|
Post by enoughalready on Jun 16, 2010 17:43:33 GMT -5
Why would Al agree to an extension..I feel that this is going to be delayed and delayed and delayed..
|
|
|
Post by jimbob on Jun 16, 2010 17:48:17 GMT -5
bjenkins,
Where is CMKX, CMKM, Al Hodges, or anyone else related even mentioned in this "delay"? If it was for us it would actually have us in there right?
|
|
|
Post by gabbyhayes on Jun 16, 2010 18:04:50 GMT -5
Why don't you all just look at the positive side of this...read between the lines....Al jumped right on top of this and agreed...is it possible some form of negotiation is going on...yeah...right...we need more time for what... vacations.....I don't think so...there are some serious deliberations going on...the govt was caught with their SHORTS down... .........heh..heh..heh....and they are trying like hell to figure a way out....imho of course....Al...is sitting there with a Cheshire cat grin...with all the evidence he needs....have a nice evenin kids.......
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Jun 16, 2010 18:53:04 GMT -5
Or not?
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on Jun 16, 2010 19:58:14 GMT -5
This is what to prepare for: Agreement will be made on or before July 19th to release the funds. END! (not too convince of this, still more needs to be accomplished in Washington) OR: Which this is what I think will more than likely be the case. Hodges will file a opposition to prove reasons and merit for a court date to be set, he will show enough evidence to move to a trial date. On July 26th Judge will make a court date for sometime in the fall or late 2010 or even maybe early 2011, then sometime between July 26th and that set court date, we will see a agreement made between both parties to release the funds. As far as I can see these are the only two ways this can unfold, because WE WILL WIN, some will attack me and say the other option is July 17th judge will say there's not enough evidence and case closed NO PAYOUT! I don't believe this option will happen. Think Timed event, I just don't think they're quite ready yet, I hope I'm wrong. First option would be nice. I don't think the roller coaster ride is quite over yet. Please understand I'm not trying to say this IS what's going to happen, THIS IS MY GUESS! Did you bashers hear that? I believe EVERYONE and I mean EVERYONE who is involved in this operation is doing their part of a compartmentalized plan, including Mr. Hodges. The battle for the money was done a long time ago, it's not a matter of fighting someone for the money, it's a matter of getting that money released at the right time. As much as I hate to say it again, this has a political aspect that is driving that timeline or release date. TIMED EVENTS Don, IMHO! Bjenkins, I think my post says it all, this delay only give my post credibility. This isn't going to happen until the agenda behind the scenes is ready, timed event! I have been saying this fall or early 2011 for the last 6-8 months. Does anyone want to argue that Mr. Hodges is playing his role, get this down the road a little further until the political agenda is finished and ready for release of funds. Just because I say Mr. Hodges is playing his role or part doesn't mean I'm not 100% behind him, because I am, I just think EVERYONE is doing what they have to, to get this to the release date. WE WILL WIN, remember once again Mr. Hodges agreed to this. There is a bigger agenda. I don't think this filing says I'm wrong, do you? Don, IMHO!
|
|
|
Post by davesaint on Jun 16, 2010 20:42:21 GMT -5
Don,
If you were the president when would you want the funds released to gain the biggest bang for the buck? Do you think the date is set now? What was the purpose for Al's case if the date or or this whole thing is scripted? IMO I would think Obama would want this complete before the elections in Nov so he could take credit and also so the Democrats do not lose Congressional and Senate seats. I'm thinking September.
Davesaint
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on Jun 16, 2010 21:29:38 GMT -5
This isn't just about the Democrats in general or the POTUS for that matter, I'm sure he is slated to look like the hero when all is said and done, one would think it would be in their best interest to turn things around a couple months before the elections, but the most important thing is to make the changes stick. This is changing the way capitalism works, the way the banking system works, the way the FED RES works and redistribution of wealth, this isn't about a one time payout of $3.87 or $42T, this is about changing the way a system works on a day to day basis from here on out.
In order to do this you need to do many things first before you flip the switch and start the new system. If you were to change a gasoline engine to make it run on diesel, could you just change the fuel? or would you need to change the engines major parts to be able to run on diesel? We have a little ways to go in my opinion. One would think that one of those changes you would think is the financial reform bill.
I can't tell you when they will release the funds, only those in the inner circle know. All we can do is try to make an educated guess with what we do know. I've given you my best guess.
I can only say this in regards to your question about Mr. Hodges, go back and read my "What If" post and it will tell you my feelings about what could be Mr. Hodges role. Remember this is just my opinion, treat it as such.
But I still stress that I'm behind Al, 100% in what he is doing, I think his role has much to do with keeping an appearance of pressure on getting the funds released and at the same time helping ease the shareholders minds that we will see the funds released at some point, I think it would be foolish for anyone to give a exact date on when that will be. It could very well be a moving target.
Two quick questions for all of you: If this MUST stay out of the public view for the good of the markets future, would it be necessary to have a trustworthy shareholder keep the shareholders confident that a payout is imminent? Would it be necessary to keep the shareholders from taking the message of NSS and market corruption viral?
Keep in mind that if the funds are already been put in a trust for us, wouldn't that mean the bad guys have paid money in exchange for that NSS to be kept quiet and out of the public view? Now if that is true, could it be that Al is doing his part and holding up our end of the deal? We keep quiet, they pay the money. That is generally how money for silence works.
Please understand this is just a possible scenario and a opinion, treat it as such.
Don, IMHO!
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Jun 17, 2010 8:24:31 GMT -5
Still waiting for a direct link to that document.
Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Jun 17, 2010 8:49:31 GMT -5
I am not doubting that it is real. I am not a member of pacer and would simply like a link to a PDF file somewhere where someone has grabbed it and re-posted the document so I can get a copy on my hard drive.
Thank you.
|
|