|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 19, 2008 14:13:43 GMT -5
Thanks luci.................
By: billy80817 19 Feb 2008, 01:17 PM EST Msg. 667606 of 667620 Jump to msg. # One more time...two questions
1. Why hasn't the Friz filed against the brokers and investment bankers? And to the scumbag bashers, don't give me that Does and Roes crap because he would've already taken action had he needed to.
2. Logically, this equates to a negotiated settlement. The second question is when is the disbursement?
Want to guess what the bashers will say? "There is no short" and "Urban is the crook"
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 19, 2008 14:14:09 GMT -5
By: stickybunz 19 Feb 2008, 12:50 PM EST Msg. 667570 of 667664 Jump to msg. # Paltalkers here is a MAHEU UPDATE: Maheu's role was to get Urban a deal with the U.S. Government and SEC and all other regulators. Once the deal was cut, Maheu's role was done. Urban agreed to never publicly prove the Naked Short in CMKX and the Regulators agreed to not imprison him. He gets to keep all the cash he looted from us also. This above is all my opinion but the more I think about it, the more sense it makes. And the more likely it is to be the truth. All evidence IMO points to this conclusion. We are so fugged. Urban fleeced us. I just hope Frizzell can get something back for us. But its not looking too good to me. - - - - - ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=667570By: david_stevens 19 Feb 2008, 12:53 PM EST Msg. 667572 of 667668 (This msg. is a reply to 667570 by stickybunz.) Jump to msg. # sticky, and 2 think frizzell closed his practice for that - - - - - ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=667572By: stickybunz 19 Feb 2008, 12:56 PM EST Msg. 667579 of 667666 (This msg. is a reply to 667572 by david_stevens.) Jump to msg. # David, maybe Frizzell just wants whats left of the claims. He gets them back for CMKX. He sells them. He takes 95% of the money to pay himself and all the other members of his team and then the regular CMKX shareholders each get a check for $.15 TOTAL. doesnt sound too great to me ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=667579
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 19, 2008 14:14:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 19, 2008 14:15:12 GMT -5
By: upedo 19 Feb 2008, 01:37 PM EST Msg. 667640 of 667671 Jump to msg. # Absolutely no insiders for CMKM will go to jail. Shares and assets will be reclaimed and reorganized. Kevin will resign and Bill will quit. Checkmate. Keep your Certificates filed away in a safe place and if you need to pass them on to someone you love, do it correctly. - - - - - ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=667640
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 19, 2008 14:15:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 19, 2008 14:16:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 19, 2008 14:16:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 19, 2008 14:17:12 GMT -5
By: whereistheend 19 Feb 2008, 02:00 PM EST Msg. 667670 of 667672 Jump to msg. # Kevin chairman? Re: What's The Truth Kevin? « Reply #10 on Today at 12:11pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 10:28am, smeagle wrote:So, now he is signing as "chairman". What does it change? Thanks for asking smeagle. This is a topic near and dear to my heart for I was CEO of a couple of companies and worked with some great Chairpersons. First of all, there typically is not a separate President and CEO in a company. The two positions are one and the same. And this office is the operating head. It is filled by the BOD, hires the management team, and runs the day to day operations, i.e., The Buck Stops Right There! The position of Chairman, on the other hand, is an elected one from among the Directors. It is a position of honor and distinction. It IS NOT an operating position. It is the Chairman's job to lead the Board in overseeing the management team's performance, and thus, the performance of the Company. My point is simply this, if a person wants to look impressive or feel important, they will walk around calling themselves the President, CEO and Chairman, which is totally redundant. Correspondence with shareholders is from the President/CEO, not the Chairman. When one mixes and matches the three titles, shareholders and investors begin to wonder who is in charge and if anyone truly understands the nature of their job. With respect to, dare I say it, the "new CMKX" that is a question often on my mind and I suspect the minds of many other shareholders. A long winded answer to a short question smeagle. But I do get passionate about correct corporate structure. Tex millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1203433897 ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=667670
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 19, 2008 15:31:07 GMT -5
Paintedhorse DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: What's The Truth Kevin? « Reply #23 on Today at 2:16pm »
greenman, I hate to burst your KW bubble, but it is not just Tyler that this cowboy is upset with. However, they are the ones who took over the corporate shell to ostensibly do something with it for the benefit of shareholders.
It is that effort that gets them in trouble with me, i.e., lack of real effort, communication, and transparency. And their updates/FAQ's do not count.
IOW Mr. Green, the Tyler Two put themselves in the line of fire and alienated the shareholder base to boot.
As for "spending" all the money, has anything been proven by Tyler yet? Or is there still only accusations and inuendo's? What has UC, et. al. been proven guilty of?
I for one look forward to a day in court for those who deserve it. Let the battle begin. So far, we are firing at long range and hitting nothing. And still only $500 in the account, maybe.
Yet KW is thanking everyone for the support!
Tex
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Feb 19, 2008 16:11:56 GMT -5
ENTG is down 26%+
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 19, 2008 18:48:04 GMT -5
By: johnnyic 19 Feb 2008, 05:59 PM EST Msg. 667928 of 667987 Jump to msg. #
George Burns and Dr. Diamonds...they knew how too work the boards
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 19, 2008 19:01:26 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 19 Feb 2008, 05:52 PM EST Msg. 667923 of 667997Jump to msg. # a little georgeburns back in 2005 warning the og about urban, I guess the little passage from mark's book about urban wasn't a surprise with all these guys telling bill what a scumbag urban was, not a chance you could get fooled hey: Friday, August 05, 2005 Mr. George Burns Now this guy, a forum poster who goes by the name George Burns, seems to know how to post a post... I believe... could you?« Thread Started on Today at 5:55am » I believe it is what it seems to be... A company with a 703 billion OS. A million acres of unproven claims held by another entity in an unknown way. A gold mine in Ecuador that we may or may not own and production is unknown with unkown takes from other companies. A CEO who kept horrible books. Books that show massive dillution and shady transactions. A company that auditors keep bailing out; first one for not having enough information to do the job...the second one for having enough information to make the company look criminal. A CEO who allowed his IR to state that all the money for racing was coming out of his own pocket when actually the money was coming from the company to the tune of 4 million dollars. A CEO that claimed share retirement in PRs when in fact dillution was occuring. (i.e. 207 billion share increase above the 500 billion possible at the time.) I don't know about you, but when I retire, I want to stop working and stay stopped working. A CEO that spent 4 million on races, money on a party, money to give away a car, money to fly to Ecuador and take pictures, shares to give to a touted attorney who didn't do a thing. (the only visible effect of Roger Glenn was the appearance some restricted dividends, and some trusts to protect the CEO's assets.) A CEO whose money would have obviously been better spent on an accountant. A CEO who stated that he was spending 40 billion personal shares on a transaction to prevent shareholder dillution, when in fact he had never owned that many shares himself. A CEO who allowed his IR and others to state the OS was low and that we would be happy with it. A CEO that pleads the 5th at a hearing that would decide the fate of his own company.I am not however saying that I don't think we have a shot. I do have a lot of respect for Mr. Maheu. I do however believe that nice people are taken advantage of. I do believe that nice people need money. 40,000 dollars a month can do a lot for a guy. I hope this is the case and that Mr. Maheu is working on this with all his wisdom.In light of all the above, I think this it what it is... A non compliant company trying to become compliant.Motivation: Keep the CEO out of jail or in jail for as little time as possible.I think the only way they can do this, is if they do the shareholders a solid. If the CEO can get you more for your shares than what you paid for them, I think he may be okay.I am guessing that .0011 is the goal... and that is fine with me.I don't think Urban is necessarily a bad guy. He seems nice. I think he either got caught up in a lifestyle that he needed to keep, or there were people forcing his hand to do bad things. A hostile takeover or a viper for a financer. That combined with bad decisions could bring us to this point.There is no Master Plan. If there were, it would have come to frution by now. Master Plans by design do not take this long. lolIf there were a master plan it would have been thought of long ago and would not have ended with a nearly revoked company or anywhere near it. There is no explanation for the situation we are in now, other than what it is.We have not filed and can't get an audit complete due to missing information.There will be no roll over into CIM. The same requirements will be in the face of the new company as that are in the companies face now.CIM/Casavant international mining is not IPOing in Europe.I think the only way out of this is to either become fully reporting and release some actual valuation or to issue a cash dividend and go away.In till the end, and beyond.-burns « Last Edit: Today at 8:47am by CDLIC » Note: At the end of that post by George Burns you will see an edit done by a board moderator. Wonder why? Maybe CDLIC could answer that? Link to George Burns post: cmkxdiamond.proboards32.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1123246503 posted by Sammy @ 5:12 PM 1 Comments: Anonymous Anonymous said... This Guy is on the payroll of the so called Owners Group and as such is a paid basher of CMKX. They made a weak attempt last week in an effort to takeover the company through legal action. They use a personel injury lawyer and he doesn't have a clue. It is very funny to watch. 7:14 PM
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 19, 2008 19:03:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 19, 2008 19:05:54 GMT -5
By: ralph74000 19 Feb 2008, 06:20 PM EST Msg. 667945 of 667999 (This msg. is a reply to 667939 by david_stevens.) Jump to msg. # david,
I posted that the Tyler company and their website have nothing to do with shareholders and it seemed to get a lot of people mad at me. Urban was very clear that the original company was wrapped up.
Not sure what I said wrong.
oh well ralph
By: CHICPICK 19 Feb 2008, 06:23 PM EST Msg. 667948 of 668000 (This msg. is a reply to 667945 by ralph74000.) Jump to msg. # ralph, Here's a wake up call. Tyler is ALL that the shareholders have left. Got the picture? Urban? Urban lies when he goes to the Doctor.
By: ralph74000 19 Feb 2008, 06:29 PM EST Msg. 667957 of 668001 (This msg. is a reply to 667948 by CHICPICK.) Jump to msg. # chickpick, thank you for expressing your opinion in the attached post. Although it is wholly inaccurate, it did express your views very clear. Great post by the way. Actually, Urban is a very nice man from what I have been told by a very very close friend. I have no need at this time to question my friends integrity.
Regardind tyler being the only thing shareholders have? Again, you are not accurate and frankly not even close.
The shareholders (let's call them bonifide owners of trust) have 'a lot', and tyler is not part of 'a lot'
Best wishes ralph
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 19, 2008 19:12:05 GMT -5
By: jonas-dl 19 Feb 2008, 06:29 PM EST Msg. 667958 of 668001 Jump to msg. # Post of the decade!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! By: dmgroup 19 Feb 2008, 05:33 PM EST Msg. 667902 of 667955 (This msg. is a reply to 667884 by david_stevens.) Jump to msg. # thingyy i have been here as long as any. i bought and bought and bought based on pr's and what i could research about the land urban claimed we had in canada, and then i bought more. so 60,000 dollars later and 4 plus years we no longer trade urban and family hide tyler is more useless than a tick on a elephants #### the only posters that guarantee that we won because of what they know don't have the metal to post what they know to date jonas is the only one that has been correct last but not least....I was standing next to urban and carolyn when the lady took the stand in vegas. the look in his eyes was I skrewed all you fools and there is nothing you can do about it. it was then when i Believe Urban And all the Casavants to be Crooks. and to think he used sick children in the hospitals to sell shares. and the free shares to charities was a good ploy also
|
|