|
Post by JoeRockss on Dec 7, 2010 19:47:27 GMT -5
Here's one of my favorite parts of the update.
Apparently, dismissal [one way or another] of this litigation was required by the Government as a condition of the release of CMKX payments; we shall soon see if that assessment is correct. Whether it is or not, be assured that an appeal to the Ninth Circuit [and the USSC if necessary] will be timely taken and aggressively pursued, until such time as the payments are made.
|
|
|
Post by lovindiamonds on Dec 7, 2010 19:58:32 GMT -5
;D
|
|
|
Post by georgie18 on Dec 7, 2010 20:12:22 GMT -5
Thank you Mr. Hodges..aka the horses mouth..LOL Great straight forward update which answered many questions. • I am of the opinion that we are at the last turn in the road. More straight forwardly I do believe, based upon information from many, many sources including my work on securing release of the World Global Settlement funds, that payment is imminent. • Apparently, dismissal [one way or another] of this litigation was required by the Government as a condition of the release of CMKX payments; we shall soon see if that assessment is correct. Whether it is or not, be assured that an appeal to the Ninth Circuit [and the USSC if necessary] will be timely taken and aggressively pursued, until such time as the payments are made.
|
|
|
Post by georgie18 on Dec 7, 2010 20:21:51 GMT -5
Briwadd...what do you think...no sarcasm ...really want to hear your interpretation...... This is what I wanted to hear: "At any rate, the reason I mention it at all, is as a basis for you to understand that I now receive almost daily information from FBI, CIA, NSA, Pentagon, and JCS sources, as well as a plethora of other people with whom I have established a rapport and respect, and who have met certain screening criteria."
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on Dec 7, 2010 20:27:58 GMT -5
Some will still be mad after this message from AL, did he say anything more toward where we are with payout than he did last night? NO! I think this message was for those still not convinced we are there or didn't get what they needed from yesterday. Did he even need to speak, NO, nothing new but as always I will try to break the important parts down. First of all we can all agree there is certain things Al can't directly say and this is why he used Mona's post to say a lot. This being something he wanted you to take notice of: "If we go along with the idea this was scripted and yielded plausible deniability for the government then it makes sense when AL says this is [should be] over by Christmas... Yesterday’s hearing lent to logical reasoning that this has reached a conclusion." "God willing, all the work behind the scenes is done and payments begin shortly!" All the work behind the scenes or does he mean curtain? We were a part of something much bigger. And he adds these: • I did take the opportunity to meet and speak with some of the 25 plus shareholders in attendance, after the hearing; most of the ‘quotes’ of my statements that you have seen posted are accurate; e.g. I did say that “.... if I were a betting man, I would bet that we will receive payment by Christmas.” He wants you to know that he did say these things and is re-saying them. • I am of the opinion that we are at the last turn in the road. More straight forwardly I do believe, based upon information from many, many sources including my work on securing release of the World Global Settlement funds, that payment is imminent. Look at this part carefully, it tells you how big a player AL is in these settlement releases: including my work on securing release of the World Global Settlement funds• Apparently, dismissal [one way or another] of this litigation was required by the Government as a condition of the release of CMKX payments; we shall soon see if that assessment is correct. Do you really think AL would make the statements he did if he wasn't positive of payout. This part is just for your comfort Whether it is or not, be assured that an appeal to the Ninth Circuit [and the USSC if necessary] will be timely taken and aggressively pursued, until such time as the payments are made.• It has been asserted that I am the trustee – I AM NOT. I don't think he's the trustee but he sure is in a power position and further up the echelon of overseeing than we think. I hasten to add that I have written correspondence on their behalf in the belief that it would assist in speeding up the WGS payouts, and in turn the CMKX release.• It has been suggested that my actions and/or lack of same is delaying receipt of payment by CMKX shareholders – IT IS NOT. Al's actions have never been the delay rather waiting on the WGS funding and the plan to come together. Some think the Bivens was to get our funds released early, listening to his wording throughout his release says otherwise, we were never going to get a payout until all settlements were a go. • It has been asserted that the WGS have nothing to do with, or affect CMKX – INCORRECT. This is verifying that WGS and all settlements were in a holding pattern waiting for all to be funded and the plans items where all checked off the list. No we won't hear from AL ever again. Some will next ask if their information is so good and accurate, why were we not we paid months ago “as you indicated we would be.” The detailed answer to that question will of necessity have to wait for another day; CAN NOT SAY, DENIABILITY. Some will ask why I am so confident that we are about be finished with this unnecessarily lengthy travail. The only answer that I can give you at the moment is to ask you to consider how much of my time [most of it] and other resources [substantial sums of $$] have been devoted to the matters associated with CMKX during the past year. Do you think Al after dedicating all his time and substantial amounts of money to just turn calmly give our beautiful Seeking a hug and kiss with a smile and telling her not to worry if you were in his shoes and thought you just lost? I hope this helps Don
|
|
|
Post by rspence000 Wet Blanket on Dec 7, 2010 20:30:40 GMT -5
Hate to be the wet blanket but I think we will be going to the USSC for the next couple of years...sorry
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on Dec 7, 2010 20:39:46 GMT -5
Hate to be the wet blanket but I think we will be going to the USSC for the next couple of years...sorry Can you break it down on why you think this is going another two years after what AL said? You really should try to explain why you feel that way so everyone can understand your stance instead of just making a negative statement like that. It's easy to shoot a one line snippet without explaining your thoughts. It would be very helpful to others. If your going to harsh someone mello, you should at least explain.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2010 20:40:01 GMT -5
Some will still be mad after this message from AL, did he say anything more toward where we are with payout than he did last night? NO! I think this message was for those still not convinced we are there or didn't get what they needed from yesterday. Did he even need to speak, NO, nothing new but as always I will try to break the important parts down. First of all we can all agree there is certain things Al can't directly say and this is why he used Mona's post to say a lot. This being something he wanted you to take notice of: "If we go along with the idea this was scripted and yielded plausible deniability for the government then it makes sense when AL says this is [should be] over by Christmas... Yesterday’s hearing lent to logical reasoning that this has reached a conclusion." "God willing, all the work behind the scenes is done and payments begin shortly!" All the work behind the scenes or does he mean curtain? We were a part of something much bigger. And he adds these: • I did take the opportunity to meet and speak with some of the 25 plus shareholders in attendance, after the hearing; most of the ‘quotes’ of my statements that you have seen posted are accurate; e.g. I did say that “.... if I were a betting man, I would bet that we will receive payment by Christmas.” He wants you to know that he did say these things and is re-saying them. • I am of the opinion that we are at the last turn in the road. More straight forwardly I do believe, based upon information from many, many sources including my work on securing release of the World Global Settlement funds, that payment is imminent. Look at this part carefully, it tells you how big a player AL is in these settlement releases: including my work on securing release of the World Global Settlement funds• Apparently, dismissal [one way or another] of this litigation was required by the Government as a condition of the release of CMKX payments; we shall soon see if that assessment is correct. Do you really think AL would make the statements he did if he wasn't positive of payout. This part is just for your comfort Whether it is or not, be assured that an appeal to the Ninth Circuit [and the USSC if necessary] will be timely taken and aggressively pursued, until such time as the payments are made.• It has been asserted that I am the trustee – I AM NOT. I don't think he's the trustee but he sure is in a power position and further up the echelon of overseeing than we think. I hasten to add that I have written correspondence on their behalf in the belief that it would assist in speeding up the WGS payouts, and in turn the CMKX release.• It has been suggested that my actions and/or lack of same is delaying receipt of payment by CMKX shareholders – IT IS NOT. Al's actions have never been the delay rather waiting on the WGS funding and the plan to come together. Some think the Bivens was to get our funds released early, listening to his wording throughout his release says otherwise, we were never going to get a payout until all settlements were a go. • It has been asserted that the WGS have nothing to do with, or affect CMKX – INCORRECT. This is verifying that WGS and all settlements were in a holding pattern waiting for all to be funded and the plans items where all checked off the list. No we won't hear from AL ever again. Some will next ask if their information is so good and accurate, why were we not we paid months ago “as you indicated we would be.” The detailed answer to that question will of necessity have to wait for another day; CAN NOT SAY, DENIABILITY. Some will ask why I am so confident that we are about be finished with this unnecessarily lengthy travail. The only answer that I can give you at the moment is to ask you to consider how much of my time [most of it] and other resources [substantial sums of $$] have been devoted to the matters associated with CMKX during the past year. Do you think Al after dedicating all his time and substantial amounts of money to just turn calmly give our beautiful Seeking a hug and kiss with a smile and telling her not to worry if you were in his shoes and thought you just lost? I hope this helps Don Thanks Don! That actually does make me feel better. Nice analysis! D4E
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Dec 7, 2010 20:46:08 GMT -5
d*mn THERE IT IS......................................................... I did take the opportunity to meet and speak with some of the 25 plus shareholders in attendance, after the hearing; most of the ‘quotes’ of my statements that you have seen posted are "ACCURATE" e.g. I did say that “.... if I were a betting man, I would bet that we will receive payment by Christmas.”
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Dec 7, 2010 20:50:18 GMT -5
Briwadd...what do you think...no sarcasm ...really want to hear your interpretation...... This is what I wanted to hear: "At any rate, the reason I mention it at all, is as a basis for you to understand that I now receive almost daily information from FBI, CIA, NSA, Pentagon, and JCS sources, as well as a plethora of other people with whom I have established a rapport and respect, and who have met certain screening criteria." This could still go in many different directions; however, my confidence is up knowing that Al is speaking with individuals within the government. I was always concerned as to where Al was getting his information. After 10 months of imminent, you have to start asking those questions. Hopefully this is resolved by Christmas.. Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by davesaint on Dec 7, 2010 20:57:33 GMT -5
What does this mean? "the short answer is for you to look at our competition and the results of our efforts."
Thanks, Davesaint
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Dec 7, 2010 20:57:33 GMT -5
Hate to be the wet blanket but I think we will be going to the USSC for the next couple of years...sorry You "THINK" Even a giggling girl could do better than that... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by agfadoc on Dec 7, 2010 21:00:55 GMT -5
Hate to be the wet blanket but I think we will be going to the USSC for the next couple of years...sorry You "THINK" Even a giggling girl could do better than that... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Slam!
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Dec 7, 2010 21:00:58 GMT -5
What does this mean? "the short answer is for you to look at our competition and the results of our efforts."Thanks, Davesaint It means I'm getting my island baby!!!
|
|
|
Post by Walking Tall on Dec 7, 2010 21:04:52 GMT -5
Thank you AH! The only thing that is depressing is that AH added the If we go along with the idea this was scripted and yielded plausible deniability for the government then it makes sense when AL says this is [should be] over by Christmas...Should be. I hope we don't go beyond Christmas.... Also no mention of when packets will be delivered except when it's over. I guess we should be thankful for what we got. Again, Thank you AH for all you have done and are doing. I have faith. D4E packets? no-one with any authority has ever mentioned packets.
|
|