Post by soonerlew on Mar 31, 2009 17:43:25 GMT -5
tec1958
Global Moderator
Helmsman
Re: From Frizzell
« Reply #20 Today at 10:19am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is a pickle rumor that pertains to Frizzell - this will be interesting to see play out
Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:34:39 AM In reply to: None Post # of 270007
Anyway -- thanks for the laughs jimmym4. I dropped by to read the Entourage deal.
Keep an eye on Deli's case.
The judge has ordered Marco to disclose the "attorney helping" him prepare the court filings.
And if Marco files there is none (no one helping him) and the SEC finds out there is someone (helping him) -- what happens to Marco will be hillarious!
Posted by: jarta Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:50:09 AM
In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 269988 Post # of 270007
Pedro, ... "Keep an eye on Deli's case.
The judge has ordered Marco to disclose the "attorney helping" him prepare the court filings."
The only order entered lately is an order directing Glisson to comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. That rule is designed to give judges an opportunity to recuse themselves (get out of the suit) if they have a conflict of interest because of the persons disclosed who have "a direct economic interest" in the suit.
If the "attorney helping" Glisson (assuming there even is one) is working for free (no fee), that person has no direct economic interest in the suit.
In the order that was entered, there is no mention of any "attorney helping."
Here's the recital before the court says he must comply:
"The Answer (#9) in this matter was filed March 12, 2009. LR 7.1-1 requires
that counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, file a certificate as to interested parties,
listing all persons, firms, partnerships or corporations, known to have an interest in the outcome of the
case, including the names of all parent subsidiary, affiliate and/or insider of the named non-individual
parties. If there are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement
to that effect must be filed. To date, Defendant has failed to comply."
Glisson is representing himself. Thus, he is acting as counsel and must comply with the local rule. Glisson will probably state that there are no interested parties that could cause a hidden conflict for the judge and that will be the end of it. ... eom
Posted by: goodolboy Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:40:03 AM
In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 269999 Post # of 270007
GM Pedro. Although Jarta is correct, I am sure Marco had assistance in writing his response, and I am sure it wasn't done for free. That said, I find it difficult to believe Marco would supply any interested parties.
But, I would be quite interested to know any details you may have that would be to the contrary.
Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:49:56 AM
In reply to: goodolboy who wrote msg# 270001 Post # of 270007
What I heard in the background -- and I can't vouch this is true so keep this as a rumor until Deli files -- a certain attorney called up and asked questions and the SEC's reply was: I can't talk with you unless you're representing the Defendant.
Posted by: goodolboy Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:59:06 AM
In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 270003 Post # of 270008
A certain attorney? All this time I thought it was one from the West, now you got me thinking it may be one from the South. Holy schit, say it ain't so! lol!
Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 11:08:02 AM
In reply to: goodolboy who wrote msg# 270005 Post # of 270008
LOL Now you're hearing what I'm hearing!
A certain attorney is helping Deli draft up the filings.
And we both know that no one works for free!
So let's see how Deli handles this problem.
Will Deli disclose the person's name?
Or will Deli file he's doing this on his own?
Rule number one: never lie in Federal Court!
Rule number two: never tell a CMKX shareholder a secret because that secret will get around town quickly!
I’m off to work.
Adios
cmkxdiamond.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general1&action=display&thread=58426&page=2
Global Moderator
Helmsman
Re: From Frizzell
« Reply #20 Today at 10:19am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is a pickle rumor that pertains to Frizzell - this will be interesting to see play out
Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:34:39 AM In reply to: None Post # of 270007
Anyway -- thanks for the laughs jimmym4. I dropped by to read the Entourage deal.
Keep an eye on Deli's case.
The judge has ordered Marco to disclose the "attorney helping" him prepare the court filings.
And if Marco files there is none (no one helping him) and the SEC finds out there is someone (helping him) -- what happens to Marco will be hillarious!
Posted by: jarta Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:50:09 AM
In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 269988 Post # of 270007
Pedro, ... "Keep an eye on Deli's case.
The judge has ordered Marco to disclose the "attorney helping" him prepare the court filings."
The only order entered lately is an order directing Glisson to comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. That rule is designed to give judges an opportunity to recuse themselves (get out of the suit) if they have a conflict of interest because of the persons disclosed who have "a direct economic interest" in the suit.
If the "attorney helping" Glisson (assuming there even is one) is working for free (no fee), that person has no direct economic interest in the suit.
In the order that was entered, there is no mention of any "attorney helping."
Here's the recital before the court says he must comply:
"The Answer (#9) in this matter was filed March 12, 2009. LR 7.1-1 requires
that counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, file a certificate as to interested parties,
listing all persons, firms, partnerships or corporations, known to have an interest in the outcome of the
case, including the names of all parent subsidiary, affiliate and/or insider of the named non-individual
parties. If there are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement
to that effect must be filed. To date, Defendant has failed to comply."
Glisson is representing himself. Thus, he is acting as counsel and must comply with the local rule. Glisson will probably state that there are no interested parties that could cause a hidden conflict for the judge and that will be the end of it. ... eom
Posted by: goodolboy Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:40:03 AM
In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 269999 Post # of 270007
GM Pedro. Although Jarta is correct, I am sure Marco had assistance in writing his response, and I am sure it wasn't done for free. That said, I find it difficult to believe Marco would supply any interested parties.
But, I would be quite interested to know any details you may have that would be to the contrary.
Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:49:56 AM
In reply to: goodolboy who wrote msg# 270001 Post # of 270007
What I heard in the background -- and I can't vouch this is true so keep this as a rumor until Deli files -- a certain attorney called up and asked questions and the SEC's reply was: I can't talk with you unless you're representing the Defendant.
Posted by: goodolboy Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:59:06 AM
In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 270003 Post # of 270008
A certain attorney? All this time I thought it was one from the West, now you got me thinking it may be one from the South. Holy schit, say it ain't so! lol!
Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 11:08:02 AM
In reply to: goodolboy who wrote msg# 270005 Post # of 270008
LOL Now you're hearing what I'm hearing!
A certain attorney is helping Deli draft up the filings.
And we both know that no one works for free!
So let's see how Deli handles this problem.
Will Deli disclose the person's name?
Or will Deli file he's doing this on his own?
Rule number one: never lie in Federal Court!
Rule number two: never tell a CMKX shareholder a secret because that secret will get around town quickly!
I’m off to work.
Adios
cmkxdiamond.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general1&action=display&thread=58426&page=2