|
Post by tfant53 on Jul 24, 2007 10:16:27 GMT -5
LOL granny? she didn't look shady Acca said-At one time Mr. Frizzell said he could bamboozle the shareholders, and he misjudged the shareholders, and never thought he'd be dis-barred, but when it's all said and done, he'll be dis-barred, these people are very greedy.............they take over, they take someone out, they're being investigated, these people are scum bags...........they weren't for the shareholders, and because what he said about me and taking money 25, they're shady, crooked......Granny 2 shoes, Tfant..........they're shady....they're all shady. The ones that transcripted Gary Walters, John Martin, IMO.......I won't even say it, I'll hold back. Mark F. another one...... Dwayne......crack head....wanna be Christian.......they're all bad people...you can say how can that be.....they gave updates, it's elegal.........but it got to a point where it went off track. A nottery came over and stamped something..........and it doesn't mean shi-t. I'm rambling If being "shady" = being honest, posting the truth, doing DD, making phone calls, and sending emails to find out the truth then Acca can call Granny and I "shady". I would say that would make 100's of us "shady". The poor guy has not liked Granny since she exposed his Citi bank hype after the sticker was seen on the race car. Disrespecting others as he is doing in the quote above makes it very easy to see that he feels the pressure from those in search of the truth!! Have a nice day everyone!! Tom
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 24, 2007 10:35:23 GMT -5
Has this ever been confirmed to be the same paltalk richey?
By: richy_63 24 Jul 2007, 10:25 AM EDT Msg. 579746 of 579770 Jump to msg. # I am sorry to say that my source might of been wrong with some of the information. One thing is certain that something interesting is going on with many companies up there but it is a strong possibility CMKM is not involved in any way shape or form. I will be keeping tabs on various information and I apologize if I lead people astray.
By: richy_63 24 Jul 2007, 11:05 AM EDT Msg. 579761 of 579770 Jump to msg. # I have realized that my source has been wrong but I do trust some of the information. It is obvious at this time that much of what I heard is more hearsay than fact. I probably caused some of that by planting information unknowingly with my source. - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Jul 24, 2007 10:37:15 GMT -5
Here we go again...more of nothing!
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Jul 24, 2007 10:39:31 GMT -5
guru shoots self this time - now that's novel
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Jul 24, 2007 10:44:51 GMT -5
Does anyone know the reason that the document is floating out there?
Asked, document on new website, in lieu of directors meeting, losing claims.....and it was signed by Urban is it a legal document to be paid attention to or floated out there Acca said- I remember it like yesterday, and something not to be concerned about.It took a lot of people back, there's a reason why it's floating around
|
|
|
Post by MannyFin on Jul 24, 2007 11:15:01 GMT -5
LOL granny? she didn't look shady Acca said-At one time Mr. Frizzell said he could bamboozle the shareholders, and he misjudged the shareholders, and never thought he'd be dis-barred, but when it's all said and done, he'll be dis-barred, these people are very greedy.............they take over, they take someone out, they're being investigated, these people are scum bags...........they weren't for the shareholders, and because what he said about me and taking money 25, they're shady, crooked......Granny 2 shoes, Tfant..........they're shady....they're all shady. The ones that transcripted Gary Walters, John Martin, IMO.......I won't even say it, I'll hold back. Mark F. another one...... Dwayne......crack head....wanna be Christian.......they're all bad people...you can say how can that be.....they gave updates, it's elegal.........but it got to a point where it went off track. A nottery came over and stamped something..........and it doesn't mean shi-t. I'm rambling If being "shady" = being honest, posting the truth, doing DD, making phone calls, and sending emails to find out the truth then Acca can call Granny and I "shady". I would say that would make 100's of us "shady". The poor guy has not liked Granny since she exposed his Citi bank hype after the sticker was seen on the race car. Disrespecting others as he is doing in the quote above makes it very easy to see that he feels the pressure from those in search of the truth!! Have a nice day everyone!! Tom How can you be shady, there aint no shade in GA!!
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Jul 24, 2007 11:15:49 GMT -5
psssssssst she be in TN
|
|
|
Post by MannyFin on Jul 24, 2007 12:00:53 GMT -5
I didn't mean she, I meant he and he is GA!!!
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Jul 24, 2007 12:48:48 GMT -5
LOL yep HE is a true southern gent
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Jul 24, 2007 13:27:25 GMT -5
Remember when ACCA said that it needed to be done before July 4th..awwww, those were the days!
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Jul 24, 2007 14:11:11 GMT -5
Acca calling anybody shady - is like Big Bird calling someone "flighty"... lol
"I'm not allowed to be right" - lol
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Jul 24, 2007 14:12:27 GMT -5
I'm hoping that this post opens the creep up to slander/defamation charges.
I'm sure Frizzie will be made aware of this... if he hasn't already...
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Jul 24, 2007 14:21:26 GMT -5
he is - all of it
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 24, 2007 15:33:36 GMT -5
By: AlanC 24 Jul 2007, 03:36 PM EDT Msg. 1177226 of 1177226 (This msg. is a reply to 1177225 by mquietstorm3.) Jump to msg. # This afternoon I called the SEC at 202-551-2100 to inquire as to why the revocation of Regulation SHO with the unconstitutional "grandfather clause" had not yet appeared on the SEC website let alone been published in the Federal Register. Since a unanimous vote was made on June 13th and since other regulations voted on that same day had not only appeared on the SEC website but been published in the Federal Register on June 28th and went into effect immediatly it seemed strange. The Department of Market Regulation told me the delay was due to the fact that the Commissioners wanted to add some additional wording and the changes had to be rewritten. I asked if that meant that the 95 day period allowed for covering would be reduced by the number of days publication had been delayed. I was told no, that would not be the case. I let them know that I was not a happy camper that the SEC was once again protecting those short rather than the ordinary investor. I encourage others to call and demand action. Enough is enough!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 24, 2007 16:07:14 GMT -5
By: lead-or-follow 24 Jul 2007, 02:57 PM EDT Msg. 342233 of 342234 Jump to msg. # bobhwang...what was up w/the 17th date U mentioned? - - - - -
By: bobhwang 24 Jul 2007, 04:05 PM EDT Msg. 342234 of 342234 (This msg. is a reply to 342233 by lead-or-follow.) Jump to msg. # 7 12thru 17 should have seen news on cmkx...
Still expect some..
|
|