|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 6, 2007 10:19:01 GMT -5
From Paltalk
Regarding a question asking why would Deli would sell shares if he though t CMKX was going to hit big Never heard this rumor before........
Desperado2100: what about that rumor about 4B being the max that "could" be paid on???
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 6, 2007 10:25:33 GMT -5
tonydanzashoes posted this on millinaires in gossip discussion.......Interesting, huh?
Re: Gossip Discussion 6/6/ 07 « Reply #26 on Today at 10:23am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- jay's post with the list of all those people is now gone on RB
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 6, 2007 10:42:20 GMT -5
Ines on millionaires.......................
Re: Offer to re-purchase shares by ADP! « Reply #25 on Yesterday at 1:11pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We need to contact our friends.. and let them know about this.. they are trying to get our shares for cheap and they would not be buying them if they had no value.
I called TA office, transfer agent and talked to Jeff. I forwarded all the emails to Jeff and he will give them to Helen Bagley. He said that the broker houses can buy the shares but they cant transfer them. I asked how about those shareholders that may have some shares in electronic form? He said all the shares are in cert form.
I asked Jeff to do us a favor and have Helen contact Kevin and Frizzell.
Trading Direct broker house told bag lady that shares are worthless and that ADP is offering to buy them !! wow liers !!
Please contact all the past or present company people that can inform those in our company that should know about this.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 6, 2007 10:55:40 GMT -5
By: my69z 06 Jun 2007, 11:39 AM EDT Msg. 557232 of 557235 (This msg. is a reply to 557212 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # That agreement only applies to honest dealings....." To the fullest extent permitted by law,..." I don't know of any law that says,,,,,,,ok never mind....we didn't know you guys had an inside agreement to commit fraud. I don't and never bought any argument that there were some CMKX agreements that could legally stand when faced with fraud charges. Not the 14c or anything else that we do or don't know about. Chris By: jay_adobe 06 Jun 2007, 11:44 AM EDT Msg. 557234 of 557235 (This msg. is a reply to 557232 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # Chris, true. However, it does give some insight concerning why we have proceeded in the manner in which we did so things could properly and legally come to light in a legal setting. imo By: my69z 06 Jun 2007, 11:54 AM EDT Msg. 557239 of 557240 (This msg. is a reply to 557234 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # in a sense yeah,,,,my thought was more along the line of....."Urban" can't name these gulity people because of some/any agreements. there were alot of postings about the "14c" being a legal roadblock bullscht millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1181128452
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 6, 2007 11:03:41 GMT -5
By: jay_adobe 06 Jun 2007, 11:58 AM EDT Msg. 557245 of 557253 (This msg. is a reply to 557235 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # nufced, I'm not sure about any of the questions you've asked, but if and when Mr. C gets 'busy making phone calls' again, I will be sure to ask him those questions if he calls me. And remember, until you have both sides of the story, assume the best in people. Remember, innocent until proven guilty always. One cannot and should not assume that any single side of a story is the correct one filled with all the information. Let the current hired hands take care of what they are instructed first and then you may be able to gather more answers to what may appear to be negative. Remember that everything isn't what it seems on the surface. And I am glad to see that you consider Mr. C and his brother to be loving and caring people, just as the many hospitalized children they visited see them too. Good job. Treat others as you wish to be treated and be kind to your fellow shareholders. imo
|
|
|
Post by beckins on Jun 6, 2007 13:18:36 GMT -5
copied from pro 70 who cpoied it from pro 100 board........lol!!! what do you expect for a rumor!!! *New Rumor* We are Rich « Thread Started on Today at 1:48pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INES1OO: it looks like urban communicated with few shareholders at around the same time melvin had a talk with his friend INES1OO: Urban appears to be reaching out confidentially to some of his former friends and confidants. He is telling them that he expects things will be cleared up this month. Bigfork: INES1OO: Urban acknowledged he unknowingly bought a corrupt shell. He told my friend that the story of DavidJMar bringing him the truth about JE is correct... that JE and other insiders were counterfeiting hundreds of billions of shares. INES1OO: Urban and his own small group of insiders hold all the real shares! Urban also told my friend that Kevin and Bill are part of the plan! INES1OO: Regardless of where the shares come from, Urban says the SEC and DTCC are responsible for making all shareholders whole. INES1OO: However, he also noted that things are still dangerous. INES1OO: Urban claims the valuation for CMKX Shareholders will be anywhere from 50 cents to $3.50 pps, depending on damages. INES1OO: Finally, Urban says he will announce everything, to all shareholders at once, hopefully later this month. « Last Edit: Today at 7:44pm by noahltl » Link to Post - Back to Top noahltl1.proboards100.com/index.cgi?board=cmkx1&action=display&thread=1181086426
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Jun 6, 2007 16:09:17 GMT -5
By: sully47 06 Jun 2007, 05:12 PM EDT Msg. 557478 of 557478 Jump to msg. # A "birdie" told me that UC....
will be back in the US by Monday. DON'T kill the messenger!
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Jun 7, 2007 5:28:15 GMT -5
By: thingyydoo3 06 Jun 2007, 10:22 PM EDT Msg. 557563 of 557618 Jump to msg. # looks 2 me like Urban issued a 1 for 1 share (CIM) - issued some divy's as warning shots and then removed the assets from the company and did a cert pull - brilliant - Maheu was the enforcer - again just brilliant
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2007 7:51:03 GMT -5
By: sully47 03 Jun 2007, 12:04 PM EDT Msg. 555911 of 557501 Jump to msg. #
The bottom line.......
The bad guys KNOW this shareholder base is going to stick it out....so SOMEWHERE along the line they are going to have to deal with us.
IF June, 2007 marks the end of the grandfather clause, the bad guys are going to want to clean up the largest naked short in history (speculation) before then......it would be disastrous to try and cover in the open market.
Bulldog and Kevin are forcing the issue with lawsuits (small at first) and threats of trading again. NOBODY was meant to show up in Vegas court. It IS SCRIPTED! Brokerages and hedge funds MUST have this go away.....QUICKLY and QUIETLY!
I am NOW of the opinion that a settlement is close at hand with a NDA. It all fits together!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 7, 2007 9:14:17 GMT -5
nobody Diamond Miner **
Re: When will the GF clause be abolished...? « Reply #5 on Today at 8:40am »
In PalTalk banner of the Grapevine room, Grand Father meeting June 13th, we should hear something later.
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Jun 7, 2007 9:21:08 GMT -5
So they are gonna finally discuss what we have been waiting for. This should be interesting!
REG SHO HEARING-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meetings during the week of June 11, 2007:
Open Meetings will be held on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. and Wednesday, June 13, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002. A Closed Meeting will be held on Thursday, June 14, 2007 at 10:00 a.m.
Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present.
The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
Commissioner Campos, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
The subject matter of the Open Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 12, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. will be:
The Commission will hold a roundtable discussion regarding selective mutual recognition of foreign jurisdictions. The discussion will address the implications of granting foreign market participants access to U.S. investors under an abbreviated registration system, provided those entities are supervised in a foreign jurisdiction that has a securities regulatory regime substantially comparable (but not necessarily identical) to that in the United States. The roundtable will explore whether selective mutual recognition would benefit U.S. investors by providing greater cross-border access to foreign investment opportunities while preserving investor protection.
The subject matter of the Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 13, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. will be:
1. The Commission will consider whether to adopt amendments to the grandfather provision of Rule 203 of Regulation SHO and the market decline limitation of Rule 200(e)(3).
2. The Commission will consider whether to re-propose amendments to the options market maker exception to the close-out requirement of Regulation SHO and the marking requirements of Rule 200(g) of Regulation SHO.
3. The Commission will consider whether to adopt amendments to the short sale price test of Rule 10a-1. In addition, the Commission will consider whether to adopt an amendment to the "short exempt" marking requirement of Regulation SHO.
4. The Commission will consider whether to adopt amendments to Rule 105 of Regulation M that would further safeguard the integrity of the capital raising process and protect issuers from manipulative activity that can reduce issuers' offering proceeds and dilute security holder value.
The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, June 14, 2007 will be:
Formal orders of investigations;
Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature;
Resolution of litigation claims;
Other matters related to enforcement proceedings; and
An adjudicatory matter.
At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.
For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.
Florence E. Harmon Deputy Secretary
June 6, 2007
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 7, 2007 10:25:02 GMT -5
By: klonopin2mg 07 Jun 2007, 11:28 AM EDT Msg. 557659 of 557659 (This msg. is a reply to 557478 by sully47.) Jump to msg. # sully47',
wonder if that same bird continued it's flight south, because i'm hearing good things next week myself.......actually two birds flew past.... one by way of the Great Country of Canada ....the other from the Great State of Texas.
two birds, same positive outlook. one rumor one fact. and the fact was nothing more than an "icon" in an email :-)
enjoy your day!
"a picture paints a thousand words"
chuck/klon'
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2007 11:06:23 GMT -5
Ric Retired Staffer And Loving It Posts: 13,355
Re: 100 million in assets?
Besides from what I heard, they want to take any money to start a new company. They aren't giving shareholders the right to choice what to do with it. Which means that if something can get going then it may mean more then .0001. But if the company fails as 75% of them do then you get nothing
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 7, 2007 15:41:35 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 07 Jun 2007, 02:04 PM EDT Msg. 557703 of 557710 Jump to msg. # If there were brokerage houses out there that had electronic shares available to them just before some really compelling news was going to become public knowledge regarding said shares perhaps they would offer to buy them. Likewise, those that could might lend a hand and influence the owners of those shares to wake up and realize that potentially the valuation coming forth might be very compelling, and inevitably it might be best (message being) to keep those shares right where they are and not sell them at all. (:+$)
You fill in the actors guild.
IOW I am not for substantiating ANY rumors or who is sending them. Just the same. Electronic shares in dead accounts are as tasty to the brokers as a hoagie stuffed with all the trimmings on the other side of an oasis on a long hot walk through SAUDI ARABIA...and IMVHO 2!~
Mega-Oil
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2007 17:34:23 GMT -5
|
|