|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 10, 2008 19:35:49 GMT -5
john3339 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: Jay remains very quiet lately,why? « Reply #8 Today at 6:19pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 4:59pm, bradwalker wrote: Today, it's all gut feelings based on the news that's out there for all to see. However, in the past, I was told a couple of things in confidence that lead me to believe that no one on the board spouting dates and amounts knows anything about what they're talking about. and that we'd be more than happy with our eventual payout. I don't think that it's wishful thinking, but most likely the result of tough actions. Looking to the future! john millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=21514
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 10, 2008 20:22:49 GMT -5
By: snoopstock613 10 Aug 2008, 08:45 PM EDT Msg. 750104 of 750109 Jump to msg. # Rosen, if the SEC ALLOWS them to trade again, the bad part is for the shareholders. The good news would be for shorty. The company would have to R/S the share count. The price would increase. The shorters would be all over this stock again. CIRCLES WILL CONTINUE. Then the original longs would still be holders AGAIN.
THE SEC GOVERNMENT MUST MAKE SHORTERS COVER. NOT ONLY THAT, BUT TO FIND SHARES THEY CAN SHORT. ALSO, IF THE SHARES ARE IN A TRUST ACCOUNT OR COMPANY, THEY CAN ONLY SHORT IT ONCE.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 10, 2008 20:23:28 GMT -5
By: snoopstock613 10 Aug 2008, 09:18 PM EDT Msg. 750108 of 750109 (This msg. is a reply to 750051 by mquietstorm3.) Jump to msg. # MQ if your idea is correct with "nonshareholders", then we are screwed. People have certs in hand and I certainly have not seen anyone coming to my house to get a hold of my cert. If SOMEONE ALREADY PAID FOR them, they are not around anymore. Stop with this "nonshareholder" crap. Logic tells you otherwise. It is more likely that their are alot LESS share out there than majority knows. But you just keep holding your "nonshares". By the way, KW and BF already gave the "unshareholders" a site to go to. Of course, they never received any certs.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 10, 2008 20:47:00 GMT -5
tallyplunker Diamond Driller Citibank & SEC Settle = Possible CMKM??? « Thread Started Yesterday at 9:11am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All of this talk about Banks/Brokerage Houses settling with the SEC which includes billions of dollars, and thats now...with the prospects of billions more down the road...well does that affect us ...IMHO there is a real possibility that those settlements are payments disguised as other than what they really are....ill gotten gains from ( COUNTERFEITING )...I mean..lets face it..you are never going to see an admission of guilt for something the RICO Statutes were made specifically for...so put out some stupid BS that the vast majority of the people out there will swallow...it's a viable scenario...time will tell..and we got lots of that lol.....tally runningrich Diamond Cutter Level 4 Re: Citibank & SEC Settle = Possible CMKM??? « Reply #1 Yesterday at 10:32am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I agree = PAYDAY!! kranker Administrator Re: Citibank & SEC Settle = Possible CMKM??? « Reply #2 Yesterday at 10:35am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- As a CMKM shareholder, I wish it were otherwise but unfortunately I am going to have to vote NO. No connection to CMKM whatsoever. cmkxunitedforum.proboards70.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=13826
|
|