Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 25, 2010 9:52:04 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo
25 May 2010, 07:17 AM EDT
Rating: Msg. 936109 of 936136
(Reply to 935828 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. #
I like the thoughts of time to react to a huge payout, but in reality there needs to be written notification. Has to be for legal(ity) reasons. The INTERNET aint gonna cut it. Once notification is there, and NDA will accompany the disclosure, (as in a nondisclosure statement by U required), as the Government does not give and not receive. That shot will be heard by the 'bona fides' round the world in less than 24 hours. They can give a reasonable return for response time and certainly should. If it is 90 days then that would be based on something else in my opinion like renounce(able)? rights/rr, and goodies. However, the money will be tapped from trusts in a fast orderly response time, and needs no more than it takes to get a notarization of signature.
Shareholders today are being placated, lied to, entertained, and bullcheeted like they always have, and that is the only consistent thing going, because those rules of communication as a constant cannot be amended for nothing.
Again, I entertained Mona's rumor because it was a goodin, bank side, and might still have some weight, but beyond this week it is not happening (near term). 'They' can say whatever they want to about the time to notify, and it's now a 90 day window process for response time. If so 'it' needs to be this week sometime, 'anytime' (I like that!). Like the man upbeat said initially. Nothing changes of great importance. I am sure he would agree.
One last note. I want my cash. They can pay me in Federal Reserve notes. I do not buy the waitin on the 40+ trillion world settlement fraud program any longer for 40,000 similarly situated angry, and damaged (mostly). It's enough already. I do support the communications of Mr. Hodges and the President, just do not buy into all the goop. Sorry I was not born yesterday. As I posted yesterday, and that was a decent post IMHO for those who bothered to read it. Why? - Because the essence of it was that if Mr. Hodges is transparent (and it appears as such that he has been very much so) then the 'blues clues' of the 'World Reports', which his/ Mr. H.'s statements so closely reflect must also be parallel to some degree. They sure as heck are timed efficiently, as referenced. The details are strategic in both papers, Hodges, WR, and coordinated to some extent. Even Gus Jarvis's. Not my assessment. It is blatant.. With this thought that would make the delays congruent, and compatible. You do the math.
Once FORMALLY notified the shot will be answered by the record holders in a very short response time. The 90 day window is a legal deadline for multiple issues, or the stage for more rumor, and gagging time for delays.
The dots are aligning, but until it's in black, and white it's all a "0". So far it's around 15 zeros of updates to nowhere. $0,000,000,000,000.00.........
Please let this end. GLTUA~
AIMVHO,
Oil
25 May 2010, 07:17 AM EDT
Rating: Msg. 936109 of 936136
(Reply to 935828 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. #
I like the thoughts of time to react to a huge payout, but in reality there needs to be written notification. Has to be for legal(ity) reasons. The INTERNET aint gonna cut it. Once notification is there, and NDA will accompany the disclosure, (as in a nondisclosure statement by U required), as the Government does not give and not receive. That shot will be heard by the 'bona fides' round the world in less than 24 hours. They can give a reasonable return for response time and certainly should. If it is 90 days then that would be based on something else in my opinion like renounce(able)? rights/rr, and goodies. However, the money will be tapped from trusts in a fast orderly response time, and needs no more than it takes to get a notarization of signature.
Shareholders today are being placated, lied to, entertained, and bullcheeted like they always have, and that is the only consistent thing going, because those rules of communication as a constant cannot be amended for nothing.
Again, I entertained Mona's rumor because it was a goodin, bank side, and might still have some weight, but beyond this week it is not happening (near term). 'They' can say whatever they want to about the time to notify, and it's now a 90 day window process for response time. If so 'it' needs to be this week sometime, 'anytime' (I like that!). Like the man upbeat said initially. Nothing changes of great importance. I am sure he would agree.
One last note. I want my cash. They can pay me in Federal Reserve notes. I do not buy the waitin on the 40+ trillion world settlement fraud program any longer for 40,000 similarly situated angry, and damaged (mostly). It's enough already. I do support the communications of Mr. Hodges and the President, just do not buy into all the goop. Sorry I was not born yesterday. As I posted yesterday, and that was a decent post IMHO for those who bothered to read it. Why? - Because the essence of it was that if Mr. Hodges is transparent (and it appears as such that he has been very much so) then the 'blues clues' of the 'World Reports', which his/ Mr. H.'s statements so closely reflect must also be parallel to some degree. They sure as heck are timed efficiently, as referenced. The details are strategic in both papers, Hodges, WR, and coordinated to some extent. Even Gus Jarvis's. Not my assessment. It is blatant.. With this thought that would make the delays congruent, and compatible. You do the math.
Once FORMALLY notified the shot will be answered by the record holders in a very short response time. The 90 day window is a legal deadline for multiple issues, or the stage for more rumor, and gagging time for delays.
The dots are aligning, but until it's in black, and white it's all a "0". So far it's around 15 zeros of updates to nowhere. $0,000,000,000,000.00.........
Please let this end. GLTUA~
AIMVHO,
Oil