|
Post by JoeRockss on May 14, 2007 16:19:19 GMT -5
From yesterday 5-13 soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator) By: oil.ipo 12 May 2007, 06:23 PM EDT Msg. 544443 of 544547 Jump to msg. # Others are now finally seeing the significance of these methodical efforts being put out there to Bury this company and Urban. Let there be no trails of evidence for hungry bears walking through the forest in years to come of this concern. No crumbs of evidence to comb through on the Internet unraveling any monumental damages to feed upon. No precedent setting maps to follow any such paths... Just the presentations that set a WHOLE new standard for all public companies to follow by our great Public Agencies, and of course some smaller examples of disciplinary injustice:justified and their corrections. Just the way that it is intended to be presented, and no other way. Great that you finally came around/woke up and are voicing it your way. ....In your own words.. All in my humble opinion. Oil/Rob millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1179045613
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on May 14, 2007 16:20:42 GMT -5
From yesterday 5-13 soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator) millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1179045613DIAMOND DIGGER * During this discussion comments were made stating that if the problem in the markets is so obvious to everyone then why is it not obvious to the politicians who have the power to enforce the laws - to me the answer is quite simple - from yahoo today - Hedge fund executives gave at least $2.3 million in campaign donations during the 2004 election, compared with $576,000 four years earlier, according to federal election data compiled by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. In 2006, that jumped to around $6 million.
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on May 14, 2007 16:21:10 GMT -5
From yesterday 5-13 soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator) member is online Joined: Apr 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 1,277 Location: Oklahoma Re: Rumors (Updated Daily) « Reply #87 on Yesterday at 8:10am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Re: No Entourage Distribution « Reply #7 on Today at 7:58am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It makes me NERVOUS to say the least having MF and a bunch of the NEGATIVE POSTERS supporting BF and KW...that does not make me feel good about them anymore...and the way he now treats POSITIVE POSTERS that supported the ccompany after he posted much the same thing over the years...and the part about THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COMPANY...SCREW THAT...I want what is best for SHAREHOLDERS for a change...if they are both the same then let us know how we are going to get a ROI and WHEN...the writing in the UPDATES is not too professional IMO either that does not make me feel good about the new TEAM...but I guess we have no choice lacking the voting rights or even the ability to find out what those rights are...WATCH THE BOUNCING BALL...Flying Moose(MM board) millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1179027860
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on May 14, 2007 16:21:36 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator) member is online Joined: Apr 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 1,277 Location: Oklahoma Re: Rumors (Updated Daily) « Reply #89 on Today at 11:04am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: jay_adobe 13 May 2007, 06:19 PM EDT Msg. 544721 of 544759 Jump to msg. # Some would have you believe that the cert pull was useless and a waste of time, but the handling of money and resources towards the cert pull proves differently. You that have the DD, know that we are in to win. Some would have you believe that we obtained and then just ‘lost’ 1.9 million acres of the richest land on the face of the earth, rather than have that acreage held safely. Fifteen years of acquiring claims does not just get lost. You that have the DD know about the most prolific diamond field in the world, and we are in to win. Some would have you believe that ‘it breaks their heart’ to hear positive, visionary, forward-thinking information and opinions about our companies, when in reality we all should support the forward movement of the company, and not try to deface or degrade shareholders. We are in to win. Some would have you believe that the entire Casavant family was privy to and part of the demise of our company over years and years, but we that believe in Mr. Casavant do not think that way. Imagine the shear number of people that would have to be in on the demise if it were true. We are in to win. Some would have you believe this is not scripted, that the hearing was legitimate, that we are just struggling to get along day to day. Others believe this plan is brilliant, and we are in to win. Some would have you believe that our super powered lawyers could put together an 82 page TRO in just a few days, after several boxes of information just magically appeared on our doorstep. An 82 page TRO is a feat in itself to accomplish that takes time and information to complete. We are in to win. Some would have you believe that we, as shareholders, are ignorant to the ongoings of everyday life, but we aren’t a stupid bunch; and we don’t like being treated as such. Put out the factual information for all to see. If we can hire lawyers across the country, surely we can hire just one person to scan in the several boxes of papers and put them on the website for the shareholders to view, so that we can make our own decisions. We, from the beginning, are in to win. Some would have you think Mr. Casavant is a crook. He could have walked away a very long time ago, but he didn’t. And he didn’t for a very good reason. When it was time for him to step down, he did. He could have reverse split our company into oblivion, but he didn’t. We are in to win. Some would have you believe that we do not have the pleasure of high-powered people involved in our company. Read the past PRs to see the high-powered people’s names that were/are involved and why. They weren’t/aren’t with us for their health or just for fun, that’s for sure. We are in to win. Imagine the most prolific diamond field on the face of the earth. Imagine. Just imagine that you, we, bought a piece of that pie…..and we are in to win. Of course, all in my humble opinion. ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=544721millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1179118460
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on May 14, 2007 16:22:01 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator) member is online Joined: Apr 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 1,278 Location: Oklahoma Re: Rumors (Updated Daily) « Reply #90 on Today at 11:06am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Re: Gossip Column 5/14/07 « Reply #1 on Today at 12:16am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: dustybutler1001 12 May 2007, 10:49 PM EDT Msg. 340582 of 340601 Jump to msg. # DTCC Clarifies Work Experience of Former DTC Employee New York, March 14, 2006— The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) issued a statement to correct inaccurate information that has appeared in the press and has been represented on Web sites and in public forums regarding the purported work experience of a former employee at one of DTCC’s subsidiaries. Susanne Trimbath has never been an official of DTCC or any DTCC subsidiary or predecessor company. She has never been an officer of the company or any of its subsidiaries. Our records indicate that Susanne Trimbath was hired by The Depository Trust Company (DTC) in 1987 as a manager of transfer agent services, a corporate middle-management position below officer level. Ms. Trimbath resigned from her DTC employment in1993 holding the same position. There have been claims that Ms. Trimbath is an expert on clearance and settlement and the Stock Borrow Program. The Stock Borrow Program is now, and was at the time of Ms. Trimbath’s employment at DTC, operated by the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC), a separate company from DTC. In fact, Trimbath’s employment at DTC pre-dates any corporate affiliation between DTC and NSCC, and predates the formation of DTCC. At DTC, Ms.Trimbath was responsible for representing DTC’s interests with transfer agents for DTC-eligible securities regarding DTC’s business interactions with these agents. She never held a position in any operations area that dealt directly with electronic clearance and settlement or the Stock Borrow Program. www.dtcc.com/PressRoom/2006/workexpe.html By: stervc 13 May 2007, 12:00 PM EDT Msg. 340586 of 340601 (This msg. is a reply to 340582 by dustybutler1001.) Jump to msg. # Dustybutler1001, with that DTCC Article... That's interesting. I'm not sure what Susan Trimbath leaked out, but if one were to research the information about the make-up of the DTCC and their "family" of six subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, one would see that someone within the DTCC probably could have answered the mail a little differently. According to the duties of Susan Trimbath as a manager of the transfer agent services within the DTC (a subsidiary of the DTCC), she was expert enough for me to believe whatever it was she was talking about concerning the DTCC. Check out below the duties and responsibilities of the DTC: www.dtcc.com/AboutUs/affiliates.htm…The Depository Trust Company (DTC) established in 1973, was created to reduce costs and provide clearing and settlement efficiencies by immobilizing securities and making “book-entry” changes to ownership of the securities. It provides settlement services for all NSCC trades and for institutional trades, which typically involve money and securities transfers between custodian banks and broker/dealers. … I’m not sure why they are trying to downplay her role and knowledge as such. Maybe I’m missing something here, but she was a manager within the DTC. I would like to think you get that position because of knowing very well the arena involved concerning your job and affiliates. I would have to think that she knows something after working there at the DTC from 1987 to 1993 as a manager. Personally, it would be hard for me to challenge anything she was saying. v/r Sterling
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on May 14, 2007 16:22:25 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator)
member is online
Joined: Apr 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 1,278 Location: Oklahoma Re: Rumors (Updated Daily) « Reply #91 on Today at 11:06am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Re: Gossip Column 5/14/07 « Reply #2 on Today at 7:01am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xxdiamondchildxx Ace of Diamonds *****
My Fellow CMKX Shareholders,
I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH THESE THOUGHTS BY SHOWMETHEMONEY from Millionaires Board:
"Along this same train of thought, what we need to most be concerned about are "preferred" shareholders, or those who claim first right to any assets. This is why I want to know what the arrangements are for those who are funding Kevin and Bill's current operational expenses."
...and I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH SNOOF77's THOUGHTS (via Christian Traders Board):
"Company Control: Unfortunately, with power comes the temptation of greed. Therefore, there is the possibility of yet another threat by certain new insiders that may see an opportunity to manipulate the share structure for the purpose of enhancing their personal percentage of ownership of the company, especially if they know better the likelihood of successfully achieving profit from future restitution and/or recaptured assets. This scenario can be accomplished by the offering of private funding by a shareholder, or group of shareholders for the purpose of funding short term requirements to initiate the legal action necessary for the recapturing of lost assets, in addition to all costs associated with bringing the company back to trading status. Kevin West must be on guard against something like this happening. It would be ashame if ALL shareholders were not given an opportunity to participate in this type of activity so as to not have their current percentage of ownership in the company be further diluted, thereby negatively affecting any future ROI. If this is the case, I would also be concerned that some of these individuals will be working the message boards in an attempt to condition shareholders for a further transfer of ownership upon commencement of trading."
God Bless those with "Righteous" intent!
Peter (Dxild)
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on May 14, 2007 16:22:44 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator)
member is online
Joined: Apr 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 1,278 Location: Oklahoma Re: Rumors (Updated Daily) « Reply #92 on Today at 12:05pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Re: Gossip Column 5/14/07 « Reply #2 on Today at 7:01am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xxdiamondchildxx Ace of Diamonds *****
My Fellow CMKX Shareholders,
I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH THESE THOUGHTS BY SHOWMETHEMONEY from Millionaires Board:
"Along this same train of thought, what we need to most be concerned about are "preferred" shareholders, or those who claim first right to any assets. This is why I want to know what the arrangements are for those who are funding Kevin and Bill's current operational expenses."
...and I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH SNOOF77's THOUGHTS (via Christian Traders Board):
"Company Control: Unfortunately, with power comes the temptation of greed. Therefore, there is the possibility of yet another threat by certain new insiders that may see an opportunity to manipulate the share structure for the purpose of enhancing their personal percentage of ownership of the company, especially if they know better the likelihood of successfully achieving profit from future restitution and/or recaptured assets. This scenario can be accomplished by the offering of private funding by a shareholder, or group of shareholders for the purpose of funding short term requirements to initiate the legal action necessary for the recapturing of lost assets, in addition to all costs associated with bringing the company back to trading status. Kevin West must be on guard against something like this happening. It would be ashame if ALL shareholders were not given an opportunity to participate in this type of activity so as to not have their current percentage of ownership in the company be further diluted, thereby negatively affecting any future ROI. If this is the case, I would also be concerned that some of these individuals will be working the message boards in an attempt to condition shareholders for a further transfer of ownership upon commencement of trading."
God Bless those with "Righteous" intent!
Peter (Dxild)
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on May 14, 2007 16:23:01 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator)
member is online
Joined: Apr 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 1,278 Location: Oklahoma Re: Rumors (Updated Daily) « Reply #93 on Today at 12:05pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: klonopin2mg 14 May 2007, 12:45 PM EDT Msg. 545349 of 545360 (This msg. is a reply to 545330 by abadgoodgirl.) Jump to msg. # abad', "The Hearing"
i know you like to deal with facts, but here's how i see tomorrow's hearing:
"hearing is only for "PUBLIC VIEW" as i've stated so many times.....
tomorrow is to "prepare us" and/or "leads to" ..... next prescripted PR. the "RUG" where all the facts have been thouroughly swept under is so "HUGE" that it's going to take a tremendous amount for "PUBLIC VIEW" information i.e. firings/resignations/hedge trimming/hopefully remuneration etc....to get the wrinkles out of the rug."
remember, it's what's under the surface!imo
in typical klonism' cryptic format.lol
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on May 14, 2007 16:23:24 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator) member is online Joined: Apr 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 1,278 Location: Oklahoma Re: Rumors (Updated Daily) « Reply #94 on Today at 4:19pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Re: Gossip Column 5/14/07 « Reply #4 on Today at 2:25pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: abadgoodgirl 14 May 2007, 12:50 PM EDT Msg. 545356 of 545504 (This msg. is a reply to 545349 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. # omg klon! wait a second..so there is a big rug...under which lies all of the evidence of the financial heist of the United States Market that went on in full view of the United States Government? And tomorrow's hearing helps this get swept away how? Come on... I don't ask that many questions and I provide a lot of research.. I am trying to understand this part of the puzzle..this hearing/tro/injunction stuff and what kind of ruling do we need? By: klonopin2mg 14 May 2007, 02:59 PM EDT Msg. 545470 of 545503 (This msg. is a reply to 545356 by abadgoodgirl.) Jump to msg. # omg abad', absolutely, YES! you were probably one who didn't see the "RUG" with watergate either.......nor the myriad of other government/military blunders/dealings that were/are under that same type "RUG". what nakes you think this would be handled differently. years have passed to contrive this script and i personally guarantee (fwiw) we can't handle the truth! do you honestly think the wheels of justice turn this fast.... SERIOUSLY, i guess you also believe these boxes of "information" just happened upon us and in 30 days we're having this hearing, let alone have the time and money to file the lawsuit in the first place (5 days after reciept of same and 5 days after a temporary injunction). you laugh all you want at my post.......doesn't effect me or the outcome of tomorrow's hearing.....it's already determined! and it's all just common sense.... p.s. not "swept away"...more like temporary government storage facility and we are seeing the "HOW" each and every week. "RUG" ....nothing more, nothing less than the two to three years it's taken to plan the "What's Best For Our Country" script. mine is just an opinion based on family history of military "take it to the grave" mentality)......you go the judicial route with all it's justice. i will ignore the scripted hearing and and just read the positive PR that comes after the hearing. we are on the same team, no need to belittle another's beliefs. i respect your tremendous research and effort, i just believe the outcome has been/is predetermined as to the direction we take and the choices/opportunities from which "we shall choose". let me know what ruling(s) we need! i am very interested! thanks for what you do......it's people like yourself that eventually get the truth, i just hope you don't find it before i get paid.lol millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1179118460
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 14, 2007 22:11:20 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 14 May 2007, 06:54 PM EDT Msg. 545757 of 545780 (This msg. is a reply to 545751 by restripe2007.) Jump to msg. # Jay, could you at least tell people here that you no nothing more than the information that has been made public, and have made your posts here base soley on the available information. I, for one would be content, and certainly have a great deal more respect towards you if you would at least admit that you have no inside contact or information.
I realize that you always (or at least most of the time) state that you are only a shareholder and that your posts of IYO only. But the statements you make, insiuate that you have additional knowledge specific to CMKM than is publicly available. This method of posting style that you have has created either maliciously or indirectly, a cult like following that has shown to be detrimental to the management's current battles. At some point you either need to address this issue with honesty and integrity, or do as you have repeatedly said before and just "fade away."
I look forward to your reply.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
By: jay_adobe 14 May 2007, 06:59 PM EDT Msg. 545759 of 545780 (This msg. is a reply to 545757 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # goodolboy, No, I cannot. And 'at some point' the latter will occur, I assure you.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 14, 2007 22:17:51 GMT -5
seagull Board Addict another interpretation of Acca's PalTalk ... from May 12 ... someone emailed this to me.... Consider this rumor...Click on the link below to listen to the MP3 of Acca. He spoke last night just a bit after midnight to the CMKX International Paltalk room. One thing he mentioned was that the Naked Short on CMKM was last counted to be at 1.9 trillion. Also, May 15 is an EXTREMELY important date for something to take place..not a payment..but some other event is to take place. The Belgians have also stated the same about May 15th, I believe. He also said that he expects us to get a payment shortly after June, but does not expect it to go past Independence Day. He told us there would be multiple payments..that it will not come all in one payment and that the first payment will be small. He answered someone's question who asked if the man's wife has 10 million, would the first payment make her a millionaire. He answered that it would not, but would make her a thousandaire and that however, the second payment would make her a multimillionaire. Another person reminded Acca that he had once said the the first payment would be between .01 and .10 and if he still sticks by that statement. Acca said that he does still agree with his previous statement. Acca did answer someone's question about whether or not Maheu is still with us. Acca stated that he is still with us. At another point in the conversation he told us that the ROI(return on investment) is HUGE. He said to keep the faith, that we are fine and that justice will prevail. People are very fortune to be in this stock and that CMKX was naked shorted into the trillions and that WE HAVE WON. This will payout to our children and our children's children and their children. (I do recall Urban Casavant telling us that this is a HERITAGE STOCK). Someone asked him if we are still in some danger. He said that absolutely with this much money involved, yes, but that we have already won..FACT, he stated. That Urban is not a crook and that he has a heart of gold. (Personally, I agree) www.internationalshareholdersgroup.com/mp3/2007/05May/Accadacca_May12_07.mp3
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 15, 2007 8:32:22 GMT -5
By: 3dcg 15 May 2007, 08:43 AM EDT Msg. 340621 of 340627 Jump to msg. # Hey, folks with Ameritrade. Check the UCAD restricted shares - has a pps of 285.20001/share. Looks nice XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXBy: snifferpup 15 May 2007, 10:58 AM EDT Msg. 340631 of 340632 (This msg. is a reply to 340630 by snifferpup.) Jump to msg. # noczs4me DIAMOND DIGGER Re: USCA Value in Ameritrade Today « Reply #2 on Today at 9:53am » Mine is still there and people with Waterhouse Accounts are reporting the same thing. Now...what are the chances of two major brokerage houses with the same "technical glitch" ? The second time I logged into my account there was a message from Ameritrade: "We are experiencing extremely high call volume......." I bet they are! XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ![>:(](http://yoursmiles.org/tsmile/yes/t2774.gif) Really.... not a rumor...because that's what it was reading............ BUT...... now stands at .01?? isn't it supposed to be 0.00 ?? like it has been?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 15, 2007 8:35:15 GMT -5
By: amos8111 14 May 2007, 11:45 PM EDT Msg. 545921 of 545947 (This msg. is a reply to 545737 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # jay what about the free shares at the Denver race back in 2004? You already admitted that you received free shares there? Do I need to find the post? LOL
By: jay_adobe 15 May 2007, 08:00 AM EDT Msg. 545945 of 545946 (This msg. is a reply to 545921 by amos8111.) Jump to msg. # amos, You are incorrect in that assumption. I have never received free shares. Never. - - - - - View Replies »
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 15, 2007 8:36:20 GMT -5
Re: Gossip Column 5/15/07 « Reply #3 on Today at 7:40am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thoughts from ihub...
Posted by: pantherj In reply to: puppydotcom who wrote msg# 234617 Date:5/14/2007 8:09:49 PM Post #of 234643
The Question: Why would Bill & Kevin want to get CMKM reporting again?
Let us list the reasons why they might 1 may have NSS? bill says they do 2 West needs a steady gig 3 Frizzy sees lots of billable hours in his future. 4 5
Now list - the reason they should not
1 Bad Name 2 revoked 3 only one asset ( ENT ) 4 Other assets will have to be decided/collected by a court of law - with years of court time standing in its way 5 No products 6 No revenue 7 No employees 8 Wells notice 9 many federal investigation - fines & penalties 10 many Private lawsuits against CMKM 11 little to no company records 12 No company taxes ever filed 13 $558 dollars in the bank 14 Bill/Kevin building more debt day by day 15 Joke of the securities business ( known Pump & Dump) 16 Joke of the mining business 17 At least 703 Billion share outstanding (the biggest joke of them all) 18 Millions will be need to be spent to collect other company records (if ANY others exist) and to bring the records up to date and filed by certified auditors 19 20 21
Feel free to add in any section When finished maybe someone can get this to Bill and ask him to answer the question
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 15, 2007 8:49:57 GMT -5
TexasPride Administrator
Re: Well, tomorrow's the big day... « Reply #5 on Yesterday at 7:37pm »
Not diminishing their contributions, but for a second, lets forget about Robert "Iron Bob" Maheu, Donald Stoecklein, Roger Glenn, Lizzie Baird, Bill Jarvis, Mark Hutchison and a host of other characters who either are or were associated with CMKM Diamonds, Inc.
Now, let's concentrate on some simple, relatively new ideas...
Does Kevin West work for free..? Ummm, No Does Bill Frizzell work for free..? Nope Does David R. Koch work for free..? Again, No Does Susanne Trimbath work for free..? Not hardly
With that said, why are these people so eager to jump on the CMKX bandwagon, investing their time and efforts on a "defunct" pink sheet, that has a whooping $558.50 in the bank and no claims to speak of..?
Anyone who expects me to believe that they are doing it out of the kindness of their heart, or that they feel compelled to stand up for justice, defending "the little guy" is just plain nuts!
These people are professionals, with families to feed and reputations to protect.
While we have no idea of what's taking place behind curtain number two, I can assure you, these people are here for a reason and that is - - - To Win...
The first round bell is about to ring and I'd bet anything that David Koch and "The Frizz" are both wearing brass knuckles...
Go get 'em boys!
|
|