Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2010 17:19:33 GMT -5
Thank you D4E... We all make mistakes. And you corrected yourself. Very admirable. Thanks! D4E |
|
|
|
Post by gjfromfla on Sept 16, 2010 17:25:40 GMT -5
Read the whole thing. He just named names and told the story. NO hard evidence. This must be to show the bad guys that he knows who they are and now it's time to pay the piper. One thing bothers me. It looks like the trust does not contain 3.87T. That number was a culmination of the two trusts and punitive damages combined. Now this makes sense. 6$ a share would be if the judge awards everything we are asking for, the trust, and damages. $.54 a share is what the trust contains. $2.00 is what AH thinks the judge will award in damages + the trust. Oh so clear now. No hard evidence yet. The judge probably wont ask for it unless the SEC comes back and asks for a dismissal again. d*mn!!! 30 more days. Well I hope to hell they read this and just give up and release the money. D4E  If it means getting paid $.54 today or $2.00/share indefinitely determined, give me the $.54 and call it a day. Or split the difference? |
|
|
|
Post by lurknomore on Sept 16, 2010 17:35:56 GMT -5
What am I missing here?
Wasn't Al given the opportunity to amend the complaint so that he could add some shred of evidence? One reason for the motion for dismissal was it was all allegations and no evidence.
Still no evidence. Doesn't that leave us open for dismissal?
|
|
|
|
Post by beavis on Sept 16, 2010 17:40:32 GMT -5
NO WAY! I must be imagining things!
Well, anyway, that must be the boca-burger meatless version... plus what Al said at the MTD hearing...
|
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Sept 16, 2010 17:44:42 GMT -5
What am I missing here? Wasn't Al given the opportunity to amend the complaint so that he could add some shred of evidence? One reason for the motion for dismissal was it was all allegations and no evidence. Still no evidence. Doesn't that leave us open for dismissal? You must have evidence to present evidence! |
|
|
|
Post by sake321 on Sept 16, 2010 17:46:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Sept 16, 2010 17:55:29 GMT -5
It's not completely meatless. He made direct allegations toward the individuals he's suing. He detailed the alleged roles they played individually.
|
|
|
|
Post by z06mike on Sept 16, 2010 17:56:06 GMT -5
Is this a real legal filing? Is it Treffrey or Treffry? Just askin...
Mike
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2010 18:00:17 GMT -5
What am I missing here? Wasn't Al given the opportunity to amend the complaint so that he could add some shred of evidence? One reason for the motion for dismissal was it was all allegations and no evidence. Still no evidence. Doesn't that leave us open for dismissal? What I believe he did here was to name individuals as the SEC lawyer suggested. And to bring to light exactly what evidence he has. Now that these individuals in the SEC know what he has, they will expedite the release of the funds to avoid discovery. I believe that the judge may ask for some kind of hard evidence only if the SEC comes back with another motion to dismiss. In this way they still have a chance to deliver and cut a deal to skip scott free. If they don't by 30 days, it's trial baby and we wait another ten years. Then AH will have to show the beef. In the end we probably would benefit from a trial but for me, no way, I want this over.. just give us whats in the trust and call it a day. That much alone and I retire. IMO D4E |
|
|
|
Post by sake321 on Sept 16, 2010 18:01:53 GMT -5
also I must point out the poster only has 1 post. I know I can't really talk but how reliably is The poster? AH said no need to file. I'm sticking with my guns until I hear other something official.... I call fake document. =P and Amendment not ammendment. Sry no offense
|
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on Sept 16, 2010 18:09:48 GMT -5
indeed who is this ely. Registered since 2005 and yet this was the first post.  |
|
ely
Diamond Hunter
Posts: 25
|
Post by ely on Sept 16, 2010 18:10:31 GMT -5
also I must point out the poster only has 1 post. I know I can't really talk but how reliably is The poster? AH said no need to file. I'm sticking with my guns until I hear other something official.... I call fake document. =P and Amendment not ammendment. Sry no offense LOL at 1 post, this coming from a guy who only has 6 posts since yesterday. I have been a long time poster but left when the 3 amigo fiasco hit the board, but have remained a long time lurker. Search for yourself and see what you come up with, will be the same one. |
|
|
|
Post by gjfromfla on Sept 16, 2010 18:13:25 GMT -5
Your funny .. Of course this is real. |
|
|
|
Post by joe on Sept 16, 2010 18:14:33 GMT -5
What other SHOE?  ? I assumed he meant announcement of money to us. Things seem to be pointing in that direction. Thanks be to God.  |
|
|
|
Post by ucaughtme on Sept 16, 2010 18:16:07 GMT -5
also I must point out the poster only has 1 post. I know I can't really talk but how reliably is The poster? AH said no need to file. I'm sticking with my guns until I hear other something official.... I call fake document. =P and Amendment not ammendment. Sry no offense LOL at 1 post, this coming from a guy who only has 6 posts since yesterday. I have been a long time poster but left when the 3 amigo fiasco hit the board, but have remained a long time lurker. Search for yourself and see what you come up with, will be the same one. Looks like this character has been saving this ID for a special occasion, or a rainy day. But why? Any pertinent info would have been put out by someone we know. NOT this poster. |
|
