|
Post by briwadd on Feb 27, 2010 13:05:41 GMT -5
I can't say that I am excited about this rumor.
By: zahnj 27 Feb 2010, 12:22 PM EST Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 915913 of 915926
Jump to msg. # The latest update was disappointing to say the least. But it points out that people spreading rumors of monies received, payment imminent are totally disconnected from what Al is doing. That includes the plaintiffs. (Oaks beware whoyou listen to)
Today saltydog, a plaintiff said on the microphone:
1. Last night (Friday) Al emailed a copy of the laswuit to Cuomo of NY
2. Last night (Friday) Al Hodges emailed Christopher Story of World Reports to ask him to persuade the Queen to help expedite our money.
#2 is not a joke. Again Salty said this on the microphone.
Friends I think we have a problem and the problem may be Al. He is tied to the World Reports group and all of the crap that that site spews. He has several plaintiffs who support the WR and are conspiracy oriented to say the least.
The good news is when this does go to trial it should be clear fairly quickly if he has a case that the courts on this planet would recognize as having merit. If the judge throws it out that will be closure.
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Feb 27, 2010 14:02:53 GMT -5
Yes I have to agree that AH seems to be attracted to all the total BS that worldBS spews which as I have pointed out has never EVER been right one topic. Sad really that AH would even associate his name with such a irreputible web site that makes up stories so they can sell subscriptions to Salty, Shelia etc. nd now Hodges.
|
|
|
Post by shmokie2 on Feb 27, 2010 14:29:32 GMT -5
Since when has anyone believed anything from worldbs. This just more crap spun by people who think they know everything or they are just trying to break down our ranks with more crap. I for one believe in AH. Anyone else out there acually done anything to put this thing to rest other that AH and Gus? ? No, didn't thnk so. So stfu. All imho of course
|
|
|
Post by straighttalk on Feb 27, 2010 14:43:39 GMT -5
I've been told to calm it down by the mods of this board, but VARNSON you have no right to talk about people like that.
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Feb 27, 2010 15:13:12 GMT -5
Just an observation that is correct at this point...relax buddy
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Feb 27, 2010 15:16:46 GMT -5
i dont think al is claiming his case against the WR. that is just idiotic.
|
|
|
Post by snifferpup on Feb 27, 2010 18:05:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 27, 2010 19:14:44 GMT -5
"I recommend that you read the legal allegations carefully; they will explain what has happened with your investment up through 2009""The only exception to that is for certain items which are prefaced with the words “information and belief;” in that case, the allegations describe what we believe happened." Whooooaaaaa!!.... someone correct me if I am wrong... but the only places I see the exceptions Al talks about is........ #35...Plaintiffs herein are informed and believe, #36...Plaintiffs herein are informed and believe, Is Al telling/insinuating to us that he does in fact have PROOF to back up all other facts as stated? ? PROOF of.....Frozen Trusts trillions of NSS negotiated settlements with promises from US Gov of no prosecution sales of claims to several Chinese companies Sting, involving SEC, DOJ & Dept of Homeland Security encouraged & underwrote racing promotions etc etc etc Oh d*mn, just go read the legal allegations CAREFULLY as Al suggests !! Hell, I know .... I have always been one to look at the glass as half full ... I just hope & pray my assumptions are correct now!! Al, Bhollenegg, Dennis where are you?? Am I even close with my assumptions?? Thanks for the Update !! SINGLE PS... as Don would say FIRE AWAY.... lol Brigantine DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: Hodges and Associates Update « Reply #138 Today at 1:02pm » Kibert, I tend to agree with you. I suspect that even the prospect of discovery weighs heavy on their minds. Hence the sense that we were near completion so many times in the last few weeks. IMO, the Hodges update had two primary goals. A. to focus the shareholders on what is real. Hence his specifying what is fact and what is alleged. So many of the posts in the past two months have indicated a sense that his entire filing is an allegation, as opposed to based on known facts. So he has laid it out for you, what he knows and what he alleges. (anyone who has ever worked near a courtroom already understood this concept.) A side benefit of that, is attempting to focus the shareholders on taking specific action instead of sitting here self flagellating over when and how much. And B. I believe this was a very distinct message to the enemy. "I'm tired of your crap and itching to get to discovery!" We shall see.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 27, 2010 19:20:34 GMT -5
ty bikinipro.. hawkeye1 King of Diamonds Wheres Your TRUST? « Thread Started Today at 10:54am » Keep in mind what Acca said, Starts with City and Ends with City. Also, its a fact the government gave the largest holder of the shorts (City) 1 year to cover, I believe the year is up March 11th. keep in mind 60% of City's investments are off shore...Hmmmm. Now about this website, here is a list of many trust from the DTCC'S website. I found it by entering release of Economic Receipt in the box at the top of the DTCC website.Hawk www.dtcc.com/downloads/membership...._Securities.pdf
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 27, 2010 19:30:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 27, 2010 19:34:37 GMT -5
ty seagull...
By: oaks Thanks GB for that excellent post. Folks, we have to unfortunately or maybe fortunately, look at the BIGGER picture here.
If anyone has followed Jay Adobe over the years he has stated when the EVENTS all come together countries will realign and the financial system will be impacted worldwide. Now we have Al Hodges pretty much stating the same thing. IMO, there is no coincidence.
Yes, I would have been overjoyed to finally hear we are getting money. I still think it will happen and I believe Hodges does as well.
Oaks (aimho)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 27, 2010 20:20:47 GMT -5
Posted by: ponokee Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010 11:39:11 AM In reply to: TSXminer who wrote msg# 295253 Post # of 295402
I wonder how he found out about this?
"33. During the period from November 2004 through April 2005, CMKM Diamonds, Inc. negotiated the sale of some of its Saskatchewan mineral claims to the three Chinese domiciled corporations with the advice and consent, inter alia, of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Proceeds from the consummation of such sales were placed into a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time."
He obviously has records of claim transfers and knows a trust exists.
The Chinese made out like bandits with their "ium" claims.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 27, 2010 20:47:28 GMT -5
By Jarta who happens to be a lawyer..... Posted by: jarta Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010 6:38:00 PM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 295356 Post # of 295406
nuffie, ... "Hodges used the phrase "plaintiffs are informed and believe" only twice in the complaint, in nn. 35 and 36, pp. 13-14."
That is correct. Only 2 paragraphs of allegations are alleged on information and belief.
In the rest, Hodges asserts under Rule 11 that he has proof of that is not based on mere information and belief and that he has investigated the facts and found them to be true before signing the complaint. Hodges had better have something to back up the bizarre allegations that are not alleged on information and belief. ... eom
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 27, 2010 20:58:50 GMT -5
Posted by: janice shell Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010 7:40:34 PM In reply to: jimmym4 who wrote msg# 295396 Post # of 295407
well janice if it was a sting we would never know what the SEC did or didn't do?
Yes we would, because they couldn't prosecute the perps without explaining exactly what went on. Bermuda Short, if you recall, got huge media coverage once it was over.
Posted by: Chas56789 Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010 7:52:12 PM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 295398 Post # of 295407
janice shell - Maybe that is what we are about to SEE !
JMHO Chas56789
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 27, 2010 21:03:59 GMT -5
An oldie but goodie !! Chris re-hashing the event..... Posted by: Chrisl Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010 8:10:35 PM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 295401 Post # of 295407
janice,,,Here is what I asked of Morris Richards:
On January 23, 2009 I called Morris Richards who is or was at the time employed with the DTCC. I asked him if he met with Rod Gorman a few years back and he said yes. I asked him if he had a conversation with Rod Gorman on money being collected on behalf of CMKM and he did not know why it has not been distributed. He confirmed the conversation with me and said yes money was collected and he did not know why it has not been distributed.
janice this meeting with Rod Gorman took place before Entourage was in the picture. There were also 4 or 5 others that were on a conference call with Morris Richards and he stated much more than this with relation to money being collected.
Mark Faulk then made a phone call to Morris Richards and he denied everything. Also after the phone call Mark called me and stated he felt Morris Richards was lying and was covering his a$$ now.
janice I know what I asked him and I heard with my own 2 ears what he said.
There were others that were more involved.
janice this guy worked for the DTCC why would he meet with Rod Gorman at all? Why would he tell me money was collected and he did not know why it has not been distributed? And janice if this took place well before Entourage what are they hiding?
One more thing janice Morris Richards works in the dividend/cash distribution office of the DTCC or he did at one time.
I do not believe there is a sting, I do not believe there is trillions of dollars sitting around waiting for shareholders I only believe what I heard for myself janice that is all.
And that's Faulk's "Story" ... wonder if Faulk taped the convo as proof, or is it just Faulk's "He said".... ? Posted by: Chrisl Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010 8:40:15 PM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 295405 Post # of 295407
janice,,,But he did. And actually he stated to Mark Faulk he did talk to me but he denied everything
|
|