|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 8:22:37 GMT -5
By: smartmoneyknows 05 May 2008, 09:04 AM EDT Msg. 715500 of 715508 Jump to msg. # NOW HERE'S A DREAMER
OR MAYBE JUST ANOTHER PAID PUMPER
THANKS_URBAN: if the shares were never put into the market and urban bought back the float -we r talking a PPS n the 100's THANKS_URBAN: probably the 1000's THANKS_URBAN: like mitchs friend said - it would melted the market
1000.00 PPS??? IS THIS GUY TRAMPS' COUSIN ON STEROIDS???
NOW THERE'S SOME SOLID THINKING....LOL NOT!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 8:24:44 GMT -5
By: aladin99 05 May 2008, 09:22 AM EDT Msg. 715508 of 715508 Jump to msg. # 1st Global Stock Transfer LLC -
4/7/2008 Summons Issued as to 1st Global Stock Transfer LLC. (MJZ) (Entered: 04/07/2008) 4/24/2008 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Securities and Exchange Commission re 9 Summons Issued. 1st Global Stock Transfer LLC waiver sent on 4/14/2008, answer due 6/13/2008. (Hakala, Leslie) (Entered: 04/24/2008)
Folks can still get CIM certificates from the TA while we have 85% of our O/S is Unregistered shares... Is that interesting?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 9:34:51 GMT -5
dicek18 DIAMOND JEDI Re: The Daily Buzz Discussion - 05.05.08 « Reply #18 Today at 9:10am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 8:52am, icanoe1 wrote: I agree Canoe. One thing I will say about Deli, I don't know of anyone - outside of current and former CMKX management - who has come as close as Deli has to being scooped up by the Feds and charged with SEC violations. This guy has brass ones. He's been walking on the razor's edge for some time now. He's had several interviews with SEC people regarding his selling of CMKX shares after revocation, and yet he still remains vocal and active in this saga. Obviously, he wasn't given a gag order, or forced to sign an NDA. Deli is still a player. Neither the SEC, nor any other Federal agency ordered that Deli's activities be shut down and that he be brought up on charges. Deli has issues with the State of Wisconsin, but not with the federal government. Deli has skated through this entire drama relatively unscathed. The proof is in the pudding: If Deli were truly suspected of any wrongdoing by any of our federal agencies, he would have been brought up on charges long ago. And I believe that the lack of any clamp down by the Feds on Deli, and the lack of any pending charges against him, is a tacit agreement by the Feds there is no evidence of any wrongdoing by Deli. I see this as vindication of Deli and his activities. I'm hoping that he's right about the packets/letter coming our way. He's still standing. He continues to be vocal about CMKX. He has not been quieted by any federal agency. I believe he's a bona fide player. He's most definitely got my attention. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=19675
|
|
|
Post by twobits10 on May 5, 2008 11:44:08 GMT -5
i don't think deli is a player, he is an opportunist. the SEC cannot singley fret out deli and charge himi for selling unregistered shares....all the big brokerage houses did it, so the SEC would have to take down all of them if they took down deli, so deli isn't invincible...he just got lucky.
btw there is NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS for fraud...and as far as the limitations on any SEC rule...they are tolled cause we had a hearing, every fruadster is free game. having said that, i think SEC will disgourge and pay us like the final ruling states.
2bits
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 14:39:53 GMT -5
i don't think deli is a player, he is an opportunist. the SEC cannot singley fret out deli and charge himi for selling unregistered shares....all the big brokerage houses did it, so the SEC would have to take down all of them if they took down deli, so deli isn't invincible...he just got lucky. btw there is NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS for fraud...and as far as the limitations on any SEC rule...they are tolled cause we had a hearing, every fruadster is free game. having said that, i think SEC will disgourge and pay us like the final ruling states. 2bits Where ya been twobits10? Been missing ya!!!!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 14:40:25 GMT -5
By: aladin99 02 May 2008, 09:04 PM EDT Msg. 714779 of 715522 Jump to msg. # Tiger Fund may add CIM??? www.mffais.com/institutions/124439/By: aladin99 02 May 2008, 11:31 PM EDT Msg. 714830 of 715522 (This msg. is a reply to 714826 by reality.bytes.) Jump to msg. # R.Bytes... I did not mean CIM...I said...Tiger Fund MAY add CIM....please re read....check who has just added LDK....
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 14:55:30 GMT -5
By: lilburrito0 04 May 2008, 07:57 PM EDT Msg. 715328 of 715678 Jump to msg. # Blessed be God that we CMKM Shareholders are one day closer to seeing Urban in Jail!
By: joesixpack333 04 May 2008, 08:43 PM EDT Msg. 715341 of 715679 (This msg. is a reply to 715328 by lilburrito0.) Jump to msg. # burrito.....
some of us who pray to God get what we pray for... some get what they deserve... tread lightly...
By: leowanta 05 May 2008, 12:11 PM EDT Msg. 715565 of 715679 (This msg. is a reply to 715341 by joesixpack333.) Jump to msg. # joesixpack333....good post to lilburrito0...had to take him off ignore though...
Blessed to God> lilburrito0 is blessing the Father which is praising him for his Glory....lilburrito may or maynot know what he is saying....either way, it's a good post, positive for UC, cause the Father has already "saved" UC out of this.
Thank You Father, Bless 'lilburrito0'....he knows NOT what he says! LOL
leowanta
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 14:56:46 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 05 May 2008, 09:52 AM EDT Msg. 715511 of 715679 Jump to msg. # OT; "tolling of statute of limitations" means the statute is being extended, until whatever they are waiting for is resolved. FYI.IMO. eom.
By: greedy_malone 05 May 2008, 10:46 AM EDT Msg. 715522 of 715679 (This msg. is a reply to 715511 by newtopennies.) Jump to msg. # RE:tolling of statute of limitations
This is the tolling statute that would apply to Urban.
7.03 TOLLING PROVISION: FUGITIVE OR OUTSIDE U.S.
Section 6531 of Title 26 contains its own tolling provision. The statute provides:
The time during which the person committing any of the various offenses arising under the internal revenue laws is outside the United States or is a fugitive from justice within the meaning of section 3290 of Title 18 of the United States Code, shall not be taken as any part of the time limited by law for commencement of such proceedings.
26 U.S.C. § 6531 (1988). Thus, the statute of limitations in Title 26 cases can be tolled if the defendant is outside the United States or is a fugitive.
"Outside the United States" and "fugitive from justice" are interpreted in the disjunctive. Mere absence from the United States without any intent to become a fugitive is sufficient to toll the statute of limitations.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 15:03:09 GMT -5
By: snoopstock613 05 May 2008, 10:33 AM EDT Msg. 715518 of 715680 (This msg. is a reply to 715482 by adrienne07.) Jump to msg. # President Sergey Rumyantsev was right though. That letter STATES that Nevwest sold over 250 billion shares. The SEC has just stated that insiders flooded the market with 622 billion. Why was Jeffreies not charged for their 112 billion. Why was TD Canada not charged with their 80 billion or more? Why was Etrade not charged with maybe over 69 billion shares? Why was Ameritrade not charged? Why was CS not charged? Why was TD Waterhouse not charged? Again the little fish gets the charges and the big fish swim away. Now you know what is wrong with OUR SYSTEM. The BIG MONEY pays them off.
By: 2puttbirdie 05 May 2008, 10:43 AM EDT Msg. 715520 of 715680 (This msg. is a reply to 715518 by snoopstock613.) Jump to msg. # Snoop; NevWest was a convenient fall-guy, a head on the pike, and so they were thrown under the bus. The Market doesn't care about NevWest, but it certainly does care about TD, CS, ETrade, etc.
The Sec didn't publically expose the criminal deeds of the mainstream brokers.
However, I really do believe that these guilty brokerages will be privately punished and in a big way.
The cert pull prooved how complicit the major brokerages actually are in the CMKX NSS, and the proof is in the certs that we hold.
The Sec cannot argue with issued certs.
The certs are strategic evidence of shareholder harm which will eventually lead to our receiving a settlement.
By: snoopstock613 05 May 2008, 11:04 AM EDT Msg. 715526 of 715680 (This msg. is a reply to 715520 by 2puttbirdie.) Jump to msg. # We still have some hope, but will that carry most to Aug 7th?
By: greedy_malone 05 May 2008, 10:55 AM EDT Msg. 715523 of 715680 (This msg. is a reply to 715520 by 2puttbirdie.) Jump to msg. # 2puttbirdie
You obviously have never invested before or you have and have never made a penny.
The SEC revokes scams and frauds. Only the worst of the worst violators get revoked. Nobody pays back shareholders for investing in a scam.
Urban is the one who filed the false form 15. Urban is the one who issued billions of unregistered shares. Urban is the one to blame. The SEC can't protect you from your own stupidity. Your lack of proper DD here is what the problem is. There will always be scams who operate on the pinks. Thousands of them at a time. If you want protection you have to educate yourself. It's obvious after years and years of opportunity to do so, you have refused.
Nobody is going to come rescue you from your own ignorance. Youw ant to fight for your right to be victimized then go right ahead. You have become a terminal victim. Somebody who has been conditioned to buy shares and act as if you are somehow in a fight against evil and by releasing your shares before they become worthless is allowing evil to defeat you.
But all it really consists of is you losing money and then chasing ghosts for the rest of your life. You are to blame for your losses here. You could have avoided them simply by verifying claims before you invest. If you can't find the verification then you should assume it is a scam and move on. If you choose to buy knwowing there is no way to verify any of the hype then you have to accept your fate.
Only those who are 100% clueless blame shorts, the SEC and brokers for their losses. You lost because you were not smart enough to figure out this was a scam and you are doomed to repeat those actions based on your beliefs long after having the opportunity to learn the facts.
But hey, if it makes you feel good about yourself then keep it up.
By: sparkysantos 05 May 2008, 11:17 AM EDT Msg. 715530 of 715680 (This msg. is a reply to 715523 by greedy_malone.) Jump to msg. # 2puttbirdie; Greedy has it all wrong - IMHO, the shorters are the ones who should have "avoided them simply by verifying claims before you invest."
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 15:07:43 GMT -5
By: whyme176 05 May 2008, 11:59 AM EDT Msg. 715555 of 715680 Jump to msg. # Wonder what etrade will offer for my illegal naked short unregistered certificate that went through the whole system illegal... The sec says I am a injured shareholder.. Now certain posters want to add insult to that injury.. How evil is that................
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 15:10:42 GMT -5
By: pennypauly 05 May 2008, 01:09 PM EDT Msg. 715595 of 715680 Jump to msg. # Jay Im out of tea Please help me
Please Give us true long of longs some Ice with the tea...
thanks
take care
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 15:11:33 GMT -5
By: jack_cass 05 May 2008, 01:12 PM EDT Msg. 715600 of 715680 Jump to msg. # I love the secent of fresh green untaxed funds from the naked shorted treasury.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 15:16:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 19:45:04 GMT -5
BasicInstinct DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Barry Shipes « Thread Started Today at 12:03am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For those that never read this..... Barry Shipes, This is the guy who called Molly @ the SEC in that MP3 Aug 2, 2005Opponents of 'naked' short selling picket DTCC Shareholders of several small-cap companies demonstrated outside the Manhattan offices of the Depositary Trust & Clearing Corp. on Friday to complain about the practice of "naked" short selling. "Naked" short selling occurs when a trader sells shares that he or she does not own. U.S. securities rules allow this if the shares are finally delivered to the buyer, but it becomes illegal when the trade can't be settled, or is done to drive the stock's price down. I'm in the car business," said George Boomer, of Heathrow, Florida, one of the more than dozen picketers. "If I sold you a car and I failed to produce the title of the car, you'd march to the attorney general's office to complain." Several of the protesters claimed the practice had taken a toll on the shares of CMKM Diamonds Inc. (OTC: CMKX) , a minerals exploration company that trades on the Pink Sheets. Its shares were unchanged Friday at 0.01 cents. In recent months, the group has also targeted the offices of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq with demonstrations. Barry Shipes, an investor, said the loosely organized group was taking on the DTCC because it had not stepped up to interfere in the practice of "naked" shorting. The DTCC makes a fractional profit out of every share that trades in the U.S. market," said Shipes, a security guard from Beacon, New York. "Why would they stop it? The money is going into their accounts." For its part, the DTCC noted that it is not charged by the SEC or its shareholders with enforcement duties. "We are neither a contributor to any of these trading activities or a factor in any of the allegations that these folks are making," said Stuart Z. Goldstein, a managing director at the DTCC. "These folks are wrong in their assumptions and wrong in their facts." Short selling is a way of profiting from a stock's decline in value. A short seller borrows shares and sells them, hoping to buy them back later at a lower price, pocketing the difference. In "naked" short selling, the seller does not borrow the shares prior to selling them. Source: U.S. Equity News (August 2, 2005 - 3:01 AM EDT) News by QuoteMedia www.quotemedia.com "The DTCC which is owned by banks, operates as a clearing house, overseeing the post-trade delivery of securities and cash to buyers and sellers." Basic................ BasicInstinct DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: Barry Shipes « Reply #3 Today at 11:06am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Things to note" #1.)The DTCC makes a fractional profit out of every share that trades in the U.S. market. Trillions of CMKX stock traded.. wonder what they made? #2.)The DTCC which is owned "by banks", operates as a clearing house, overseeing the post-trade delivery of securities and cash to buyers and sellers. The DTCC "is" the BANKS, so when the DTCC washed their hands of this it was actually the banks washing their hands of this.... How convenient. #3.)The DTCC noted that it is not charged by the SEC or its shareholders with enforcement duties. What does that mean? #4.)"We are neither a contributor to any of these trading activities or a factor in any of the allegations that these folks are making," said Stuart Z. Goldstein, a managing director at the DTCC. "These folks are wrong in their assumptions and wrong in their facts." No "YOU" are wrong Mr. Goldstein... Wonder what you are saying about the mortgage crisis right now. Basic................... millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=19671
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 5, 2008 19:52:33 GMT -5
seagull Administrator Gossip Queen of CMKX Re: gossip 5/5/08 « Reply #16 Today at 9:51am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oil Re: The Daily Buzz Discussion - 05.05.08 « Reply #23 Today at 10:12am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I believe that Deli got it correct when he first stated about notification leaving its first area of departure. As I posted on the "CMKX VEGAS ROOM BOARD" several days ago; "Shareholders have long discussed the receipt of their notifications on or about the same time "IN HAND". It just makes more sense to me that (as we have kicked around the logistics of such timing issues) that there would be HUBS for the dispersing of these letters or packages in route from where ever they originated. In this way we all receive around the same time, and it cuts down on the chatter. Makes way too much sense in any organized campaign that was well thought out. Mass mailings of importance that carry priority because of return notification requirements, identification purposes, or liability with regards to Non Disclosure issues where large DAMAGES are involved all require timing, and a window of opportunity to close the gate on discussion and IMHO2!~ As Mr Deli said even if it takes a few more days it really makes little difference. I agree with him with the caveat that the reason would be; For the timing issue 4 shareholders to all receive in a given time frame relative to each other say by an 8 hour period. (as a guess ) The only other alternative is that this notification is not of any priority, and we all receive it on our own time. So be it. I just doubt that scenario greatly. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ AIMHO2~ Good Luck, and G_D Speed To Us All~" Oil tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=5014
|
|