|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 19, 2008 0:46:42 GMT -5
By: my69z 18 Oct 2008, 11:50 PM EDT Msg. 773112 of 773112Jump to msg. # MP3..FG/Syria/BAE/Laundering/Liston...no sting here folks,,,,,,move along www.zshare.net/audio/50033637b9a82d7f/ 24 mins Chris
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 19, 2008 0:53:49 GMT -5
Yesterday at 8:41pm, ravenpeach wrote:T hank you so much for answering Funado....
I remember the last time was regular mail, but was wondering if that is the same or different now....
Hope you are doing well....
This sure has been a long travel for all of us...
God Bless
Ravenpeach
funado DIAMOND JEDI Re: It's Been A Pleasure (Acca related posts)« Reply #6471 Yesterday at 11:18pm »
Thanks Ravenpeach,
Yes, I'm doing fine. Lifted by the mere thought that something might be coming to an end here by the time of the election, or by Halloween, or by Thanksgiving, which have all been offered as timelines.
Acca said things would be fine after Nov. 5 (I think), then later said he knew we would be having a great Halloween, and also told someone to expect great things by Thanksgiving.
So it looks like we've got plenty to look forward to. I'm going for Halloween just because it's the earliest date mentioned.
No more tricks. Only treats.
Hope you're doing well too.
Funado
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 19, 2008 9:05:40 GMT -5
By: my69z 18 Oct 2008, 11:50 PM EDT Msg. 773112 of 773112Jump to msg. # MP3..FG/Syria/BAE/Laundering/Liston...no sting here folks,,,,,,move along www.zshare.net/audio/50033637b9a82d7f/ 24 mins Chris By: rosencrantz2010 19 Oct 2008, 04:51 AM EDT Msg. 773113 of 773121(This msg. is a reply to 773112 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # another good MP3 from my69z. wow, this liston connection is turning into something very big suggesting what others have been claiming for years, that is, it was a sting. but are we more than hooker bait, which chris asks? and if we were then it says something about the government's willingness to use investors. i guess they figured that since the cmkx investor pool contained mostly poor, small time investors that it wouldn't matter and that the government could get away with it. well, it sure looks that way. but back to chris' research, this liston connection suggests major illegal foreign activities were going on with cmkx way back then and someone brought in significant legal muscle to help cmkx. it's very impressive.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 19, 2008 9:20:10 GMT -5
cmkxdiamonds DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: buzz talk 10/15...10/17...and through the week « Reply #65 Today at 7:52am »
seagull most think acca works for the company so he only would know info from that end correct well if say citi or the sec was to pay us first acca would then have no clue correct???he is here to delay nothing more nothing less because it looks to me like we have to wait for arrests which wont come until bush leaves office so he can not pardon anyone...
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 19, 2008 9:42:17 GMT -5
lacajungal DIAMOND DIGGER Re: What does Buffett know? « Reply #3 Yesterday at 10:44pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 7:30pm, trillionaire1 wrote: I have been reading about the "AMERO". I can see us combining currency with Canada, but with Mexico? NOT! I'm with you trillionaire1, about the only way I will put some back in the market is if I have a lot more to spare than I do now! I probably lost close to 20% of my IRA this year. IIIIFFFF CMKX/M comes through in a big way, .54 or more, then I will put some back in the market! I give it until Christmas and after that I will put this on the back burner. The company will have to either send something in the mail or send a personal e-mail to get my attention. I will not invest much more time on this. It's beginning to feel like a big joke and the jokes on me! Here's to hoping we hear something soooon, but I'm not holding my breath. lacajungal « Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:45pm by lacajungal » millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=22861
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 19, 2008 11:04:25 GMT -5
By: jonas-dccxi 19 Oct 2008, 11:11 AM EDT Msg. 773131 of 773139 (This msg. is a reply to 773129 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Martin is a thief. Same as UC same as Frizzy. All thieves.
By: 1forall 19 Oct 2008, 11:17 AM EDT Msg. 773132 of 773139 (This msg. is a reply to 773131 by jonas-dccxi.) Jump to msg. # jonas Even a dead bee can still STING
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 19, 2008 11:06:13 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 19 Oct 2008, 11:04 AM EDT Msg. 773129 of 773139 Jump to msg. # John Martin's response . . . By: ivory551100 31 Jan 2006, 11:05 PM EST Msg. 108957 of 109005 Jump to msg. # Read this - Good night!!! cmkxdiamond.proboards66.com/index.cgi?board=general1&action=display&thread=1138461799 ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=773129By: dustybutler1001 19 Oct 2008, 11:18 AM EDT Msg. 773133 of 773139 (This msg. is a reply to 773129 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # gusjarvis... I bet John Martin has a very different opinion of Urban and the whole CMKX mess these days. By: gusjarvis 19 Oct 2008, 11:50 AM EDT Msg. 773136 of 773139 (This msg. is a reply to 773133 by dustybutler1001.) Jump to msg. # dusty I bet he knew exactly what urban did before one og update was given, in fact I guarantee it. And I 100% guarantee bill and john knew about the silver state bank records before they gave one amazing update after another and worked with urban, 100% guarantee it.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 19, 2008 11:15:54 GMT -5
By: my69z 12 Oct 2008, 06:31 PM EDT Msg. 34825 of 34827 Jump to msg. # MP3..Steintzman/Liston/SEC..... www.zshare.net/audio/20437460b1240cf5/ 35 mins Chris gusjarvis King of Diamonds Re: mp3 by my69z « Reply #3 on Oct 14, 2008, 10:54am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- someone on here said a few things like there are lawyers involved we don't know about and lawyers watching the boards. There is a sealed grand jury imo for sure and this mp3 and the first say it all, anyone still worried about cmkx should listen By: my69z 13 Oct 2008, 09:44 PM EDT Msg. 34849 of 34849 Jump to msg. # MP3: Glenn/Liston/Maheu/SEC.... www.zshare.net/audio/20505160e0cfc17d/ 11 mins By: my69z 18 Oct 2008, 11:50 PM EDT Msg. 773112 of 773123 Jump to msg. # MP3..FG/Syria/BAE/Laundering/Liston...no sting here folks,,,,,,move along www.zshare.net/audio/50033637b9a82d7f/ gusjarvis King of Diamonds Re: mp3 by my69z « Reply #7 Today at 9:39am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- beth liston was the assistant district attorney for manhattan and our lawyer, just one more of the most famous team every put together of super lawyers, amazing really. He was never pr'd and supposedly messed up the shareholder numbers but was never called again. IMO he was in the stock that was a sting, the stock that had confidential informants (some he probably knew very very well), he was part of the operation. He is also now part of the leman bro bankruptcy distribution and we know 138 billion dollar secret payment was made to them to cover their shorts, wonder if any of that is for us and how did they come up with that number if they didn't just buy out the shorts in some sort of settlement. In any event he is one more of the amazing team we had, makes the ending so dumb it is ridiculous. tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6476
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 19, 2008 12:52:56 GMT -5
Posted by: pantherj Date: Sunday, October 19, 2008 11:26:01 AM In reply to: goodolboy who wrote msg# 262466 Post # of 262474
The "Squid" is Allen Treffrey, a small time attorney out of Southern California. He uses multiple aliases, is a friend of Ed Thompson (surfit) and has been connected with many scams including, ECNC/ECNI, PCBM/SRCI, CMKX, BTMD/BTME/BMCS & others. He has also been connected with Chris Jensen, LoCastro, Hall, Harlan & all the familiar players. He is partcularly vile & vulgar and has a real hate for Janice & jarta who have factually exposed him many times.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 19, 2008 12:57:56 GMT -5
jfarn DIAMOND DIGGER Adobe--hindsight and clarity? « Thread Started Today at 12:41pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Read the email below from Jay and let me know if any thing jumps out at you. What is the significance of 2.4 years prior to August 8, 06 when he sent me that interesting note below. Was he part of the original group that Phx. talks about when referencing the 14c...see below. Or was he with some other "organization" ? Who/how is one indirectly asked to purchase shares? Who did he encourage to purchase shares? Why was Jay so specific with 2.4 years? What is so significant about April/May 04?? Jay is not around for collaborative thinking so I share this with my fellow investors to toss around. As you will read he got his panties in an upwad due to the fact that I asked him if he was part of the problem or part of the solution. I was working with Ralph Lambiase on our situation back in 06 and had just begun garnering public support for our situation. Jay was a class act consistently, I can only hope his words/efforts were sincere. Thoughts welcome, jfarn~ ____________________________________________________________________ The definitive 14c filed by CMKX in Feb 2003 states some interesting things. I hope you have reviewed it for what it truly is, a contract. In that contract there are a group of people listed as “the sellers”. These people hold not more than 4.9% of CMKX individually and a total of 85.8% of CMKX collectively. What I find interesting is that these shares are deemed “unaccessable” according to the contract until registered with the SEC. That means to me that 85.8% or 603,619,194,750 of this companies 703,518,875,000 shares cannot even trade, that leaves 99,899,680,250. I’m sure it has struck you as strange that the DTCC claims to have 404 billion shares under CEDE and Co. control. Was Jay an original "seller"? ____________________________________________________________________________ jfarn wrote: Part of the problem? OR Part of the solution? How do you want it? I choose the latter but look for reciprocity re: the flow of information. Not pleased as of late hence the offensive. > --- On Tue, 8/8/06, Jay Adobe <jay> > wrote: > > > From: Jay Adobe <jay > > > Subject: Re: > > To: jfarn > > > Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 8:36 AM > > Jim, Sad for me to see it, but now I'm not sure of > which side you are batting for. Your apparent chosen COA > seems to be one of which I am not wishing to, nor can I, be a > part. If I and those of my organization had chosen to sue, I > do believe that would have been enacted 2.4 years ago > when it was at a critical junction. No, Jim, I must now part > and let you guys attack your course of action as your own > main attack. I will watch it as you keep us informed and observe the peripheral activities as they unfold. I wish you well and hope your spearhead reaches the objective with the result that you have wargamed. We each have to travel > the path on which we believe. The result of our analysis differs, thus there are more than one COAs, naturally. > Good luck, Jim. Oh, I almost forgot.....Part of the Solution of Part the Problem??? As a shareholder I have been indirectly asked to first purchase shares, then ask others to purchase shares, then believe in the company, then wait, then observe what we have and what we do not have, then and most importantly to become a cohesive unit of 72K+ shareholders (at one time almost 90K), then wait, then pull certificates to lock in the bad guys. No where in there does it mention another course of action. Rest assured that part of the overalll wargaming pre-hearing included some consideration for fringe elements that may choose to counter the plan by lawsuits. I wish you well, and good luck. Jay > > > > millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=22866
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 19, 2008 15:09:12 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 19 Oct 2008, 02:30 PM EDT Msg. 773157 of 773173 (This msg. is a reply to 773155 by darlingdaphne.) Jump to msg. # darling, what are the implications for the case as a result of these names appearing? tks
By: darlingdaphne 19 Oct 2008, 02:43 PM EDT Msg. 773160 of 773173 (This msg. is a reply to 773157 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen I think they have all the players named that are needed to bring this to a conclusion that will benefit the shareholders
By: CHICPICK 19 Oct 2008, 02:54 PM EDT Msg. 773161 of 773175 (This msg. is a reply to 773160 by darlingdaphne.) Jump to msg. # daphne, The only conclusion here is going to be who wears the stripes, and who doesn't....
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 19, 2008 15:16:49 GMT -5
By: reality.bytes 19 Oct 2008, 12:28 PM EDT Msg. 773142 of 773177 Jump to msg. # BELGIANS SAY HUGE NEWS COMING NEXT WEEK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
By: reality.bytes 19 Oct 2008, 04:13 PM EDT Msg. 773177 of 773178 Jump to msg. # CMKX = The Little Engine That Could
God Bless.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 19, 2008 15:23:30 GMT -5
lmao *Silver* Here's my opinion, yes I like everyone else have 1 « Thread Started Today at 10:59am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I (think) based on obvious events and non-events that the Tyler group including Mark is flailing in the wind.
I (think) the rhetoric of not showing their hands due to compromising their/our position is bogus. Litigation is rampant right now in the financial market; they are making headlines left and right. Not so secret it seems and the investigative parties have been gathering evidence in farrrrr less time than the cmkx circus.
I (think) the fact that a media person is now in charge speaks volumes for the sucess rate of this journey. And I'm sure "sucess" is relative.
goodolboy *Silver* Here's my opinion, yes I like everyone else ha « Reply #1 Today at 11:46am » uh... they're broke. The talking head is on a pay-later program.
|
|
|
Post by chris on Oct 19, 2008 16:33:16 GMT -5
Same posters, same theories and no facts. I wonder who will still be posting next year?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 19, 2008 16:42:37 GMT -5
By: leowanta 19 Oct 2008, 04:56 PM EDT Msg. 773189 of 773216 (This msg. is a reply to 772980 by newtopennies.) Jump to msg. # BY ACCA.... 10-17-2008>>>>> "Q: Do you know the date of the release? Acca: No Q: What do you think of this... we were waiting for a correspondance from the government and the packages are just sitting around and can now be sent? Acca: It is not a rumor ... and I do concur with that" "...WE WERE WAITING FOR A CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE GOVERNMENT AND THE PACKAGES ARE JUST SITTING AROUND AND CAN NOW BE SENT" Correspondence form the Government: SEC taking action on Reg SHO and Naked Shorts .... EFFECTIVE TODAY! sec.gov/rules/final/2008/34-58773.pdf SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 17 CFR PART 242 [Release No. 34-58773; File No. S7-30-08] RIN 3235-AK22 Amendments to Regulation SHO AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission. ACTION: Interim final temporary rule; request for comments. SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is adopting an interim final temporary rule under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) to address abusive “naked” short selling in all equity securities by requiring that participants of a clearing agency registered with the Commission deliver securities by settlement date, or if the participants have not delivered shares by settlement date, immediately purchase or borrow securities to close out the fail to deliver position by no later than the beginning of regular trading hours on the settlement day following the day the participant incurred the fail to deliver position. Failure to comply with the close-out requirement of the temporary rule is a violation of the temporary rule. In addition, a participant that does not comply with this close-out requirement, and any broker-dealer from which it receives trades for clearance and settlement, will not be able to short sell the security either for itself or for the account of another, unless it has previously arranged to borrow or borrowed the security, until the fail to deliver position is closed out. DATES: Effective Date: October 17, 2008 except §242.204T is effective October 17, 2008 until July 31, 2009. Comment Date: Comments should be received on or before December 16, 2008. sec.gov/rules/final/2008/34-58774.pdf SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 17 CFR PART 240 [Release No. 34-58774; File No. S7-08-08] RIN 3235-AK06 “Naked” Short Selling Antifraud Rule AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is adopting an antifraud rule under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) to address fails to deliver securities that have been associated with “naked” short selling. The rule will further evidence the liability of short sellers, including broker-dealers acting for their own accounts, who deceive specified persons about their intention or ability to deliver securities in time for settlement (including persons that deceive their broker-dealer about their locate source or ownership of shares) and that fail to deliver securities by settlement date. DATES: Effective Date: October 17, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Brigagliano, Associate Director, Josephine J. Tao, Assistant Director, Victoria L. Crane, Branch Chief, Joan M. Collopy, Special Counsel, Christina M. Adams and Matthew Sparkes, Staff Attorneys, Office of Trading Practices and Processing, Division of Trading and Markets, at (202) 551-5720, at the Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-6628. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are adding Rule 10b-21 [17 CFR 242.10b-21] under the Exchange Act. sec.gov/rules/final/2008/34-58775.pdf SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 17 CFR PARTS 241 AND 242 [Release No. 34-58775; File No. S7-19-07] RIN 3235-AJ57 Amendments to Regulation SHO AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is adopting amendments to Regulation SHO under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). The amendments are intended to further reduce the number of persistent fails to deliver in certain equity securities by eliminating the options market maker exception to the close-out requirement of Regulation SHO. As a result of the amendments, fails to deliver in threshold securities that result from hedging activities by options market makers will no longer be excepted from Regulation SHO’s close-out requirement. The Commission is also providing guidance regarding bona fide market making activities for purposes of the market maker exception to Regulation SHO’s locate requirement. EFFECTIVE DATE: October 17, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Brigagliano, Associate Director, Josephine J. Tao, Assistant Director, Victoria L. Crane, Branch Chief, Joan M. Collopy, Special Counsel, Christina M. Adams and Matthew Sparkes, Staff Attorneys, Office of Trading Practices and Processing, Division of Trading and Markets, at (202) 551-5720, at the Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-6628. *************************************** PACKAGES JUST WAITING AROUND READY TO BE SENT! ONE MOMENT IN TIME...... THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH, MAY GOD BLESS YOU AND LAURA GOD BLESS AMERICA THANK YOU FATHER leowanta
|
|