|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Jul 7, 2010 14:11:23 GMT -5
varnson:
"I love the part where they do nothing to Fannie/Freddy..."
INDEED!
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Jul 7, 2010 14:21:08 GMT -5
Ed, Two Buddies of that sad excuse some call a Prez made 90M and 125M respectively in salary/bonus from Fannie/Freddy when they were tanking but I don't see a "Claw Back" for them and yes both are Fed employees and Dems. How would like to have held stock in either one because the stock is almost worthless.
Frannie/Freddy hold 65%+ of all mortgages most are under water and the bailout will be over One Trillion in the end which we can not afford.
We are for dire straights and it is coming soon along with massive tax hikes starting Dec 31 2011 at 12:01AM. I am selling out of most my postions gradually and will be flat by Thanksgiving...Cash is King at this point.
Cheers,
PS I am traveling for the next few weeks and I am in Scottsdale, AZ...Forgot just how hot it is this time of year WOW...but the pool is somewhat cool and the drinks are for sure...never again.
|
|
|
Post by pennytraders on Jul 7, 2010 15:51:36 GMT -5
Getting paid!! now thats what Im talking about!! JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE'S NEW ROLE! AS I ONCE POSTED"THE FED HAS BEEN OSORBED INTO THE US TREASURY" THE CIRCLE IS ALMOST COMPLETE. THEN YOU GET PAID!!!! "On the other side of the Atlantic, the U.S. Federal Reserve, in an in-depth analysis released last month, found that many U.S. banks' compensation practices were deficient in curbing excessive risk-taking. The Fed – and other major banking regulators – under a newly adopted plan can veto pay policies that cause too much risk-taking by executives, traders, loan officers and other key employees"
The full article is here www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/07/eu-caps-bank-bonuses-comp_n_637600.html
|
|
|
Post by supercim1 on Jul 7, 2010 15:58:19 GMT -5
If Attorney Al Hodges could have convinced Kevin West to turn 360 degrees and believe 100% in the evidence, the CMKX fund and the Team's efforts, then why would you not trust what Al has said ? IMO, the evidence is a secret deadly weapon to win the war. It should only be shown in Court but not to be displayed in a store. If any plaintiff wants to back out for not seeing the proof, I would like to be a Replacement. I own shares more than most of them and I don't demand the non-sense.
|
|
|
Post by vpd on Jul 7, 2010 16:04:32 GMT -5
If Attorney Al Hodges could have convinced Kevin West to turn 360 degrees and believe 100% in the evidence, the CMKX fund and the Team's efforts, then why would you not trust what Al has said ? IMO, the evidence is a secret deadly weapon to win the war. It should only be shown in Court but not to be displayed in a store. If any plaintiff wants to back out for not seeing the proof, I would like to be a Replacement. I own shares more than most of them and I don't demand the non-sense. Maybe you mean 180 degrees. 360 degrees would get you back to exactly where you started. And I believe Kevin seemed to believe that Al was confident in what he had not necessarily that Kevin wa convinced. I could be wrong though. IMHO
|
|
|
Post by TallyHo on Jul 7, 2010 16:18:29 GMT -5
Keven said he believed Al was 100% committed....stop spreading rumors and changing peoples words. That is a far cry form 100% confident
|
|
|
Post by vpd on Jul 7, 2010 16:23:56 GMT -5
Keven said he believed Al was 100% committed....stop spreading rumors and changing peoples words. That is a far cry form 100% confident Great that's even worse so Al is not 100% confident. Great for us. My point was that Kevin was NOT turned around.
|
|
|
Post by cmkxerlong on Jul 7, 2010 17:47:10 GMT -5
But Kevin did also say this: "he firmly believes, without any room for doubt, that he has irrefutable evidence of funds being held for eventual distribution to the CMKM shareholders and that he believes that the release of those funds is imminent." That sounds pretty confident to me. Keven said he believed Al was 100% committed....stop spreading rumors and changing peoples words. That is a far cry form 100% confident
|
|
|
Post by mailman78 on Jul 7, 2010 17:57:03 GMT -5
I don't think pissing up a rope is possible.Dennis should gave gave us his guess of a pay date deadline.IMO
|
|
|
Post by dyamondhead on Jul 7, 2010 18:31:36 GMT -5
I don't think pissing up a rope is possible.Dennis should gave gave us his guess of a pay date deadline.IMO Apparently the point of the expression is exactly that, that it is something impossible. This is interesting on more than one level. If those who are unhappy with the results of Mr. Hodges' heroic (and I mean that sincerely) efforts are so on the basis that they believe they are not oriented in reality, and Dennis is unhappy with them for being so unhappy, one would have thought that he could best address that issue by showing them why those efforts are, on the contrary, realistic. Instead, he tells them to do something impossible, which would seem only to confirm their fears. Then again, in another thread, when Mrabner claimed (as he so often does) that the Great Truth is obvious for all to see, thus implying ignoble motives on those who don't agree with that, I pointed out that merely saying it's so doesn't make it so, that it is something that needs to be demonstrated, or, in other words, "Don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining." Now, the idea of pissing up a rope, to me, implies standing this notion on its head, because, as everyone knows, rain comes from the sky, and gravity brings it to the earth, just as it does piss. Thinking that it is possible to piss upwards suggests that it is possible to create truth by imagining it. In other words, it's nuts. Please note that I have not demanded anything. Dyamondhead
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 7, 2010 22:04:05 GMT -5
By: 1billionplus 07 Jul 2010, 04:14 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 945458 of 945533
Jump to msg. # Many shareholders don't know, that the BATTLE/hold up is over people not getting paid who bought shares after trading was halted and are not considered Bonafide shareholders.These people bought shares from the deli dog and WILL NOT be included in the distribution. Yes they can register thier shares with the TA but they WILL NOT GET PAID.
|
|
|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Jul 7, 2010 22:14:19 GMT -5
By: 1billionplus 07 Jul 2010, 04:14 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 945458 of 945533 Jump to msg. # Many shareholders don't know, that the BATTLE/hold up is over people not getting paid who bought shares after trading was halted and are not considered Bonafide shareholders.These people bought shares from the deli dog and WILL NOT be included in the distribution. Yes they can register thier shares with the TA but they WILL NOT GET PAID. IF ABOVE IS TRUE:Well, in this case there may be an obvious conflict of interest; what if any Of the plaintiffs or Mr. Hodges bought post revocation.
|
|
|
Post by portrush on Jul 7, 2010 23:07:49 GMT -5
By: 1billionplus 07 Jul 2010, 04:14 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 945458 of 945533 Jump to msg. # Many shareholders don't know, that the BATTLE/hold up is over people not getting paid who bought shares after trading was halted and are not considered Bonafide shareholders.These people bought shares from the deli dog and WILL NOT be included in the distribution. Yes they can register thier shares with the TA but they WILL NOT GET PAID. My understanding is that this isn't correct. Those that purchased from Deli have received bonafide certs from the company and new TA. I'll be doggone if I don't understand how the man can continue to sell them...but he is and they are being approved by Kevin West. pr
|
|
|
Post by gusjarvis on Jul 8, 2010 0:21:28 GMT -5
deli was never really investigated, he was part of the game, all fake or he wouldn't be selling today, he wouldn't hang with the insiders. He was part of the mission, the one that is still going on. We should be more concerned with the fact we are still pawns in a intel operation, now is that legal.
|
|
super
Dr. Of Diamonds
Posts: 176
|
Post by super on Jul 8, 2010 0:34:20 GMT -5
From what I know of pissing up a rope, it will splash back down on you. But hey better your own pee then someone else's!!
|
|