|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 25, 2009 12:53:04 GMT -5
Oh what a tangled web.... I remember the name Joseph Meuse being connected to St George Metals..... as a director back years ago.......  ty sandi Pacific Stock Transfer Company Announces Appointment of Joseph Meuse as President and Managing PartnerPress Release Source: Pacific Stock Transfer Company On Friday July 24, 2009, 5:45 pm EDT LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Pacific Stock Transfer Company is proud to announce the appointment of Joseph Meuse as its new President and Managing Partner. About Joseph Meuse Joseph Meuse is Founder and President of Belmont Partners, an international financial consulting firm and leading provider of public shell vehicles for use in reverse merger transactions. He is also the co-owner of PacWest, LLC, a registered stock transfer agency representing over 100 publicly traded issuers, a Principal in Global Filings (an Edgarizing Company), and is a contributor for The Huffington Post. With over 13 years of financial management and advisory experience, and recognition as a leading expert in the China market, Mr. Meuse brings his years of experience to PSTC (working with over 250 public companies) and has already helped a number of Pacific Stock Transfer clients with a diverse number of issues related to becoming or being publicly traded. Mr. Meuse’s dedication to providing innovative solutions during the current economic environment has led to the development of a wide range of programs at PSTC focused on increasing the variety of services provided to clients, as well as streamlining current services for efficiency and value. About Pacific Stock Transfer Company Pacific Stock Transfer is a recognized independent Stock Transfer Agent, headquartered in Las Vegas, with over 27 years of experience in the securities industry. Registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and a member of the Stock Transfer Association (STA), Pacific Stock Transfer is a superior registrar and stock transfer agent dedicated to serving all of your transfer needs. Contact: Pacific Stock Transfer Company702-361-3033info@pacificstocktransfer.comJoseph Meuse540-675-3149jmeuse@pacificstocktransfer.com finance.yahoo.com/news/Pacific-Stock-Transfer-bw-3503194924.html?x=0&.v=2
|
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Jul 25, 2009 14:16:23 GMT -5
Mina Mar Group Commences Legal Action Vs Belmont Partners Joseph Meuse Re: VSHE, KING, AZTC Distributed by Press Release EMAIL ARTICLE PRINT ARTICLE Map data ©2009 Tele Atlas - Terms of Use Map Satellite Hybrid TORONTO (Map) - TORONTO, June 24 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ - Toronto Canada Mina Mar Group Inc. (www.minamargroup.com) acting in regards to the following public companies; VShield Software Corp. (VSHE: PK), King Resources Inc. (KING: PK) and Aztec Technology Partners, Inc. (AZTC:PK), today filed a lawsuit in Toronto Canada against Belmont Partners, LLC www.belmontpartners.net and Joseph Meuse, the Managing Director of Belmont, personally. The Mina Mar Group, Inc. is a privately held Canadian company. In summary, Mina Mar Group takes the position that assets were improperly removed from the 3 aforementioned companies which belonged to all of the shareholders, however it is alleged that Joseph Meuse admitted to Your Ad Here Can this add 10-20 years of healthy life? Miro Zecevic President of Mina Mar Group that these assets were distributed to only to some, but not all of the shareholders. Miro Zecevic said "Upon learning this, it just didn't sit well with us. That action exposed us and these Companies to lawsuits from dissenting shareholders, SEC inquiries, sanctions and other possible liabilities that Mina Mar did not anticipate and did not bargain for. "We are extremely disappointed that Belmont and Mr. Meuse (The X management) simply refused to address these matters and other matters when brought to their attention. Moreover there are other serious irregularities that were discovered by our internal forensic research analysts that would seriously undermine the rights of minority shareholders of these companies. In addition any company that merged with these issuers would have been placed in peril". "Our team has worked very hard over the past several months by completing filings on Pink Sheets and increasing these issuers' ranks from "STOP NO INFORMATION" to "YIELD LIMITED INFORMATION" and further introducing these issuers to substantial companies in Europe USA and China we identified as potential merger candidates as per various past news releases. All of these pending deals are now off the table. We have a very strong presence in China with approximately 20 Chinese companies looking to enter the public markets via reverse mergers. In good conscience and as a good corporate citizen we can not recommend these companies to our clients nor provide any sort of meaningful investor relations to these issuers shareholders. We recently launched a shareholder advocacy division where we assist minority shareholders in cases where the issuers are abusive or where the issuers simply abandon the assets, and leave minority shareholders out in the cold. This Belmont matter goes against the very principles we believe in". Mina Mar Group acknowledges the efforts and assistance of Big Apple Consulting, a USA based company, who is also involved in a similar type of lawsuit with Belmont on a similar but unrelated transaction. The entire Mina Mar Group law suit against Belmont Partners can be viewed at this link www.minamargroup.com/client_interests.phpAbout Mina Mar Group Mina Mar Group is a Corporate Consultancy firm that specializes in small cap or OTC market business services, including public markets in Frankfurt Germany, and UK. The company's focus is on growth companies or emerging markets such as those in South America, Eastern Europe, and Mainland China. We provide our clients with comprehensive advisory and consulting services regarding mergers and acquisitions, including reverse mergers of private companies into publicly traded entities, and special purpose companies (SPC) off shore companies. Mina Mar also offers a full suite of related ancillary services subsequent to the successful completion of a reverse merger, including Private Placements, PIPE, Pink Sheets Adequate Disclosure documentation, various SEC regulatory filings and a broad range of other Corporate Governance matters. The company licenses it's brand name and back office as a white label solution which allows professionals in the industry to tap into The Mina Mar back office to deliver high quality solutions on a private label basis. The company also operates a shareholders advocacy division which seeks out publicly traded companies in distress or where the minority shareholders positions are in peril, and assists as a guardian with interim and or turn around management. Through it's wholly owned subsidiary Mina Mar Marketing Group Inc (www.minamargroup.net) the company offers publicly traded companies services such as Investor Relations, and Investor Awareness exclusively. www.examiner.com/p-367073~Mina_Mar_Group_Commences_Legal_Action_Vs_Belmont_Partners_Joseph_Meuse_Re__VSHE__KING__AZTC.html...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial) |
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 28, 2009 9:02:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Jul 28, 2009 9:46:51 GMT -5
Yeah it's the same one IMO...of Belmont partners...here is another one...
...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 9, 2009 10:11:01 GMT -5
dyemenz
DIAMOND DIGGER
Re: Do you know Joesph Meuse? ..You SHOULD
« Reply #15 Yesterday at 1:36pm »
Ines,
Not true: our new TA wont work with cmkx shareholders. Sorry, but you're starting to sound like Chrisl.
i called yesterday and asked WHY their bonding company won't bond CMKM certs?
Pacific Stock Transfer company offers a service to CMKM Diamonds and many other companies and wants to assist shareholders in getting bonding. The problem is with the level of bond required. Yes, you will have to find your own bonding company BUT...
It is possible to find one, the TA has some names they will suggest to you and if they find one that they know absolutely will, they will be happy to share that with shareholders.
Their bondsman is very conservative. There are more liberal ones out there and it is possible to obtain bonding, the TA knows of some.
#1. Lots of shareholders hold humungous numbers of shares of CMKM in cert form. The bondsman cannot establish a $$ dollar value of this stock at the present time. Cannot call the company and receive that info nor look at trading examples. The answer is not CMKM holds so much value bondsman can't cover it. The exact opposite is true, exactly in trying to obtain the true value.
#2 Litigation. This makes conservative bonding companies nervous and due to those 2 reasons, haved opted to reject bonding CMKM certs. Simple truth.
The TA's office said to mention to shareholders, they will try their best to help you.
702-361-3033
Cell phones also work to get answers. Not just for calling friends and telling them how drunk you were last night nor trying to break the Guiness Book of World Records in how many accidents you can cause behind you from texting.
Joseph Meuse was also a Director of St George Metals
|
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 10, 2009 18:16:56 GMT -5
Its completely true Dy..
TA wont replace the certs for shareholders that lost it.
they ask that bondsman insure them. BUT! their own bonsdman wont do it.. wont work with cmkx certs or shareholders.
And yet.. the TA does not have the name of any other bondsman that will do it.
The end.
for now.
but fact.
shareholders still could not replace the certs. FACT.
|
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Aug 10, 2009 18:28:57 GMT -5
Doesn't surprise me any...just another fine example of the kind of decision making we have at the TOP of OUR? company...HA HA HA...I wouldn't do business with ANY company run or associated with Joseph Meuse myself...but the paranoia about our CERTS certainly makes CENTS...IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 10, 2009 18:39:10 GMT -5
Seems to me.. from this post dy made on mill board.. that she knows personaly these people.. she seems to be more interested in defending them then.. the problem that our own shareholders have. Wonder if she would feel the same way if she had the same problem.
By dyemenz:
"That comment is hurtful to their business & reputation. i've been talking to someone at this agency for a couple years now, when having a general question. Due the fact, Helen at First Global, has hardly been reliable. Always found my answer with Pacific and courteous also."
How could she be talking to pacific ta for years now.. if we just got them?
And i dont see any reason to say that Global and Helen were unreliable. Nobody ever had problems with Global and Helen.. however we obviously do have a problem with new TA.
if you say that the truth is hurtfull to the new Transfer Agency to be put out.. then thats the way it is.
Its also hurtfull to those shareholders to be in an impossible situation. Expecting the TA to actualy replace their certs.. and getting the runaround.
TA asking for bonding, but in the same time their own bondsguy refuses those services to cmkx shareholders.
Well thats the point of the boards.. to see how many shareholders have problems and if anybody is helpfull or not to rectify them.
And yes, it is a shareholders board for shareholders concerns.
|
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 10, 2009 18:48:16 GMT -5
Doesn't surprise me any...just another fine example of the kind of decision making we have at the TOP of OUR? company...HA HA HA...I wouldn't do business with ANY company run or associated with Joseph Meuse myself...but the paranoia about our CERTS certainly makes CENTS...IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial) I have no clue who the guy is.. and i am quite tired of .. elevating all these guys.. as greek statues.. who ever the new greek god like statue is.. maybe he can find a way to give these shareholders new certs.. or find himself a bondsman that would actualy work with customers he takes on in his Transfer Agency.. as in CMKX. |
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 10, 2009 18:55:29 GMT -5
Looks like Meuse got sued last month.. www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS225933+25-Jun-2009+PRN20090625Mina Mar Group Commences Legal Action Vs Belmont Partners Joseph Meuse Re: VSHE,... Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:35pm EDT Email | Print | Share| Reprints | Single Page[-] Text [+] Featured Broker sponsored link Mina Mar Group Commences Legal Action Vs Belmont Partners Joseph Meuse Re: VSHE, KING, AZTC TORONTO, June 24 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ - [glow=red,2,300] Toronto Canada Mina Mar Group
Inc. (www.minamargroup.com) acting in regards to the following public
companies; VShield Software Corp. (VSHE: PK), King Resources Inc. (KING: PK)
and Aztec Technology Partners, Inc. (AZTC:PK),[/glow] [glow=red,2,300] today filed a lawsuit in
Toronto Canada against Belmont Partners, LLC www.belmontpartners.net and
Joseph Meuse, the Managing Director of Belmont, personally.[/glow] The Mina Mar Group, Inc. is a privately held Canadian company.  In summary, Mina Mar Group takes the position that assets were improperly removed from the 3 aforementioned companies which belonged to all of the shareholders, however it is alleged that Joseph Meuse admitted to Miro Zecevic President of Mina Mar
Group that these assets were distributed to only to some, but not all of the shareholders. Miro Zecevic said "Upon learning this, it just didn't sit well with us. That action exposed us and these Companies to lawsuits from dissenting shareholders, SEC inquiries, sanctions and other possible liabilities that Mina Mar did not anticipate and did not bargain for. [glow=red,2,300] "We are extremely disappointed that Belmont and Mr. Meuse (The X management) simply refused to address these matters and other matters when brought to their attention. [/glow] Moreover there are other serious irregularities
that were discovered by our internal forensic research analysts that would seriously undermine the rights of minority shareholders of these companies. In addition any company that merged with these issuers would have been placed in peril". "Our team has worked very hard over the past several months by completing filings on Pink Sheets and increasing these issuers' ranks from "STOP NO INFORMATION" to "YIELD LIMITED INFORMATION" and further introducing these issuers to substantial companies in Europe USA and China we identified as potential merger candidates as per various past news releases. All of these pending deals are now off the table. We have a very strong presence in China with approximately 20 Chinese companies looking to enter the public markets via reverse mergers. In good conscience and as a good corporate citizen we can not recommend these companies to our clients nor provide any sort of meaningful investor relations to these issuers shareholders.  [glow=red,2,300] We recently launched a shareholder advocacy division where we assist minority shareholders in cases where the issuers are abusive or where the issuers simply abandon the
assets, and leave minority shareholders out in the cold. [/glow] This Belmont matter goes against the very principles we believe in". Mina Mar Group acknowledges the efforts and assistance of Big Apple Consulting, a USA based company, who is also involved in a similar type of lawsuit with Belmont on a similar but unrelated transaction. The entire Mina Mar Group law suit against Belmont Partners can be viewed at this link www.minamargroup.com/client_interests.php About Mina Mar Group Mina Mar Group is a Corporate Consultancy firm that specializes in small cap or OTC market business services, including public markets in Frankfurt Germany, and UK. The company's focus is on growth companies or emerging markets such as those in South America, Eastern Europe, and Mainland China. We provide our clients with comprehensive advisory and consulting services regarding mergers and acquisitions, including reverse mergers of private companies into publicly traded entities, and special purpose companies (SPC) off shore companies. Mina Mar also offers a full suite of related ancillary services subsequent to the successful completion of a reverse merger, including Private Placements, PIPE, Pink Sheets Adequate Disclosure documentation, various SEC regulatory filings and a broad range of other Corporate Governance matters. The company licenses it's brand name and back office as a white label solution which allows professionals in the industry to tap into The Mina Mar back office to deliver high quality solutions on a private label basis. The company also operates a shareholders advocacy division which seeks out publicly traded companies in distress or where the minority shareholders positions are in peril, and assists as a guardian with interim and or turn around management. Through it's wholly owned subsidiary Mina Mar Marketing Group Inc (www.minamargroup.net) the company offers publicly traded companies services such as Investor Relations, and Investor Awareness exclusively. SOURCE Mina Mar Group For corporate matters contact: corporate@minamargroup.com © Thomson Reuters 2009 All rights reserved Share:Del.icio.usDiggMixxYahoo!FacebookLinkedIn |
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 11, 2009 9:42:05 GMT -5
By: pontiyak
10 Aug 2009, 05:57 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 856773 of 856829
(Reply to 856755 by snoopstock5)
Jump to msg. #
snoop... sadly I/We are only now learning Meuse was is a crook.....
why is it we are always the last to know?
I never bought any SGGM.
thankfully
yak
|
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 11, 2009 11:45:59 GMT -5
Could They Be Laying a Pysanka? [glow=red,2,300] Add St. George Metals, Inc. to the roster of obscure companies entwined in the CMKM/U.S.Canadian mix. St. George, which trades on the Pink Sheets [/glow](Pink Sheets: SGGM) announced in October 2002 that it had "no continuing ongoing business operations." The Company's Form 10-Q report for the period ended October 31, 2002 confessed that it's "financial resources have been substantially exhausted." As of January 31, 2002, the date of the last audited financial statement filed by the Company, St. George had no money. When it was last heard from – or at least at the time of its last public filing in November 2002 – St. George, a Nevada corporation, maintained its offices in Alexandria, Virginia. [glow=red,2,300] The Company, which had abandoned its mining operations and appointed a new set of directors (Joseph Meuse, Gary Meuse and Barry Martelli)[/glow]who it hoped would "be able to propose a combination of the Company with another business entity that could possibly result in a return of some shareholder value to the shareholders of the Company."  [glow=red,2,300] Joseph Meuse, an investment consultant and licensed stock broker, was identified as the Company's new Chairman. [/glow] St. George now has resurfaced, with a different home – and apparently a different set of characters. The Company is now located in the town of Vegreville, in Alberta, Canada. Vegreville, with a population of 5,376, is best known as the home of the world's largest Pysanka, a Ukrainian Easter Egg. [glow=red,2,300] The Company also has new management. The National Quotation Bureau identifies Mark Giebelhaus as the President of St. George. [/glow]We have not discovered any public information detailing the transition from the Meuse group to Mr. Giebelhaus, describing Mr. Giebelhaus's professional background, or indicating the identities of any other members of the St. George management team. St. George ceased filing public reports in November 2002, joining CMKM and Juina as non-reporting public companies whose financial status remains hidden from the public. Somehow, that has not dissuaded investors from purchasing St. George shares – or CMKM from tagging St. George as another business partner. On September 2, 2004, CMKM announced that St. George had agreed to acquire 5% of CMKM's mineral claims in exchange for $10 million and 200 billion restricted shares of St. George stock. CMKM said that St. George had already paid the first $2.5 million installment and that a second $2.5 million payment was anticipated by October 2nd. Indeed, CMKM announced receipt of the second $2.5 million payment on September 13th, the third $2.5 million payment on September 22nd, and the final $2.5 million payment on September 28th. CMKM offered no insight into St. George's sudden ability to dole out millions of dollars. As we noted earlier, when last heard from, St. George was in dire financial straits, and there has been no public information that would indicate a dramatic turnaround. Indeed, on October 15, 2004 St. George issued a press release suggesting that it still is struggling to ramp up operations. The announcement certainly would not encourage investors to conclude that St. George is on the brink of success. Instead, it revealed that St. George: • Had retained a mining consultant, but had yet to assign him any work, and could not be certain that any fruitful mining claims would be forthcoming; • Is considering exploration in Northern Arizona, but has not entered into any contracts; • Is seeking a new Board of Directors and Board of Advisors but had not yet identified any candidates; and • Was continuing negotiations with CMKM – but gave no indication of how those talks might position the Company. So where did St. George get $10 million to invest since the Company does not reveal the existence of any operations that would generate those funds? Does that mean St. George raised the money by selling shares, and, if so, to whom? The Company has not issued any information detailing the source of those funds – or explaining why it valued 5% of CMKM's unproven mining claims at $10 million. Then there is this – which should not be lost in the glow of St. George's $10 million investment. [glow=red,2,300] St. George would now appear to be a subsidiary of CMKM.[/glow]According to the National Quotation Bureau, as of September 6, 2004, 16.9 million shares of St. George common stock had been issued. That same month, CMKM said it would receive 200 billion St. George shares as part of the $10 million deal. That would leave CMKM holding 99.99% of the outstanding St. George shares. There are other elements that suggest the underpinnings of a close working relationship between the two companies. [glow=red,2,300] St. George identifies its investor relations representative as Vickie Curran. As recently reported by Stockwatch, an Internet publication headquartered in Vancouver, Canada, Ms. Curran's father is Victor Casavant, Urban Casavant's brother. [/glow] According to Stockwatch, Ms. Curran says that Victor Casavant has no role at St. George. [glow=red,2,300] As for Urban Casavant – with CMKM holding a controlling interest in St. George, his involvement would appear to be considerable. [/glow] St. George may barely exist as an operating entity, but that has not deterred investors in the wake of the CMKM announcements. [glow=red,2,300] On September 1, 2004, St. George stock closed at a price of one cent a share, on volume of 500 shares[/glow]. On [glow=red,2,300] September 8th, shares prices hit 75 cents [/glow]and over 653,000 shares were traded. Volume continued to increase, to 2.4 million shares on September 9th and over 1 million on September 10th. Shares have continued to trade at prices ranging from 23 cents to 50 cents, although by October 21st they had dipped to 28 cents a share. Of course, even that seems high for a Company which seems to be starting over – at best.
|
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 11, 2009 12:08:47 GMT -5
never know where the search will lead you.. one thing after another.. mosaic coming together..
well some people in paltalk remember this..
I did not do much dd in those days.. when i thought we are getting paid next week.
Now i take much bigger interest in individuals connected and history.
It is quite evident from the above that Mr. Joseph Meuse , who is now the president of our new Transfer Agency - Pacific, is no stranger to Cmkx and its people. ( urban casavant, Victor Casavant- urbans brother and a father of Investor Relations in SGGM Vickie Curran, and Mr Mark Giebelhaus as the President of St. George.)
And imo he did not get our account as our Transfer Agent as an accident. However there could be much simpler explanation for our new TA.
However Pacific TA was in the same building with our old ta with Helen.. and she knew them..
So it also makes sense.. that they just bought it when she wanted out.
And Tyler.. did not have to pay 25k to get a new transfer agency since the Pacific just took over Helens business and inherited cmkx.
But off course all these people knew each other for years.
|
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 11, 2009 12:09:04 GMT -5
xx: i thought meuse sold the shell to the sggm folx.. been a while since i read all that tho INES1OO: rite x xx: sggm deal called for 10 million to be paid.. it was paid..and quickly taken out of silver state..and wired to canada INES1OO: its interesting that tyler took a transfer agent.. that .. has all those ties to urban and cmkx and old people. INES1OO: that is interesting xx: ines.. tyler didnt take this ta INES1OO: www.stockpatrol.com/article/key/CMKM6 cmkx sggm 2004 xx: helen bagles records were given to pacific xx: bagley xx: pacific got all her files INES1OO: none the less.. tyler can change the ta xx: yeah and pay 25-30 thousand dollars to do it xx: that would be ridiculous.. as we arent even doing any ta work now INES1OO: given or not given.. its in the same circle of people. INES1OO: that is quite intersting xx: of course it is.. helen tied to them vv: they worked in the same building.. not hard to figure out INES1OO: dont know what it cost to get a new ta.. INES1OO: but tyler probably has to pay pacific anyway. the new ta xx: to get a new contract new ta.. cost a fortune..especially with cmkx cause they have such huge files to handle.. this ta just inherited it from helen..so we didnt have to pay a sign up fee xx: but you do have monthly or yearly..whatever fees too « Last Edit: Today at 12:08pm by ines » |
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 11, 2009 12:20:51 GMT -5
Its funny we ended up with same seth of characters.. in our new TA.
People with long history of cmkx connections for years. .. sggm connections, deals.. moneys etc. And we would have to find if indeed it was this guy meuser that got the sggm shell or sold the shell to them.
Some say that is what they remember.
Well, I dont know if tyler cares or dislikes who they ended up with.
No way of telling.
It would cost them 25 to 30k to get a new TA.
Considerable cost.
Some Tyler suporters said.. that Helens goos will be fried.. and they did not take nice to Helen.
Now we ended up with exactly the same batch of characters.. that are completely entwined in the long history of cmkx dealings.
Curious what Tyler thinks of this,, but imo we will never know.
|
|
