|
Post by hundredtoone on Oct 17, 2007 20:36:38 GMT -5
A small synchronisity is that in the Scottrade e-mail .20 is mentioned as the last shareprice same as the Cornerstone Dividends talked about...chalk up another one...add it to the dot collection...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 17, 2007 21:58:28 GMT -5
sandi66 Global Moderator ***** Re: Scottstrade has set restrictions on stock « Reply #2 on Today at 4:36pm » another received this email today: Dear Investor: Thank you for your email. CMKM Diamond "CMKX" is on our list of stocks that we only allow orders selling existing shares that are already in a client's account. We do not allow new purchases and do not allow shares to be transferred in to an account. This stock has not traded since Oct 11th when it had a closing price of $0.20. We would not be able to assist you in selling these shares. Please let us know if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, Don S. National Call Center Scottrade, Inc. They too have emailed back for a bit more understanding of this. Ya know something screwy here..... looks like the information given in the Email is actually the information for TICKER CMKM... could this representative, have made a mistae and used CMKM instead of CMKX to get his/her info? Easy to make this mistake !! Either that or they would be insinuating that we are China Marketing Media?? Go Figure !! CHINA MARKETNG MEDIA (Other OTC:CMKM.PK) Last Trade: 0.20 Trade Time: Oct 11 Change: 0.00 (0.00%) Prev Close: 0.20 Open: N/A Bid: N/A Ask: N/A 1y Target Est: N/A Day's Range: N/A - N/A 52wk Range: 0.20 - 1.01 Volume: 0 Avg Vol (3m): 130 Market Cap: N/A P/E (ttm): N/A EPS (ttm): N/A Div & Yield: N/A (N/A) finance.yahoo.com/q?s=CMKM.PKSingle
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 18, 2007 6:21:36 GMT -5
ming117 Junior Miner * lenormand on acca « Thread Started on Today at 1:54am »
what did the cards say about the latest acca prediction?
used an upside down V configuration, and this is the result :
1. horseman 2. sun 3. mountain 4. dog 5. fishes 6. mice 7. key
so what does it mean?
he is clearly a messenger (1), bringing us very good news (2).but there is still an obstacle (3) that has to be removed. the complete process is supervised by a good and trustworthy friend (4) ("we are in good hands...), and we are actually in a position of great prosperity (5). things have been stolen, but will be returned (6), which gives us the posibility to unlock new doors...
because card number 3 is between two very positive cards, the sun and the dog, there is a good chance that this obstacle will be removed soon.
conclusion : acca is really a messenger, of great things to come, but if this obstacle is not removed by the 19th, things still remain very positive, but then we will have to wait a little longer...
if the object is indeed removed by the end of this week, then next week will be a week to remember....!!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 18, 2007 12:01:39 GMT -5
bikinipro Mini Mod Re: Gossip Column 10/18/07 « Reply #4 on Today at 11:35am »
hawkeye1 Diamond Finder and Miner ***
Just talked to SEC again... « Thread Started on Today at 12:25pm »
Talked to Randy at 11:45 I ask him if anything has happened for CMKX? He said nothing at this time. I ask him if the Government was holding this back and he said "Theres nothing to report, they were deregistered by the SEC and they appealed that and it didn't work. I said " Randy Is there any information on all the naked shorting that was done to CMKX"? He said "We don't have any information about them being naked shorted." He said "They can trade on the pink sheets but they can never trade on any major exchange." He said " There ought to be enough red flags for you to realize whats going on and if you are listening to the message boards they are 90% lies.
I didn't want to hear none of this, he couldn't give me a time frame when we would see something on the SEC's website either. I did say to him after he said CMKX was deregristed by the SEC, I said "I thought they self revoked themselfs and he said "No they were deregistered by the SEC and they appealed that and it didn't work.
I guess some day the truth will surface...Do I trust the SEC and our government? NO, I do not!
Hawkeye1
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 18, 2007 12:03:31 GMT -5
bikinipro Mini Mod
By: GGroovy 18 Oct 2007, 11:58 AM EDT Msg. 614540 of 614552 Jump to msg. # sept rain, looks like you're not the only one that "thinks" UC will be returning in Nov...Mav on the other board mentioned that also, but before you came on here first. Now is that all we have, just 2 "witnesses" that UC will be returning? Hmmmm, time will tell.
By: klonopin2mg 18 Oct 2007, 12:40 PM EDT Msg. 614552 of 614552 (This msg. is a reply to 614540 by GGroovy.) Jump to msg. # GGroovy', just a fwiw:
keep in mind that mav's post coincided with an appearance from "Keith Urban". i remember that post well.
enjoy the day!
"GOT CMKX"e
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 18, 2007 12:04:42 GMT -5
From Paltalk
LUFKINCY called his Broker at AG Edwards and asked him to research the RUMOR regarding that CMKX would start to trade on Monday.
His broker had the firms St Louis Research department research it and this is what he was told.
The research department made calls to 1st Global T/A, The President of the Company (I presume KW) in Texas, The SEC, and other Brokerage firms. They all say that CMKX will not be trading in the foreseeable future. They said that CMKX is on restriction therefore NO buys, NO sells.
However, if your broker is holding your certificate/ shares he can try to find a buyer for them. His broker also told him that IF CMKX ever traded again that AG Edwars would not be handling it.
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Oct 18, 2007 12:14:51 GMT -5
From this it sounds like ACCA will be wrong once AGAIN!!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 18, 2007 13:59:30 GMT -5
By: gotoil1870 18 Oct 2007, 05:13 AM EDT Msg. 614419 of 614473 Jump to msg. # WHY DO WE STILL HAVE BASHERS WHEN WE ARENT EVEN TRADING? ?dont bashers come to message boards to cause doubt in your investment so you get scared and sell???if we cant sell they why arent they leaving this non trading revoked private company board? ? By: sparkysantos 18 Oct 2007, 09:35 AM EDT Msg. 614458 of 614473 (This msg. is a reply to 614419 by gotoil1870.) Jump to msg. # GOTOIL1870: IMO the obvious reason bashers are still here 24/7 bashing away at a revoked sub-penny Grey is because their bosses know firsthand that bona fide CMKX shareholders will eventually be required to make one or more decisions. And for greed-driven, cost-minimizing reasons, the bashers' bosses want we shareholders to take whatever comes aong, and to take it quickly. Why else would they be here? What else, aside from perhaps a mental illness, could explain their unwavering presence? And IMO, what will ultimately happen is that CMKX shareholders will be offerred a monetary settlement (no doubt disguised as something different, like an asset sale), but only if they agree to something else, something like a reverse split; or perhaps even giving up their shares completely. Now granted, this is pure speculation on Sparky's part. But if there is a existing naked short (or failure to deliver, if BF prefers that phrase) position in CMKM Diamond shares (and why the he11 else would BF be talking to Eagletech's CEO), it should be noted that mathematically it can not be remedied with a cash settlement. Think about it! For illustration purposes, and to keep the example simple, let's say that CMKX shareholders hold 1.4 trillion shares and that there were only supposed to be 700 billion shares outstanding; this meaning that there is a naked short position of 700 billion shares. Now to keep things simple, and to make our example interesting, let's say that the proverbial Bad Guys have agreed to pay $ 1.00 to make this nasty and potentially-devastating situation go quietly away. And after many delays, let's say the checks finally arrive in the mail. Now how the he11 would that event make the naked short away? It wouldn't!! In order for the $ 1.00 a share settlement to resolve the naked short problem and restore CMKX's capital structure balance; in exchange for the $ 1.00 a share, shareholders in this example would have to either agree to a 2 to 1 reverse split, or to surrender 50% of their shares (which would accomplish the same thing mathmatically). And this is precisely why Sparky thinks that there are decisions that have to be made in the future. All IMHO of course ~ Sparky
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 18, 2007 14:00:31 GMT -5
Re: Gossip Column 10/18/07 « Reply #3 on Today at 10:49am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brigantine King of Diamonds *****
Re: lenormand on acca « Reply #2 on Today at 7:54am »
Tramp, And you said Acca did not mean delay. I didn't need cards to tell you that.
Acca=Delay. It's that simple.
tramp Administrator
that's right, he came in because he was excited and for us, letting us know it was over.. we will find out tommorrow besides some big court thing going on, G-7 meetings and the checks were mailed.. whatever was signed and being released tommorrow should open up our mailings.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 18, 2007 14:01:04 GMT -5
Re: Gossip Column 10/18/07 « Reply #6 on Today at 1:03pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tramps reply to Hawkeye's post:
tramp Administrator *****
Re: Just talked to SEC again... « Reply #5 on Today at 1:23pm »
well the cover story is in, thats easy to see.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 18, 2007 14:01:36 GMT -5
Re: Gossip Column 10/18/07 « Reply #7 on Today at 1:19pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acca says.... THERE IS MONEY!!! By: huckfinnn 18 Oct 2007, 02:19 PM EDT Msg. 614570 of 614570 Jump to msg. # media.putfile.com/There-is-a-fund
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 18, 2007 14:51:47 GMT -5
Brigantine King of Diamonds tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1192686867Just for the record, if it was over, we'd be out having meetings with Tax Accountants, Tax Attorneys, Financial Planners and Oshin's Trust Attorneys instead of sitting here arguing the semantics of whether Acca=Delay or not. When it is over, I'll be outta here so fast it will make your head spin.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 18, 2007 14:52:53 GMT -5
:oI am leaning towards agreeing with Brig....
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 18, 2007 19:24:00 GMT -5
Tramp whatever took place on sept 28th, and then the 21 days goes past, which is tommorrow, opens up for our checks to be released.. and then the mailings starts.. remember, we were supposed to been paid last oct 15th, but was delayed because the sec was not ready.. u had the post not only on my board, but here also.. showing why the sec needed 1 year along with the IRS and with ucrocks p[osts what he heard about the irs was the delay and thats fact, last year, oct 15th, 2006, etrade legal dept.. and everyone called and they shut up fast. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1192694215
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Oct 18, 2007 19:32:36 GMT -5
Tramp whatever took place on sept 28th, and then the 21 days goes past, which is tommorrow, opens up for our checks to be released.. and then the mailings starts.. remember, we were supposed to been paid last oct 15th, but was delayed because the sec was not ready.. u had the post not only on my board, but here also.. showing why the sec needed 1 year along with the IRS and with ucrocks p[osts what he heard about the irs was the delay and thats fact, last year, oct 15th, 2006, etrade legal dept.. and everyone called and they shut up fast. I really do enjoy tramp, but, there's just simply not enough proof to call anything within this post, fact. We've been getting the round around for over 3 years now by the sec, brokerage firms and CMKM management.
|
|