|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 14, 2009 21:58:26 GMT -5
I remember listening to this interview with the geologist.... He was very upbeat about the company. when down the road... I wanted to listen to it again.... it was still available but it was archived.... & there was a fee involved to listen I also THINK I remember it mentioned Weirdale property.... Here's the link......www.tradersnation.com/cmkm.shtmlTom Allinder - Guest Host Interviews Dr. Mark Hutchison, Consulting Geologist for Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (bb: CMKM) Shares O/S: 352,223,510 Avg. Daily Volume: 36,047,885 52-week Range: $.002 to $.054 THIS INTERVIEW HAS BEEN MOVED TO THE ARCHIVES You're in luck - it's available for download. Click here to find out more Interview Information: Interview Date: 02.28.03 Run Time: 25:00 . ty hermannmaier0 & pennypauly Today at 12:58pm, smegadild wrote:ANyone know if Ralph Newsome made this statement in an interview he gave or is this heasay. If someone has the audio of him saying this and a reach number, can you post it or IM me? By: gusjarvis 14 Jul 2009, 11:33 AM EDT Msg. 849706 of 849710 (Reply to 849660 by rosencrantz2010) Jump to msg. #rosen that is awesome news hey, our geologist said this is the best swarm of kimberlite in the world, and he said cmkx's land is a 9 out of 10 as he doesn't give tens. hermannmaier0 replied:I believe that was DR Mark Hutchison who said that in a online interview. I once emailed him asking about cmkx claims in Falc in Oct 2005, and he wrote back Dear XXXXXXX, Thank you for your email. Re. the companies you mention, I am afraid that I am not really in a position to comment. I would suggest that you contact them directly and I would imagine that they could put you in touch with their current professionals. Generically I do think that Forte a la Corne is an area of good diamond potential and I woud direct you to the websites of Shore Gold and Kensington in particular if you are interested in finding out more on current operations in the area. It is very hard to say what the probability of a working mine in the area is and especially so what likely cpht values would be achieved. I do know from the acedemic papers on the area that the kimberlites are some of the largest in the world however it is likely that a producing mine will be partly motivated by volume rather than grade. I hope this helps, Sincerely, Mark Hutchison
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 14, 2009 23:59:28 GMT -5
Shore Gold... click link ........detailed information w/ charts & maps......Thanks NSDM-forever Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 4:45:48 PM Check it out for yourself. www.environment.gov.sk.ca/2008-089ProjectProposal Posted by: jimmym4 Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 6:12:09 PM In reply to: NSDM-forever who wrote msg# 274665 Post # of 274700 Hmmm..Cree nation smack in the middle!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 15, 2009 0:46:21 GMT -5
By: aladin99 14 Jul 2009, 09:30 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 849850 of 849885 (Reply to 849841 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. # Rose - This is the first time in stock history that NSS has to deal with their trillions of FTD...This is also the most painful experience for us and CMKX itself...fore and so for shareholders...let's see how our smart system works!
JD - The system handled it w/o any problem...just be patient and you will know how...
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Jul 15, 2009 8:13:02 GMT -5
By: aladin99 15 Jul 2009, 08:56 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 849940 of 849966
Jump to msg. # REMEMBER this???
One shareholder from Chicago, who brought his 11-year-old daughter to a race in 2004, said he was happy to shake hands with Mr. Casavant in the company's tent.
"(Casavant) said, 'We're driving truckloads of diamonds out of there.' And then he looked down at my daughter and said, 'Your daddy is going to be so rich.' "
By: aladin99 15 Jul 2009, 09:00 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 849949 of 849966
Jump to msg. # Hope JUMBO could explain this???
CMXK was revoked in 2005 and how come UC resigned in 2007?
Therefore, DEC.2007 everything was done...so the shareholders' list!
|
|
|
Post by sweettime on Jul 15, 2009 11:06:09 GMT -5
i got this from something Shoregold_1 said in the paltalk scroll from last night. 1. Delist 2. Protect Assets by moving them out of CMKX...including the Entourage Deal 3. Cert pull with the help of the DTCC. The DTCC was working with CMKM Task Force as evidenced by this letter from Bill Frizzell www.petitiononline.com/cmkx2006/petition.html "As the final deadline imposed by CMKM approached, the DTCC, working with the CMKM Task Force, directed all participants to request their certs on deposit at the DTCC or the DTCC would send all remaining certs to the transfer agent for distribution back to the brokers" 4. Threat of Interplead gets SEC/Government to finally say "okay we'll work with you to fix this" 5. Entourage and Koch fake a fight so that the samples will not ever get tested so long as the Government continues to fix the CMKX FTD's...but if they ever decide to screw CMKX then Emmerson and Entourage will test the samples....announce the results and all CMKX shareholders will demand their Entourage shares be distributed causing a big mess for the SEC 6. SEC and Government did their job and collected cash for CMKX FTD's remaining. 7. Entourage gives back CMKX claims and CMKX gives back Entourage Shares (the one thing that could help expose the CMKX FTD's) 8. Pretend to get sample results which they already have and announce them 9. Pretend to sell land claims and hide the FTD settlement money into the cash distribution for land claim sales. Is that how it all went down? and will step 9 happen? it makes sense to me that this MIGHT be how it all happened Now time for Tyler to HURRY UP and get us those Sample Results!!!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 15, 2009 11:56:28 GMT -5
bikinipro hawkeye1 King of Diamonds I hope it's OK To Post This « Thread Started Today at 8:49am » then I'll go to my instructed back row seat, I want to apologize for so many posting over the years and trying to keep the board interesting, now that it's where I would like to see it...Well, like I said, off to my back row seat. You shareholders will have to know this before the news, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A private placement (or non-public offering) is a funding round of securities which are sold without a initial public offering, usually to a small number of chosen private investors.[1] In the United States, these placements are not subject to the Securities Act of 1933 and do not have to be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, although the sale must conform to SEC rules. Private placements may typically consist of stocks, shares or warrants and purchasers are often institutional investors such as banks, insurance companies or pension funds. [edit] References 1.^ Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks (March 1990) (in English). Private placements: Comptroller's Handbook. US Department of the Treasury. www.occ.treas.gov/handbook/PrivatePlace1.pdf. Retrieved on 2009-06-13. This economics or finance-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 15, 2009 14:50:50 GMT -5
well.... Can I ask....who is this Sheila ??ines DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Per Mona, Sheila says she will sue if no pr this w « Thread Started Today at 12:24pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Per Mona:Sheial says she will sue if no pr this week. Or no news.. or no closure etc.. Well tiger said that about Sheila months ago.. and then nothing happened. But ok this is from the scroll: Mona Lisa Smiles: on phone with sheila Mona Lisa Smiles: very good info shareholder: ok..shes going to mp3 a conversation with sheilah.. for tonight shareholder : says that she has confronted hakala.. and hakala is shakin in her boots.. why she is giving her information one more week to release it or they will sue whole conversation will be tonight www.zshare.net/audio/626992960c417caa/ ooopppppsss...... Ines tell who she supposedly is...xx: mona said shareholders with billions of shares xx: tigerpaw prob twisted that into billionaire backer xaz: the billionaire is her boss.. dont think he owns cmkx xaz: yeah they are going to get sheila mp3 this afternoon.. on the phone i guess xcv: to not be paid because they are scared our money is not protected by basel is ludicrous I agree, that specolation.. does not make any sense to me.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 15, 2009 15:05:57 GMT -5
By: cbaughan 15 Jul 2009, 03:43 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 849889 of 850064 Jump to msg. # SUMTIN SKWEWY (sorry for copy of previous but I had to add something) Aren't we supposed to have a share count of 703 billion? OK I was up all night thinking on this one. Someone is not giving out the correct share count. If I am wrong please tell me...cause I am up trying to figure this out. Take a look at this document: www.zshare.net/download/62672820ccc8395c/ That is an old shareholder list dated 12/31/04 This is based on all the certs that had been sold and surrendered as of the end of the year 2004. Now look at the running total of shares at the end..on page 548 it says 703 billion (and change) Since the cert pull occurred in fall of 2005..I would say there have been MANY more shares added to this count...don't you? Tell me where I am wrong in my thinking because it looks like they are screwing around the numbers.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 15, 2009 15:14:16 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 15 Jul 2009, 09:19 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 849970 of 850072 (Reply to 849783 by oil.ipo) Jump to msg. # Raging Bull has proven valuable (at times) for some well intended messages that hung high enough, that could not be taken down. Mine; What I felt that many shareholders thought/focused on- - Truth over lies. -Transparency over Rumor. One common goal. THE FACTS SURROUNDING CMKX CONCLUDING IN THE PAYMENT OF DAMAGES. - Not really reasoning that most/many would argue with. AIMHO Oil
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 15, 2009 15:15:26 GMT -5
By: jboydwv 15 Jul 2009, 09:43 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 849978 of 850073
Jump to msg. # "Its always been the "unseen" forces that shapes future events and then many stories are planted to hide truth."
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 15, 2009 15:17:38 GMT -5
By: cbaughan 15 Jul 2009, 03:43 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 849889 of 850064 Jump to msg. # SUMTIN SKWEWY (sorry for copy of previous but I had to add something) Aren't we supposed to have a share count of 703 billion? OK I was up all night thinking on this one. Someone is not giving out the correct share count. If I am wrong please tell me...cause I am up trying to figure this out. Take a look at this document: www.zshare.net/download/62672820ccc8395c/ That is an old shareholder list dated 12/31/04 This is based on all the certs that had been sold and surrendered as of the end of the year 2004. Now look at the running total of shares at the end..on page 548 it says 703 billion (and change) Since the cert pull occurred in fall of 2005..I would say there have been MANY more shares added to this count...don't you? Tell me where I am wrong in my thinking because it looks like they are screwing around the numbers. By: cbaughan 15 Jul 2009, 11:29 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 849995 of 850073 (Reply to 849889 by cbaughan) scruffy2 wrote: That question comes up a lot when we start talking about that list, Mona. That list includes all the shares issued and outstanding. If you look on the list, you will see billions and billions iof shares under brokerage names and Cede and company. These account for the official shares in street name (trading). When certs are issued, these totals are reduced and the shareholders name is added to the list along with his share total. What is not included here are NSS shares, where brokerages have sold more than the number of shares under their or Cede's name on the list. Scruffy, Yes I believe you explanation accounts for the seemingly wrong number of shares accounted for as far as this list goes. The 703 billion has not changed because they have surrendered shares and turned them into trading stocks which were bought and sold...Thanks mystery solved! By: Bellingus 15 Jul 2009, 03:23 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 850053 of 850076 (Reply to 850046 by snoopstock5) Jump to msg. # All previous counts are irrelevant. The actual number has yet to be determined.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 15, 2009 15:26:45 GMT -5
By: aladin99 15 Jul 2009, 04:24 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 850078 of 850078
Jump to msg. # The perfect system helped RG/UC raise 800B shares...U will C how it worked....this year!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 15, 2009 17:24:37 GMT -5
By: aladin99 15 Jul 2009, 04:17 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 850075 of 850111 Jump to msg. # JUMBO - Carolyn said...UC will be the biggest winner so his shareholders... )
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 15, 2009 20:25:28 GMT -5
thanks seagull... By: tramp Remember these?...Banks Receive Treasury Dollars « Thread Started Today at 5:59am » ----------------------------------------------------------- and thats what were supposed to be paid by and FRN's will be gone..oops.. all money must be accounted for, and we can account for ours, but can some of these banks can along with the drug lords? Yesterday a CSHD shareholder was in walmart and their bank, suntrust was in the shopping center and the shareholder went in asked... do you have any of those treasury dollars yet? they said yes.. he also asked.. are you Basel 111 compliant?.. again got a yes, and, some of the big banks are not and they don't have treasury dollars yet..oops.. many of us do believe, thats what were waiting on and of course, the new conglormate wants treasury dollars, not FRN's with a promise to pay..lol one last thing, first news story i had ever seen with treasury dollars now being sent out.. now, do you want FRN's or the new treasury dollars? GOLD BACKED TREASURY DOLLARS?.. I REST MY CASE.. --- Banks Receive Treasury Dollars Fifteen banks have added their names to the list of institutions accepting government investments. The companies include McLean-based Capital One, which said it will take $3.55 billion from the Treasury Department. The new banks join the nine giants that initially accepted government funding. The government has promised to spread a total of $250 billion among U.S. banks. So far, Treasury has committed about $156 billion. Here’s the list of new additions: PNC Financial (PA) $7.7 billion Capital One (VA) $3.55 billion Regions Financial (AL) $3.5 billion SunTrust (GA) $3.5 billion Fifth Third (OH) $3.4 billion KeyCorp (OH) $2.5 billion Northern Trust (IL) $1.5 billion Huntington (OH) $1.4 billion First Horizon (TN) $866 million City National (CA) $395 million Valley National (NJ) $330 million United Commercial (CA) $298 million Washington Federal (WA) $200 million First Niagara (NY) $186 million Treasury backed off plans Friday to release a list of about 20 institutions that will get government investments in this second round of funding. Instead, the department decided to let institutions announce their own participation in the program. That means we’re probably still waiting on about five names. The two largest U.S. banks that have yet to disclose government investments are U.S. Bancorp, based in Minnesota, and BB&T, based in North Carolina. --Binyamin Appelbaum voices.washingtonpost.com/economy....ry_dollars.html
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 15, 2009 20:27:36 GMT -5
seagull...
By: tramp
mccurdydon1: been told to chill for the next few days
|
|