|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 25, 2007 20:15:28 GMT -5
By: cbaughan 25 Nov 2007, 05:07 PM EST Msg. 626222 of 626255 Jump to msg. # In the procmkx room we have been discussing an interesting thing that happened to ranupbill and tatbird...two months ago they requested to get cmkx certs transferred into diffrent family members' names. They had to go through Kevin West who ok'd it. When they received their certs..lo and behold there is Urban Casavant's signature as President and Corey Klassen's name as Secretary (who is now with Entourage?) Momike mentioned the fact that we have been led to believe that the person by the name of Urban Casavant is a crook and being hunted down to answer a lawsuit...is the same person still signing cmkm certs...hmmm ...and Kevin gives permission for these certs to be distributed to us today? How is it legal for Urban to remain a signatory on our certs? Does anyone care to comment? By: jonathonanders 25 Nov 2007, 08:03 PM EST Msg. 626253 of 626255 (This msg. is a reply to 626222 by cbaughan.) Jump to msg. # cb vaughn, Phone calls were made to the TA and to Frizzell office about Urban's signature still being on the certs. It is because they have a bunch of them still printed..those signatures were fed in and several printed out during the cert pull. They are still valid CMKM certs. As a matter of fact, Korey Classen hasnt been with the company in about 3 years, yet his name still appears. It means nothing. The certs that they turned in were reissued from certs during Urbans tenure. Both the TA and Tyler say these certs are legitimate and bona fied..sorry..another dead end - - - - - ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=626253
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 25, 2007 20:40:17 GMT -5
By: my69z 25 Nov 2007, 08:34 PM EST Msg. 626261 of 626262 Jump to msg. # NRS 78.235 Stock certificates: Validation; facsimile signatures; uncertificated shares and informational statements; replacement. 3. If any officer or officers who have signed, or whose facsimile signature or signatures have been used on, any certificate or certificates for stock cease to be an officer or officers of the corporation, whether because of death, resignation or other reason, before the certificate or certificates have been delivered by the corporation, the certificate or certificates may nevertheless be adopted by the corporation and be issued and delivered as though the person or persons who signed the certificate or certificates, or whose facsimile signature or signatures have been used thereon, had not ceased to be an officer or officers of the corporation. Chris ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=626261
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Nov 25, 2007 20:52:28 GMT -5
All it proves to me is our CERTS were issued for the OLD CMKX...FOR THAT CERT PULL ONLY...and since IMO they WERE NSS they must be valued and paid for by the end of the DEADLINE...DEC 3...it makes sense to only issue the CERTS that are valid for THAT CERT PULL ONLY...with the OLD SIGNATURES ...the NEW CMKM will have to issue NEW CERTS if they ever trade again IMO...only AFTER the filings of financials which must include the REAL O/S and sharestructure...IMO...it makes perfect sense to me...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 25, 2007 21:28:48 GMT -5
By: cbaughan 25 Nov 2007, 09:27 PM EST Msg. 626272 of 626272 Jump to msg. # Regarding the NEW certs with UC's OLD signature: Here is the answer to the SEC rule that was posted on raging bull and the answer to our question Does this mean that UC is still in charge?" The Sec Rule: Applies like this according to a corporate lawyer we just spoke to: I am referrring to this one : ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=626261 This rule applies if a CEO dies or is otherwise removed as CEO of the company in question on the cert WHEN THE CERT IS GIVEN BACK TO THE COMPANY for disbursement or for any transaction (changing names on cert etc)..it means the CERT is still good despite the fact that things have changed in the company regarding CEO or even TA. HOWEVER for the making of all new certs...the TA IS NOT ALLOWED IN FACT IT IS ILLEGAL to keep blank certs that are signed. Every cert must be ok'd by the CEO and all information must be up to date and a seal is not allowed until the amount of shares, the signatures and all pertinent information on the NEW CERT is UP TO DATE and agreed to by the PRESENT CEO. Therefore there can be NO OLD NAMES on a NEW CERT. Therefore Urban Casavant must STILL be the CEO of CMKM. ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=626272
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 26, 2007 8:01:55 GMT -5
Ghost DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: Gossip Discussion 11/26/07 « Reply #1 on Today at 2:19am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sorry to come back on yesterday's rumour... I may be wrong but the way I read it is like UC signed off the certs for these shareholders two months ago... . Going on the sting theory and IBM is still behind the scene, I would assume no slip ups are made. Now here's UC signing off these certs. This tells me it either doesn't matter anymore and they can let everybody know UC is not a crook and not sought for prosecution or somebody made a mistake. But who? Would IBM allow? Or did he slip up? And if this is not a slip up, then why don't we hear from him ? Another rumour shot ? Quote:Quote:By: cbaughan 25 Nov 2007, 05:07 PM EST Msg. 626222 of 626244 Jump to msg. # In the procmkx room we have been discussing an interesting thing that happened to ranupbill and tatbird...two months ago they requested to get cmkx certs transferred into diffrent family members' names. They had to go through Kevin West who ok'd it. When they received their certs..lo and behold there is Urban Casavant's signature as President and Corey Klassen's name as Secretary (who is now with Entourage?) Momike mentioned the fact that we have been led to believe that the person by the name of Urban Casavant is a crook and being hunted down to answer a lawsuit...is the same person still signing cmkm certs...hmmm ...and Kevin gives permission for these certs to be distributed to us today? How is it legal for Urban to remain a signatory on our certs? Does anyone care to comment? Also Tatbird says the new certs do not contain this typed message on the bottom as some of the older ones did: This reproduced signature is specifically and soley for this distribution of CMKM (under the transfer agents' signature) millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1196060566
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 26, 2007 8:02:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 26, 2007 8:03:00 GMT -5
my69z Ace of Diamonds Re: That CERTainly is peeeculiar « Reply #28 on Yesterday at 10:46pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: my69z 25 Nov 2007, 11:47 PM EST Msg. 626294 of 626295 Jump to msg. # you know,,,what's so funny is to think that all Kevin has done is get up infront of Denton and lie about his positin at CMKX...cause pro or not on CMKX,,,,,that exactlly what it would be doing. "CMKX" will do nothing illegal from March 30th on,,,,,,,think about that. Chris cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1196027944&page=2my69z Ace of Diamonds Status: Offline Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,830 Re: That CERTainly is peeeculiar « Reply #29 on Yesterday at 11:13pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: my69z 26 Nov 2007, 12:15 AM EST Msg. 626297 of 626297 ( This msg. is a reply to 626272 by cbaughan.) Jump to msg. # " IN FACT IT IS ILLEGAL to keep blank certs that are signed." An example of "Blank Certs",,,,look at this Nevada T/A called Action Stock Transfer Corporation 10. In case any officer of the Company who shall have signed manually or whose facsimile signature shall have been affixed to blank certificates shall die, resign, or be removed prior to the issuance of such certificates, Action may issue and register such certificates as the certificates of the Company notwithstanding such death, resignation, or removal; and the Company shall file promptly with Action such approval, adoption, or ratification as may be required by law. www.secinfo.com/d1a45v.ud.7.htm " may issue and register such certificates as the certificates of the Company " ....all Kevin has to do is approve Chris
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 26, 2007 8:03:26 GMT -5
By: jabberjaw521 26 Nov 2007, 07:21 AM EST Msg. 626310 of 626316 Jump to msg. # Congrats to all CMKM share holders.!!!!! The cards are falling, and they are falling fast.. JMHO Jab P.S. Check out the Canadian stock posting boards.. They make a whole lot more sence than what we have been hearing here..!! My boy has been keeping up with them more than me.. God Bless America, Jab ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=626310
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 26, 2007 8:03:58 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 25 Nov 2007, 07:01 PM EST Msg. 626241 of 626318 Jump to msg. # my69z, lol, yeah, i'd like to read your response to gusjarvis' final three questions. you threw me for a loop-de-loop when you said you couldn't tell if those were questions or answers. i wasn't sure which way was up or down after reading gus' post to you and then your post back to him. he since put them all in question form. good questions. ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=626241&submit=GoBy: gusjarvis 25 Nov 2007, 08:06 PM EST Msg. 626254 of 626318 (This msg. is a reply to 626241 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # hey rosencrantz those questions really are rhetorical since the answers are so easy and this is so easy to figure out. I can't answer for chris but he knows what the answers are, we did the audit, we covered the shorts with the cert pull as the certs were paid for, we have are assets protected as that is why chris is saying we are getting them back as they were never really gone. It is funny chris basically to me, not putting words in his mouth, but is basically hinting everything is fine and the og is doing what they have to do as planned and are hiding things from us as we all know or should know. They are doing the legal things that had to be done to get the extortionist out of the stock and pretending for legal reasons they know nothing of the years of work they did. They actually have given us hints if you know what to look for, ie just saying we need an audit when we did the best audit ever is ridiculous and uncalled for unless you have to forget it happened for legal reasons. Our claims we allll knew on the boards were held by emerson koch so why would they sound shocked he held them when they already knew. John edwards has been out of this stock for years and is no threat whatsoever, but they pretend he is. They know exactly what the real o/s is or wouldn't have done the cert pull or worked on the interpead but won't tell us what it is because they can't. They can't tell us what etrade and the others paid for our certs for legal reasons, but we all know they paid as it took months on end for many to get certs. I mean get serious why would kevin work on the interplead with urban for months if what they say is true, ie they were barely getting their expenses paid and the shares look like they were dumped to us. If the shares were dumped to us and that is soooo easy to prove during the cert pull, why on earth would you do an interplead with urban. Really a monkey could figure this out. cheers and really there isn't anything left to say but give us our money and stop the charade as we all see through it, or should. ps anyone who thinks etrade flew those certs across the country on the last day at the last minute for kicks and without a check needs to use more common sense imo, I will guarantee you they bought those certs or they wouldn't have had them, just like the rest who certed their clients who before they paid were holding fake shares. By: nigel773 25 Nov 2007, 08:25 PM EST Msg. 626258 of 626318 (This msg. is a reply to 626254 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # gus, Since you seem to want us all to believe you know all the answers: Why is the EGTMF suit taking So long? It is a No Contest! Why do you refer to Kevin at all? He is not a true performer here. At best, he is a Puppet! When/that is WHEN? will this all end? By: my69z 25 Nov 2007, 08:30 PM EST Msg. 626260 of 626318 (This msg. is a reply to 626241 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Rosen,,, lol......i think Gus beat me to answerin him lol Later
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Nov 26, 2007 9:42:10 GMT -5
I couldn't down load ACCA's message this morning. What does he have to say for himself?
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Nov 26, 2007 11:00:57 GMT -5
East:
Probably something like "I can never be right". but money next week is a trillion % guarantee.
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Nov 26, 2007 11:01:25 GMT -5
I bet! ;o) I don't know why I even asked!
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Nov 26, 2007 13:47:36 GMT -5
POOF REPORT SUNDAY 11-25-07Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:07:40 -0500 Riding the Rainbow LyricsArtist(Band):Elvis Presley(Words & music by Weisman - Wise I'm riding the rainbow, hitting the highway to happiness Oh yes, I'm looking to find someone whose meant to be mine I'm living to loveand loving to live I've got a heartI'm longing to give I'm riding the rainbow, I'll follow that star to where you are I'm riding the rainbow, heading for heaven and happiness I guess somebody somewhere, someday will teach me to care But being alone,don't bother meI'm free to have fun It's fun to be freeI'm riding the rainbow, I'll follow that starI'm riding the rainbow to where you are Greetings and Salutations; Jeeze, I'm sorry I haven't any bad news to give you, no clandestine treacherous things to report. Just the report of an ongoing locomotive making it stops and drops, in the proper places, and moving on to the next. I have to take you back in history a little to put todays actions in perspective and perhaps, it'll make things a bit easier to understand. I've already established that the ch/mk people are the last in the corral before it's all cleared out. One thing that may have been forgotten about is, who were the orginal loose cannons, the orginals who were brought in before americans, canadians, or even mexicans, came in? I take you back to the foundation itself. It is european and for the all the vast holdings of it, the bulk was in eastern europe. Consider then, that the orginal 'regular folks', would be people from those lands. People just coming out from under soviet rule, those of the original holdings, of the foundation. One would necessarily start at the middle and work outwards from the center. By the time the nice gentleman brought this opportunity to america, they had already had many people of european lands, as a part of the payout. The europeans needed more bodies to fulfill the dissolution of the foundation and it's attending trusts. In the early days of coming to america, there were no names for this, not were there any update lines. It traveled quietly thru churches and other humanitarian organizations. It remained that way until a certain gentleman got ill and couldn't continue, that's when they had to do a search to see who could just collect names and finish up the numbers europe was after. CH got himself chosen and what most of you know, begins and ends with him and mk. By some mysterious circumstance, or perhaps dumb luck, ch comes up with the last letter of the greek alphabet as the name for what he was doing. Because, it truly was the end of something that had been around longer than this country has even existed, in modern terminolgy of a country. When people let me know, they haven't stopped delivering, it remains ongoing to the finish, and I know they were under no compunction to even say a word, like a gift, I accept it. As my grandmother would say, 'never look the gift horse in the mouth'. Since there's been so much discussion of how many deliveries have actually got to be done to fulfill the job, I would challenge anyone who thinks they know, outside of the principals or perhaps some high ranking trustee, on the numbers they present. They don't know, and it's never been broadcasted. We can figure out what mk did or ch and bw counted up, but the whole shooting match? The parameters have to be vastly expanded before one can even make a good guess. What does it matter in the first place? The messengers out here keep making this an american centric thing, if the message I gave some time ago about the dollar being cut out of the equation of the payout in 2003, wasn't a signal, I don't know what would be. The trick is, I don't care what they are doing in dc about anything because none of it has bearing on brussels' actions, except angering someone, you really don't want angry at you, if you go sideways on something. They've given us all a big hint inside of that pack on the best way to handle things, follow it, and you're in the money without having to look over your back or wonder if they really are going to go back to the constitution. Meanwhile, I'm not holding my breath....not for 3-5 years anyhow. What happens over here after the completion of these vast money dumps are over, lends itself to a wide array of ideologies...just know junior sits with a panic button in his pocket. He hasn't accepted responsibilities for any of his former failures, what makes anyone think he'd accept this mess as his own?...or even gracefully bow out? His buddy down in Aus didn't, he had to take a royal butt kicking before he'd acknowlege he was whipped. Oh yea and the guy who defeated him, 'promised' to bring the aussy troops home. The war against Oceana, of 1984 fame, just doesn't wash in the world's intelligentsia. In summary, the bulk of all deliveries this past week, weren't in this country. That's not to say there weren't some. We just have bunkmates, we never think about....'cause we're 'mericans. I'm sure aunt hilda who lives on the hungarian border is one happy lady today and using the best paprika for the goulash. Most of the folks we know, overseas, are those who came in under mk, they will receive the same time we do. Try and maintain some sort of patience, I know that's a dirty word nowadays, but try anyhow. We're not forgotten about, nor throw away recipients. We really do count in the big picture. As a public service announcement, I will be reaching you folks who are waiting for a consultation, asap. The other thing is, the person who thinks I tossed them off my list, is wrong, I did no such thing. I delete addresses which keep bouncing back at me. Keep you chin up and 'expect' they will reach you and give you your freedom papers. I can't tell you when they'll hit your door, I can only say, they are on 'target', whatever that is, that's not the sort of info that gets dropped....but they aren't letting any grass grow under their feet....no matter what isn't public info over here. I keep saying this but who cares, 'it's not for public consumption'...you'll never see an advertisement on bloomberg or on cnn and fox. Drop a little something in the contribution box, as you pass by, www.paypal.com account 2goforth@safe-mail.net Good luck this week and take a few sweaters with you, the temp is dipping over yonder too. Consultations upon request. Love and Kisses,Poofness www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/nesara/news/news.php?q=1196100113...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Nov 26, 2007 14:15:04 GMT -5
I don't get it. Where's the rumor about CMKX?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 26, 2007 14:57:13 GMT -5
retflyr2 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Its feel good day time, spider MP3 revisted « Thread Started on Today at 7:33am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- www.zshare.net/audio/4545304f66cb69/ IceCrush Mod Squad Re: Its feel good day time, spider MP3 revisted « Reply #1 on Today at 9:18am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tidbits; SOL runs out in two years, you can put them on notice, with letter of intent, with 12 months to state your case. Doesn't want to go into that. He says there is a reason why a private company was established in Canada incorporated with 1 shareholder, CMKM diamonds, not to be confused with CMKM Nevada The Sask comp. was privately held company with 1 shareholder which is CMKM Nevada, hense residents of Sask. were not allowed to trade in Sask. There was also a duplicate company in BC called St.George, so if you were a residence of BC, you couldn't trade in BC. The key is USCanadian minerals. So we have two private companies holding the value. and they very likely merged with CIM and Juinna.........as owned subsiduraries of CIM. See why this is such a snarl. You've got to understand the duplication. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ That's what I think he meant, if wrong..........sorry. But it's a good concept. IceCrush « Last Edit: Today at 9:20am by IceCrush » millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1196080402
|
|