Post by georgie18 on Nov 27, 2010 13:01:33 GMT -5
MILLIONAIRES BOARD
« Reply #390 Today at 12:31pm »
Yesterday at 9:25pm, taskforceviking wrote:
I wish Mr. Hollenegg would share a more complete picture of the recent plaintiff update from Mr. Hodges... rather than just "cherry pick" the pumper lines...
What about Obama's arrest? Why didn't that happen?
What about the incident we were supposed to watch for in Indiana?
Why not include the crazy "World Report" lines from the update?
Who's on first... what's on second... and I don't know is on third...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BHOLLENEGG response
Taskforceviking....I need to make this perfectly clear. I am a plaintiff in a lawsuit trying to get the funds released to the Shareholders. Attorney Hodges provides updates to the plaintiffs because of his attorney/client relationship. I am a shareholder and I thoroughly understand what the shareholders are experiencing. Frustration is what got me to where I am at today. I didn't make threats and talk about doing something, I actually did something.
I do not have Attorney Hodges's permission to share the information in his updates outside the legal team. What I do share are the pieces of information on the release of the funds, as long as , the information does not affect the progress made on releasing the funds. Any information not pertaining to the release of the funds or outdated information are ignored. It is difficult enough to keep the pertinent information from being distorted after I post the information.
Whether you were trusted by certain plaintiffs or not with the updates or their opinions, I do not understand why you post negative information, how they feel about Attorney Hodges, and accuse me of cherry picking the information from the updates. I know the plaintiffs you mentioned are just as frustrated with the delays, as is Attorney Hodges, but I also know they commented how brilliant Attorney Hodges is. You feel I am jerking you around? If you would like to do the updates, please do. If you want to do something that is constructive to releasing the funds and not destructive, then go after the ones who are not releasing the funds and not go after the ones trying to keep the shareholders informed and working to get the funds released to the Shareholders.
When some one helps me or tries to help me, I am appreciative that they are willing to help. It doesn't matter if they are successful or not successful, the fact that they cared makes me appreciative. When some one spends their money, doesn't charge me a dime, works very hard to get something done that will benefit me and many others, I am not going to say I will thank you only if I get something out of this. I certainly would not criticize them for helping me.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
« Reply #390 Today at 12:31pm »
Yesterday at 9:25pm, taskforceviking wrote:
I wish Mr. Hollenegg would share a more complete picture of the recent plaintiff update from Mr. Hodges... rather than just "cherry pick" the pumper lines...
What about Obama's arrest? Why didn't that happen?
What about the incident we were supposed to watch for in Indiana?
Why not include the crazy "World Report" lines from the update?
Who's on first... what's on second... and I don't know is on third...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BHOLLENEGG response
Taskforceviking....I need to make this perfectly clear. I am a plaintiff in a lawsuit trying to get the funds released to the Shareholders. Attorney Hodges provides updates to the plaintiffs because of his attorney/client relationship. I am a shareholder and I thoroughly understand what the shareholders are experiencing. Frustration is what got me to where I am at today. I didn't make threats and talk about doing something, I actually did something.
I do not have Attorney Hodges's permission to share the information in his updates outside the legal team. What I do share are the pieces of information on the release of the funds, as long as , the information does not affect the progress made on releasing the funds. Any information not pertaining to the release of the funds or outdated information are ignored. It is difficult enough to keep the pertinent information from being distorted after I post the information.
Whether you were trusted by certain plaintiffs or not with the updates or their opinions, I do not understand why you post negative information, how they feel about Attorney Hodges, and accuse me of cherry picking the information from the updates. I know the plaintiffs you mentioned are just as frustrated with the delays, as is Attorney Hodges, but I also know they commented how brilliant Attorney Hodges is. You feel I am jerking you around? If you would like to do the updates, please do. If you want to do something that is constructive to releasing the funds and not destructive, then go after the ones who are not releasing the funds and not go after the ones trying to keep the shareholders informed and working to get the funds released to the Shareholders.
When some one helps me or tries to help me, I am appreciative that they are willing to help. It doesn't matter if they are successful or not successful, the fact that they cared makes me appreciative. When some one spends their money, doesn't charge me a dime, works very hard to get something done that will benefit me and many others, I am not going to say I will thank you only if I get something out of this. I certainly would not criticize them for helping me.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
