|
Post by whereismymoney on Aug 17, 2010 9:26:13 GMT -5
Sorry No Deals
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Aug 17, 2010 9:31:36 GMT -5
ONE MORE TIME............ I don't know if this is true or not, but about four months ago a reliable source told me when I asked how much, he said somewhere between .54 & $2.00 a share and not to belive all this crap about $6.00 a share!! So Al is full of shi* then? Al said that there is a total of $3.87T... it is the SHAREHOLDERS who did the math to come up with $6. What if there's a whole bunch of uncerted shares derived from naked shorts? I know several people that either have not or did not get their certs. If the number of shares being divided in $3.87 is 1-2 trillion... that's a lot different than 600-700 billion shares. Anyway, .50-$2, will put me in a position of having MUCH more wealth than I can possibly use over my lifetime... Ed
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Aug 17, 2010 9:38:38 GMT -5
So Al is full of shi* then? Al said that there is a total of $3.87T... it is the SHAREHOLDERS who did the math to come up with $6. What if there's a whole bunch of uncerted shares derived from naked shorts? I know several people that either have not or did not get their certs. If the number of shares being divided in $3.87 is 1-2 trillion... that's a lot different than 600-700 billion shares. Anyway, .50-$2, will put me in a position of having MUCH more wealth than I can possibly use over my lifetime... Ed What I find interesting is that Mr. Hodges has not himself suggested a PPS, and has only provided a top end number for the trust value and suggested that one calculate the pps on their own. Now, why would he do that? It sure doesn't reflect confidence in the $6 pps, but why suggest it then?
|
|
|
Post by MannyFin on Aug 17, 2010 10:25:40 GMT -5
Al said that there is a total of $3.87T... it is the SHAREHOLDERS who did the math to come up with $6. What if there's a whole bunch of uncerted shares derived from naked shorts? I know several people that either have not or did not get their certs. If the number of shares being divided in $3.87 is 1-2 trillion... that's a lot different than 600-700 billion shares. Anyway, .50-$2, will put me in a position of having MUCH more wealth than I can possibly use over my lifetime... Ed What I find interesting is that Mr. Hodges has not himself suggested a PPS, and has only provided a top end number for the trust value and suggested that one calculate the pps on their own. Now, why would he do that? It sure doesn't reflect confidence in the $6 pps, but why suggest it then? Read my lips GOB, ------------------.54--$2.00 a share straight from AH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Aug 17, 2010 10:27:26 GMT -5
What I find interesting is that Mr. Hodges has not himself suggested a PPS, and has only provided a top end number for the trust value and suggested that one calculate the pps on their own. Now, why would he do that? It sure doesn't reflect confidence in the $6 pps, but why suggest it then? Read my lips GOB, ------------------.54--$2.00 a share straight from AH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL! I knew I could get you to post it! (your source that is) Now, do you want me to explain how problematic that is?
|
|
|
Post by MannyFin on Aug 17, 2010 10:31:37 GMT -5
Read my lips GOB, ------------------.54--$2.00 a share straight from AH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL! I knew I could get you to post it! (your source that is) Now, do you want me to explain how problematic that is? I got a better idea-------------STFU and go back to sleep and dream of back door romances--LOL
|
|
ATL
Dr. Of Diamonds
Posts: 177
|
Post by ATL on Aug 17, 2010 10:34:14 GMT -5
Al Hodges always stated $3.87, never mentioned PPS. It was also alleged that there are 7X or 11X naked short shares (?). If you add them all and do the math, it will get you to close to Manny's .54 to $2 imo.
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Aug 17, 2010 10:38:58 GMT -5
LOL! I knew I could get you to post it! (your source that is) Now, do you want me to explain how problematic that is? I got a better idea-------------STFU and go back to sleep and dream of back door romances--LOL Now, now. I was nice yesterday, and gave you a break. If you want, I will give you the opportunity to explain the problem with Mr. Hodges telling you one thing and suggesting to everyone else a completely different figure.
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Aug 17, 2010 10:47:43 GMT -5
Al Hodges always stated $3.87, never mentioned PPS. It was also alleged that there are 7X or 11X naked short shares (?). If you add them all and do the math, it will get you to close to Manny's .54 to $2 imo. Correct. Mr. Hodges has always stated $3.87 trillion. Instead of stating a PPS, he suggested others do it themselves. Robert posted the equation of dividing the $3.87 T by the number of shares in cert form (633 billion I believe) creating the $6 pps figure, and that amount has been touted ever since. Mr. Hodges had the opportunity to clarify that at any time, but as of the last update chose to let others believe in that $6 figure anyway.
|
|
|
Post by MannyFin on Aug 17, 2010 10:48:46 GMT -5
I got a better idea-------------STFU and go back to sleep and dream of back door romances--LOL Now, now. I was nice yesterday, and gave you a break. If you want, I will give you the opportunity to explain the problem with Mr. Hodges telling you one thing and suggesting to everyone else a completely different figure. If you must know, I am really getting tired of all this conjecture--he said-she said, to me who gives a flying fark, either we get paid or we don't!! Why keep bringing up the same s h i t day after day is way beyond my comprehension, it is really getting old!!!!
|
|
|
Post by jcnelson298 on Aug 17, 2010 10:53:23 GMT -5
Just wanted to let you know that I'm happy your son is comming home.... From one vet to another give him a big wecome home from me and tell him a job well done,,,,, VietNam vet 101st Airborne 1/506 recon and ranger for almost 3 years now I'm telling my age darn....... LOL! I knew I could get you to post it! (your source that is) Now, do you want me to explain how problematic that is? I got a better idea-------------STFU and go back to sleep and dream of back door romances--LOL
|
|
|
Post by MannyFin on Aug 17, 2010 11:09:29 GMT -5
Just wanted to let you know that I'm happy your son is comming home.... From one vet to another give him a big wecome home from me and tell him a job well done,,,,, VietNam vet 101st Airborne 1/506 recon and ranger for almost 3 years now I'm telling my age darn....... d*mn, "your old"--LOL I will tell him and TY very much, as we speak, he is back from Iraq and is now @ Ft. Bragg, his ETS is Nov. 5 I got a better idea-------------STFU and go back to sleep and dream of back door romances--LOL
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Aug 17, 2010 11:13:20 GMT -5
Now, now. I was nice yesterday, and gave you a break. If you want, I will give you the opportunity to explain the problem with Mr. Hodges telling you one thing and suggesting to everyone else a completely different figure. If you must know, I am really getting tired of all this conjecture--he said-she said, to me who gives a flying fark, either we get paid or we don't!! Why keep bringing up the same s h i t day after day is way beyond my comprehension, it is really getting old!!!! I'm confused, Which part is conjecture? What Mr. Hodges told you or how he left it for everyone else? And, this hasn't been discussed day in and day out at all. You just announced today who told you those amounts.
|
|
|
Post by supercim1 on Aug 17, 2010 11:35:37 GMT -5
I agree with MannyFin. If this is a sting operation, the government might also have purchased ton of NSS shares as well. Therefore, they will also share the pie of $3.87 trillions.
|
|
|
Post by TallyHo on Aug 17, 2010 11:39:21 GMT -5
I agree with MannyFin. If this is a sting operation, the government might also have purchased ton of NSS shares as well. Therefore, they will also share the pie of $3.87 trillions. LMAO......I somehow doubt that.
|
|