|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 8, 2009 16:12:36 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 08 Apr 2009, 02:36 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824911 of 824940 (Reply to 824706 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. # To date there has not been one source that has connected shareholders to any time frame that is even remotely accurate regarding any expectancy- financially, or with notification, or news worthy. Now if you want to place any credibility/ level of importance on a source Domestic or Foreign that has a zero batting average, and connect that in any way, to any of our welfare ( as shareholders of record ) then good luck with that priority concerning mental awareness.
AIMVHO2~
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 8, 2009 16:15:46 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 08 Apr 2009, 03:05 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824919 of 824940
Jump to msg. # SEC Proposes 5 Curbs to Short-Selling By: Reuters | 08 Apr 2009 | 12:19 PM ET The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission voted unanimously Wednesday to issue proposed curbs on short selling, including a return of the ''uptick rule'', for a 60-day public comment period. to read article..... click the link ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=824919By: rosencrantz2010 08 Apr 2009, 03:07 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824921 of 824940 (Reply to 824919 by rosencrantz2010) Jump to msg. # doesn't appear naked shorting is seen as a problem, or they figure they've taken care of it.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 8, 2009 16:18:27 GMT -5
By: mquietstorm3 08 Apr 2009, 04:24 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824933 of 824940
Jump to msg. # Remember when I gave you this statement awhile back:
"THE POWER OF THE PEOPLE LIES IN ITS LAND OWNERSHIP "
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 8, 2009 16:19:45 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 08 Apr 2009, 03:05 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824919 of 824940
Jump to msg. # SEC Proposes 5 Curbs to Short-Selling By: Reuters | 08 Apr 2009 | 12:19 PM ET The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission voted unanimously Wednesday to issue proposed curbs on short selling, including a return of the ''uptick rule'', for a 60-day public comment period. to read article..... click the link ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=824919By: rosencrantz2010 08 Apr 2009, 03:07 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824921 of 824940 (Reply to 824919 by rosencrantz2010) Jump to msg. # doesn't appear naked shorting is seen as a problem, or they figure they've taken care of it. By: jboydwv 08 Apr 2009, 04:28 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824936 of 824940 Jump to msg. # although market makers would not be included ..... All five proposals included some exemptions, although market makers would not be included. online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090408-713337.html
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 8, 2009 16:22:11 GMT -5
By: tenn21 08 Apr 2009, 04:56 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824938 of 824940 (Reply to 824901 by demntx)
Jump to msg. # demntx,
Is this your opinion??
If it is your opinion, then may I ask YOU a question? I would appreciate an explanatory answer, please. You see, I believe Urban Casavant to have REALLY been and still might be the man he portrayed himself as at all functions originally. You say "WHAT"?
This is my opinion of what has happened and is still on going, I believe that the powers that be used him as a sit-up for a sting operation and it got so involved they stole the monies and they still have the most of it and we will have to fight for it forever. As you know when "THE MAN" steals your "billions" you are going to play he11 ever recouping all your loses. JMHO/FWIW.
tenn21
By: demntx 08 Apr 2009, 05:06 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824939 of 824942 (Reply to 824938 by tenn21)
Jump to msg. # tenn.......Kw wrote this as you can see but I do agree with it. As KW says, all the facts and all the evidence that can be produced shows this is the case. No one can produce any document, evidence or otherwise to back up the BS lies that are still constantly told about cmkx daily. Jay worked for JE which is why he bolted this joint when JE was taken down. Acc is just still hanging around occaisionally to get his jollies. Everyone else who claims to know things are about to happen with this huge pile of money to distribute refuse to show any proof. Now why would they refuse? Because there is no money. UC has 2 bad addictions, alcohol and gambling, and it cost him and all of us dearly. These are the facts. Thanks for asking......eom
ty... 1forall "If you don't read the newspapers you are uninformed. If you do read the newspapers you are misinformed." Mark Twain
errrrrr..........did Mark Twain have a premonition about CMKM updates, I wonder....
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 8, 2009 16:46:55 GMT -5
Posted by: IQ1 Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 3:55:11 PM In reply to: goodolboy who wrote msg# 270553 Post # of 270562 What is troubling is that there are phone records from NevWest, which show that they contacted the SEC each time Edwards came in with CMKX certs to sell, many of which were clearly forged and fraudulent, some even "signed" by an individual who had been deceased for months. Instead of taking action to halt the obvious fraud against innocent shareholders, the SEC and NASD (FINRA) ignored the evidence and dozens of other red flags, allowing the scheme to continue unabated, costing unsuspecting buyers of CMKX stock hundreds of millions of dollars. Now president Obama has not even got his secretary to respond to the letter as thou the little people don't matter to someone of such great importance. I don't think its too much to ask to respond that this matter is being looked into especially since it involves thousands of people. Would you not agree? Posted by: puppydotcom Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 4:03:43 PM In reply to: IQ1 who wrote msg# 270554 Post # of 270562 he does not have time for such trivial matters .. he is to busy raising taxes and giving billions to banks for bonus money and parties
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 8, 2009 16:56:03 GMT -5
By: mquietstorm3 08 Apr 2009, 05:47 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824949 of 824949 Jump to msg. # Why is Buffet and Gates laying low about their visit to Canada? Think it through before you respond emotionally lilfellas!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2009 20:51:48 GMT -5
heat1944 DIAMOND JEDI Class Action paid off..... « Thread Started on Apr 6, 2009, 7:11pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I do not normally start these things however, I just received a check for an old stock I purchased back in 04 where a law firm brought a class action suit, and it was quite a nice suprise. I also received a notice at the same time that I filed this one from another attorney bringing a class action against another stock which was shorted. I will await that monies. Anyway, the reason for this is to say that even though I feel we got screwed on CMKX I am going to contact the same group of lawyers to see if they are interested in our little company. The attorneys are Gainey # McKenna out of New York. They got us over $650,000 for its shareholders. I don't know if this is the solution to closure but I just wanted to share this with y'all and see if anyone else has an opinion. Heat steveo1965 DIAMOND MINER Re: Class Action paid off..... « Reply #1 on Apr 6, 2009, 7:30pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What percent of your investment did you get back? heat1944 DIAMOND JEDI Re: Class Action paid off..... « Reply #2 on Apr 6, 2009, 7:43pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I would say about 15%. But it was not expected and someone had to pay over $600,000. To me that is ok. superfun63 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Class Action paid off..... « Reply #3 on Apr 6, 2009, 10:13pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, as little as I own of CMKX, I wouldn't even get back enough to make one of my loan payments getting only 15% of my investment back. I would have to say, NO THANK YOU. We as shareholders have been wronged and I think we deserve damages, settlement, or whatever you want to call it. I think getting a settlement of a per share price of what it would have been if not for the manipulation, for starters. I think Urban said $.54 without the naked short figured in. If I'm guaranteed at least that, then I'm all in. waterdog85 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Class Action paid off..... « Reply #4 Yesterday at 7:17am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO please do not start this. Once they start and win it is over. This was a .0001 sub penny extremly high risk play. High risk hopefully = high reward. personnaly I am not interested in 15% back that would be a 85% loss. 144r DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: Class Action paid off..... « Reply #5 Yesterday at 7:43am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Exactly don't start this. Nothing worse than watching people screw themselves by accepting less. uraniumprincess DIAMOND JEDI Re: Class Action paid off..... « Reply #6 Yesterday at 8:15am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Agree..........Not interested in 15% return and 85% loss..........PLEASE do not start this. alberta DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Class Action paid off..... « Reply #7 Yesterday at 12:01pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15% return is too few. Please do not start this heat1944 DIAMOND JEDI Re: Class Action paid off..... « Reply #8 Today at 7:19pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well this is not going to be a class action but it will be my action. Fifteen percent of something is better than one Hundred percent of nothing. Besides I have lost faith in ALL these Gurus to be of assistance and I firmly believe its nothing more than a stalling tactic. At least it certainly cuts down on the number of shareholders holding on and that in itself is highly profitable, if we ever do get paid, to those who would string this sting along. Heat millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=25333
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2009 21:09:32 GMT -5
thanks Seagull.... By: wodan rumors in belgium « Thread Started Today at 6:39am » ---------------------------------------------------------------- my friend mark talkt to the old guy again a hour ago he was back from spain for a day or 3 the old guy is the 1 that told us before summer 2008 that this probably will drag on till end of 2009 before we gone hear something so my friend mark askt him if he still hears the same time frame old guy said no rumor between top bankers is at this point .... 1 more year min. so with some luck before summer of 2010 2th quarter and he is still saying buyout ... after a big merger between mining stocks he said to that he and the people he talks to had big expectations in your new president but that's gone to .. seems to be that he is nothing more then a big walking talking doll ..and that he is forcing nothing .. he said they are not gone clean up nothing around NSS after this i called the fortis banker that we talk to .. that person agreed i just bring over what i hear this are not facts just rumors between top bankers or important investment people ---------- The SEC was expected to debate and then vote on issuing the proposals for a 60-day public comment period. There will also be a public discussion of the issues, sponsored by the SEC, on May 5. Any final action is likely months away. www.cnbc.com/id/30107738SEC Advancing Options on Short-Selling Rules ~wodan « snoopstock5 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: rumors in belgium « Reply #20 Today at 1:30pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 6:53am, smeagle wrote: Yes statue of limitations for the 622 billion shares will end on April 7, 2010. wodan11 DIAMOND JEDI Re: rumors in belgium « Reply #21 Today at 1:43pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- let wait and wait ... till its to late and let the ego shi*t be our downfall group your self and start to do something make it publiek and step in with people like snoop millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=25352&page=2
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2009 21:13:24 GMT -5
wodan Junior Miner Re: Snoop's thread!!! « Reply #6 Today at 12:47pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Statute of Limitations, we may be close if at all « Thread Started Today at 1:45pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I just spoke to a very excellent fraud examiner/investigator with a law degree. With a short overview of our story today, he is concerned we may be close to the statute of limitations for filing for damages, a derivative filing, not sure what he called it. IF the company has not officially filed the derive lawsuit on our behalf against Edwards, like they said in a pr, guess what? We are not a part of it. It could also have been the beginning of the clock ticking for the SOL when Bill told us in 2005 we have a huge short. (paraphrased). If that is the case we could be close to a problem here. In some states it is 4 years. He was not sure for Nevada. He could find out though. He is looking into the pleadings of the Edwards case as I type this but would need to be retained to do a complete discovery and analysis of the SOL status for us right now, which he stressed was the first step for us. He would need approximately 20 hrs to properly research and give us a report. If so, it would cost 2500.00. I am prepared to contribute to his first hour of work just to get him started, if the group decides to go forward. This seems like first base imo. He agreed that the letter to Frizzell is a good first step and the call to the states attorney general. I think time is of the essence here and this man can take us forward. At that point, after an official analysis of where we stand, we could decide to let this man take it further, which he is more than qualified to do. Im ready to do this but it will take the group to fund it. A 100 people could contribute 25 each. But I leave this out there for comments. I have been asked if it is smart to post the letter for Tyler to see what is happening, giving them a heads up. I feel at this point that although that is an excellent point, that we have no more time for playing and if there is an official investigation coming from the right people in authority, what can they possibly do to hide the facts at this point? Even if some shifting happens, we still have a huge short, a cert pull that hasnot been disclosed, contradictory and vague info coming from the company and a lot of BS after 4 years of dealing with the same people who supposedly had our backs. I say express your opinions but lets make this a swift move, no more waiting. If they want us to stop, then prove to us why we should, in writing, no more crap and to the entire group of us. Otherwise I say, Onward..lol but not really funny, not at all. millionaires.proboards.com/index.....ay&thread=25360 tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=8279
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2009 21:14:35 GMT -5
wodan Junior Miner Re: Snoop's thread!!! « Reply #7 Today at 12:50pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Letter going out to Bill Frizzell, CMKM this week « Thread Started Today at 11:09am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If anyone has any concerns why this should not go out, please mention them here. Otherwise this is a rough draft of a letter I am preparing to send to CMKM/ Frizzell at the recommendation of the States Attorney Generals office today: Mr. William Frizzell CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Dear Mr. Frizzell, At the suggestion of the States Attorney Generals Office in Texas, I am contacting you on behalf of myself and the entire CMKM Shareholder base because of the great ongoing concerns regarding the idea that you may have misrepresented your relationship to our group, albeit through John Martin, as the representative who collected funds from the shareholders, who in turn paid for your services to us, prior to you focusing your time and attention to the work of Robert Maheu's Task Force. We believed and understood that you were hired to work on our behalf on the effort of discovery of information regarding our mutual investment in CMKM Diamonds, Inc. It is my understanding that our money was paid to Frizzell Law Firm for your work. Did that not legally establish you as shareholder attorney at that point in time? I do not recall any final official report of your findings on our behalf for the two paid terms you were contracted for. We would like to know if you in fact can produce an official report to the shareholders of your findings and if in your present status as company attorney for CMKM Diamonds, Inc, if you are in a conflict of interest situation, since you did at one point represent our interests albeit through John Martin, another shareholder/organizer of the shareholders, as that was his role as perceived by many who entered into the agreement to pay for your services. Would you please forward to me your legal position on what actually transpired between the shareholders and yourself What was your definition of your legal relationship to the base of shareholders who paid and what is your legal position and relationship today as "company attorney" or otherwise, and your relationship to the current shareholders of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. who are bonafied and registered with the company and Transfer Agent. I am also requesting that you update the shareholders regarding the litigation you were involved in on behalf of the shareholders and the company as stated in company press releases regarding John Edwards Derivative Lawsuit.I understand you hired Atty George Cromer and then subbed him out for David Koch and Al Hodges. Can you please explain why this was necessary and if so, what is the current standing of the that lawsuit as it pertains to any present or future payments to the company and the shareholders. Also, if you could please explain if possible, the fees due to the attorneys involved in this case and if those fees would be coming out of the awarded settlements if any? Why has there not been any activity on that lawsuit since the summer of 2008? Can you please update us? Finally, I would like to share a growing concern for the lack of information coming from the company, CMKM Diamonds, Inc, to the shareholders and if you have any comments to make about Leslie Hakala's emails to shareholders stating we do have funds set aside for the Naked shorting of our stock. Can you please comment on any settlements that you are aware of that are earmarked for the shareholders, either now or in the future? Also, is Kevin West still a member of the Board of Directors of CMKM and if not, does he still hold a position in the company at present. Also, what is the exact relationship between the Owners Group, Inc and Togi Entertainment and CMKM Diamonds, Inc, if any? I look forward to your timely response to these matters and hope that you will be forthcoming with solid and direct answers to these questions. There is growing mistrust of the company and that is well known at this point. I felt it best to go straight to the source before proceeding in any other direction as a group and want nothing more than honest disclosure after so much time has passed where little or faulty information comes out of our company. At this point in time, information regarding our status as shareholders, share structure and any information you are able to distribute to the group is much desired and needed. Questions have arisen regarding the conversion of CMKM from a Vegas corporation to a Texas corporation and has us wondering if in fact we are the same company and if there have been any changes that we need to be made aware of. Are we a private company? Are we not entitled to vote on any company decisions at this point in time? Please provide us with the legal standing of our company and our relationship to it at this point in time and any further information that may be of value in helping us better understand what our positions are at present. I thank you for your time in this matter and anxiously look forward to your responses. Sincerely- xxxxxxxxx cc: Texas States Attorney Generals Office millionaires.proboards.com/index.....ay&thread=25356 tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=8279
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2009 21:17:08 GMT -5
erthtunes Junior Miner poof replies « Thread Started Yesterday at 8:03pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I wrote to poof- had a few questions- much to my surprise he took the time to answer - thought you may find it interesting > Hello poof- > been reading your reports for yrs > holding them pretty lightly- as a safeguard > I have been burned too many times- you can understand > I am a CMKX shareholder- hopefully that won't need to be explained > Just a couple questions > > 1- in you're reports when you mention deliveries- distributions- letters > etc. are you including cmkx- the biggest proven naked shorted company in history > > 2- when you refer to WE who hold the Gold- is that physical- or would claims and mines be included > > 3- this new currency - that I assume will be backed by GOLD- minerals etc- when the new wealth- deliveries > settlements - programs- or whatever you want to name them - do show up - will it be real and not fiat- poofs replyThere are lot of programs being released and I don't even know what all of them are, since things aren't 'named' in europe, everything is transaction numbers. The new system is gold backed, personnaly I'm accessing in europe but the new system makes accessing in the us, 'safe', but my work is in europe. Everything being accessed will be into the new global banking system and that is literal gold, which was put in place from the 'ancient gold' of asia. P tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=8268
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 8, 2009 22:11:26 GMT -5
bluefin DIAMOND DIGGER Roger D. Glenn -E.A.P. & D. ?? « Thread Started Today at 7:49pm » Just did a search for Roger D. Glenn www.eapdlaw.com/ourfirm/He was on the site a few months ago when I last checked. It appears the he may have moved on...or maybe his name was removed by mistake during a update. Who knows! found this....Edwards Angell Lays Off 25 Attorneys, 35 Staffers Thu, Mar 26, 2009 Home, Law Firms, LayoffsEdwards Angell Palmer & Dodge has announced today the layoffs of 25 lawyers and 35 staff. That’s roughly 15% of the firm’s workforce. From the firm’s statement: Today we will inform about 25 lawyers and 35 staff that their employment with the Firm is ended, and will offer them severance arrangements similar to those offered by the many other firms that have also made these difficult decisions. Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP is an American law firm based in Boston, Massachusetts. The firm is number 97 on the list of the world’s largest law firms by 2006 revenue. The firm was formed by the 2005 merger of Edwards & Angell LLP and Palmer & Dodge LLP.
|
|
|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Apr 8, 2009 23:10:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 9, 2009 7:27:20 GMT -5
TY LUCI...
By: factanonverba13 09 Apr 2009, 01:27 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 824988 of 824988 Jump to msg. # Tyler news coming!!
And you will NOT be happy
|
|