|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 14:42:18 GMT -5
By: bigfork2 04 May 2009, 10:01 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 830448 of 830606
Jump to msg. # So, Raging Bull deleted all of Darlene's posts. What's the matter, her posts make you guys a bit uncomfortable? LOL. Got CMKX? Why yes, yes I do.
Bigfork
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 14:43:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 14:45:27 GMT -5
WOW!!! These people actually read our board. Sooo, chris, maybe you betta watch what you say ...monetaryshift pulled some of our posts also...By: newtopennies 04 May 2009, 10:51 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 830487 of 830608 Jump to msg. # FYI...LUCKILY....Soonerlew over on Proboards 29 copied many if not all of Darlene's posts, because I missed them here. Really great stuff. If that kind of information is coming out, it must be time for some official announcements... IMO. eom.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 14:49:27 GMT -5
By: chico_marx 04 May 2009, 10:57 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 830496 of 830611 (Reply to 830482 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. # monetary...There is genuine fear being built up in the business community due to the Obama administration "strong-arming" the Chrysler bond holders to give up their bonds so that the Unions can have a bigger chunk of Chrysler...Those bond holders that refuse to give up their bonds are being threatened by the Obama administration with the wrath of the full force of the Washington Press Corp coming down on them...So I seriously doubt that Obama is "pro CMKX"...If there IS "tons of $$$" to be had from CMKX Obama is gonna make sure that the Government "somehow" gets it and not the CMKX "shareholders"...
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 14:49:54 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 10:59 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 830501 of 830611
Jump to msg. # isnt cmkx the trading symbol that was used to trap shorty - GOT CMKX???
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 14:51:32 GMT -5
By: kilroy.killbasher 04 May 2009, 11:19 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 830511 of 830611
Jump to msg. # Posters and their histories that do NOT violate TOS of RG are being removed? Who's doing that, RB or is some deviant poster (e.g., Jonas, etc.) capable? If it's RB, I would think that suspicious behavior without TOS violations. Interesting.
\\|// ( o o ) ~~~~oOOo~(_)~oOOo~~~~ KILROY WAS HERE
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 14:52:22 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 04 May 2009, 11:39 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 830520 of 830611
Jump to msg. # There are no more events. Only a news story. OURS. EOM////
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 14:57:22 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:02 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830557 of 830611
Jump to msg. # Hey guys this is from Darlene:
She wants to know when is the next CEO update
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:03 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830558 of 830611
Jump to msg. # Darlene wants to know:
Did Mark hear back from the FBI regading the 622B unregistered shares
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:04 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830559 of 830612
Jump to msg. # Darlene wants to know - what time is the FBI picking up Kathy Robbins
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:05 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830560 of 830612
Jump to msg. # Another from Darlene - She wants to know why Tyler was never served with the Entourage lawsuit
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:08 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830561 of 830612
Jump to msg. # Darlene says it makes sense to her that when the 4,000 shareholders were moved over to Entourage there was no need for a Tyler vote since it was all agreed back in October of 2005 - UC what I C
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:09 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830563 of 830612
Jump to msg. # Darlene says that must have been what Mr kennedy meant by the Entourage Share Structure was "designed" for the CMKM Diamond Shareholders
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:11 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830564 of 830612
Jump to msg. # Darlene also says that it also makes sense that Tyler needs to keep hush on the agreement since they have nothing to do with it
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:13 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830566 of 830612
Jump to msg. # Darlene says that Tyler is getting ready for their FORENSIC PARTY" with the 622B idiots. They have waited a long time, I am SHORE they are very excited to finally meet the unhappy posters on this board
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:15 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830567 of 830612
Jump to msg. # I am speaking Darlene now - awesome person guys
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 14:59:30 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:19 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830569 of 830612
Jump to msg. # Darlene says, giving Tyler the 7 boxes was priceless! The negative ones never saw it coming
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:19 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830570 of 830613
Jump to msg. # Darlene says step right up negative ones - ask any question you want
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:23 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830572 of 830613
Jump to msg. # Darlene says what if this was never about Diamonds
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:24 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830573 of 830613
Jump to msg. # Darlene says what if this was always about a massive energy shift and monetary system clean up?
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:26 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830574 of 830614
Jump to msg. # Darlene says has anybody else noticed the limited PRESS RELEASES from Tyler
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:30 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830577 of 830615
Jump to msg. # Darlene thinks that Mr. West has not received any files from the previous company attorneys regarding work that was done on the Interpleader
By: newtopennies 04 May 2009, 02:40 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830583 of 830616 (Reply to 830573 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. # THEN IT IS bigger than anything I could have imagined......em.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 14:59:59 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 04 May 2009, 02:29 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830576 of 830614
Jump to msg. # SHIFT...THE 622 B are certed as well, but they couldn't locate real owners? Is that what Darlene was saying, that they are counterfeit certs counted by the task force? Sorry if I am a bit confused. eom.
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:31 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830578 of 830615 (Reply to 830576 by newtopennies)
Jump to msg. # NP - Darlene says the 622B r not certed :-(((
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on May 4, 2009 15:00:44 GMT -5
blah..blah..blah..why doesn't "Darlene" step up to mic and talk to us and tell us more...another character thrown into the mix means we have about 5 more years left..how about just telling us when we will get paid or tell us it is over..
=================================================================
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 02:15 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830567 of 830612
Jump to msg. # I am speaking Darlene now - awesome person guys
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 15:03:52 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 04 May 2009, 02:37 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830581 of 830616
Jump to msg. # SHIFT...IS DARLENE quite sure of her numbers? Only 4000 shareholders holding only 17 Billion shares? TIA. eom.
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 03:10 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830588 of 830618 (Reply to 830581 by newtopennies)
Jump to msg. # NP - YES DARLENE IS SHORE OF HER NUMBERS
By: tuscan9 04 May 2009, 03:20 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830595 of 830618 (Reply to 830581 by newtopennies)
Jump to msg. # Monetary...
Darlenes numbers caught my eye also... I figured about 20,000 REAL Bonafide shareholders...
that 4,000 was a shocker ...!
I like it... won't be unhappy to be wrong here...lol...but, and there's usually a but, isn't there..?
here's my non-official calculation in my memory bank going back awhile.. There were about 2000 shareholders interested like mad in the beginning on the boards...(?0
That number has dwindled a LOT...but,
it appears to me that EACH person most likely brought 10 people (rounded out) into the stock on average...
so, easy calculation rounds it to 20 K BONaFIED shareholders.. not 50K .. not 70K...
and hey, if my thought it off 16K .........so be it... Wowzwer !~
if 4 K Bonafied shareholders is all there are.. that makes those 4ooo people so dang rich they won't know what to do with it all ~
Tuscan
Same holds true with it if its 20 K Bonafied...lol...
ain't this fun?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 15:05:14 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 04 May 2009, 02:41 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830584 of 830617
Jump to msg. # how many bona fide shareholders are there? 4,000? 40,000? 60,000?
By: rosencrantz2010 04 May 2009, 02:44 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830585 of 830617
Jump to msg. # in other words, how many are there of us? do we only number in the thousands and not the tens of thousands?
and are there really only 17B legit shares and the 4,000 of us own all those shares?
the latest info doesn't make sense to me.
i thought there were 40,000 to 60,000 shareholders and that we held roughly 600B to 700B shares.
now it is being suggested there are fewer than 4,000 of us and those of us with certs own only 17B shares?!!!
why did helen take months and months to get us our certs is they were issuing only 4,000 certs?
By: rosencrantz2010 04 May 2009, 02:46 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830586 of 830618 (Reply to 830576 by newtopennies)
Jump to msg. # newtopennies, you aren't alone in being confused about this latest idea.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 15:07:02 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 03:21 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830596 of 830618
Jump to msg. # Darlene is pretty sure makay will be one of the real shareholders who will be iliminated from the real BonaFide list just based on her over the top support of the criminals
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2009 15:07:59 GMT -5
By: tuscan9 04 May 2009, 03:22 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830597 of 830618 (Reply to 830593 by monetaryshift) Jump to msg. # Monetary.. You always have been Shore...so, between being Shore and Seeing the Tsunami pass over the Shore... the Storm is over and the Sun is OUT! Its Picnic time... you name the place ~ got cmkx? By: monetaryshift 04 May 2009, 03:27 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830600 of 830618 Jump to msg. # Tusc, Darlene says keep in mind the boards (even back then) were out numbered 8 to 1 by the shorters. So once you remove the bashers how many were actual BonaFide shareholders back then?
|
|