|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 17, 2008 20:44:42 GMT -5
BHollenegg DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re:Gurus should be put on notice..Response « Thread Started Today at 3:55pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- When we bought CMKX, that was our own decision. Unfortunately, due to various reasons, the information concerning the stock is not as forthcoming as we need in order to understand what is transpiring with our investment. Many of the shareholders put in a considerable amount of time and effort trying to make sense with what information is available. It is difficult enough to get the information without adding the contradictions from the company and entities involved with this saga. Fortunately , some of the shareholders were able to communicate with those working the CMKX problems. These shareholders shared their findings because they care about their fellow shareholders. When the information does not occur on time or within a certain time period, it is not the fault of those providing the information and it is not the fault of the source. This is a complex situation. Complex problems usually requires more time to resolve unless the complex problem is a routine problem that has been resolved many times. What we are witnessing, and what we are a part of, was and still is a systematically routine problem that occurred over several decades. This requires a monumental fix; one that is complex, has not been tested, and will require many tweaks. I understand the frustrations the shareholders are experiencing with this stock, I am just as frustrated because I am aware of many shareholders who are in dire circumstances and need the funds as soon as possible. What I do not understand is why some shareholders feel compelled to attack the shareholders who share. I do not understand why this is even condoned. I would rather have the information, whether opinion, fact, belief, which offers a glimmer of hope than to be lost in a dark information abyss. Each of us made our own decision to invest in CMKX, not the ones sharing their information, and not the sources. I am thoroughly disappointed. I will not be a part of or condone this lynch mob type of mentality towards fellow shareholders and their sources all because they shared, all because they care. It is a sad day in CMKX. To the Shareholders who are appreciative and want to understand the situation, I will do my best to keep you informed of any ”verified information” I receive either by private messages or telephone. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=23370
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 17, 2008 20:45:39 GMT -5
tuscansun DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: Re:Gurus should be put on notice..Response « Reply #6 Today at 4:33pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I concur Bob.... if people don't want info they should have left the boards. Anyone living this can see that when we started the Media said nothing and now we are in a Recession Depression and the Media is flowing with info that we KNEW of years ago... YEARS ago. For those that cant take it... Join the ranks of the shareholders that have chosen to not be on a board period. This was and IS work.... W O R K.... and those that are finding info could hold that info and bag everyone else. But then, if they did that, someone would yak that they were WITHHOLDING info... someone should get it figured out just what they really want ! Best to all that are in and have continued to stay positive on this ride... I would chose YOU to be with if this were literally a physical journey, over all the people that just want info and dont want to put any personal effort in this. IF they did work at it and open links... they would have caught on that they are IN the midst of a awesome, mysterious, HUGE, MONUMENTAL EVENT(s) and they have no control, as others don't, as to the DAY of PAYOUT! I join Bob Hollenegg in doing the same ~ those shareholders who over these long years have proved they are not instigating negativity.... I too answer all phonecalls and emails....not necessary to fight the negativy anymore on the boards by posting the info here. Best to all...... Tuscan « Last Edit: Today at 5:11pm by tuscansun » millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=23370
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 17, 2008 20:57:07 GMT -5
Posted by: IQ1 Date: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:56:03 AM In reply to: NSDM-forever who wrote msg# 263395 Post # of 263425 Acca is full of ... with the promise of info.... www.cmkm.infoInformation Will Be Available On This Website November 15 Or Earlier. If anyone feels like giving ACCA some words of advice... He is full of it: cmkm.info@domainsbyproxy.com Domain ID:D24541401-LRMS Domain Name:CMKM.INFO Created On:21-Apr-2008 23:48:00 UTC Last Updated On:21-Jun-2008 20:33:23 UTC Expiration Date:21-Apr-2009 23:48:00 UTC Sponsoring Registrar:GoDaddy.com Inc. (R171-LRMS) Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED Registrant ID:GODA-046691004 Registrant Name:Registration Private Registrant Organization:Domains by Proxy, Inc. Registrant Street1:DomainsByProxy.com Registrant Street2:15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353 Registrant Street3: Registrant City:Scottsdale Registrant State/Province:Arizona Registrant Postal Code:85260 Registrant Country:US Registrant Phone:+1.4806242599 Registrant Phone Ext.: Registrant FAX:+1.4806242598 Registrant FAX Ext.: Registrant Email: Admin ID:GODA-246691004 Admin Name:Registration Private Admin Organization:Domains by Proxy, Inc. Admin Street1:DomainsByProxy.com Admin Street2:15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353 Admin Street3: Admin City:Scottsdale Admin State/Province:Arizona Admin Postal Code:85260 Admin Country:US Admin Phone:+1.4806242599 Admin Phone Ext.: Admin FAX:+1.4806242598 Admin FAX Ext.: Posted by: HndtoHnd Date: Monday, November 17, 2008 10:05:36 AM In reply to: IQ1 who wrote msg# 263396 Post # of 263425 Acca getting paid per click on it..... might be a good place to start thinking........ Posted by: goodolboy Date: Monday, November 17, 2008 10:16:29 AM In reply to: HndtoHnd who wrote msg# 263397 Post # of 263425 HndtoHand, agreed, but don't you think he would get more hits (thus more $$$) if he actually posted something on the site?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 17, 2008 21:04:32 GMT -5
By: scruffy_too 16 Nov 2008, 10:23 PM EST Msg. 779277 of 779523 (This msg. is a reply to 779146 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. #
By: gusjarvis 15 Nov 2008, 07:21 PM EST Msg. 779146 of 779276 (This msg. is a reply to 779115 by oreodiamonds.) Jump to msg. # not only was money collected by the dtcc but paid by them as well, they were hundreds of billions of shares short in their inventory before cmkx raised the shares to sell them certs to cover the cert pull that they knew was coming. Thanks roger no wonder you aren't in jail and hanging with our friend susan - - - - -
Gus, care to speculate on what these shares were sold for? ;-)
By: gusjarvis 17 Nov 2008, 10:06 AM EST Msg. 779321 of 779523 (This msg. is a reply to 779277 by scruffy_too.) Jump to msg. #
scruffy once you realize this was a sting for sure then you take what was said by urban and others, with the full blessing of th sec, and think about it differently. Every pump after the silver state bank fraud was done with the sec as our partner, so whatever urban and others said to pump this stock better be right imo, not talking about board rumors, just what the insiders said. All pr's with roger here on have to be real imo, and our land is just fine and the best in the world.
I would say if we don't get bought right out, the pps we get before we have to do the r/s to move on better be what they said, ten cents or more!
By: Bellingus 17 Nov 2008, 10:24 AM EST Msg. 779326 of 779523 (This msg. is a reply to 779321 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. #
no r/s em
By: thejetswithbrett 17 Nov 2008, 10:29 AM EST Msg. 779330 of 779523 (This msg. is a reply to 779326 by Bellingus.) Jump to msg. #
Bellingus, may I ask if you think we will gain our wealth here via trade again or buyout?...I have always thought buyout as that seemed a less invasive route for any entity short..thoughts? TIA
By: gusjarvis 17 Nov 2008, 10:56 AM EST Msg. 779343 of 779523 (This msg. is a reply to 779330 by thejetswithbrett.) Jump to msg. #
jets it definitely won't get covered on the open market as we are already covered, and that route would be impossible for cmkx alone let alone all the other stocks. Nobody is selling their shares on the open market for a small pps, it would run into the hundreds of dollars before it was over. The fake out of trading again was just that, and just a threat for leverage over the years. A simple buyout hides the issue forever and in fact has been done already. It is just is it a complete buyout of just a buyout of the naked short then we move on with less shares
By: thejetswithbrett 17 Nov 2008, 11:48 AM EST Msg. 779378 of 779522 (This msg. is a reply to 779343 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. #
gus, agree....but we have two issues I think....NSS and our land....do you see these lumped together into buyout and we go away, or NSS cleared up and we trade again? that seems like it could take awhile...thoughts and thanks for commentary....
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 17, 2008 21:06:07 GMT -5
By: jay_adobe 07 Jul 2008, 10:34 AM EDT Msg. 739853 of 779526 (This msg. is a reply to 739800 by jlecks.) Jump to msg. # jlecks, Things are surprisingly well, thanks for asking. I've no comment on what is happening. It is pretty much self-explanatory throughout the big picture of the financial market and situation. Just wait and see. IMO By: klonopin2mg 17 Nov 2008, 11:36 AM EST Msg. 779369 of 779526 (This msg. is a reply to 739853 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # from a friend named jim: someone got it right andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/11/vindication.html By: cage228 17 Nov 2008, 12:00 PM EST Msg. 779385 of 779526 (This msg. is a reply to 779369 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. # Unreal Klon. We need that good guy high up in government. Was that sparkey?lol. Love to see the bad guys put on the spot now! Watch them shake. Was all of this IBM's last big Hah rah (break the thiefs)? Imho-Yes! Thx and Great Day to All Longs!!!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 17, 2008 21:07:02 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 17 Nov 2008, 11:19 AM EST Msg. 779355 of 779528 Jump to msg. # SEC Charges Mark Cuban with Insider Trading. By: gusjarvis 17 Nov 2008, 11:51 AM EST Msg. 779381 of 779528 (This msg. is a reply to 779355 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # goodolboy you mess with the fed you pay I guess bailoutsleuth.com/2008/11/the...html#comment-7 I'll try and keep this sports related. This sight, bailoutslueth.com was started by Mark Cuban to help track down how the FED is lending taxpayer money out and to which businesses. Quote: The rising cost of the bailout By Chris Carey on November 10, 2008 6:50 PM | 1 Comment | No TrackBacks Although the price tag on the Treasury Department's Troubled Asset Relief Program is $700 billion, the full amount that the government has invested in its rescue effort for struggling financial institutions appears to be closer to $2.5 trillion. Bloomberg L.P., the parent company of Bloomberg News, said last week that it filed a lawsuit seeking information on the collateral that a group of banks pledged for some $2 trillion in emergency loans from the Federal Reserve. Bloomberg asked a federal court in New York to require the Federal Reserve to disclose the identity of the banks that borrowed money through certain financing mechanisms, and to disclose what assets they pledged against those loans. Bloomberg filed the suit after the Federal Reserve said that it would deny Bloomberg's request for the information under the Freedom of Information Act.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 17, 2008 21:07:57 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 17 Nov 2008, 12:02 PM EST Msg. 779388 of 779529 (This msg. is a reply to 779378 by thejetswithbrett.) Jump to msg. #
jet easiest is buyout, but we are all smart with cmkx now, and will watch our land to see if they f'd us or not. We have enough valuation imo to move on for many years and the r/s would not be as much as some think imo as retail does not own that much stock, ie the 622 billion. I think you will see a big share cancellation and that may be in place of a r/s we will see, or we may see both. That would be best case scenerio. The sting started with operation uptick and with shawn hackman, so I hope many of the 622 were bought for the operation and can be simply canceled. If you look for example at gemm and ucad divvies on you have retail only buying about 32 billion shares or so, so if that is true then before that retail should hold, guessing, under 100 billion for sure.
Georgeburns showed the total naked short on cmkx at the ucad and gemm divvies by doing the reverse math on their run ups, it equaled 590.5 billion shares short, that is the exact amount the ticker stopped at on the last official day. Since those divvies retail bought the chit out of cmkx, but not even close to the 500 billion they tried to make it look like, it was 32 billion or so imo. And the massive buying pressure makes it impossible to have jeff cover on the open market and have the pps go straight down. That happened as they had predetermined prices for sales to the dtc or whoever they allowed to buy those certs that the sec tracked, every one of them.
Tooo much speculation in these posts but the pps will be amazing imo, it has to be to make us go away
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 17, 2008 21:09:54 GMT -5
By: leowanta 17 Nov 2008, 12:34 PM EST Msg. 779406 of 779530 (This msg. is a reply to 779402 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. #
sorry Frizzell...CMKX WILL NEVER TRADE AGAIN....
FORGET IT...CMKX IS DONE.
To Determine a Minimum CMKX Valuation for the Tender Offer It has been now determined that we actually picked up two thirds of the piece of land that was originally thought to have been DeBeers and was that piece of land/kimberlite that Dr. Hutchison valued at $40 to $80 billion.
Let�s take the low side to determine fundamental valuation. Two thirds of $40 billion is about $26 billion. I will use that amount x 2 as the amount as income because of what many will soon discover is that we have far more resources and locations that would allow that to be used as a minimum. This figure of $52 billion would definitely cover above and beyond any expenses. Again, I think such would be revealed soon to show how this figure is still being conservative.
TO TYLER....YOU ARE A NAME ONLY.....WHATEVER DREAM OF GETTING BIG BUCKS FOR HOLD A NAME...FORGET IT....
THE COMPANY TURST NEEDS TO BE PAID TO CMKXERS THE DTCC NEEDS TO PAY DAMAGES
THE COMPANY NO LONGER EXISTS...FOR IT HAS NO REVENUE...
IF URBAN WANTS TO IPO CIM....IT HAS NO CONNECTION TO THE ABOVE...CMKXERS MUST BE PAID...AND NO "SWAP" OF CMKX SHARES FOR CIM IS FAIR...
PAY US...IF WE WANT TO BUY INTO URBAN'S IPO...THAT FOR EVERYONE TO DECIDE....
FAIR VALUE OF CMKX VS POTENTIAL OF ALL THE CLAIMS WE LOST IS WHAT IS TO BE PAID...IN NO WAY THE TRUST BELONG TO URBAN...AND IN NO WAY WILL OUR TRUST MONEY IS TO BE USED FOR COMPANY BUSINESS OTHER THAN TOTAL/COMPLETE DISTRIBUTION...WITH THE COMPANY NOT PARTICIPATING IN THAT DISTRIBUTION SINCE THE COMPANY DID NOT "TRADE" IN THE NAKED SHORTING ARENA.....
I OBJECT TO FRIZZEL/TYLER TRYING TO USE OUR TRUST MONEY FOR COMPANY BENEFIT.... NOT GONNA HAPPEN TYLER.... BE HONEST...YOU ARE NOT FILING ANY MORE LAWSUITS, YOU ARE NOT IN CHARGE OF NOTHING.....THE SEC IS THE ONLY ENTITY THAT HAS JURISDICTION OVER CMKM DIAMONDS....
leowanta
|
|
|
Post by shrubberpa on Nov 17, 2008 21:30:08 GMT -5
If the money is paid...why would it come to the share holders ,would it not go to the company...and be used or distributed at the discretion of the bod?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 17, 2008 22:52:31 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 17 Nov 2008, 10:50 AM EST Msg. 779339 of 779409 (This msg. is a reply to 779323 by nigel773.) Jump to msg. # nigel my friend the million dollar question my guess is april like bud said would be the first win by o'quinn, also the summit just said they wanted a solution by april of all months. I would love something earlier but we aren't getting paid before overstock for sure imo, eagletech is a different story as they aren't trading, but we aren't getting paid before eageletech at least. Look at eagletech's o/s then look at the damages they may get, looks like over a hundred dollars a share hey. Would you buy up some overstock if you got a decent check from cmkx, I am. If it is earlier I will be thrilled but all the bullchit on the boards over the years with dates has been a joke, and a joke played on us by our own company my friend! ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=779339 abadgoodgirl vegas member Re: By: gusjarvis says no payments before April! « Reply #1 Today at 8:53pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I disagree with gusjarvis for certain reasons that I cannot share... imo, we'll at least be notified...after all, it's 2008. camrhon.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=safe&action=display&thread=4827abadgoodgirl vegas member Re: By: gusjarvis says no payments before April! « Reply #2 Today at 9:46pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- One more thing. To anyone and everyone who wants an ROI on his/her investment: GET IN LINE BEHIND Urban's Warriors! PERIOD!! INCLUDING BURNS AND HIS FLOCK camrhon.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=safe&action=display&thread=4827
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 17, 2008 22:56:14 GMT -5
diamond4me DIAMOND MINER Commission barred Anderson « Thread Started Today at 9:36pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLease delete if this new has already been posted News for 'CMKX' - (ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS - In the Matter of Daryl Anderson) Nov 17, 2008 (SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RELEASE/ContentWorks via COMTEX) -- On November 14, the Commission issued an Order Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against Daryl Anderson (Anderson) of Las Vegas, Nevada. The Order is based on the entry of a permanent injunction against Anderson in the civil action entitled SEC v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 02:08-cv-00437-LRH-RJJ in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada. In the Order, as a remedial sanction, the Commission barred Anderson from association with a broker or dealer. In the Order, the Commission found that on Aug. 7, 2008, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada entered a Judgment of Permanent Injunction by Consent against Anderson, permanently enjoining him from violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933. The Order also found that the Commission's complaint in the civil action alleged that, among other things, from March 2003 until May 2005, Anderson improperly sold more than 259 billion shares of unregistered securities of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. in 569 separate transactions, which generated more than $53.3 million in proceeds and yielded approximately $2.3 million in commissions for Anderson. (Rel. 34-58958; File No. 3-13156) Copyright (C) 2008 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. -0- Source: Comtex Wall Street News Compliments of Scottrade.com millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=23380
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Nov 17, 2008 23:25:49 GMT -5
By: aladin99 17 Nov 2008, 09:58 PM EST Msg. 779552 of 779567 Jump to msg. # UC sacrificed... 40 Billions shares....Why? 40B + 35B = 75B shares were retired to the treasury on January 25, 2005...Why UC did not sell these shares? LAS VEGAS -- CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Pink Sheets: CMKX) announced today that it has agreed to acquire a 60%, undivided interest in 500,000 acres of potential Kimberlite mineral property in Saskatchewan, Canada. The property is currently owned by Nevada Minerals Inc., a private company unrelated to CMKM. The property is being developed by a joint venture between Nevada Minerals Inc. and U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. CMKM will acquire the interest in the property in exchange for 75 billion shares of restricted Rule 144 stock of CMKM. In order to reduce the dilution to CMKM's shareholders as a result of this transaction, Urban Casavant, CMKM's CEO, has agreed to contribute 40 billion shares owned by himself in exchange for an agreement from CMKM stating that Casavant will be paid only if the acquired property actually yields a profit. According to the agreement, Casavant will be paid one-half of the net proceeds from any mining on the property, after paying all associated expenses, up to a maximum aggregate total of US$62 million. CMKM will issue 35 billion new shares of the company to Nevada Minerals Inc. to complete the transaction.
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Nov 18, 2008 0:01:42 GMT -5
By: aladin99 17 Nov 2008, 09:58 PM EST Msg. 779552 of 779567 Jump to msg. # UC sacrificed... 40 Billions shares....Why? 40B + 35B = 75B shares were retired to the treasury on January 25, 2005...Why UC did not sell these shares? LAS VEGAS -- CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Pink Sheets: CMKX) announced today that it has agreed to acquire a 60%, undivided interest in 500,000 acres of potential Kimberlite mineral property in Saskatchewan, Canada. The property is currently owned by Nevada Minerals Inc., a private company unrelated to CMKM. The property is being developed by a joint venture between Nevada Minerals Inc. and U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. CMKM will acquire the interest in the property in exchange for 75 billion shares of restricted Rule 144 stock of CMKM. In order to reduce the dilution to CMKM's shareholders as a result of this transaction, Urban Casavant, CMKM's CEO, has agreed to contribute 40 billion shares owned by himself in exchange for an agreement from CMKM stating that Casavant will be paid only if the acquired property actually yields a profit. According to the agreement, Casavant will be paid one-half of the net proceeds from any mining on the property, after paying all associated expenses, up to a maximum aggregate total of US$62 million. CMKM will issue 35 billion new shares of the company to Nevada Minerals Inc. to complete the transaction. Intere sting comment made by aladin......lol....... Now since that deal with Neveda Minerals fell thru ( cmkx paid 2 million to get back those shares), I wonder if those 40 billion shares revert back to Urban and are in fact still sitting safely in the treasury. Maybe this is the reason cmkx pretty much did what they wanted all along with no proxy vote. It's funny that Tyler is saying (recently) that no one shareholder holds 10% of the outstanding shares of cmkx. If that statement is 100% true, how do you explain them still making all these decisions on our part with no proxy vote? According to cmkx's bylaws, 10% of the shares would have to be held by either one shareholder or a group of share holders acting as one. That 75 billion shares sure would do it. Maybe Urban quietly purchased the other 35 billion shares from that deal, giving him all the voting power and giving Tyler the capital it needed to go after all who wronged our company.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 18, 2008 15:57:29 GMT -5
By: techpro101 18 Nov 2008, 02:46 AM EST Msg. 779575 of 779611 Jump to msg. #
Ownership rights are essential to free societies. Allowing anyone to sell something that they do not own, sometimes that belong to me or you, is the first step to the end of freedom.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 18, 2008 16:00:05 GMT -5
By: hanssolong 18 Nov 2008, 11:34 AM EST Msg. 779586 of 779611 Jump to msg. # old article from stock patrol Search Results Stockpatrol: Buddy Up! - CMKM Diamonds, Inc.; U.S. Canadian ... CMKM Diamonds, Inc. and US Canadian Minerals, Inc. have been waging an aggressive campaign to win the hearts and minds of investors. Regulators in the US ... www.stockpatrol.com/article/key/CMKM6 - 45k - Cached - Similar pages By: yetihunter04 18 Nov 2008, 12:09 PM EST Msg. 779588 of 779611 (This msg. is a reply to 779586 by hanssolong.) Jump to msg. # ah, the good old days. i had forgotten willy wizard had over 700 million shares! LOL crazy.
|
|