|
Post by eastcoastswing on May 29, 2007 9:55:19 GMT -5
If it is a dollar why would it be .01 and not a dollar? They should pay what they should pay
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 29, 2007 10:03:29 GMT -5
By: sparkysantos 28 May 2007, 11:42 PM EDT Msg. 553440 of 553451 (This msg. is a reply to 553413 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # GUS: That would certainly explain all the exaggerated buying volume we've seen almost daily since way back before the elections in November of 2006; not to mention all the fake record highs seen in most major global equity indexes ...
IMHO,
Sparky
By: gusjarvis 28 May 2007, 09:21 PM EDT Msg. 553413 of 553439 (Msg. is a reply to by None.) GF goes then trillion owed right away geeeee lets see would they do this without fixing the problem or did they spend the last couple years clearing old problems, not tough too figure out
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 29, 2007 10:04:06 GMT -5
By: huckfinnn 29 May 2007, 12:47 AM EDT Msg. 553445 of 553451 (This msg. is a reply to 552783 by oil.ipo.) Jump to msg. # Repost:Q: How many cars could I buy if I had 1mm shares?
A: 23
(Acca Q+A)
No time or pause for that answer that I recall. Usually he asks for you to repeat it or he pauses.
One would think that the answer was more to do with the unit amount than a cost per car calculation by Acca, or allocation of cash for $ cars.. Acca thinks privately a few seconds generally before he responds. He never just throws it out there.
.23 was always the "locked up" number rumored to be disclosed, (and held) to be paid out to shareholders. "Never to change." "First payment" "Divi" "land claims" sales/ Whatever it was. This was a very factual discussion by him previously regarding the .23. Best of my recollection.
I personally feel that could be our payment. Possibly first or second, but I tend to feel that it might just be the first. This famous rumored "Packet" is to be arriving with information, and that information is vital to the decision making of each shareholder. One would think that the first payment would be larger than smaller to be included in with such a packet. Serious decisions , serious demeanor, serious price per share. No one will complain with a few cents P/S. Just interesting the way that ACCA responded to such a question when he could have answered it completely differently and played it down BIG TIME. Think on that one!
AIMHO as something always needs to happen first that never has.
Good luck to all Bonafied Shareholders. What constitutes that one? 5-15-2006 I always said. Oh well Be happy!
Mega-Oil
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 29, 2007 10:04:41 GMT -5
By: sonbh01 28 May 2007, 08:42 PM EDT Msg. 553409 of 553451 Jump to msg. # Basher Pedro stated that bhollenegg is uneducated but now wanted to debate - what a jerk! By Pedro: ========= After I listening to the guy talk (on Mark's show) and reading his antics the past few months; My conclusion: the guy is uneducated! cmkxdiamond.proboards66.com/index.cgi?board=general1&action=display&thread=1179598365&page=2By Pedro: ========= I want to discuss your allegations that CMKX still holds claims. We'll talk about the five areas in detail. All I need to know is which subject category that you're referring about when you make the allegations that CMKX still owns mineral claims. And I am looking forward to our debate! So don't run away from my direct line of questioning like you have done in the past! cmkxdiamond.proboards66.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=pedro2004 « Last Edit: Today at 5:29am by bikinipro »
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 29, 2007 10:05:16 GMT -5
By: abadgoodgirl 21 May 2007, 01:45 PM EDT Msg. 549706 of 553451 Jump to msg. # ot: did ConocoPhillips help short cmkx to the trillions and out of business or was that only its competitors: Exxon Mobil Corporation; BP p.l.c.; Royal Dutch/Shell Group; ChevronTexaco Corporation; TOTAL S.A...
Of course this theory is only if CMKX actually hit oil or stumbled onto OIL claims in Canada.
By: 4chun_pckr37 21 May 2007, 02:31 PM EDT Msg. 549744 of 553451 (This msg. is a reply to 549706 by abadgoodgirl.) Jump to msg. # Abad - But does'nt that go against previous research where we thought that Debeers was the major shorter here? By the way I love your DD. It is also becoming increasingly difficult to navigate on this board. Ragingbull was the best message board for a longtime for a reason. I sure hope they don't think they will continue to be able to operate like this without there being some form of fall out. There is a reason why it is so difficult to navigate. All the advertising aside it will be interesting to see when and what will be the straw that breaks the proverbial camels back
By: abadgoodgirl 21 May 2007, 02:35 PM EDT Msg. 549746 of 553451 (This msg. is a reply to 549744 by 4chun_pckr37.) Jump to msg. # 4chun, seeing as how DeBeers is a client of a DC Lobbying firm that is OWNED by one of the Board of Directors of ConocoPhillips, I don't think it is too far fetched.
In fact, Accenture, BP and Goldman Sachs are also clients of the same DC lobbying firm.
Is it just a small circle? or is there a reason?
|
|