|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2007 12:32:01 GMT -5
(Tramp's response to the previous message in this thread which gusjarvis posted on RB)
By: tramp1950 06 Sep 2007, 11:55 AM EDT Msg. 600091 of 600100 (This msg. is a reply to 600068 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # remember the .37 cents and the vwap numbers? there you go, hedgies are now covering, and its in europe..sweet.. away from the bashers, away from the sec, and away from the banks in this country.. - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2007 12:36:32 GMT -5
tramp Administrator ***** Re: ( Euroclear) I hope this is for us... « Reply #11 on Today at 12:07pm » read this and close.. takes them off the market.. tinyurl.com/2hz243and there is mr. peters name... geezer_49: header from mona's room...Triple called Mr. Peters from euroclear who confirms trading going on between issuers and buyers in CMKX, that is why the update on thier site for CMKX. fwiw Mr. Peters triple_14: tel:003223262618 you have him directly on the phone
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2007 14:12:13 GMT -5
Mona Lisa Smiles Queen of Diamonds From Euroclear..... « Reply #23 on Today at 1:09pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- interesting found by another poster in paltalk ...was dated Feb 2006: 9 DTC participant 5099 reportedly a secret account at the CDS (Canadian Depository for Securities, the CDS is a subsidiary of the DTCC) failed delivery for 212 days. DTC Participant account 5099 is reportedly a special account that clear(s)(ed) through Euroclear for seven Canadian brokerages: Thompson Kernaghan, Wolverton Securities, Global Securities, Pacific International, Canacord Capital, Yorkton Securities, Research Capital, with now defunct TK being replaced by TD Waterhouse. cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=1189085354&page=2 Thanks to pj for this added info... That quote is from the following website(Rodney Young..CEO of Eagletech): www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=155&mn=5560&pt=msg&mid=86329
|
|
|
Post by Catdaddy on Sept 6, 2007 14:15:36 GMT -5
Hmmmm...
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2007 16:41:57 GMT -5
By: abadgoodgirl 06 Sep 2007, 05:25 PM EDT Msg. 600320 of 600320 Jump to msg. # FACT: our trustee has an open and shut case against the SEC for NSS if we lose the ETGMF for non-distribution because of criminal NSS.. remember, Senator Bennett was concerned the SEC had allowed fractional securities system based upon the 'fractional banking system'. hee hee
Did the Federal Reserve, DTCC, SEC forget that securities are NOT fungible? Securites are unique with a FINITE number available.
And it is precisely this 'fungibility' concept that makes what the Federal Reserve/DTCC/SEC engaged in treasonous and qualifies the activity as counterfeiting ops... Because unlike the monopoly charter given to the Federal Reserve for banking and for printing species, unlimited printing of securities is illegal.. ya can't just print an endless supply of securities to suit your whims.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2007 17:50:59 GMT -5
By: abadgoodgirl 06 Sep 2007, 06:02 PM EDT Msg. 600328 of 600345 Jump to msg. # fungibility does NOT apply to CMKX securities because they are UNIQUE with a FINITE amount available and endless printing of same is a real crime.
Congress forgot to give the Federal Reserve a monopoly charter on printing endless supplies of CMKX.
NSS of CMKX and other securities is a crime under Title 18 and the secret service has jurisdiction over electronic counterfeiting [see revised statute].
The Federal Reserve thought they could get around this particular inconvenience by calling the rather large balance of shares, "loans"...never thinking in a million years that stockholders would have synchronized delivery requests for their purchase.
Lucky for CMKX stockholders, the large balance IS considered securities lending on a vast scale with the overage considered legal shorting by participants [recall they only had to think they could borrow a share].. Yez... quite the legal conundrum for them because they have/had a delivery problem and they guaranteed all trades AND they are the lender of last resort. - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2007 17:52:42 GMT -5
By: bobhwang 06 Sep 2007, 06:19 PM EDT Msg. 600337 of 600350 (This msg. is a reply to 600312 by abadgoodgirl.) Jump to msg. # abdgirl: We shall see...That option not yet exercised...
the futures of gold are now...no waiting... - - - - -
By: abadgoodgirl 06 Sep 2007, 06:30 PM EDT Msg. 600342 of 600350 (This msg. is a reply to 600337 by bobhwang.) Jump to msg. # bobhwang: did you ever wonder who was buying up the gold while the Federal Reserve had the price of gold pegged to a certain price for almost 20 years?
Remember the price of gold was flatlined for over a decade... I have a feeling somebody took advantage of buying it at artificially priced LOW levels.
There is no out for the other side. NONE...and they CANNOT crash the market...our team thought of that too.
CMKX has the resources and can IPO CIM when they see fit. Maybe tomorrow? - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by Catdaddy on Sept 6, 2007 20:29:21 GMT -5
By: bobhwang 06 Sep 2007, 06:19 PM EDT Msg. 600337 of 600350 (This msg. is a reply to 600312 by abadgoodgirl.) Jump to msg. # abdgirl: We shall see...That option not yet exercised... the futures of gold are now...no waiting...- - - - - By: abadgoodgirl 06 Sep 2007, 06:30 PM EDT Msg. 600342 of 600350 (This msg. is a reply to 600337 by bobhwang.) Jump to msg. # bobhwang: did you ever wonder who was buying up the gold while the Federal Reserve had the price of gold pegged to a certain price for almost 20 years? Remember the price of gold was flatlined for over a decade... I have a feeling somebody took advantage of buying it at artificially priced LOW levels. There is no out for the other side. NONE...and they CANNOT crash the market...our team thought of that too. CMKX has the resources and can IPO CIM when they see fit. Maybe tomorrow? - - - - - UPDATE 5-Gold hits 16-month high on demand, technicalswww.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUKL0674519820070906?rpc=44&pageNumber=1Thu Sep 6, 2007 5:17PM EDT By Carole Vaporean NEW YORK, Sept 6 (Reuters) - Gold surged to a 16-month high on Thursday, boosted by strong physical demand, technical buying and firm energy prices, analysts said. "For most of this week we've seen fund buying. Today it was just steady, consistent buying. As we broke through some key levels there were some stops triggered, as well," said Paul McLeod, vice president of precious metals at COMMERZBANK. While he noted strong physical demand also pushed gold higher, he said fund buyers were the price drivers. "Funds are definitely in and they're long and they keep getting longer," said McLeod. Gold climbed to a peak at $697.70 an ounce, its highest since May 2006, but traded at $695.70/696.30 by late New York trade against $681.40/682.00 in New York late on Wednesday. Dealers said strong gold fundamentals fueled the rally. "The fundamentals are good. There are expectations of increasing physical demand, particularly out of India for the wedding season, and also demand from jewellers and watchmakers in Europe," said Robin Bhar, analyst at UBS Investment bank. A number of other reasons were cited for gold's rally, from higher oil prices, which draws those looking for an inflation hedge, and dollar declines, which attracts investors holding other currencies to dollar-denominated gold. Crude oil rose above $76 per barrel after a drop in U.S. gasoline and crude inventories stoked fears of a fuel shortage this winter in the world's biggest consumer. Renewed tensions in the Middle East, when Syria accused Israel of bombing its territory [nL062568], also helped drive oil prices up and spurred flight-to-safety gold purchases. Investors watched the euro, which initially fell against the dollar after European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet said recent market volatility had led to uncertainty. But the dollar later fell against the euro, making gold cheaper for holders of other currencies. The dollar fell to a one-month low as it looked increasingly vulnerable amid rising mortgage delinquencies and credit concerns fanning fears of slower U.S. growth ahead of the much-anticipated U.S. employment report. On Friday at 0830 EDT/1230 GMT, August U.S. payrolls data is due and is projected by analysts to show tepid gains. If jobs growth comes in as expected, it may support calls for the U.S. central bank to cut the key overnight rate. An interest rate cut tends to weaken the dollar and spurs flight-to-quality purchases. "Gold prices continue to be heavily influenced by investor sentiment and movements in foreign exchange rates," said Michael Widmer, director of metals research at Calyon Corporate and Investment bank. Gold traditionally has been used by investors as protection against economic and political uncertainty. But in recent months it behaved much like other financial assets because of the growing role of commodities in diversified portfolios. "Gold does seem to have found some momentum of its own this week, suggesting the metal's safe-haven attributes have well and truly kicked in," said James Moore, precious metals analyst at TheBullionDesk.com. In other metals, silver was catching up with gold's gains, rebounding 11 percent since last month's sharp drop as purchases from jewellers and bargain hunters resurfaced. Silver rose to as high as $12.52, its highest since Aug. 16, before easing to $12.39/12.42 an ounce, versus $12.19/12.22. Palladium advanced to $333.05/337.00 an ounce, also hitting its highest since Aug. 16 at $335.50, from $329.50/333.50 in New York. Platinum hit one-month high of $1,286.50 before falling to $1,284.50/1,291.50 an ounce, against $1,269.50/1,276.50. "The main factor for the platinum price is still concern about a shortfall this year, caused in part by the buoyant demand for cars expected. We therefore envisage moderate gains over the next few months," Commerzbank said in a daily note. (Additional reporting by Chikafumi Hodo in Tokyo and Lewa Pardomuan in Singapore)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2007 21:09:55 GMT -5
Found these tucked away in another thread........Heeere's Abad.....................
By: abadgoodgirl 06 Sep 2007, 06:46 PM EDT Msg. 600356 of 600457 (This msg. is a reply to 600345 by 1fastmoney.)
1fastmoney, and know this:
The SEC can have all the pretend 'dirt' on UC it wants but the inability to distribute a validated dividend has absolutely NOTHING to do with UC. It's irrelevent.
UC has NOTHING to do with the criminal treasonous conduct perpetrated against cmkx stockholders by the SEC/DTCC/Federal Reserve/Gov't officials.
Task force website was clear in its mandate and while the task force gave top billing to Robert A. Maheu and Donald S. Stocklein, it only gave a grumbling mention of Bill Frizzell. Why wasn't his name pronounced clearly and with authority for maximum intimidation? Why not his full name? Why just Bill Frizzell?
Because of ETGMF, we do NOT have to depend on the Texas Tumbleweeds to bring an action against the SEC/DTCC/Federal Reserve/Gov't officials.. The Trustee is NOW fully empowered.
By: abadgoodgirl 06 Sep 2007, 06:55 PM EDT Msg. 600361 of 600457 (This msg. is a reply to 600356 by abadgoodgirl.)
Not only is the Trustee of ETGMF distribution fully empowered, now the trustee can attach the value of ETGMF to its cause for punitive effects without breaching any type of agreement whatsoever that may have been made with anyone.
ETGMF is valuable to us because ETGMF has uranium indications in all 32 holes drilled on the Doran properties. Those claims didn't belong to cmkx, but the value of ETGMF belongs to cmkx stockholders who were defrauded by the SEC/DTCC/Federal Reserve/Gov't officials because of our trustee's inability to distribute the 45 million shares.
Value can be released Cause of action can commence Criminal charges can be brought
All without violation of any previous agreements.
By: abadgoodgirl 06 Sep 2007, 07:03 PM EDT Msg. 600371 of 600459
If the Trustee of ETGMF thinks the Texas Tumbleweeds are not acting in our best interests.. it is the fiduciary DUTY of the trustee to see to it that our interests are addressed in any state or federal court.
The failure of the Texas Tumbleweeds to address the NSS is not in our best interests; so for whose interests are they working? [bouncing balls notwithstanding]
By: abadgoodgirl 06 Sep 2007, 07:09 PM EDT Msg. 600376 of 600462 (This msg. is a reply to 600367 by oil.ipo.)
oil.ipo! our CMKX team ROCKS! the hoops they've maneuvered around are quite brilliant...astonishing really. thank you oil.ipo...and keep posting your smokin' hot posts too!
And the best for last~
By: abadgoodgirl 06 Sep 2007, 07:31 PM EDT Msg. 600384 of 600463 (This msg. is a reply to 600374 by 1fastmoney.)
1fastmoney, thank you so much. Our claims don't really matter right now because ETGMF has value on its own without the CMKX claims and UC.
If we lose that validated dividend because of the criminal NSS and the Trustee's inability to distribute, we don't even need our claims for a cause of action [the motherload of all causes of action].
The beauty of the team is that the dividend distribution was placed with a TRUSTEE...and not the company itself.
Microsoft didn't appoint a 'trustee' to distribute its cash dividend of $3.00 per share... the company distributes the dividend thru its t/a or dtcc for electronics..in the normal course of business.
Our team had the foresight to appoint a TRUSTEE to act on our behalf and in our best interests and it includes state and federal court.
This is why the Texas Tumbleweeds have no claim to the ETGMF dividend and CANNOT change it or take it or do anything to it. It was placed outside and beyond their reach.
The Trustee is in CHARGE of distribution of the ETGMF validated dividend...and the TRUSTEE must act in the best interests of the stockholders and there is NOTHING the Texas Tumbleweeds can do about it.
This is why trusts are created in the first place... clearly the company has rogue mgmt who do not act in our best interests.. and the Trustee will act in our best interests.
In my opinion, no law suit against UC is doing anything to hold this up. It's impossible. UC is not even participating in the distribution of the ETGMF validated dividend.
So IF the cmkx bona fide stockholders lose this ETGMF dividend because of the Trustee's inability to distribute, the SEC is destroyed and Overstock law suit will look like a tea party.
I doubt there will be SEC/Federal Reserve manipulation capabilities in the courts of Canada..... considering the ETGMF Cert issue will be heard in another country whose citizens also own CMKX.
And nobody knows what other TRUSTEE(s) were appointed prior to the Texas Tumbleweeds taking over an empty shell. What if there is a Canadian Trustee? What if there is a TRUSTEE in Saudi Arabia? Australia? The possibilities are endless.
|
|
|
Post by carats4me on Sept 6, 2007 21:20:13 GMT -5
Abad is the craziest person around CMKX. What can you say? She probably has been taking half her medicines.
|
|
falcman1
Dr. Of Diamonds
SOON!
Posts: 131
|
Post by falcman1 on Sept 6, 2007 22:17:32 GMT -5
i like the scenarios............but hypothetical theories dont pay my bills..
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 6, 2007 23:11:19 GMT -5
mgl Mod Squad Re: Gossip Column - 9/6/07 « Reply #9 on Today at 9:42pm »
By: oil.ipo 06 Sep 2007, 07:49 PM EDT Msg. 600397 of 600492 Jump to msg. # I want to tell you guys something. I will make it brief; Without ABGG you would not have the slightest clue wtP is going on here. She has delivered the proof in layman's terms on a gold platter. IMO it puts an end to all of the speculation as to whether we have damages, punitive, etc., based on the "monumental wrong ."
As far as I am concerned the cash has been collected for the Bona Fides and now we wait. Sad that we wait but heck we have gone this far so whats a few more hours right? lol
As far as some of you; I feel for you that you continually struggle with the facts. Hopefully the cash will come before that Big Tsunami/Meteor takes us out. I understand that it is easier for some Govt heavies to not pay than to pay, but that is really a mentality issue IMHO. I am not about to repo someone's Ferrari for my welfare. Just want my restitution that I am owed. Plus interest accrued -AIMHO
Mega/Oil - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2007 6:21:40 GMT -5
This is a major asset raid. What better way to get the company cheap and the shares cheap by playing the doom and gloom card.
Those who are concerned about bankruptcy... You do not claim bankruptcy on a company that has substantial Fails To Deliver and NSS affecting 40,000 plus legal bona fide stockholders, seasoned with thousands of informed shareholders who are aware that the law states under these circumstances, compensation is paid to the shareholders. You do not claim bankruptcy on a company, which does have claims in areas known to have the most lucrative mineral deposits in the World, and then lose control of the company because the company and assets will end up under the control of a court appointed holding company.
When you read anything about CMKX, add at the end, "This is because there is a major asset raid in progress", and then you will know why.
All the best to All, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by tradervic on Sept 7, 2007 8:40:59 GMT -5
LOL, Bhollenegg.....You have to have assets in order to have a raid.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2007 14:49:44 GMT -5
mgl Mod Squad Re: Gossip Column - 9/6/07 « Reply #9 on Today at 9:42pm » By: oil.ipo 06 Sep 2007, 07:49 PM EDT Msg. 600397 of 600492Jump to msg. # I want to tell you guys something. I will make it brief; Without ABGG you would not have the slightest clue wtP is going on here. She has delivered the proof in layman's terms on a gold platter. IMO it puts an end to all of the speculation as to whether we have damages, punitive, etc., based on the "monumental wrong ." As far as I am concerned the cash has been collected for the Bona Fides and now we wait. Sad that we wait but heck we have gone this far so whats a few more hours right? lol As far as some of you; I feel for you that you continually struggle with the facts. Hopefully the cash will come before that Big Tsunami/Meteor takes us out. I understand that it is easier for some Govt heavies to not pay than to pay, but that is really a mentality issue IMHO. I am not about to repo someone's Ferrari for my welfare. Just want my restitution that I am owed. Plus interest accrued -AIMHO Mega/Oil - - - - - By: abadgoodgirl 07 Sep 2007, 09:31 AM EDT Msg. 600589 of 600626 (This msg. is a reply to 600397 by oil.ipo.) Jump to msg. # oil.ipo, thank you seems inadequate in light of the compliment paid to my research. Sooooo, thank you tons and tons and tons! Now, back to business. The grandfather clause had a part (i) and a part (ii) [which you know... but I didn't want to begin a new thread] So for anyone out there who still doesn't understand, the monumental wrong is not quite righted in the totality. part ii of the grandfather clause, its elimination was proposed along with or grandfather clause on June 13, 2007 but the Commissioners declined to eliminate part (ii) of the felony grandfather clause which basically says that market participants can legally have open NSS on a stock in which the participants have an option. So lets say they have a call option [they can buy the stock at a certain price at a certain date] because they are SHORT the underlying stock itself. The criminality of this SECOND part of the grandfather clause is that the SEC, once again, behaving in a criminal fashion, ALLOWS NSS (not just regular shorting). The SEC is allowing criminal behavior to persist by facilitating the participants' illegal short positions, which corrupts the price of the security. So on June 13th, 2007, rather than eliminating both (i) & (ii) of the felony illegal grandfather clause, the SEC eliminated (i) and not (ii) [options market maker exception]. Instead, the SEC re-proposed its elimination of the felony and published the newly proposed elimination on its website on August 6th, 2007 which was published in the federal register on Friday, August 10, 2007.. which began the 30 day comment period on whether or not to allow the felony [which they are not entitled to allow; but we know the SEC can be brought up on charges of treason since making felony rules is against the constitution anyway.] So the 30 day comment period ends on Sunday (there were 31 days in August so it will be 9/10/07). Over the past 30 days, the market makers were allowed to submit comments on why the felony should not be eliminated. Then the vote has to be scheduled [or they can do it in the ordinary course of business] at which point the elimination of part (ii) of the felony NSS relating to options should be published on the SEC's' website and then in the Federal Register and will be given an effective date. In summary, part (i) of felony was eliminated by vote in June and publication in August with an effective date of 60 days from publication. Part (ii) of the elimination of the felony was re-proposed as published in the Federal Register on August 10th and 30 days were given to the market makers to submit comments about why they should be allowed to illegally short the underlying stocks of options. Honestly, this monumental wrong, which includes the felony grandfather clause, has no business effecting our payment at this point. In my opinion, oil.ipo is absolutely correct and $$ was paid for each cert and it should be and can be distributed. However, what if our NSS in the trillions is the most formidable leverage on the planet to effect this change? Then of course we are righting a monumental wrong and we should have been writing and faxing comment letters for the past 30 days. Remember, our CERT PULL puts those at the SEC/DTCC/Federal Reserve/Gov't officials BEHIND BARS. Irrefutable proof of treason and counterfeiting. One would think the SEC would have moved faster in light of the fact that life behind bars IS an option...not to mention the trillions for which they can all be sued...and that includes the private stockholders of the Federal Reserve and DTCC which are 'for profit' corporations.
|
|