|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 26, 2009 22:38:17 GMT -5
By: imsoweary 25 Jun 2009, 10:09 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 844038 of 844260 (Reply to 844007 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. # And yet after years of being strung along by "gurus" with questionable agendas, people STILL fawn over these guys. Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it...over and over and over. It must be some kind of mental masturbation for them to enjoy the constant whipsawing of emotions.
By: gusjarvis 25 Jun 2009, 11:09 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 844051 of 844260 (Reply to 844038 by imsoweary)
Jump to msg. # weary strung along, mark is living on his line of credit
right! that is how much he believes in cmkx
now who is the dummy here
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 26, 2009 22:41:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 26, 2009 22:43:12 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 26 Jun 2009, 06:41 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 844089 of 844263
Jump to msg. # what is TYLER saying about the judgement and edwards payout? are they holding their breath or do they know he will never pay? what if edwards pays the $56m, then what? the company won't get any of it so maybe they don't care. but at least edwards is out of the equity side of the debate about who own what in the company. at least the judgement settles that argument once and for all. maybe that's the real victory for the company and not the money? maybe now that the courts have declared edwards own 0% of the company other things can move forward secure in the knowledge that edwards isn't going to step into the pictures claiming he owns X% of the whole deal?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 26, 2009 22:46:25 GMT -5
By: jboydwv 26 Jun 2009, 09:00 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 844101 of 844263 Jump to msg. # When Bellingus says .... " legal milestones" I hope he is not saying we are waiting on the legal process becuase that could take 5 to 10 more years!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 26, 2009 22:52:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 26, 2009 22:57:56 GMT -5
By: jfarn 26 Jun 2009, 10:44 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 844233 of 844274 Jump to msg. # Leslie, Tell the gals you will soon be able to join the play-date circuit full-time. By: jfarn 26 Jun 2009, 10:49 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 844234 of 844274 Jump to msg. # Roger, Friendly fire is a risk when you get in the way of what you shouldn't for too long.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 26, 2009 23:01:17 GMT -5
By: jfarn 26 Jun 2009, 10:53 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 844238 of 844276 Jump to msg. # CMKX investors, We might have lost a few sheckles, but we will continue to exact our pound of flesh until justice is served.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 27, 2009 11:07:29 GMT -5
retflyr2 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Final court document filed June 25,2009 « Thread Started Today at 6:21am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/sec_judgment_6-23-09.pdfRetflyr2 stormgrey43 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: court document filed June 25,2009 « Reply #1 Today at 6:41am » Thanks Ret, How ridiculous are these documents? I mean they name Urban Casavant as being complicit and masterminding the entire operation and mention that the authorized shares went from 500 billion to 800 billion based on phony opinion letters, yet Casavant is not charged and no mention of D Roger Glenn whatsoever. Instead they use Dvorak's name without making reference to the shares that his opinion letters authorized, and confuse the 500 billion to 800 billion share authorization that Glenn's opinion letters authorized. Guess we'll have to wait and see just how much they will penalize "the mastermind" with... lol..... Looks like this is "the story line" that the public eyes will have to accept in order for us to get paid and to protect some of "the players". Now pay us please........Storm
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 27, 2009 11:10:42 GMT -5
snoopstock5 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: Final court document filed June 25,2009 « Reply #5 Today at 9:39am »
Civil case always come last. An arrest first, trial, and then the trial for the civil case. We are so backwards. We don't have ONE arrest warrant out for any of them. However, I notice with all the "ponzi schemes" coming out in the news, they were arrested BEFORE the SEC charged them. Most only have seen Madoff, Stanford, and other big fish, but there were others that did a few million all the way up to Madoff at 64 billion worth of ponzi schemes and the WERE ARRESTED FIRST
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 27, 2009 11:26:42 GMT -5
By: joesixpack333 27 Jun 2009, 12:24 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 844288 of 844360 (Reply to 844285 by JENYLI) Jump to msg. # Jeny.. do the math.. EM By: JENYLI 27 Jun 2009, 12:38 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 844293 of 844358 (Reply to 844288 by joesixpack333) Jump to msg. # Oh I see.... since there are still certs available it is obvious to you that a short exists? Shouldn't there be some people that can't get them? I have heard Frizzell and those other liars say that they have anecdotal evidence of this phony short yet nobody has ever seen it nor has anyone documented any proof that they were denied certs. There is only the great imagination of the CMKX shareholder that keeps this fantasy alive. No prob.... I have known about and watched this stock for longer than you I am sure. It is not an uncomfortable question at all. I am back here on assignment doing what needs to be done with this stock, It includes ridding the boards of people that not only took advantage of your obvious lack of investing experience and many other peoples'. They not only do it here but on many other boards with many aliases. The chickens have come home to roost for many that frequent this board. There are still people fleecing CMKX shareholders because they are so gullible. They will continue to fish in this pond-o-plenty until all the fish are gone or until they are stopped. Since there is no limit to the fleecing some here will take in the name of NSS, stings, etc., I will handle it for them. I have full paltalk transcripts, many e-mails, im chats and records of phone calls as well as a pleathora of posts, cross referenced and analyzed. Good luck 2 u. well there ya go....JENYLI is Janice Shell... figures..By: restripe2007 27 Jun 2009, 12:26 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 844289 of 844360 (Reply to 844284 by JENYLI) Jump to msg. # janice you had a good point until, I will handle it for them By: joesixpack333 27 Jun 2009, 12:39 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 844294 of 844360 Jump to msg. # Restripe.. doesn't matter anymore.. seems the world is crashing and burning around us.. the financial world and every other one too.. and the likes of janice, who instigated this melt down.. hopefully will go down in flames.. GLTA
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 27, 2009 11:32:16 GMT -5
errrrr... Is that you Mark? Kevin? Martin? Frizzell? By: johnny_yuma 27 Jun 2009, 12:57 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 844303 of 844360 (Reply to 844293 by JENYLI) Jump to msg. # JENYLI, a "corporate update" is more than just anecdotal IMO. By you bashers' own account, Tyler has been fairly straightforward regarding the allegations against Urban Casavant and John Edwards. But, if it doesn't fit your agenda, you discredit them on other points. Is that how you work? Are you saying they were honest about most of it, but then just decided to outright lie in this 09-25-08 corporate update? "Update on Questionable Brokerage and Clearing Firm Activity CMKM Diamonds, Inc. has received letters from a broker requesting that larger CMKX certificates (held in the same broker's name) be broken down into several smaller certs. The written request contained the notation "FOR FAILS PHY". The broker confirmed that the request was to cover a fails to deliver in the stock. In a separate incident, one major brokerage firm requested the transfer of a bulk certificate from another major brokerage firm. This request was dated June 29, 2008, over two and a half years after the Company was delisted and no longer trading. The Company also has in its possession a letter where a clearing firm discusses the cost effectiveness of obtaining stock so that they could issue certificates to their clients, saying "Given the price of the stock, it may be more reasonable for us to go out and buy the shares to cover the short." This letter is dated almost two years after the Company was delisted and its shares no longer trading. In a CMKM Diamonds press release dated April 20, 2007, it was confirmed that the Company "halted the transfer of a large bulk certificate to a major brokerage from a third party". The Company is continuing its investigation of this and other questionable brokerage activity. Mark Faulk, CEO" If "there are still certs available" as you say, what was all that above about so long after revocation? Explain.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 27, 2009 11:34:57 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 27 Jun 2009, 05:49 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 844316 of 844361
Jump to msg. # how is Bill Frizzell paying his bills? where has his money come from these past FOUR years?
it should be easy to answer. yes, it is a private matter, but given that he wants to reassure people he's not in the pocket of the mob or some group working to undermine cmkx investors, why not just provide an answer rather than say, "it's none of your business."
well, bill, it is our business since you are representing us in one form or another. i know we're not your clients but some of your authority to speak is there because of us. yes, it's not formal authority - in a contractual sense - but it is the informal authority you have as someone working for cmkx.
so, again, why not spell out where all the money is coming from to pay your bills? how much do you get, what are the terms and who is providing it?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 27, 2009 11:38:48 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 27 Jun 2009, 10:07 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 844335 of 844361 (Reply to 844333 by aladin99)
Jump to msg. # how big will the judgement be against urban? the same or more than edwards? and no matter what it is, will he be able to pay it?
and will there be criminal charges? if so, when? if not, why not? will there be criminal charges against edwards and the rest of them? if not, why not? they are all being charged with fraud or various kind. so why no criminal charges? if they can't pay the money then i would think the government would want to put them behind bars.
read the rationale being used in the charges against madoff and why the prosecutor not only wants all his money and his wife's money but the prosecution also wants madoff sentenced to 150 years even though madoff if in his late seventies and has no chance of making it another 20 years let alone 150.
so, again, if the government is charging edwards and the rest of them with largely the same kind of crime committed by madoff why isn't the government going after their heads and not just their billfolds?
maybe the government will. i sure don't know, but given what the government is doing to madoff i would think the prosecution in the cmkx case would follow that other case's lead.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 27, 2009 11:41:09 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 27 Jun 2009, 11:53 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 844348 of 844361 (Reply to 844007 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. # If anyone disagrees with this fill me in along the way to the BANK; I do not possibly see how a 90 page document could come to 50 thousand people respectively and be "CMKX" related, and not specifically spell out the details of a 4 year old PENDING settlement outlining "HUGE" details on valuation, and damages forthcoming as discussed being mailed from the BIG "C/iti" .
-Furthermore, I cannot fathom how "some" may be getting faxed copies of this document in advance of a mailing (2 others) if this doc could have any valuable details without an NDA, or the signing of written verification of who they are. So it must be just general public prospectus info, or NOT RELATED in any way to what many are waiting for "CMKM RELATED". Not worthy of the wheel spinning. Again, imVho. I would like to be wrong on this. That kind of information is not faxed to a shareholder if it has legal documentation of a financial windfall i.e., settlement between LEGAL parties.
GLTUA
I tried to get this out there, but as usual there is much to be desired in communicating a message that has a modicum of negativity, or concern for discussion + for good reason.
Consider the cost in initiating the notice of damages forthcoming alone, and know that it would have to done inclusive in such a packet if it was there to be executed today. Let me think about this? Would it be mailed after, before or together with like /related information?
Oil
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 27, 2009 19:08:33 GMT -5
snifferpup Mod Squad Re: The Weekly Buzz - June 22 --> « Reply #19 Today at 2:33pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TBeezley1: spudey was just in the info room saying he called the CITI 800 # again and got it confirmed that the divvy packets were going out by US mail and there were a lot of them.
TBeezley1: then dracoi showed up and said a friend of his from Greensboro called the # 6 times identifying himself as a CMKX shareholder each time and twice got word that Broadridge is doing the CMKX mailing
TBeezley1: I had heard they were telling later callers there were delays
TBeezley1: the latest we heard from spud was that they were saying the packets should arrive by Tuesday
TBeezley1: next week at the latest
MisisipiFlyer: "pre-dated delivery"
MisisipiFlyer: same day world wide imo
|
|