Thanks seagull.....
ines' recap of the Acca mp3 ... a few minor differences from what I wrote in my hurried recap...that is in the Oct. 18 gossip.. still you might want to read hers too ~ seagull
Q; How many trust do we have set up for us?
A; 2
Q to desperado: When you met with acca have you seen evidence of these trusts?
A; not of trust funds no. But didn’t Andy hill post that he was aware of transactions.. (Trust funds) that Acca is describing..? Ok yes.< somebody confirms as positive.
A; Its funny its that citi group thing is coming to fruition finally, and its still not good enough, nobody gives a poop, it can be interpreted a different way.. is , no it cant be that way, all this amounts to citi group, I am going to end it there , I am not going to go on about citi group I had enough of them..for 4 years.. that’s it.
Q; Ok acca do you know the date of release,
A; no comment on that.
Q; since we .. some kind of correspondence we were waiting to go for a while, correspondence from the gov has been added to the packet that has been sitting around? Comment? Is it rumor?
A; it is not a rumor and I concur with that .. whole heartedly.
Q; is there more then one name on the trust or the trusts?
A; yes there is
Q: were you at the party at 2004 Vegas
A; I was in vicinity, don’t read into it
Q; again I agree with you about the dead horse with citi, but.. do you think that Tuesday with the .. Credit default swaps coming due for Lehman brothers and citi being one of the biggest culprits having to come up with big chunk change.. to pay for it .. anyone else having to cough anything .. bla bla..
We will have huge default.. on Tuesday..
A; I don’t see them saying as a default, I said it in the past it will be ..drop in the bucket. I think the present financial state of the stock market.. I have said to diff people, you have breaking news where cmkx shareholders received certain amount of money – its not going to be that way, what I said in the past.. the markets .. they way they are now… don’t have anything to do with that.. did it have to happen, I think not,
Because it happened, I think its bonus it will be mixed in wall street..
The present financial state,
I said it to different people
You have breaking news where cmkx shareholders received amount of money – its not going to be like that.
Because it happened, I think its bonus, I think I will be mixed in the,,,
I am very pro where we are at, as far as releasing of the funds, it will be more then one, maybe the way it had to happen, and in round about way it was not premeditated to be this way, and so on and I hope..
Its all good.
Q; acca, going back to 2 people that are in the trust,
Do you know when the 2 people were made the trustees, or one person made a trustee.. and then changed over to 2 people ..
Approximately 5 years ago
A; there are 2 individuals that are important to shareholders.. Don Stoecklein and bob Maheu. Not William haseltine, not roger Glenn, not urban Casavant, and not individuals in Tyler.
DS and BM are 2 individuals that have it all under control, that’s it.
Q; I understand that acca but my main q is when, the trustee was it approximately 5 years ago that this was transferred over.
A; it was not 5 yrs ago, the trust was, consummated if you will 3 yrs ago, there was a transfer of funds into a trust, of a certain individual .. of why are are in this stock
You have a fund that has funds in it, earmarked for the shareholders of this company, so, that fund is still there, its entrusted, and people ask why it has not been released.
Why can’t he at least release a half a penny, I love this questions but he can’t do it, cannot release it until certain entity says he can.
Q; Acca you said you want to go to all the rooms. Is there somebody that is watching the rooms? To see how many people are following you?
A; cant answer that
Q; something about judge Brenda if you had common cause..
A; you broke up I have common cause to be here for shareholders. I am the only one that has been here for 4 years. You have to ask yourself why is that. There have been prominent posters that have gone into sunset but I will always be here.
Q; can you share with us the last tangible information .. from DS. Or IBM
Reminder of who is in control and where are we heading?
A; ds, main man, as far who is control I cant say that.
Q; shed a light on, if the trust that robber Maheu and Stoecklein are in charge based on cmkx shares, back side of that .. where does cim sit? And is it sitting on the front of the whole thing
A; I want to touch on cim, so many shareholders have been screwed by brokers.. and there is no recourse. Absolutely not. This was a catalyst, when we all bought into cmkx, originally, dividend with cim, ok
Now, its funny how a lot of these brokerage houses, and a lot of them just swept them away, its about a year or year and a half ago, and they said .. well plucked it , gone..
Cmkx is still there, certificates, could not do anything about it, IBM was a catalyst for this.
Cim if you have them in your cert form, god bless, if you have them in your broker account that’s a blessing.
Some brokers wiped them out of the accounts shareholders. Td waterhouse, York securities, .. there is many more just wiped them off the map.. most of people have just cmkx certs, it’s a travesty..
That threw a wrench in everything. That is my opinion.
Regardless of what you think, I think that the heritage stock, but these individuals Jane and Joe does.. that had position in cmkx.. and got cim, of what they position was,… is just pooped , gone.
10.17.08
tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6553