|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 11, 2009 19:54:09 GMT -5
By: radiomo0 11 May 2009, 04:14 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832465 of 832555 (Reply to 832454 by sharasilva) Jump to msg. # Shar...y'know?I'm getting the impression by what i have seen over the years...the people that designed this plan from the git go..Are MASTERS at designing legal ways of getting end results LEGALLY WITHOUT spilling the beans in an obvious way..THE END RESULT is what counts....took time and legal progression to get to. These Pro's believe They've got ways around us Rocket Scientists figuring out 8 yr or more plan. IF this is BIG...Then it must be PROTECTED at all costs... ask Chuck Fipke. (hee hee) rad
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 11, 2009 20:02:08 GMT -5
By: radiomo0 11 May 2009, 04:35 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832468 of 832562 Jump to msg. # What Bank recently suddenly came up to announce they owned Uranium..gee i forgot. I wonder if any other BANKS bought some "worthless mineral stocks" years ago? ......untill one day years later, DISCOVERIES are found! Well waddia know... "back engeneering to achieve FINAL RESULTS"?? I believe the City is made of GOLD & precious minerals that just won't burn...who da thunk of that.. many YEARS AGO. Sure would murder shorties that bet the CITY...would burn down eh? rad By: rosencrantz2010 11 May 2009, 04:45 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832474 of 832565 (Reply to 832468 by radiomo0) Jump to msg. # radio, what is your point? are you saying citi bought into cmkx and in fact was always on our side and was not shorting cmkx stock? it would be nice if people would state their position and defend it with either evidence or logic. so, citi owns a big chunk of cmkx,,, is that what you are saying? what about our 17B shares? i thought the 4,000 of us owned 59% of the company? apparently not. so what do we own 59% of? entourage? that ain't much. and if we're just a bunch of sask small joint ventures then we're still not much. i hope everyone is right in some sense, but right now there is no clear picture from anyone about exactly how we become this MEGA mining giant. the uranium isn't going to do it. the gold isn't. the diamonds aren't. etc. yes, there are a bunch of companies involved but all of them are like SHORE GOLD, they are small stuff when compared to the really big boys.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 11, 2009 20:05:02 GMT -5
By: sharasilva 11 May 2009, 04:28 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832467 of 832563 (Reply to 832465 by radiomo0) Jump to msg. # rad, what facts exist that would give anyone the impression that anyone running cmkx at anytime were masters at anything but promoting junk to race fans? By: radiomo0 11 May 2009, 04:42 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832472 of 832563 (Reply to 832467 by sharasilva) Jump to msg. # Char...I'm sorry..gee i thought you were just uninformed...I was wrong.. U R CLUELESS! (not that there's anything wrong with that) I gotta hard drive fulla good stuff you'd like to know..it's a long complex story...hey tell you what i'll do... Post your email address and I'll send you the answers and what i have. Although You may have to leave the boards for awile to read the documentation...it'll be well worth it. I promise. rad
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 11, 2009 20:12:52 GMT -5
By: grajekk 11 May 2009, 06:51 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832499 of 832568 (Reply to 832402 by nufced)
Jump to msg. # Nuf.. What if McIntyre/Edwards hosed UC in past dealings, and Urban decided to pay him back tenfold! LOL! Anything could be possible in this stinking mess..
By: nufced 11 May 2009, 07:11 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832502 of 832569 (Reply to 832499 by grajekk)
Jump to msg. # grajekk..could be possible, but it didn't give UC license to empty the corporate coffers. I bet they both made out on Petro Plus. Same as they did here. PR's.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 11, 2009 20:19:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 11, 2009 20:22:50 GMT -5
By: eaglesrock2008 11 May 2009, 07:56 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832517 of 832574
Jump to msg. # Like I said the CMKX SUPER MINERAL STORE will be a Monster of a store . And all Longs will be Extremely Wealthy.
and those Hedge funds and brokers will have to pay through the nose to get in to join the CMKM Long shAreholder party. Because It wont be cheap for those basher hedge funds and brokerages to buy in. lol
CMKX is BIG MONEY!!
And no basher will get in for cheap!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 11, 2009 20:26:23 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 11 May 2009, 08:38 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832546 of 832576
Jump to msg. # By: aladin99 11 May 2009, 11:08 AM EDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 832312 of 832537
Jump to msg. # Why these people involve with revoked stock? hehehe!!!!!!!
Charyn Aldred, IRS Brian Pugh, DOJ Andrew Petillon, SEC Ryan Randall, FBI David Kotz, Inspector General, SEC
Is that making you go hhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm???
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 11, 2009 20:29:26 GMT -5
By: imsoweary 11 May 2009, 09:06 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832565 of 832578 (Reply to 832510 by eaglesrock2008) Jump to msg. # When we have cash in hand, then you can pat yourself on the back for making such a wise investment decision. Until then there is only rumor, fairy tales and lies. The same thing we have seen every day for 5 years. Thanks but no thanks. Only the mentally weak get excited over this crap anymore. People with the ability to reason stopped swallowing this garbage long ago.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 11, 2009 21:09:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ivegotanace on May 11, 2009 21:18:50 GMT -5
By: eaglesrock2008 11 May 2009, 07:56 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832517 of 832574 Jump to msg. # Like I said the CMKX SUPER MINERAL STORE will be a Monster of a store . And all Longs will be Extremely Wealthy. and those Hedge funds and brokers will have to pay through the nose to get in to join the CMKM Long shAreholder party. Because It wont be cheap for those basher hedge funds and brokerages to buy in. lol CMKX is BIG MONEY!! And no basher will get in for cheap! $$$ Hey will we be alive to reap any of this Super Store
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on May 12, 2009 10:13:19 GMT -5
Ent now at .16 down over 70%
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 12, 2009 12:54:23 GMT -5
sweettime Diamond Hunter ParticleWaves could you respond please « Thread Started Today at 8:39am »
BadBassPlayer: Did anyone hear a rumor from hodges?
BadBassPlayer: Hmmmmmm...........I was told he put some info out. But I couldn't get the rest of the message.
Particlewaves, do you know anything about this? Badbass is mostly a notorious bs'er....but still i thought i'd ask you directly...
Are there any new statements or opinions about CMKX from Al Hodges? Thanks
particleswaves Diamond Hunter Re: ParticleWaves could you respond please « Reply #1 Today at 8:57am »
Hi Sweet, Al and staff have been otherwise occupied the last few weeks with the firm's business. Wish we had some news re everyone's favorite obsession, but we don't. Al still feels generally positive but has not issued any opinions lately. Regards, pw
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 12, 2009 12:55:43 GMT -5
ty seagull..... By: grajekk 11 May 2009, 10:08 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832594
I see Shore had a PR last week. 46 and 33 carat moose poops they found in these test holes along with a few 10's. The 2 big ones should just about pay for drilling those holes I would suspect.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 12, 2009 12:57:13 GMT -5
ty Seagull..... By: planter82 11 May 2009, 09:44 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 832583 message board blitz there was a poster who started posting in Feb 2000 who has over 100000 posts the job they were assigned to do was create doubt in the shareholder base. They are paid by the post and have been paid that way for the last 9 years. they are here rain or shine 24/7 they out number the shareholder posters 8 to 1. but lets get back to the queen of the naysayers. she has the job to create doubt in the shareholder base. now the best part of the story is she is paid in counterfeit shares that will be canceled ROTFLMAO Now that would be a bummer.... huh??
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 12, 2009 13:01:46 GMT -5
thanks Seagull... By: snoopstock5 You say TransCanada.puc.sd.gov/commission/dockets/hyd....final061407.pdf------------ Re: Can You Say, North American Energy Shift? « Reply #7 on May 10, 2009, 3:51pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CMKM Enters Reorganization Negotiations LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 14, 2003--Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (OBB.CMKM) is pleased to announce it has commenced negotiations to reorganize its business, in conjunction with another Bulletin Board publicly trading company. Cameco Announces Close of Bruce Power Deal SASKATOON, Saskatchewan--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 14, 2003--Today, Cameco Corporation (NYSE:CCJ)(TSX:CCO) acquired an additional 16.6% interest in the Bruce Power Limited Partnership (Bruce Power), bringing its total interest to 31.6%. TransCanada PipeLines Limited (TransCanada) and BPC Generation Infrastructure Trust (BPC) ... -------------- southdakotawatch.blogspot.com/200....ranscanada.htmlFriday, April 10, 2009 WORC Goes to War Over TransCanada I received the following email from the Western Organization of Resource Councils today concerning the Keystone TransCanada pipeline. They bring up the thinner pipe problem as well as a new issue--where will the pipe be made? WORC is asking its members to contact the U.S. State Department--yes, the State Department--to not issue a permit. Image via Wikipedia Here's the message: Hi Todd, A Canadian company wants to build a pipeline to carry dirty tar sands oil through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska and on to the Texas Gulf Coast. Farmers, ranchers, and the rural communities along the route will get all of the impacts and none of the oil. Landowners are concerned that TransCanada wants to use thinner pipe more prone to leaks and spills for most of its 1,300 mile route. Steelworkers want to know whether the pipeline will be made of U.S. Steel, or mostly from imported steel, like a pipeline TransCanada is building further east. TransCanada needs a permit from the U.S. State Department to build this pipeline. The State Department is taking comments on the issues it should consider in an environmental impact statement. Please send a message to the State Department. Tell them the pipeline isn't in the public's best interest if the health, safety and livelihoods of the farmers, ranchers and rural communities along the route aren't fully protected. Posted by Todd D. Epp at 4/10/2009 Labels: Montana, Nebraska, South Dakota, United States Department of State, WORC
|
|