|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:41:09 GMT -5
ty seagull...
By: swather Re: CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Announces New Joint Ventur « Reply #221 Today at 1:21pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A reverse merger or a share distribution of the "New Company" to CMKX shareholders will only happen when pigs fly..........
its not going to happen......the current set-up is the best way for both companies to organize this new venture.
IMO
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:41:50 GMT -5
seagull..
By: stormgrey You don't bring in former SEC attorneys, current Securities attorneys, and Security Forensic Specialists, all of whom are actively fighting Naked Shorts when you are trying to run a scam operation. To even think that UC brought Bob Maheu on board to promote his scam is simply ludicrous because most of didn't even know who he was before any DD was done on him.
The fact that Stoecklein shares an office with Whistle Blower Aguirre should be proof enough that he would never take part in a stock scam. If I'm wrong - show me any past convictions.
If in fact Tyler still believes that these people all helped perpetrate a fraud, then why honor an agreement that was set up by them back in Oct 2005? Why not go after them instead? Isn't that what the company (excuse me, Tyler) has been claiming to be doing all along? Going after those who helped to defraud the CMKX investors?
yeah, ok. Storm
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:42:46 GMT -5
my69z 04 Jul 2009, 04:45 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 846395 of 846396 (Reply to 846382 by gusjarvis)
Jump to msg. # Gus,,,it's 40K divided by $60m right now....that's the only type of direct cash pay out.....the SEC case
That equals $1500 a head at full pay out mind you,,,,and CMKX has a judgement for half that,,,,,so IMO...my personal preference is....CMKX keep that change and put into tha claims.....like Faulk said yesterday
i agree 100% wit then on that,,,,,at this point.....cash in tha kitty thats' collected by the CORP.......and see what's in that ground
That post to Rosen wasn't bout a "per share" pay out.....with tha way things look "right now",,,,, i don't see it...and i'am fine with that if our subsid is movin forward on tha claims
later
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:43:24 GMT -5
By: oldepro 04 Jul 2009, 04:49 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 846396 of 846430
Jump to msg. # A Few Questions
Why a "New Corp" ?
What happens if they distribute the shares ?
Will it be a Canadian or American public/private company ?
If distributed, why would it be any different from all the OTHER dividends ?
Got Certs ?
By: my69z 04 Jul 2009, 04:57 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 846399 of 846430 (Reply to 846396 by oldepro)
Jump to msg. # Old,,,imo...this is what alot of companies do....they set up controling intrest through subsids.......besides,,,it lets CMKX move forward and lets say if down the road our final o/s isn't known yet,,,this wouldn't keep anyone from dealing with us casue they wouldn' tbe delaing with "CMKX" per say.....kinda like what's goin on at home dosen't effect "them".....dealn with a subsid
I don't think they'll distribute any shares....no need to
Canadian or U.S.??...we'll see
later!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:43:58 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 04 Jul 2009, 05:38 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 846411 of 846431
Jump to msg. # emerson being partners with mark says
there is no way in helllll urban did chit, if he did there would be no way in hellll emerson would be any where near this stock. He would be worried about being in jail for promoting the chit out of cmkx with his partner in crime urban casavant. I assume all race rumors were true that emerson was a part of.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:44:33 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 04 Jul 2009, 05:48 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 846412 of 846431 (Reply to 846385 by my69z)
Jump to msg. # chris when you think shore think us, it was always
that way and not just cause melvin said it, not just cause rick is partners already with shore, it is just reality. Project surround became a reality, it is unfolding.
Now that post made more sense, and just says the conglomerate is forming that forrest gate knew was coming. And the pipes go for miles
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:44:55 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 04 Jul 2009, 06:39 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 846430 of 846434 (Reply to 846391 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. # Personally I feel, and it is an obvious forgone conclusion by so many who dd that if the CMKM DIAMONDS share structure of legal record was ever pr'd (again) in any capacity , altered, changed by way of merger, acquisition or otherwise quantified for legal restructuring that this group of 40-50k shareholders will be satisfied at such time. Based on VALUATION, NS, RESTITUTION, and pull up a chair and I can go on from there. It has just become "time is of the essence". Hahahahaha...
AIMVHO
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:45:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:46:06 GMT -5
By: stervc 04 Jul 2009, 03:58 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 347278 of 347280 (Reply to 347275 by partymartypa2)
partymartypa2, with that CMKX PR...
The PR was interesting and of course positive. As far as finally being home as you mentioned, it would be nice if we are finally there.
I have been hearing a lot over the past few years even still up to this very day, but I made the decision a long time ago to speak less and listen more with CMKX. It keeps things from getting misinterpreted.
So far, nothing has ever proved to be of the substance that we all so desired and expected. So, we all have no choice except to wait and see what will "actually" transpire.
Since I don't know "what is" I can't say "what is not" with any of the situations. Still, I do wish us all well!
v/r Sterling
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:46:38 GMT -5
oaks DIAMOND JEDI THE REAL CMKX SHAREHOLDERS PARTY!! « Thread Started Today at 4:52pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nothing is real until it actually happens, but I am feeling pretty optimistic, given the SUBSTANTIAL PR the other day, recent SEC commentary, and the CHATTER, MP3's, etc. The indication is there are more IMPORTANT PR's on the HORIZON very soon and there will be considerable CLARITY.
When we get PAID, we MUST have a PARTY which will gather together as many CMKX SHAREHOLDERS as possible!
I VOTE that the PARTY be held in LAS VEGAS!!
What say YOU?
Are you READY to WIN and READY to PARTY?
Oaks (aimho)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:47:08 GMT -5
nubchai DIAMOND DIGGER Re: CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Announces New Joint Ventur « Reply #234 Today at 6:21pm
First it's great to get factual news to talk about. Here's my stab at guessing at what they'll do.
I think there's a good chance that "New Corp" will be a Canadian company There's no mention of any target exchange. But if you look at the way the deal is structured ALL voting rights are held by 1010 (Koch) in both New Corp and the Joint Venture. Koch will be running the company but he'll get 20% of the profits and CMKM will get 80%. Think that one over. What's wrong with that picture? Koch is getting more but I couldn't guess what it is. But they're keeping Tyler out of running the new company
I wouldn't be surprised if "New Corp" (whatever company name they use) remains in Canada and this is one of the negotiating points that took so long.
CMKM would own the majority and it would be similar to a subsidiary. 80% of the profits would go to CMKM as a revenue stream. And one option would be to pay CMKM shareholders a quarterly or annual dividend. But this type of payment would be years down the road and would depend on getting some good core samples. UNLESS we already have some really good core samples, they can show valuation and some other company buys us out.
I think this deal is separate from any typeof reverse merger into another company that would adjust our current share structure.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:47:48 GMT -5
By: bhollenegg 04 Jul 2009, 07:31 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 846449 of 846494 (Reply to 846441 by hanssolong)
Jump to msg. # Hanssolong...I am pleased about the PR. No, I did not know the PR was going to be released. Communications is Good...Good Communications in CMKXLAND is Great. Great News for Legal CMKX Stockholders.
BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:48:19 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 04 Jul 2009, 07:41 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 846457 of 846494 (Reply to 840471 by mquietstorm3)
Jump to msg. # "BIG TIME BUSINESS EVOLVES AND THEN IT EMERGES "
By: mquietstorm3 09 Jun 2009, 09:55 AM EDT Msg. 840471 of 846455 (Msg. is a reply to by None.)
"BIG TIME BUSINESS EVOLVES AND THEN IT EMERGES " eom
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:48:53 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 04 Jul 2009, 08:20 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 846471 of 846496
Jump to msg. # we move when bigger issues are dealt with
IMF for the First Time in History Issues Bonds Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friend
July 4, 2009 (LPAC)—The International Monetary Fund issued bonds for the first time in history on Wednesday, uttering currency outside government control, as decided at the G-20 meeting in London, where Obama embraced the shrinking Queen. The IMF issued Special Drawing Rights-denominated bonds which were purchased by China, Russia, India, and Brazil. China requested $50 billion, and the others $10 billion each. Special Drawing Rights are a form of international currency de facto replacing the U.S. dollar. Once a country applies for SDRs, the loan will be denominated in a national currency. For instance, if the country wants U.S. dollars, its SDR account is debited, and America's SDR account is credited. The same goes for other national, or regional currencies such as the euro. So, the day when China or any other BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) country wants to cash its bonds, it can choose to do it in currencies other than the dollar.
At the same time, the bonds are generating a new market, i.e., they are traded at no less and no more than sovereign state bonds. This means they have a price tag, and they are subject to derivatives trading. This gives the British the ability to manipulate the price of SDR as against the dollar and other national currencies.
De facto, we now have the seed crystal of a shift from a dollar-based system to an entirely supranational-based system
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 5, 2009 7:50:18 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 04 Jul 2009, 09:16 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 846497 of 846507
kevin on emerson koch and our claims
from the listener
"Very key points that need to be known this late in the game. 1. do we have assets? 2. is there a naked short? 3. does the company own the naked short?
Well according to the recent conference call Kevin addressed my questions. 1. He said the Emerson Koch he recently met with and felt comfortable with what is has done. Basically Emerson in my opinion verifies the assets and well as my previous conversation with Kevin that CMKM has substantial assets. 2. Kevin outright said there is a naked short and he identified them with me who they were. Etrade, Ameritrade and TD Waterhouse. I also verified through a phone call to the transfer agent that these firms were playing games with their clients that they ordered certs and they were quote “lost” when in fact they never placed an order with the TA for a cert. 3. Most importantly Kevin said on the conference call that the naked short could give huge valuation to shareholders. The only way that could give bonafide shareholders valuation is if electronic shares are owned by CMKM."
By: major_hedgehog 04 Jul 2009, 09:23 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 846503 of 846508 (Reply to 846497 by gusjarvis)
Jump to msg. # gusjarvis, when was that post made, recently? TIA
By: gusjarvis 04 Jul 2009, 09:42 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 846508 of 846508 (Reply to 846503 by major_hedgehog) I will look it up, but this is great as well, cim
and our friend and urban's friend emerson
Q) What happened to the Casavant International Mining (CIM) zinc claims?
A) Our investigation shows that in 2005 these claims were transferred into a new company, owned and directed by Emerson Koch. Our evidence indicates that on January 22, 2007 these claims were mentioned in a press release as the principal properties being developed in a joint venture with Golden Arch Resources. The company is giving full consideration to its options regarding these claims.
|
|