|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 6, 2009 20:14:30 GMT -5
By: nufced 06 Apr 2009, 05:17 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824654 of 824682 Jump to msg. # acca- www.cmkm.info/ Nov, March, April, now May??
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 6, 2009 20:16:16 GMT -5
By: chrisl_trustee 06 Apr 2009, 05:31 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824657 of 824682
Jump to msg. # We all have a goal. Mine is to put CMKM into receivership.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 6, 2009 20:28:03 GMT -5
oh swell.......
By: rosencrantz2010 06 Apr 2009, 07:23 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824671 of 824682
Jump to msg. # HAKALA got her law degree from YALE. the same place bush got his MBA
an MBA from YALE that got us the economy and markets we've got and now we learn the SEC has put a YALE lawyer in charge of the CMKX investigation.
its over. it's done. forget it. there is no way on god's green earth this dimwit, YALE "educated" lawyer HAKALA is going to be able to do us any good. we are screwed, big time
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 6, 2009 20:36:19 GMT -5
grrrrrrrrrrrrrr..... Rosen making a funny..... not so funny though..... because unfortunately imo disgustingly true... They constantly are patting themselves on their backs with one hand while thumbing their nose at us with the other..... grrrrrrrrrrr
By: rosencrantz2010 06 Apr 2009, 07:41 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824676 of 824682
Jump to msg. # frankly, most of us working at the SEC are getting real tired of dealing with you whining little snot-nose cmkx investors.
we've busted our buttts for you guys over the years and we don't appreciate for one moment your snide remarks about us. in fact, if you keep it up we are going to take it out on you BIG TIME. mess with us and we will mess with you,,,,, BOY!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 6, 2009 20:37:48 GMT -5
By: jfarn 06 Apr 2009, 07:49 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824677 of 824682
Jump to msg. # Screws will are nice and tight.
There was a risk with involving 50k folks....
Statistical probability not in your favor....
They will continue to be turned until something breaks~
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 6, 2009 20:41:02 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 06 Apr 2009, 08:09 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824680 of 824682 (Reply to 824599 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. # Monetaryshift- I would like to say that nothing would make me happier than what I feel to be true, to come true tomorrow early AM, and what I see you posting to come to fruition. I happen to agree with the timing of your posts, but there remains the simple issue that If "It's so big"...then - "their" just busting at the seems to pay us. So where is it? Just need a reason good enough in order to do just that? I cannot help but thinking;
Everything here matters.
Not everything is "wrapped up".
For if it were nothing would matter. There would be no more discussion, and we would not be in this constant mode of anticipation (many of us), and urgent expectancy.
Oh, I think many have confused this activity of "expect the UN_EXPECTED" with accomplishment like making a huge public awareness campaign of everything including CMKM, OLD, NEW, and----- all GOVERNMENT AFFILIATIONS that are more than complicit-until all shareholders of record are paid for their good certificate pull, and what many feel that such naked shorted shares represented in VALUE, and some can help prove.
"STORY"; Why we would not be compensated "TODAY", the obligation that is more than due, and owed. DAMAGES, RESTITUTION, INTEREST,based on a Huge Naked Short tied to Significant Valuation, and this constant message that somehow circulates that something is out there for injured shareholders if they just hang on long enough, but no one of authority/Public or Private knows a thing about it in reality.
Mediate, Litigate, Negotiate the Legal Process. Find the number that mitigates the liability for one party while compensating the other party. The shareholders might need to reach out and grab that number.
How long are the shareholders going to wait on funds that they hear are already collected, and on account but not dispensed?
EXPECT NOTHING, and GET THE STORY OUT TO MEDIA, & LEGAL, because the wait is truly ridiculous...
AIMHO~
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 6, 2009 20:42:58 GMT -5
By: cage228 06 Apr 2009, 09:04 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824681 of 824682 Jump to msg. # oil or anyone? What is the new os of entourage?? According to yahoo uscn has a new os of only 5 mil??? Pretty thin,lean and mean?? Do these #'s mean anything when speaking of a conglamurate setting up?? Who's next who was once associated with cmkx?? Anyone ?? I was in a junk stock for years then bang r/s, name change, 10 mill os and it now trades $5-$8 per share. Did not have much but did very well over intial investment. All mho & fwiw.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 6, 2009 21:34:27 GMT -5
Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Sunday, April 05, 2009 7:22:41 PM In reply to: TSXminer who wrote msg# 270058 Post # of 270495 Civil? _ LOL _ The only left with CMKX is to watch the people squirm. Posted by: IQ1 Date: Monday, April 06, 2009 10:00:41 AM In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 270429 Post # of 270495 I think you have it wrong we will make people squirm. CMKX shareholders are not going away, and in fact the longer they keep delaying this the more of us are gathering. We are like a swarm of bees ready to charge. CMKX shareholders are certainly creating a very corrupt picture of the stock market and its being noticed! It would be easier for someone to pay us off just to shut up. ha ha ha 250,000,000 is not that much money when they're loosing more millions daily because of what we represent. We are a buch of real people that got screwed by the current lack of security in the stock market, Transfer agent, and the Banks. Lets face it, this should not have been possible!!! Someone with so little education has just proved it! Over and over!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 6, 2009 22:00:42 GMT -5
snoopstock5 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD IMO: We have to hire R own lawyer for fraud cases « Thread Started Today at 3:07pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gus from RB and Tramps board is trying to get everyone in a class action suit. Bill cannot represent us, because of conflict of interest. We need to find our own lawyer for a law suit against SEC and brokers and even the transfer agent. Statue of Limitation already started On April 7, 2008. You have two years after discovery in Federal Securities Fraud. millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=25328
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Apr 7, 2009 0:06:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 7, 2009 13:47:09 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 07 Apr 2009, 07:09 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 824706 of 824782 (Reply to 824680 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. # I want to move forward into a proactive, productive posture that sends this into immediate mediation for either payment to 40k shareholders of record, or the litigation process to legally identify shareholder damages, parties responsible, and who will handle that matter today for interested participants, and not years more of discovery. Yes, this is not rocket science. Some here have some very good DD compiled as proof i.e. of record. (I also believe that a payment would be forthcoming before any public trial if this pressure was correctly applied.)
IMVHO, the methodology to keep these shareholders "here"/timing, and complacent is more than enough evidence that we have been held off because of a proven NAKED SHORT that threatens WORLD ECONOMIES. I personally am blown away that we would not have been satisfied by this point (from a financial vantage point between both parties), and being that we are not it would behoove those that are in control of this situation to pay something rather than nothing to mitigate the liability issues. That is logical.
Why we do not have the group that has all of the DD in charge of this moving ahead is beyond me??? I would vote, "YES", in advance, and advance my cash to see this plan into action before there is no more time to effectuate a decent enough plan.
2 key obvious points;
1.) Someone out there knows something significant about our "NS DAMAGES", restitution, and it's physical existence.
2.) Restitution is there to be paid, or it will be paid at some "level" in order to mitigate the damage and structure of liability dealing with the responsible and culpable agencies. The time between then and now is interest bearing, taxable, owed, growing, and exponential at best- reflecting damages. At worst it is and will remain a liability of the domicile of the Federal Government as someone has gone through great lengths to hold back a legal obligation on a massive force of shareholders (if not paid very soon).
Finally, I believe that I heard Spook01 say that if nothing happens by the mid month of APRIL (of this year) that he also would have been ready to deploy proactive measures. He was not speaking about more discussions IME, and was very serious. I believe that even Spook supported this sort of declaration that would have led to the delegation of some group authority, a positive action towards helping move Federal Agencies in identifying/notification , and the delivery of fair damages/compensation to those that were harmed due to huge financial public failures.
AIMVHO,
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 7, 2009 13:54:28 GMT -5
By: jfarn 07 Apr 2009, 09:25 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 824717 of 824782 Jump to msg. # 1 year delay Complaint is exclusionary, arbitrary, and capricious. A great cause for concern. By: reality.bytes 07 Apr 2009, 10:14 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 824722 of 824782 (Reply to 824718 by nufced) Jump to msg. # nufced- he's talking about the one year anniversary of this, and rightly so. one year has passed and the SEC folks are still watching porn and running their side business at work instead of following up on this. Litigation Release No. 20519 / April 7, 2008 www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2008/lr20519.htm By: nufced 07 Apr 2009, 10:29 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 824726 of 824782 (Reply to 824722 by reality.bytes) Jump to msg. # reality__I think they have to wait for the Judge to sign off..and for discovery. not sure what else they can do. I would place the blame on the Nevada Courts. the FEDs are even slower than the courts.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 7, 2009 14:12:41 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 07 Apr 2009, 01:17 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824756 of 824786
Jump to msg. # Who is this guy? He was on Bloomberg and HE HATES the short-selling rules the SEC is considering. Found this older site....http://asensioexposed.com/
By: baloney_cleaver 07 Apr 2009, 01:19 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824757 of 824786 (Reply to 824756 by newtopennies)
Jump to msg. # pennies..
He is a notorious short/naked shorter. Of course he will kick and screem about any new rules.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 7, 2009 14:24:47 GMT -5
By: stockrich0 07 Apr 2009, 12:51 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824747 of 824786 MONETARY, you say 'nothing matters'...Does this matter? ty sweettime Brand new poster Two posts from sweettime and here they are. I like this poster cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=3407&page=1By: mt.men 07 Apr 2009, 01:03 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824750 of 824785 (Reply to 824747 by stockrich0) Jump to msg. # stockrich Thanks for bringing the post here . Those are just some of the many reasons why the Bashers continue to fight the fight . By: adrienne07 07 Apr 2009, 01:31 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824759 of 824786 (Reply to 824747 by stockrich0) Jump to msg. # stockrich0: sweettime's post tells all. Everything said is 100% accurate !
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 7, 2009 14:27:40 GMT -5
By: pete85204 07 Apr 2009, 01:39 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824763 of 824787
Jump to msg. # newto/nufced/jfarn: I called clerks office main number (702) 464-5400 in Nevada about twenty minutes ago. Docket clerk is option 5, and asked about updates on case 2:08-CV-0437. According to the clerk I talked to, there are three summary judgments pending: one against John Edwards; one against Daryl Anderson; and one against Kathleen & Anthony Thomaso. She could give no time frame but did say that big cases like these usually take a while. Call for yourself, all you need is the phone number, option #5 for docket clerk and Case number 2:08-CV-0437. I did not ask about any other defendants, just latest updates to case.
|
|