|
Post by JoeRockss on Jun 18, 2007 16:08:51 GMT -5
By: tuscan9 18 Jun 2007, 02:37 PM EDT Msg. 562711 of 562779 Jump to msg. # To John Martin...
question ...'animals' ...?? my, what a adjective that is !!
oh, by the way ... whats happening there in Texas about the shareholders that would be gathered to appoint the Board of Directors? Just WHO would those certain shareholders be or where would they come from...? by chance the MONEY BACKERS of this venture?
Thanks in advance
Tuscan
By: bze2 18 Apr 2007, 09:12 PM EDT Msg. 526584 of 562417 (This msg. is a reply to 526576 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # nufced- Here is my e-mail from John Martin about the two companies -old and new
"John Martin" Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert To: "t" LOL There is no difference between the old CMKX and the New other than the management is moving forward. There is no nor has there been a sting operation. There is no payout for the Old CMKX. This is a new spin. We all need to pull together to oust these animals who prey on innocent people. Kick them out of the rooms, join forces, and lets move forward together as one.
------------------------------------------------------------
By: tuscan9 18 Jun 2007, 03:33 PM EDT Msg. 562747 of 562781 (This msg. is a reply to 562740 by abadgoodgirl.) Jump to msg. # Abad......
It is going to be very difficult for Martin to 'talk' the shareholder base into his idea of follow the leader, imho.
He is Just a shareholder... (isn't he?) and the shareholder base is still waiting for Urban to step up and show his side of the story...
It seems to be easy to file against someone but that doesn't make a person guilty.
The proof in the puddin' ... I mean boxes.. is still not on the website for the shareholders not IN THE LOOP like Martin, to actually see and study... (as it was said the documents would be)
Many of us don't take lightly accusations, accusations that in other words, leave the shareholders broke, baseless and at the mercy of self-appointed folks who SAY they saved us ... Prove you saved us guys... in Black and White.
The issue is not to be laid on the shareholders now... its on YOUR shoulders to prove to US, the shareholder, that YOU saved us from bankruptsy. Get with it... start showing us the facts.
Tuscan
(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long)
--------------------------------------------------
By: tuscan9 18 Jun 2007, 05:00 PM EDT Msg. 562773 of 562783 (This msg. is a reply to 562770 by abadgoodgirl.) Jump to msg. # abad.. the REAL CEO WILL stand up imho... and when that time comes... look out...
Its best in life to allow a person(s) to do their thing... set the hook and then you reel it in...
Once in awhile in fishing on the bay... you have to allow the fish some 'Line' and let 'em run until they get tired.. run out of steam or get all twisted up in themselves.
TIMING TIMING TIMING ----------------------------------------------------
By: tuscan9 18 Jun 2007, 05:01 PM EDT Msg. 562776 of 562784 Jump to msg. # IS there a CONFLICT of INTEREST?
in Texas?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 18, 2007 16:47:37 GMT -5
hermannmaier0 DIAMOND DIGGER
Member Info Status: offline Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 170 Karma: 17
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Contact Icons
Re: Gossip Discussion 6/18/07 « Reply #16 on Today at 2:28pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today at 1:51pm, eureka1968 wrote:I spoke to Les from Golden Arch Resources and he told me that he had hired Melvin because he was being called by CMKM shareholders and he didnt have time to field all the calls.He understood that Melvin knew alot about them and would be able to answer their Question's next question was are you associated with the CMKM company?He said not at all.
*Why on earth would anyone hire someone to be able to answer questions about a company that they have no association with.This was highly fishy to me.I dont believe they dont have any association with us after I spoke to him.Once again who hires someone to field calls about a company that they have no association with.
Les said that after Melvin was hired the calls coming in about CMKM were alot more than before.Les then said that they just had a Board meeting and the Board members voted that he should no longer be their IR guy.If it were up to him he would keep him on as their IR guy.
*If you ask me they saw the amount of calls coming in by Melvin being the IR guy and said this is making way to much noise.Maybe there is some association but they are not talking about it.
I asked him if this was the property from Saskatchewan that was CIM's and he said it was from Saskatchewan # ? Falconbridge had it before the Saskatchewan company.
*We already found out this was CIM's property yet he didnt want to mention CIM or CMKM. It all goes back to why you would hire someone to talk to shreholders about a company you dont have any associationb with.Very Fishy If you ask me. I would have bet we do have something to do with them and after this conversation I would raise my bet.
Hi Eureka,
I would bet that the number of calls from cmkx shareholders to Golden Arches were building when it was discovered on these boards that the rights to a Greenlake zinc claim Koch held, that used to be in CIM , were acquired by Golden Arches Resources. And that it was discovered that Carolyne Casavant had bought a lot of Golden Arches, and that UC had Golden Arches shares in personal accounts. (as per Phxgold)
Was that claim movement good for us, or bad? I dont know. To me it doesn't look good. Another murky aspect of activity. The actual claim number was PR'd with a typo..intentional or not...it rendered tracking that claims movement harder. But poster Pinkdiamond tracked it out, and posted it to the boards.
Is it relevant?...It seems that if it was worth Carolyne and UC investing significantly into the new acquiring company, it might be worth considering, why was it moved away from CIM? Good reason or bad?.....it appears to have been worth them following with their money. Was it moved into Golden Arches to benefit us?.....or let lapse from CIM as not to benefit us?
Certainly 1,000,000 was invested into CIM from CMKX coffers, and 10% lifetime CIM royalty was PR'd to CMKX.
Were we benefited, or not, by the claim move?
Another line of questioning most would probably like answers to, I am sure. Hence the phone calls. IMO.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 18, 2007 17:02:43 GMT -5
By: CHICPICK 18 Jun 2007, 04:56 PM EDT Msg. 562771 of 562818 (This msg. is a reply to 562770 by abadgoodgirl.) Jump to msg. # abad, An earlier post of yours says that the postings on this board are stupid, and then you go and post this. It doesn't look like your elevator goes to the top floor. Urban robs this company blind, and you go after West and Frizzell for going after him. Looks like dumb is just a box of chocolates, and you ate them all.
By: klonopin2mg 18 Jun 2007, 05:04 PM EDT Msg. 562779 of 562818 (This msg. is a reply to 562771 by CHICPICK.) Jump to msg. # "Chic'" yours: "Urban robs this company blind, and you go after West and Frizzell for going after him."
that said, i say this again.......
"a nod is as good as a wink to a blind horse"
;- )
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 18, 2007 17:09:39 GMT -5
Re: What's KW doing suing the sole owner of CMKX? « Reply #83 on Today at 4:54pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: zahnj 18 Jun 2007, 05:50 PM EDT Msg. 562817 of 562819 (This msg. is a reply to 562476 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # Jay that makes no sense. If Urban had 51% and owns or controls the float then why did he give up control and ownership of the company to Kevin? Even more importantly if Urban was in that position then why didn't he simply tell Frizzell and Kevin that when he heard about the lawsuit. Failing that why didn't he send a lawyer to the hearing to bring out those points?
The company is not private. Papers were never filed to convert it to a private company. It's a revoked public company that is obviously not filing. It's not a sole proprietorship as that is an entirely different business structure and so risky to Urban that he is certainly not insane enough to restructure it as a SP. Not to mention that there are no filings to that effect which would be done at the state level.
So in short thanks for the useless hot air
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Jun 18, 2007 18:12:34 GMT -5
bikinipro Mini Mod
Gossip Column Queen
Bikini needs a new pair of Choos!
Member Info Status: offline Joined: Feb 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 4,361 Location: New Jersey Karma: 140
Contact Icons
~Paging Mr. Accadacca~ « Thread Started on Yesterday at 6:48pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Re: Gossip Discussion 6/14/07
"ACCA RECAP : SHO had to take place for us to move on, we are soooooooooooooooo close, very articulated play, bottom line......... we will be very very wealthy, he will be in tomorrow night ( 8PM EDT Tentative) He will answer questions point blank then. "We are there. next thing is payment" LOOK FOR NEWS WIRE TOMOROW"
Where's that newswire?
Today is the 17th 18th!!
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Jun 18, 2007 18:16:58 GMT -5
wembley DIAMOND DIGGER * SEC phone call I spoke with a lady from the SEC complaint line. I asked her about the Grandfather Clause being lifted, Her response was that it is not in affect yet . It is in "publication" and once that has cleared They failing trades then have 60 days to settle. I asked her if she had ever heard of CMKX and she said yes. bikinipro Mini Mod *** AND? ? Did you just hang up after that? wembley DIAMOND DIGGER * Re: SEC phone call Pretty much, I was shocked and caught off guard , I said "We had proof that we had been naked shorted" and "so what happens with in the 60 days" She said the company will be in touch with you". It was uncomfortable , I could sense she wasn't happy me asking her any question, so I said Thank you and hung up.
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Jun 18, 2007 18:19:28 GMT -5
Did she say when the publication phase would end - when the 60 days would start to tick down?
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Jun 18, 2007 18:39:31 GMT -5
Did she say when the publication phase would end - when the 60 days would start to tick down? No idea.....That's all I could find out.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 18, 2007 20:27:36 GMT -5
tramp Administrator member is online Shorty..Thanks for your Donation..we came, we saw, we got was robbed from us back..Sundance is mean Joined: Aug 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 21,162 New info..from roddy.. « Thread Started on Today at 6:19pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : in monster room. we have been bought out. packets comming from new company transfer agent. tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=118221596Ain't this news just a little hard to swallow? Good Gosh!! Who wants us? HUH? soonerlew
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Jun 18, 2007 20:40:15 GMT -5
maybe it's Enron?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 18, 2007 21:03:16 GMT -5
Re: Many know that I am a proponent of CMKX cash B « Reply #15 on Today at 7:28pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Drillbit, Here's my perspective (in brevity) fwiw. I think KW and BF are working their fannies off for the benefit of the shareholder and they deserve our support. They have mine. I also believe there is MUCH more to this story than will ever be told--and that is (imo) intentional. It is also why after all these years "something" is still going on behind the scenes. I'm told the mob is involved...and while I know of nothing to verify such, it doesn't surprise me one bit. It also seems apparent the government may be complicit in some measure, be it by unintentional neglect or ineptitude. Nonetheless, it doesn't resolve anything for us to know the what's and the why's--we likely will never know everything. And we for sure won't know anything more until they determine it is time for us to. We have no choice but to bide our time. I hardly believe there is a DD-fact to be discovered that would "uncover" all that has transpired or is yet to be ferreted out. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if there was a mis-information campaign going on just to confuse the 5,000 shareholders said to frequent the various boards. To correct a problem of this purported size and far-reaching market impact, there must be some measure of confusion so as to never reveal what actually took place...in order to protect the market from repercussion in the future. Give the shareholders their due...and they will ride off into the sunset never knowing. Wish it wasn't so, but I wouldn't be surprised if it were such. Sting--who cares anymore? Just get it done. pr portrush DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1182189870smegadild DIAMOND JEDI Member Info Status: online Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 559 Karma: 24 [ Exalt | Smite ] Contact Icons Re: Many know that I am a proponent of CMKX cash B « Reply #18 on Today at 8:52pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If everyone read the EagleTech law suit, the mob reference should not be very surprising. What may be surprising is: how systemic thoughout the ENTIRE OTC PINKS it had gotten.. The Mob liked how easy it was. I think this goes WAY beyond CMKX. Also, If the Saudi's do own Citi, let's remember Saudi Arabia is home to the most extreme sect of radical Islam, the Wahabists. You(Not directed to you PR..I mean everyone.) fill in the blanks. Good post PR and it spells out that the time table is external to us.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 18, 2007 22:07:58 GMT -5
2 rumors rumors did i say rumors? « Thread Started on Today at 8:57pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- troutback: diamondsandgold: : in monster room. we have been bought out. packets comming from new company transfer agent. troutback: not sure how we could get bought out. for example, the market cap on lundin mining is only 4 billion. troutback: i think merger but what do i know (10:49 PM) INES1OO: troutback: tramp never mentioned by what company we were getting bought out from troutback: diamondsandgold: supposedly roddy said..going to rooms troutback: lol troutback: listening to roddy now (10:49 PM) INES1OO: troutback: he said information will come from THEIR transfer agent troutback: lucas lunding gave beatiful deal to tenke shareholders folks. roddy said don't disbelieve that lucas lundin is not involved in cmkx troutback: this makes sense shroomman63 Ace of Diamonds cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1182221876
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 18, 2007 22:13:56 GMT -5
From Paltalk
acbert: momike7: Quote from Melvin:I know that this is not the news that you wanted to hear. You wanted to hear good news about CMKX and believe me folks you are going to get it”
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 18, 2007 22:16:09 GMT -5
tramp Administrator member is online Shorty..Thanks for your Donation..we came, we saw, we got was robbed from us back..Sundance is mean Joined: Aug 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 21,162 New info..from roddy.. « Thread Started on Today at 6:19pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : in monster room. we have been bought out. packets comming from new company transfer agent. tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=118221596Ain't this news just a little hard to swallow? Good Gosh!! Who wants us? HUH? soonerlew Info on who roddy is, I'd never heard of him before...sooner Re: New info..from roddy.. « Reply #2 on Today at 6:52pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- he is the admin from the watercooler room.. he done some DD today, made a call and what he was told, we would hear from the companys T/A agent.. information.. and most likely, my assumption.... packets. tramp Administrator
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Jun 19, 2007 7:08:22 GMT -5
omg never heard of roddy? think of the worst evangilist you have ever heard - multiply by 10 - and you still won't be close
|
|