|
Post by Display Name on Oct 13, 2008 14:43:54 GMT -5
Heys Guys, Could you click to give my site a vote? Thanks. The American Dream 2009 at BlogTopList Could you post the URLs one more time? I didn't quite get it after the 50,000 times that its been posted so far.
|
|
|
Post by Catdaddy on Oct 13, 2008 15:05:00 GMT -5
Heys Guys, Could you click to give my site a vote? Thanks. The American Dream 2009 at BlogTopList Could you post the URLs one more time? I didn't quite get it after the 50,000 times that its been posted so far. I agree lurker...this type of posting needs to stop now. JoeRocks, do you agree? Later, Catdaddy
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Oct 13, 2008 17:20:03 GMT -5
I agree Running Rich you have a thread with your post on it...keep posting to that thread and it will stay on top...but leave the other threads alone unless you have a post that CONTRIBUTES to the thread...THANKS...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Oct 13, 2008 19:10:58 GMT -5
I agree Running Rich you have a thread with your post on it...keep posting to that thread and it will stay on top...but leave the other threads alone unless you have a post that CONTRIBUTES to the thread...THANKS...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial) good idea
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 19:12:15 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 12 Oct 2008, 01:41 PM EDT Msg. 771837 of 772208 Jump to msg. # I don't get this Viashow suit
Case 08-A-569762-C Status ACTIVE Plaintiff CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R. Defendant Viashow Inc Attorney Ryan, Thomas G. Judge Vega, Valorie J. Dept. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Event 10/07/2008 at 09:00 AM DEFT'S MTN TO CONSOLIDATE WITH A569615/02 Heard By Gates, Lee A Parties 0001 - P1 CMKM Diamonds Inc No 0002 - D1 Viashow Inc No 0003 - D Durr, Nicole No 0004 - P Pecevich, Stephen No 0005 - P MDW And GRW 2000 Irrevocable Trust No
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEFT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE WITH A569762...DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
There being no opposition, COURT ORDERED, Motion to Consolidate GRANTED. Counsel argued fraudulent inducement and negligent misrepresentation should be dismissed as they have not been plead properly. COURT ORDERED, Plaintiff to amend causes of action with more particularity. Counsel further argued regarding unjust enrichment claim advising of no disagreement about contract. Mr. Spear advised willing to forgo it at this time. COURT SO NOTED. Counsel inquired of conversion claim against Viashow. COURT ORDERED, motion GRANTED.
By: calvinwinters 13 Oct 2008, 05:36 AM EDT Msg. 772012 of 772208 (This msg. is a reply to 771837 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # goodolboy:You're not alone, but of more interest is we got no advance notice of the event. Since so many around here know so much.
Some claim there is no trust, we're penny-less!
Thanks much, cal
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 19:14:05 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 07:50 AM EDT Msg. 772016 of 772208 (This msg. is a reply to 771890 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # my69z put out another good mp3. big stuff is a brewin' in the FALC and with cmkx.
thanks chris.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 19:14:34 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 09:39 AM EDT Msg. 772018 of 772208 Jump to msg. # when CMKX trades again shorts will have 35 days to cover. many cert holders will NOT send back their certificate to be converted to electronic shares, plus, there will be new buyers of CMKX.
given that scenario i'd say shorty will have his hands full covering in those first 35 days.
and if there are a lot of buyers.... "whoa nelly!"
and there will be a ton of buyers when the word gets out about the size of the short. that's the great thing about the internet!
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 10:01 AM EDT Msg. 772019 of 772208 (This msg. is a reply to 772018 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # no wonders Y many key bashers are still here working hard... :
By: stockfred 13 Oct 2008, 10:02 AM EDT Msg. 772020 of 772209 (This msg. is a reply to 772018 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen...OS is the total outstanding, = Certs AND Electronic shares.
Help me understand how CMKM Diamonds will trade again with so many purported NSS?!
Any short will have to be dealt with, before the SEC will allow a new form of CMKM to trade.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 19:17:00 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 10:15 AM EDT Msg. 772024 of 772210 (This msg. is a reply to 772020 by stockfred.) Jump to msg. # stockfred, you could be right. they sure wouldn't want cmkx to come back to life with a boatload of FTDs,,,, but, you never know? maybe there are some brokers that figure they'll do just fine in the marketplace and they're not worried about covering?
but if cmkx returns to trading and it announces it's share in the FALC that worth $xxxxxxxx, then, at that point, covering might be difficult and exceedingly expensive. maybe too expensive? then what happens? what does the SEC do then? in other words, your argument makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 19:18:03 GMT -5
By: factanonverba13 13 Oct 2008, 10:06 AM EDT Msg. 772021 of 772210 (This msg. is a reply to 772016 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Things may be brewin' in the Falc, but nothing is brewing with CMKX except lawsuits and a slow but certain set up for another con.
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 10:17 AM EDT Msg. 772025 of 772210 (This msg. is a reply to 772021 by factanonverba13.) Jump to msg. # fact, listen to my69z's latest mp3. there is a lot of good info in there. we're involved in the FALC somehow, someway.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 19:18:51 GMT -5
By: factanonverba13 13 Oct 2008, 10:14 AM EDT Msg. 772023 of 772210 (This msg. is a reply to 772018 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # That's all nonsense, rosie. CMKX won't ever trade again. Besides that, your certs have no meaning, no value and represent nothing except the collective folly of the thousands who were duped into buying them. One cubic foot of air has more value than a CMKX cert.
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 10:19 AM EDT Msg. 772027 of 772210 (This msg. is a reply to 772023 by factanonverba13.) Jump to msg. # fact, you might be right, but as things drag on it's looking more and more like we're involved in somethng very big in the FALC diamond field.
cmkx is connected to too many people and entities for this to be little more than a penny stock scam.
i'm increasingly thinking we are part of something very big,,, which is what many others have been claiming for years.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 19:19:25 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 10:45 AM EDT Msg. 772039 of 772211 Jump to msg. # Has anyone been sending any questions to CMKM's new Shareholder's Corner?
I sent this one today:
Mark,
Recently, you posted that you felt the "Brewer" and post revocation sales by Marco were just a "side show," a distraction to the CMKM story.
If it was such a side show as you feel, then why can you not tell us whether or not the shares sold by them will be considered bonafide or not? Why not just state that they will be canceled? Unfortunately, I doubt you will answer that question, but maybe you can answer this:
Timontoo, a close friend of Bill Frizzel, stated that those shares brokered by Brewer were counterfeit. Braindamage, your close associate stated exactly the same thing. Both said that those shares would get canceled.
Mr. Brewer told me that those shares were not counterfeit, but the stock powers were forged, and they will not get canceled.
Who should we believe, those close to the company (timontoo and Braindamage) or the one who financed TOGI, loaned money to Urban Casavant, Rendell Williams, the new USCN management, and most likely Frizzel's legal fund.
I believe many would appreciated a legitimate answer to this issue without hiding behind the "legal strategy" disclaimer, as you haven't any suits pertaining to the post revocation sales nor the people involved. And, according to Mr. Brewer you never will.
Thank you for your time.
By: factanonverba13 13 Oct 2008, 10:51 AM EDT Msg. 772042 of 772211 (This msg. is a reply to 772039 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # LOL!! Well, that ought to ruin the FaulkingIdiot's morning!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 19:20:02 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 11:05 AM EDT Msg. 772049 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772048 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # Cindy, self revoked?!!! Jeez, why do you continue to pump that nonsense? CMKM was delisted, period. They only chose not to appeal the SEC revocation. Why, because they had no defense for an appeal. By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 11:14 AM EDT Msg. 772054 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772049 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # Goodolboy - Al hodges also said that CMKX is a self-revoked stock...google it yourself... Self-revoked makes perfect sense because how a stock could go forward with form-15 while it has 622B illegal shares? RG/Mahue had the plan,,,,and they helped CMKXers to pull certs...You bought shares after revocation so you have no past experience... By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 11:20 AM EDT Msg. 772058 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772054 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # Cindy, I've seen where Al said that as well. The shear stupidity of an attorney making that kind of comment in light of the facts is truly mind boggling. Suffice it to say, I wouldn't have him represent me in a real estate transaction, much less any other aspect of law.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 19:22:46 GMT -5
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 11:31 AM EDT Msg. 772061 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772058 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # Goodolboy - Al knows CMKX better than many folks here know about and he had a good reason to say so...
By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 11:35 AM EDT Msg. 772063 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772061 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # Cindy, there is absolutely no proof to either of your claims. Yet, there is an substantial proof to the contrary.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 19:24:21 GMT -5
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 11:39 AM EDT Msg. 772065 of 772212 Jump to msg. # KW said...2 years after cmkx was revoked...
1> He was working on the CMKX Task Force, as the point for Bill Frizzell, and he gained a lot of knowledge that Urban and others thought would be useful as the company proceeded with their efforts to help its shareholders resolve the Naked Shorting issues.
2> I (KW) trust Urban 100% -> KW stated...
He’s known and worked with Urban for some time now. Urban could have quit on us long ago...taken the assets of CMKX elsewhere... declared bankruptcy, etc. Instead, he’s still very much involved, he didn’t leave, and he’s working hard every day on helping CMKX investors see a return on their investment. He emphatically stated several times... Urban is working harder for us (CMKX Shareholders) than anyone can possibly imagine.
My question (me) is: Why KW still trusted Urban after Urban fooled him with $4,000,000 loan that KW stated earlier...and KW was so upset about this stuff...
By: gusjarvis 13 Oct 2008, 12:14 PM EDT Msg. 772084 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772065 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # all said after bill and kevin knew everything, john martin told me urban may have to take the fall but he is behind us for sure and they knew exactly what he did and didn't do
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 19:25:04 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 11:51 AM EDT Msg. 772070 of 772212 Jump to msg. # Here's a tidbit for you
Of course it's just my opinion. UC needed to cover a 55 billion share short he created in his Penson(sp) account. He contacted Brewer. Between Brewer, Kinney and UC, they devised a mechanism to launder 55 billion shares through a post revocation market scheme involving Deli and to a lesser extent Ines. The creation of the post rev pump began. Acca, Jay, tigerpaw and others were solicited to aid in the pump opening up the buying and selling of the CMKM scam once again.
The success of this market was more than some could handle and greed, as usual took over. Once the 55 billion was covered, they didn't stop, and they managed to sell over 70 billion more with deli profitting over $1 million in the process, and he was just the pusher, so you can imagine the others did just as well.
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 11:55 AM EDT Msg. 772074 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772070 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # Goodoldboy - I don't see Deli could sell more than 6-7B shares...your number did not add up...UC needed to cover his short was a joke...
By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 11:57 AM EDT Msg. 772075 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772074 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # cindy, lol! Oh, yes he did.
|
|