|
Post by marbearcat on Sept 17, 2010 0:28:33 GMT -5
Well, delusionalgrandeur was right - good guess? Also, this is dated the 14th, the same day Al told BH that the rumors were incorrect - no refile... unless he told him before that like a lot of the others... Fluid situation? Well, again the shareholders take the hit. I for one wouldn't have said "NO WAY" unless it was 100% done deal... then again, I'm no lawyer. IMO. Well, I had said not to be surprised if we dont hear of ER for the next 30 days. Al said no refile....is he now a liar? I'm not going to call him one but we all know that joke, "How do you tell when a lawyer is lying" Any who, like a poster here said many times...."The circus rolls on" Come on folks, you REALLY didn't think we were going to hear of the ER this week did you? And I think shareholder disappointment can be blamed on high expectations coming from the likes of the paltalkers. And yes, Bob H. paltalk is, in my opinion a snake pit. Anyway, I hate these words but I have to use them: "WE WAIT!" Argh!
|
|
|
Post by NobleForce2 on Sept 17, 2010 1:16:07 GMT -5
Why is Bob Hollenegg the only one of the plaintiffs whose past/present career isn't listed on the filing?
|
|
|
Post by thematrix on Sept 17, 2010 4:46:49 GMT -5
There still is no proof. This will get dismissed like it or not. Plus AH openly admits that it's not the SEC holding it up, but the big Conspiracy of WR's. Judge asks for proof, AH gives him more bs, with no proof. How about going to the media now with video proof in hand and naming everyone instead of pumping plaintiffs, pongo, and others to spread lies so Deli can sell more shares.
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Sept 17, 2010 7:46:42 GMT -5
Why is Bob Hollenegg the only one of the plaintiffs whose past/present career isn't listed on the filing? It's classified. Just Joking!
|
|
|
Post by crackerjack on Sept 17, 2010 7:53:00 GMT -5
Actually, I see Hodges added "class action" to this re-file. I posted this at the beginning of the week as a concern of mine. Looks like Its the road we are heading down. Ughhhhhh!
This will be tied up in the courts forever.
|
|
|
Post by 3bid on Sept 17, 2010 12:45:50 GMT -5
Actually, I see Hodges added "class action" to this re-file. I posted this at the beginning of the week as a concern of mine. Looks like Its the road we are heading down. Ughhhhhh! This will be tied up in the courts forever . ----->[IMO]<-----
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 17, 2010 22:16:08 GMT -5
By: ricosull 17 Sep 2010, 12:14 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 960703 of 960905 Initial and amended complaint compared
Amended Complaint
Page 10 Paragraph 31 -This is new Page 10 Paragraph 32 -This is new Page 13 Paragraph 39 -This is new Page 14 Paragraph 45 -Added specific names Page 16 Paragraph 46 -This is new Page 17 Paragraph 48 -Reworded Page 17 Paragraph 49 -This is new Page 18 Paragraph 50 & 51 -These were previously one paragraph Page 18 Paragraph 52 -Reworded Page 21 Paragraph 67 -Reworded
FWIW
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Sept 18, 2010 13:33:57 GMT -5
Why is Bob Hollenegg the only one of the plaintiffs whose past/present career isn't listed on the filing? ...and this question is being posed by an individual that posts under an alias. ;D
|
|
|
Post by TallyHo on Sept 23, 2010 12:08:17 GMT -5
Why is Bob Hollenegg the only one of the plaintiffs whose past/present career isn't listed on the filing? Because he is uber secret squirrel type that apparently (by posts and pictures and avatar) worked around the SR-71 and for some reason had no idea that it leaked fuel while on the ground because the engine seals had to have room to expand at altitude, which was a fact known by EVERY person who EVER came in contact with them. Not that I am questioning Bob or anything.......just saying.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2010 21:06:21 GMT -5
Why is Bob Hollenegg the only one of the plaintiffs whose past/present career isn't listed on the filing? Because he is uber secret squirrel type that apparently (by posts and pictures and avatar) worked around the SR-71 and for some reason had no idea that it leaked fuel while on the ground because the engine seals had to have room to expand at altitude, which was a fact known by EVERY person who EVER came in contact with them. Not that I am questioning Bob or anything.......just saying. I have to concur, that is a true statement about them leaking. I have never been near one, the leaking is common knowledge. There is no way that anyone who ever was involved with this aircraft would not know this. How do you know that BH was ignorant to this info? Just askin.. TD4E
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Sept 24, 2010 8:55:29 GMT -5
D4E: Don't mind him... I think he's just one of those guys that likes to tweak people that don't believe what he does, even when it has no particular relevancy. Easier to engage him when he's behaving ... ;D
|
|
|
Post by TallyHo on Sept 24, 2010 11:30:12 GMT -5
D4E: Don't mind him... I think he's just one of those guys that likes to tweak people that don't believe what he does, even when it has no particular relevancy. Easier to engage him when he's behaving ... ;D Lol......that's not true Ed!!!! I actually believe that we will get something out of this thing. What that is, I have no earthly clue. I do know that a lot of people have been yanking our chains for wasy too many years and I have learned to question everyone and everything and not just trust an internet board poster. When certain things don't add up, I question them. This certain thing didn't add up at the time, but I just kept my mouth shut as it didn't have much relevance then. Thought I'd bring it up based on BH continuing to delete his account/get a virus/ or get sick everytime he gets thoroughly questioned. Like I said, I'm not trying to discredit him as I believe he has already vetted himself to everyone, but I'm just stating an observation that didn't add up to me and to answer the question posed here as to why his background is not given. Maybe it's becasue he can't truly give his background......I have no idea. However, I do know that anyone who knows the slightest about USAF aircraft, knows the simple fact of the SR-71s leaking engines.....that is all. D4E.....just read post history.....BH and I had a back and forth on the SR-71 a few months ago. I was surprised to see him respond with uncertainty to my statement of fact (leaking engines).
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Sept 24, 2010 13:12:03 GMT -5
Tallyho:
Okay, well then, I think I'll chalk this one up to "Ed speaking without bothering to know what he's talking about"
But, y'know... sometimes it's SO EASY that way ;D
Ed Jagackadacca
|
|