gossip Column 4/21/07 « Reply #1 on Today at 6:10am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: kickyourace3 21 Apr 2007, 03:30 AM EDT Msg. 339759 of 339760 (This msg. is a reply to 339713 by greenman1515.) Jump to msg. # Well, since I never believe that UC was clean, no. As for Kevin, liked what I saw. As for the massive stock dump. I called it years ago and someone you beat the #### out of me. Kevin makes a great point and as a business person, I agree. We have 40000 to 60000 stockholders(customers) that we could rebuild the profitablity of the company fairly easy. I'm sure Bill sees it. I see it. Feel good about this because something good is going to come out of this on many levels. Scott.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 21, 2007 9:16:21 GMT -5
By: about_time 21 Apr 2007, 08:53 AM EDT Msg. 529175 of 529183 Jump to msg. # From MineralsRus:
Interesting observations...
This is a huge network of crooks, all of which are after the average CMKX retail Investors income. They know the loop holes. They know the longevity of the average retail investor. Longevity meaning that they know that most people would rather stick their tales between their legs and run away from shame for allowing themselves to be 'taken'. I hope this group of investors can finally turn the tables on this network. I decided to drag some questions to the main thread in order to ask some questions and give my thoughts on information that was given to us in this PR.
"The Company has recently halted the transfer of a large bulk certificate to a major brokerage firm
With that said...One can definately deduce from the communications from Kevin and Bill that brokerage firms are indeed involved. I can see where they are just as greedy and may have shorted / diluted our stock through the roof!
There's only two reasons I can think of why (a) LARGE BROKERAGE FIRM(s) had an interest in a LARGE BULK CERT after revocation.
1) They enlisted people to continue making a market. or
2 ) They needed to cover a short position. One can logically conclude that it would be far more riskier for the brokerage firm to resell these shares on a 'closed' market, then to cover a position that they were short. And if this cert was a 'Bearer' Cert, which these certs usually are, this would lead me to believe that this cert would be hard to trace.
Couple all the above with what Frizzell and Kevin have been saying all along and in previous press releases and one could again come to the conclusion that there's a short and brokers are trying to cover their short. Until Frizzell comes out and states that there's not a short in this stock ( without reading too much into his past statements) then I will cntinue to believe, as I'm sure many others will as well, that there is a short. Who's to say that these LARGE BROKERAGE FIRMS did not have there hand in the 'cookie jar' as well considering how many Nevada based corporations dissolve, leaving all traces of evidence to evaporate.
Finally, This PR tells some interesting things and there are many questions that need to be answered. Like:
"but will do everything in my power to make sure that these individuals and entities will never be able to harm others in this same way again."
Entitie(s) Plural? .Who would these entitie(s) be? sounds like more than insiders to me.. Looks like several entities other than RG's Firm, Edwards and UC's Trust accounts...etc etc etc.
"Several days ago, the Company requested and has received several boxes of Company documents from an attorney that has held said records in safekeeping."
Which Attorney had the Boxes put in safe keeping and why? Sounds like an insiders attorney held the boxes.....hmmmm Urbans Attorney or Stocklien? Which other insider would have this information saved and put into safe keeping? I can only think of one But, The main question is WHY?
AGAIN..."The Company has recently halted the transfer of a large bulk certificate to a major brokerage firm from a third party."
Who actually controlled ( Third Party ) CMKM before Kevin took over?Sure sounds like Edwards controlled the company...remember VP's in Nevada do not have to put their names on the books but can still control the company. look up Nevada Corporate law and you will see where I am going with this. "A Wells Notice from the SEC that was supposed to have been answered by March 9, 2007 (of which current management was totally unaware, until an official at the SEC contacted them on 4-10-07)"
Who in the current management on March 9th ( Before Kevin took over)was contacted concerning this Wells notice that tried to keep the info away while they tried to bankrupt the company? Yu may say UC, and may be right. But who do you think of all the insiders would have a bigger motive to cover this up? Again, Follow the Money! Not trying to say UC was not involved, I'm just saying that someone rolled over on the group that controlled. Hmmmmm. Intersting �
|
|