|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 28, 2007 12:00:37 GMT -5
By: harmonre 28 Nov 2007, 09:12 AM EST Msg. 27889 of 27889 Jump to msg. # Hummmm......Quantum Physics
The effects of Quantum Physics are typically not observable on macroscopic scales, but become evident at the atomic and subatomic level.
So you can't see what is going on.... while it's all going on....
wooo hoooo...
"Got Quantum Physics" I mean "Got CMKX"
GLTYA
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 28, 2007 13:57:22 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 28 Nov 2007, 11:28 AM EST Msg. 627067 of 627118 (This msg. is a reply to 627064 by 07isback.) Jump to msg. # 07, this was in May,,, and still no URBAN. weird, huh? any idea why the man still can't be found to be served?
why did kevin bother bringing suit against URBAN unless he was going to chase after him and get his man? maybe kevin's not a texas ranger? maybe kevin should call CHUCK NORRIS to locate URBAN?
one more thing that just doesn't add up,,, you file suit against a man and then you don't bother pursuing him.
seven months after the suit and still no action directed against URBAN. too weird.
- - - - - By: rosencrantz2010 28 Nov 2007, 11:38 AM EST Msg. 627079 of 627118 (This msg. is a reply to 627067 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # things don't add up. why doesn't kevin explain this? the only thing i've read is from the fellow they hired to serve URBAN and he said he waited around the house and then knocked on the door where a lady who looked like carolyn answered the door but said she didn't know a urban casavant. and so the guy gives up and writes back to kevin saying he tried real hard but couldn't locate urban.
do you believe this?
given the suit and the "FACT" that urban stole $200 million from shareholders wouldn't you think kevin would be flying up to saskatoon himself to serve URBAN personally? wouldn't kevin hand around the house in Saskatoon and then when URBAN went out at night to get a beer and jelly at the local tavern kevin would sneak up behind him and stuff the summons in the back of URBAN's pants?
if i really believed $200 million was on the line i'd chase him.
maybe kevin doesn't really think the suit is all that important?
- - - - - By: rosencrantz2010 28 Nov 2007, 11:51 AM EST Msg. 627083 of 627118 (This msg. is a reply to 627079 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # they pay some guy that doesn't know urban or carolyn to serve urban the court papers. they pay this guy to travel to Saskatoon to hang around and then fail in what should have been a simple task.
if they had the money to pay this fellow to serve urban they surely had the money to pay for kevin's airplane ticket and room and board for a week in Saskatoon to chase after a man kevin knows very well. and yet they give the job to a stranger. a job where $200 million dollars is resting on the outcome.
and with $200 million on the line they fiddle faddle around for seven months seemingly lost about what to do in trying to move the court case forward against urban. they don't serve him and they don't take the next step to move the case forward,,,which i think is just putting a notice in the paper. and i don't think they have done this,,,,and yet we are told $200 million dollars is riding on this suit against urban.
i thought bill frizzel was a bull dog? maybe bull dogs in texas are a little more easy going than in the rest of the country?
weird, huh?
- - - - - By: 07isback 28 Nov 2007, 12:44 PM EST Msg. 627094 of 627118 (This msg. is a reply to 627083 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # now rosen, surely you are aware that you just dont grab anyone off of the street to serve papers to someone, the process server works for the court system, not an individual,,,,,,,,,lmho, come on now you can do better then that,,,,
plus if you check closer, i think you just may find out that the p/s you mentioned was in nevada, not canada,,,
and your wrong, its not 200 million riding on the suit, the 200 million is the amount that was PILF`d from investots by urban and other crooks connected to cmkx, urban has squandered a lot of it, but you knew that already,,,
now the real question is why are you trying to paint urban as a good guy/saint, when in fact, he is nothing but a swindling low~life`d SCAMMER that is proven by the documents thats been posted todate,,,,,
- - - - - By: klonopin2mg 28 Nov 2007, 01:14 PM EST Msg. 627112 of 627118 (This msg. is a reply to 627094 by 07isback.) Jump to msg. # 07' THEN EMAIL TYLER AND HAVE HIS ASS SERVED! no need for process server....
"service by publication". YES, you and everyone else that keeps up has heard this directly from Tyler! again, why haven't they served UC? very simple....either they don't want him served or he would have been served long ago. it's just that simple, no need to complicate this issue.
they can serve a lawsuit w/i days of receiving boxes upon boxes of information that they purported as never seen before which is plausable in and of itself, but can't seem to find time in many months to serve......both are laughable.
don't know why i'm wasting my time with this.....you don't want to understand it seems. this post is not about being pro UC or pro KW, it's just what it "IS"...the truth!
- - - - - By: mt.men 28 Nov 2007, 01:33 PM EST Msg. 627118 of 627118 (This msg. is a reply to 627112 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. # klonopin Your post is so logical that it is impossible to refute. Keep up the good DD as it is much appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Nov 28, 2007 14:02:33 GMT -5
I think we need to decide as a sh base how much longer we are going to give KW and BF to dance around questions, etc. I think we are all hoping that something happens this year or before the GF date (Dec 3rd) but if not do we just sit by and wait for bs Q&A's from the TX group? I am a supporter of BF and KW but how long do we just let this thing go month after month after month...
|
|
|
Post by Catdaddy on Nov 28, 2007 14:20:49 GMT -5
As always, JMHO, I don't think that Kevin and Bill know the details as to what is really going on behind the scenes...I think that is by design and necessary for them to maintain the cover story. I think it is called plausible deny-ability, so they can say what they are saying without being in any legal entanglements at a later date. If major negotiations, arm twisting, and sensitive deal making are indeed going on in the background, and I strongly think that there are, the fewer people "in the know" the easier it is to keep everything in the background. I've said it before and I'll say it again now, I think that we are being presented with distractions and diversions to keep our collective eye off of the ball. Again, JMHO, I have no DD to support this, but I think that there are enough bread crumbs out here to make this theory believable. Later, Catdaddy
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Nov 28, 2007 14:39:38 GMT -5
I'll tell you what I think...posters like 07/kk/imsodreary/jonas/greedy/JAGGER/REALITY/ETC/ETC...are the BEST INDICATORS to the fact that SHORTY is and has been in DEEP TROUBLE for YEARS...would you keep posting on a stock you do not believe in or in some cases even OWN???...I know I wouldn't ...UNLESS I had a SHORT INTEREST in it or was being paid to post that BS...I post a few posts a day since I own 250 million shares and BELIEVE in a positive outcome...to post ALL DAY and MOST of the night on a stock I was sure was a SCAM or I don't even own shares in is BEYOND BELIEF...to me...I get a lot of HOPE from the BASHERS and they keep me interested in this stock...without them I would be much more pessimistic ...THANKS BASHERS...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 28, 2007 19:43:14 GMT -5
stormgrey43 DIAMOND JEDI Re: Name the author of this quote: « Thread Started on Today at 4:00pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Evaluation--I can tell you that I am comfortable in saying the claims represented by the company are being maintained. I make this statement based on reports from third parties that should be "in the know". John and I decided several months ago to make it a part of our investigation to determine as best as we could the existence and value of the claims which we have been told belong to the company. We have paid people on the ground in Canada to give us information about the claims. We do not have a figure for the $value of the claims in Canada, but I am convinced there is substantial value for many reasons. Our investigation reveals there has been a drilling program that continues as we speak. We hope to get more information for you as to the results of the drilling. The last PR about the drilling results probably did more harm than good. I believe we can get better information to you. I have told Mr. Stoecklein that I have some acquaintances of mine in the Oil business that are researching the area and there may be interest the oil concessions on our claims. It will take a another couple of weeks but I plan to continue my efforts in this regard." If you've figured out who made this statement, now ask yourself - "Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.........did he ever update us as promised?" The short answer is "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO". Storm millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1196283603snoopstock5 DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: Name the author of this quote: « Reply #6 on Today at 5:29pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here is a link to some old press releases. Excellent post Storm. findarticles.com/p/search?qt=CASAVANT+MINING&qf=all&qta=1&tb=art&x=0&y=0&sn=40
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 28, 2007 21:54:35 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 28 Nov 2007, 05:33 PM EST Msg. 627232 of 627310 (This msg. is a reply to 627126 by calvinwinters.) Jump to msg. # calvinwinters, if you want to put the best spin possible on it, you might argue that as part of the "deal" or "settlement" with shorty URBAN agreed to "kill" the other naked short shares they had shorty locked into. and the best way to do that is to simply get rid of all the shares and shareholders. otherwise, i don't see much reason to kill all the stock in these companies, for example, why take USCN down from 174 million share OS to 2.4 million OS? but if there was a large naked short locked up in the previous USCN and you added just a touch of claim value to it then you could really jam it to shorty. from uscn perspective what they effectively did was to wipe out it's investor base which would be pretty stupid. now, rather than having 20,000 to 50,000 investors they have 10,000 to 20,000 investors with 1-5 shares. not too much to get excited about there,,, other than hard feelings toward a company with not much value in its future. ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=627232&submit=GoBy: calvinwinters 28 Nov 2007, 06:14 PM EST Msg. 627254 of 627310 (This msg. is a reply to 627232 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosencrantz:First, why USCA did what they did could be as you suggest. From as far back as I can recall, our relationship had more to do with sector and divy's rather than USCA's short. As you're aware they did appear back in Feb 05 on SHO. Maybe others here have more data regarding their share structure. Now I guess where we split at the fork is I see no reason for UC to remove any pressure from his opponents. Seems unnecessary then to turn to some of the most brillant legal help available. Not to forget the "Got CMKX" ad funding... The only way I see your idea is that our settlement pps would be compounded to the numbers we're assuming now. Regardless of the number you expect... cal
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 28, 2007 22:05:23 GMT -5
By: kilroy.killbasher 28 Nov 2007, 04:32 PM EST Msg. 627188 of 627321 (This msg. is a reply to 627064 by 07isback.) Jump to msg. # 07, good day, sir. An SEC probe and investigations by 4 other governmental agencies 7 months ago and NO HANDCUFFS YET? If you were to steal 200 million dollars under the nose of 5 agencies as blatantly as Stock Patrol portrays, how long do you think you'd be allowed to blow the money until they put YOU in cuffs? Probably 7 hours or 7 days, but 7 MONTHS? Something's just not right with this picture IMHO. \\|// ( o o ) ~~~~oOOo~(_)~oOOo~~~~ KILROY WAS HERE By: 07isback 28 Nov 2007, 05:00 PM EST Msg. 627195 of 627321 (This msg. is a reply to 627188 by kilroy.killbasher.) Jump to msg. # howdy kilroy, sir we shall see in due time, but imo 7 months is not a very long time to be investigating cmkx/and insiders connected to it, when all is concidered, and the amount of people thats been involved with cmkx,,,,, By: sparkysantos 28 Nov 2007, 05:31 PM EST Msg. 627230 of 627319 (This msg. is a reply to 627216 by kilroy.killbasher.) Jump to msg. # Very well said Kilroy; and well worth a repost: Sparky By: kilroy.killbasher 28 Nov 2007, 05:16 PM EST Msg. 627216 of 627227 (Msg. is a reply to 627195 by 07isback.) 07, I'm like you. I just want the bad guys (whoever they are) to go to jail. The investors who MAY have lost money (until someone's in jail, I won't be sure). However, the posters on this board who were/are not shareholders are here for more reasons than "chuckles", I guarantee. If this were a simple P&D with robbed investors lamenting on a message board 2 years after revocation, nobody would want to hang out with so called "ignorant victims"... nobody in their right mind or with an inkling of a real life anyway. A lot of non-shareholding posters here live in fear of a 5 a.m. knock at their doors IMHO. GLTY! \\|// ( o o ) ~~~~oOOo~(_)~oOOo~~~~ KILROY WAS HERE ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=627230
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 29, 2007 8:21:10 GMT -5
tramp Administrator A SIGN..A SIGN..A SIGN.. « Thread Started on Yesterday at 11:45pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The ad i had after i just posted on the tumbleweed thread.. rolling into cash.. this was the ad.. on ebay..ads are at the top of the page.. i noticed it.. d*mn.. what luck is that..right? $23.94 Tony Bartone CMKX 2005 Funny car #733 of 1,254 Rac Chmp $19.98 TONY BARTONE'S CMKX " FUNNY CAR " 1/24 DIE CAST " WOW" $21.94 TONY BARTONE JOHNNY LIGHTNING GOT CMKX ? FUNNY CAR tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1196318707
|
|
1943
Diamond Hunter
Posts: 23
|
Post by 1943 on Nov 29, 2007 8:31:56 GMT -5
soonerlew what does it mean about tramp's post
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Nov 29, 2007 9:21:12 GMT -5
1943:
Tramp finds omens and secret messages in stuff...
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Nov 29, 2007 10:29:19 GMT -5
I'm thinking what Tramp is saying that when he went into ebay there were advertisments, or something like it, for CMKX funny car auctions.
The reason most likely is that ebay has his interest tracked everytime he goes to ebay. It recognizes that his IP address always searches for "CMKX" so it gives him the latest items. No coincidence. No luck. Just clever internet marketing. This is done on many sites now a days.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 29, 2007 14:24:47 GMT -5
soonerlew what does it mean about tramp's post I think he's just foolin' around. The cars that are on sale were those that had cmkx on them....I took it as foolin', not sure what he may have meant
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 29, 2007 14:26:30 GMT -5
fireman Diamond Miner Re: Begins & Ends with Citi « Reply #2 on Yesterday at 8:40pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Questions, why was the Citi sticker on the race car? Why is Citi dealing with Knight? What is the real connection with CMKX? Did Citi bail out any brokers? What is the Citi connection to UC? Just how fishy are all these different connections and is Citi the common link within this arrangement whatever it is? cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1196210456
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 29, 2007 14:27:57 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 29 Nov 2007, 07:48 AM EST Msg. 627382 of 627384 Jump to msg. # sept, are we going to see or hear about any CMKX related fireworks today or tomorrow? for instance,,,,, will there be thunder associated with the "RAIN"? and what switch are we waiting to have thrown before the "LIGHTS" come on? ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=627382
|
|