|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 26, 2007 8:59:45 GMT -5
By: anydaynow13 26 Sep 2007, 08:55 AM EDT Msg. 606632 of 606644 Jump to msg. # Will Jay be "chatty" again today? - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 26 Sep 2007, 09:39 AM EDT Msg. 606639 of 606644 (This msg. is a reply to 606632 by anydaynow13.) Jump to msg. # anydaynow, No ma'am, he won't be very chatty; not today. Errands to run. Meetings to attend. He'll be in and out. Enjoy your day. It's a great day to be a CMKXer. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 26 Sep 2007, 09:42 AM EDT Msg. 606642 of 606643 Jump to msg. # Adios, gotta run. Avoid the naysayers. Keep the faith in your decisions.
|
|
|
Post by blu1236 on Sept 26, 2007 9:11:03 GMT -5
My new mortgage is asking for references and a cosigner. I have to fax this to Roger Stelma for a signature asap. Does anyone have his fax number?
blu---------------------------------------paim was my last pink--------really blu
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 26, 2007 9:22:35 GMT -5
posted by icecrush ... on 86...
Re: Acca 9-25-07 MP3 and highlights.. « Reply #11 on Today at 12:08am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acca: The 28th is a huge HUGE date..we cannot go past it. Period, PERIOD! Acca: If it's the 28th or the 1st of October, at the VERY latest, you know.. it doesn't matter Acca: You will have...I am done by the 28th. I am done no matter what it takes.
Why is he so positive on the date (28th) and then suggests a later date?
If this is the begining of our future financial ROI, and Acca is no longer needed, why ride off into the sunset? Why would Acca not join in the celebration with us, and be vilified for his strong support, after all these years? Why leave us all at the mercy of those on the boards? ( No disrespect intended). If this happens as Acca stated it will happen, I will be the first to thank him, as I am sure many others will.
To Acca; why walk away from all the thank you's and the humbling acknowledgements of those who have not supported you. You deserve that.
IceCrush
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 26, 2007 9:23:02 GMT -5
My new mortgage is asking for references and a cosigner. I have to fax this to Roger Stelma for a signature asap. Does anyone have his fax number? blu---------------------------------------paim was my last pink--------really blu
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 26, 2007 10:02:09 GMT -5
oaks DIAMOND JEDI If EVENT DRIVEN circumstances are COMPLETE...« Thread Started on Today at 8:59am »
and money flows into the hands of CMKX SHAREHOLDERS, we will ALL be part of an HISTORIC MOMENT within the MARKETS.
Think about that and have a GREAT DAY !!
Oaks
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 26, 2007 10:28:23 GMT -5
Just found this in a thread and it is a great question....Makes one wonder.....Hmmmmm....
By: homeyclausecalif 25 Sep 2007, 07:23 PM EDT Msg. 606523 of 606527 Jump to msg. # I have a nagging question.. If the Basher boss's know there is chance we may get say........ A buck.. How come the ones who will have to pay are not offering me 50 cents at a local Kiosk near you?� - - - - - View Replies »
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Sept 26, 2007 10:35:32 GMT -5
One reason is because all transfers have to be approved by KW nd the TA...and I doubt they will approve one to SHORTY...IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 26, 2007 10:39:22 GMT -5
You think KW thinks we can get more, 100to1?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 26, 2007 10:40:29 GMT -5
.50 would do me now..........Why wouldn't it be more important to get that for the shareholders than to take UC and others down?
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Sept 26, 2007 10:59:30 GMT -5
Because if this was a STING and KW knows it...he also knows the PENALTY involved...if that is ABOVE .50 then he is BOUND not to let shorty get off EASY at shareholders expense...that would be a breach of fiduciary duty IMO...he could be SUED for that IMO...I know i would not short shareholders out of BIG MONEY in order to save a few WEEKSor even a few MONTHS...IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 26, 2007 11:02:03 GMT -5
By: jay_adobe 24 Sep 2007, 09:33 PM EDT Msg. 606078 of 606704 (This msg. is a reply to 606076 by mjl62.) Jump to msg. # mjl, I would recommend that you continue to watch the bouncing balls and disregard anything I may say or type. I would recommend you believe what you desire and disregard the rest. Either you believe or you don't; there is no in between. The facts are apparent and you have been around long enough to know better than to ask for such. Believe what you will; as it will not change the outcome. You are backing the wrong horse inthis race. And that's okay because it takes all kinds to run this world. For you, just keep watching the bouncing balls and distractions. Fact: PR imminent, give or take 3 days. Enjoy your evening. - - - - -
By: keywolfie 26 Sep 2007, 11:46 AM EDT Msg. 606703 of 606704 (This msg. is a reply to 606078 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # Lets see jay, You are a mere shareholder, but you can say for a fact that a PR will be released within a 72 hour period. Sure sounds legit to me.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 26, 2007 11:05:23 GMT -5
Because if this was a STING and KW knows it...he also knows the PENALTY involved...if that is ABOVE .50 then he is BOUND not to let shorty get off EASY at shareholders expense...that would be a breach of fiduciary duty IMO...he could be SUED for that IMO...I know i would not short shareholders out of BIG MONEY in order to save a few WEEKSor even a few MONTHS...IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial) Thanks.........So why then would he and BF need to be doing what they are doing? It is causing confusion not cohesion of the shareholders. I guess that is part of some of the things in this saga that is confusing..................................It is almost like the right hand isn't aware of what the left hand is doing..................LOL If it's all part of the "game" plan, the....IMHO.....it has not been well thought out......................LOL
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Sept 26, 2007 11:44:40 GMT -5
I believe the whole DELAY plan was a PLAM...and IF we were NSed by 3-4 TRILLION shares and it MUST get paid due to VALUE...then even the CERT PULL was only part of the DELAY to give SHORTY the MAXIMUM possible time to PAY...and that is why I see Dec 3rd(GF cover deadline) as the "DROP DEAD" date for SHORTY...after that either we had no NS/someone SOLD OUT/no one will PAY or be forced to pay... so then WHO KNOWS??... Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Sept 26, 2007 11:51:14 GMT -5
so what is the significance to something happening before the end of Sept or is that just another prediction that never materializes? Someone indicated that the new trading platform is due to launch on Oct 1st but I thought it was due to launch Sept 19th?
|
|
falcman1
Dr. Of Diamonds
SOON!
Posts: 131
|
Post by falcman1 on Sept 26, 2007 11:51:44 GMT -5
i laugh when i see these predictions of .54 - .80 people shake your heads. and people saying that were waiting with the new cmkx to get more. .50 gives you $1,000,000 for a 1oo dollar investment. come on people these gurus belong in oz with dorothy. do you not think some govt agencies wouldnt have tried buying these certs even for 25 cents. give me a break. foreign countries would be buying our certs for 10 cents on the dollar and most of us would be selling it to them with palms up. or lets see breaking into peoples houses and stealing their certs. pooooof! they are all gone. plant your feet on the ground, and hope for any return.
|
|