|
Post by JoeRockss on Sept 24, 2007 16:44:21 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: booboo1 24 Sep 2007, 12:14 PM EDT Msg. 605722 of 605732 Jump to msg. # Jay Adobe - Mr. Maheu's Exact Words: Do you agree??
"It's up to you to pick whom you want, but it's got to be set up so that Uncle Sam isn't involved - ever. If anyone connects you with the U.S. government, I will deny it," I told him. "If you say Bob Maheu brought you into this, that I was your contact man, I'll say you're off your rocker, you're lying, you're trying to save your hide. I'll swear by everything holy that I don't know what in hell you're talking about."
Next To Hughes written by Mr. Maheu
Also, there was the Las Vegas Radio Interview (2006) where Mr. Maheu states that "he has never taken an assignment for his country where he worried about it being a popularity contest"
Perhaps the same "truth" could be said with regards to the recent "Faulking Truth" words quoted??
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 12:17 PM EDT Msg. 605726 of 605732 (This msg. is a reply to 605722 by booboo1.) Jump to msg. # booboo Absolutely! I concur.
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Sept 24, 2007 16:44:46 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: go2guy2 24 Sep 2007, 01:12 PM EDT Msg. 605769 of 605860 Jump to msg. # If you stop by to visit, I left you something. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 01:20 PM EDT Msg. 605772 of 605860 Jump to msg. # go2, If you have information you would like me to peruse to help me better understand, you can email it to me at jay_adobe@yahoo.com - - - - -
By: go2guy2 24 Sep 2007, 01:41 PM EDT Msg. 605801 of 605863 Jump to msg. # Johnny, come now...you aren't being a good stewart of the truth now. Repent! The time is at hand when the wheat shall be separated from the chaff. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 01:44 PM EDT Msg. 605803 of 605863 (This msg. is a reply to 605801 by go2guy2.) Jump to msg. # go2, Do you mean George?
- - - - - By: go2guy2 24 Sep 2007, 01:47 PM EDT Msg. 605805 of 605864 Jump to msg. # Let's not pretend here...ok...your busted. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 01:49 PM EDT Msg. 605807 of 605864 (This msg. is a reply to 605805 by go2guy2.) Jump to msg. # go2, I can clearly see that you are obviously confused. It has been a nice chat; a bit confusing for me, but a nice exchange nonetheless. - - - - -
By: go2guy2 24 Sep 2007, 01:50 PM EDT Msg. 605810 of 605865 (This msg. is a reply to 605807 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # What, Jay, you're confused?? Well slap I disagree and call me Ashley! I never thought I'd see the day when you didn't have the answer. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 01:52 PM EDT Msg. 605815 of 605865 (This msg. is a reply to 605810 by go2guy2.) Jump to msg. # go2, Come back when your facts are straight, buddy.
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Sept 24, 2007 16:45:14 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: klonopin2mg 24 Sep 2007, 01:00 PM EDT Msg. 605766 of 605767 (This msg. is a reply to 605688 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # jay',
this is one reason i try not to offend the naysayers/lilfellas, some are like "plants".......
"they can't go on unless they see the light and they had to be planted in the first place"
my question is WHO'S WHO and who did not own own bonafide shares?
some i'll find out and be surprised to meet........i believe that's clearly been "you guys" effort in being nice to your "fellow shareholders"
AJMO
klon' and
"WE READY"?! - - - - - By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 12:29 PM EDT Msg. 605732 of 605860 Jump to msg. # On April 5th, the CEO said "The Company will use this website for posting of all documents and official court filings."
...use this website for posting of all documents.... ...for posting of all documents... ...posting...all documents... ...all documents... ...all..... ...all.... ...ALL...
Please address this shortfall (posting 'all', not 'some') in the next FAQ session. - - - - -
By: klonopin2mg 24 Sep 2007, 01:29 PM EDT Msg. 605780 of 605860 (This msg. is a reply to 605732 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # jay', you are correct, i remember the day well...my B-Day, just as my B-Day was equally important in 2006!
enjoy life now!
would enjoy "high tea" with you when this ends/begins!!!
klon'/chuck, and btw YHM if your the same geo!lol - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 02:18 PM EDT Msg. 605841 of 605859 Jump to msg. # Sip some iced tea, relax, and watch it unfold right before your very eyes. Enjoy your evening too. Keep your reading glasses handy.
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Sept 24, 2007 16:45:37 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tramp
CARQUEST44: What day did WIMPIE say he would pay 4 « Thread Started on Today at 2:44pm »
trackeer1: CARQUEST44: What day did WIMPIE say he would pay for his hamburger? Have a great day all.
trackeer1: "I'd gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today."
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Sept 24, 2007 16:46:05 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 02:28 PM EDT Msg. 605856 of 605858 Jump to msg. # gr8hiker, Very well said. I couldn't have put it more succinctly. I concur with what you said about the timelines, Lundin, time constraints, puppetmasters, Sep/Oct, and final scene in the journey. That was very well said. Further, we have come a long way and the ducks are lining up flawlessly and rapidly. The master and his players have an ending in sight and I believe we will see it with them very soon. I and many others appreciate all you have provided to this journey. The soles of shoes are getting worn and the clothes are getting threadbear. It is time for the journey to reach fruition. The ducks are aligning. Good luck to all longs who have endured thus far. All IMO of course. - - - - -
By: go2guy2 24 Sep 2007, 02:40 PM EDT Msg. 605861 of 605910 Jump to msg. # One more thing Johnny... 28 more legal pages are coming at you....SOon, LMAO. - - - - -
By: baloney_cleaver 24 Sep 2007, 02:57 PM EDT Msg. 605883 of 605910 (This msg. is a reply to 605861 by go2guy2.) Jump to msg. # Beware pumpers and anti KW and BF posters ..
Tortuous interference is the unlawful interference into one’s contractual or business affairs! - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 03:04 PM EDT Msg. 605892 of 605910 (This msg. is a reply to 605883 by baloney_cleaver.) Jump to msg. # baloney, And freedom of speech is the concept of being able to speak freely without censorship. It is often regarded as an integral concept in modern liberal democracies. The right to freedom of speech is guaranteed under international law through numerous human rights instruments, notably under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, although implementation remains lacking in many countries. The synonymous term freedom of expression is sometimes preferred, since the right is not confined to verbal speech but is understood to protect any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.
- - - - -
By: goodolboy27 24 Sep 2007, 03:10 PM EDT Msg. 605902 of 605910 (This msg. is a reply to 605892 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # jay, freedom of speech does not cover misrepresentation, misleading or false representation, which is the trouble you have found yourself in. Good luck to you, and keep those reading glasses clean and ready. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 03:12 PM EDT Msg. 605906 of 605910 (This msg. is a reply to 605902 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # It's a good thing that personal opinions weigh heavy in cases such as these, especially if one is not paid to present ideas or opinions. Enjoy your evening and be nice to each other.
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Sept 24, 2007 16:46:32 GMT -5
eastcoastswing Diamondologist
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What is all this about?
==============================================
By: go2guy2 24 Sep 2007, 01:12 PM EDT Msg. 605769 of 605860 Jump to msg. # If you stop by to visit, I left you something. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 01:20 PM EDT Msg. 605772 of 605860 Jump to msg. # go2, If you have information you would like me to peruse to help me better understand, you can email it to me at jay_adobe@yahoo.com - - - - -
By: go2guy2 24 Sep 2007, 01:41 PM EDT Msg. 605801 of 605863 Jump to msg. # Johnny, come now...you aren't being a good stewart of the truth now. Repent! The time is at hand when the wheat shall be separated from the chaff. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 01:44 PM EDT Msg. 605803 of 605863 (This msg. is a reply to 605801 by go2guy2.) Jump to msg. # go2, Do you mean George?
- - - - - By: go2guy2 24 Sep 2007, 01:47 PM EDT Msg. 605805 of 605864 Jump to msg. # Let's not pretend here...ok...your busted. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 01:49 PM EDT Msg. 605807 of 605864 (This msg. is a reply to 605805 by go2guy2.) Jump to msg. # go2, I can clearly see that you are obviously confused. It has been a nice chat; a bit confusing for me, but a nice exchange nonetheless. - - - - -
By: go2guy2 24 Sep 2007, 01:50 PM EDT Msg. 605810 of 605865 (This msg. is a reply to 605807 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # What, Jay, you're confused?? Well slap I disagree and call me Ashley! I never thought I'd see the day when you didn't have the answer. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 01:52 PM EDT Msg. 605815 of 605865 (This msg. is a reply to 605810 by go2guy2.) Jump to msg. # go2, Come back when your facts are straight, buddy.
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Sept 24, 2007 16:47:59 GMT -5
d*mn sooner, you were a busy girl today....I love days where there's a ton of rumors, like today.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 24, 2007 16:51:29 GMT -5
Me too, Joe......................Either keeps the blood flowing thru excitement or laughter....Just love it.....
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 24, 2007 16:54:33 GMT -5
By: restripe2007 24 Sep 2007, 02:51 PM EDT Msg. 605875 of 605937 Jump to msg. # jay, with this next news/tidbit will it show us were we are heading with cmkx? - - - - -
By: greedy_malone 24 Sep 2007, 02:57 PM EDT Msg. 605882 of 605937 (This msg. is a reply to 605875 by restripe2007.) Jump to msg. # restripe
When you go to a parking lot and repaint a parking stall, is the stall itself new or does it just look new because of the fresh paint job?
Adobe has been trying to paint CMKX ever since he was brought here at the exact same time Stoecklein was hired and the day after the company was informed by the SEC they were delinquint in their filing obligations.
And from day one Adobe has been telling you not to believe what you read because he knew what you were going to be subjected to was going to show you the real story and not the one he has been trying to paint for you.
It really is just that simple. Adobe created that alias on Feb. 5th 2005 which was one day after the company was notified, through Stoecklein that CMKX was delinquint in their filings and their original form 15 was filed in error. Yep, they got that news on Feb. 4th and Adobe mysteriously popped up the very next day. But, just so you know and can't make any silly claims, this information about being notified by the company wasn't made public until much later so the adobe alias was created by somebody who wanted to make sure there was dmage control already in place.
So adobe was paid to post or adobe himself is one of the insiders who knew full well on Feb 4th that the sky was about to cave in. Well ahead of the general public who wasn't informed of these events until much later.
You don't have to believe me but it is the truth. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 03:02 PM EDT Msg. 605889 of 605937 (This msg. is a reply to 605882 by greedy_malone.) Jump to msg. # greedy, You're very confused reference the turn of events. Try again. I'll let you know if you get it right from what I've been told. - - - - -
By: greedy_malone 24 Sep 2007, 03:26 PM EDT Msg. 605915 of 605937 (This msg. is a reply to 605889 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # really jay?
So it's just a coincidence that your alias was created the day after Stoecklein found out CMKX was in deep doo-doo?
You said there are no coincidences here so obviously your alias was created for a reason and based on an event that took place on Feb. 4th.
Would you like to see the documents that show the sequence of events? Maheu asks Stoecklein to look into the reporting status. Stoecklein does so on Feb 4th and finds out CMKX is delinquint and the form 15 was filed in error. Stoecklein Law Group hired by CMKX on Feb. 7th to handle the reporting status of the company.
Meanwhile you show up on Feb. 5th and while the company falls completely apart at the seams you tell everybody how great things are. And you showed up at the exact same time the wheels came off the bus you were trying to get everybody to ride. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 03:31 PM EDT Msg. 605920 of 605937 (This msg. is a reply to 605915 by greedy_malone.) Jump to msg. # greedy, Now that's a heck of a coincidence. Probably the only coincidence in the whole 800+ page script. Guess we overlooked that one, huh? Of course it was a coincidence. Surely you do not think someone associated with the company hired me do you? - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 24, 2007 16:55:25 GMT -5
By: greedy_malone 24 Sep 2007, 03:38 PM EDT Msg. 605932 of 605943 (This msg. is a reply to 605920 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # sorry jay
You speciafically stated there were no coincidences here. You also stated everything here is event driven. So why would a guy create an alias on February 5th, one day after Stoecklein was made aware of the serious problem with CMKX filing status and fraudulent Form 15? And why would that alias created on Feb 5th tell people not to believe what you read but look for what isn't there unless he knew what was coming out was going to be the kiss of death for the company?
See jay, your own description of the events that have taken place clearly show that you created this alias to distract attention away from what was coming. And it is easy to see. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 03:49 PM EDT Msg. 605940 of 605943 (This msg. is a reply to 605932 by greedy_malone.) Jump to msg. # greedy, But since I am merely a shareholder, how could I have known what was coming? - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 24, 2007 16:56:54 GMT -5
By: greedy_malone 24 Sep 2007, 04:27 PM EDT Msg. 605972 of 605989 (This msg. is a reply to 605940 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # jay
If you were merely a shareholder how could you tell people here you knew more than you could say? - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 04:28 PM EDT Msg. 605973 of 605988 (This msg. is a reply to 605972 by greedy_malone.) Jump to msg. # It happens. - - - - -
By: greedy_malone 24 Sep 2007, 04:34 PM EDT Msg. 605981 of 605988 (This msg. is a reply to 605973 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # no jay it does not happen
You continually told people here you possessed information you could not share. That would be inside information you weren't allowed to give out. Or you were lying.
Mere shareholders do not possess inside information. Insiders do. And they don't share it with common shareholders, that is illegal.
So, by your own admission, you aren't merely a shareholder.
Unless of course, you were lying.
You see, you painted yourself into a corner. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 04:39 PM EDT Msg. 605988 of 605988 (This msg. is a reply to 605981 by greedy_malone.) Jump to msg. # greedy, Go back and reread the posts. You will assuredly find the interpretation to accomodate either way of thinking. I am merely a shareholder and that's what you should continue to think. Do not think that I possess insider information, and even if I did possess inside information, it is not a crime unless used to trade with or manipulate stock prices, which you will easily see that I did neither. If you think different, just find a post stating such prior to revocation. Any post will do the trick. And every post is strictly my opinion. I will leave the board to you naysayers now and go enjoy some time off the computer. Enjoy your evening.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 24, 2007 16:57:49 GMT -5
Sooo, jay is at war with not only greedy, but go2guy.........Hmmmm......Interesting......
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 24, 2007 17:13:34 GMT -5
By: anydaynow13 24 Sep 2007, 04:13 PM EDT Msg. 605962 of 605991 (This msg. is a reply to 605900 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # Now it's just comical. There is NO way that this poster is the same intelligent poster using the name JAY ADOBE. His posts are so loaded with 3rd grade spelling errors. I might not agree with what the real Jay Adobe says, but I always appreciated his command of the English language. Go back under your rock -- you Jay Imposter!!
reference material
Geez!
- - - - - By: blewbyu2 24 Sep 2007, 04:29 PM EDT Msg. 605974 of 605991 (This msg. is a reply to 605962 by anydaynow13.) Jump to msg. # anydaynow13.....if you will just look closer you will see that the errors are intentional...he is playing with you...and winning
some credulous people on here
- - - - - By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 04:32 PM EDT Msg. 605977 of 605991 (This msg. is a reply to 605974 by blewbyu2.) Jump to msg. # blewbyu, Yes, some very very credible people on here. I agree. - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 24, 2007 17:14:06 GMT -5
By: go2guy2 24 Sep 2007, 04:35 PM EDT Msg. 605982 of 605991 Jump to msg. # JohnnyJay, can you copy some more Wilkepedia for us...your replies are becoming quite uncharacteristically bland lately. I wonder why? - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 04:40 PM EDT Msg. 605989 of 605991 (This msg. is a reply to 605982 by go2guy2.) Jump to msg. # go2, IT's probably not the same entity you are acustomed too, huh? Sorry, I mayh not have the same command of the verbiage as others.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 24, 2007 17:14:37 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 24 Sep 2007, 05:00 PM EDT Msg. 605995 of 606004 (This msg. is a reply to 605953 by f4ds.) Jump to msg. # so sealed means you pretend it never happened hey well a monkey could always see our case is sealed, it is probably a market wide interplead that is sealed imo:
An order to seal includes all records, papers and exhibits in the custody of court. Other records relating to the case, in the custody of such other agencies and officials as are named in the order, must also be ordered sealed. All proceedings recounted in the record are deemed never to have occurred. In some circumstances, the court may seal only certain documents in a case, without sealing the entire file. If a criminal case is ordered sealed as to one defendant, the entire case will be sealed from Internet access.
one has to guess that frizzell and others are acting under this sealed information, it is the only explanation for what appears to be complete incompetence, there is no way on earth they got conned, non imo. It is impossible given the information they were given before they did their dd.
- - - - - By: gusjarvis 24 Sep 2007, 05:09 PM EDT Msg. 605997 of 606005 Jump to msg. # and remember it was the sec who said we couldn't talk and the presidential orders saying that you can hide public stock information if it is in nation security, and oh ya that interplead that had to happen that was bigger than cmkx. Makes you wonder what can even be in the book, maybe that is why mark isn't focusing on cmkx anymore.
|
|