|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 31, 2010 18:53:36 GMT -5
dcswingtown: MO , the packets are released , it'll take a few days with the long weekend to receive them , AH has nothing to do with them being mailed and we can wait till hell freezes over for ER because it means nothing to our money being released. It's coming with or more likely w/o an announcement// your lips to Gods ears gr8 LINK??? WERE THIS COME FROM THANKS Looks like out of the PT scroll...IMO
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Dec 31, 2010 18:59:09 GMT -5
Always the gentleman, DG. Little wonder you are so well liked, here.
|
|
|
Post by cheechman on Dec 31, 2010 21:52:29 GMT -5
Today at 3:14pm, millie wrote: That's the same question I asked earlier today. What good is a Supreme Court directive if those involved in the delay ignore it. Unless there isn't a Supreme Court directive? Millie Millie we need to distinguish what the Supreme Court Directive entails. Firstly, Supreme Court Directive is SOLELY the release of funds for the CMKX Shareholders and not thereof of the World Global Settlement Funds by years end of 2010. Mr. Hodges was brilliant in this, in this way at the end of the year of 2010 our trust fund(s) break us away from the World Global Settlements timing release and we will be paid, otherwise the Supreme Court Directive is in contempt. Delay of the World Global Settlement Funds are based on National Security when those in charge XXX know and have given the green light then funds are released world wide. As of December 31 2010 11:59 pm our packets and rest of our funds in process, should have been released according to the Directive the Supreme Court issued to Mr. Hodges, which breaks us away from the WGS Funds as I have mentioned. Other aspects with delay of WGS Funds are in play in the background which cannot be disclosed yet I assure you there is far more that meets the average joe public's eye and understanding. Yes the Directive exists from the Supreme Court that we are to be paid by years end 2010. Just because we receive packets in 2011 doesnt mean the directive was not adhered to. Look at the time stamp when packets are delivered when they were released they are still dated for last date of 2010 which will show the Supreme Court Directive was adhered to. Harv I like this post
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Dec 31, 2010 22:53:26 GMT -5
Yea but what will ole Harv say when nothing comes next week?
The 2010 "Time stamp" theory has a very short shelf life.
=^ .". ^=
|
|
|
Post by sweetsp7 on Jan 1, 2011 0:43:24 GMT -5
Re: My take on bob's post « Reply #16 Today at 9:22pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My apology for the appeal filed mistake. The MTD was on Dec 6th. When I read the 29th Dec, I read it as Attorney Hodges filed it in time because he had 30 days from the MTD, which was Dec 6th. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=36289&page=1
|
|
|
Post by lovindiamonds on Jan 1, 2011 1:03:26 GMT -5
Re: My take on bob's post « Reply #16 Today at 9:22pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My apology for the appeal filed mistake. The MTD was on Dec 6th. When I read the 29th Dec, I read it as Attorney Hodges filed it in time because he had 30 days from the MTD, which was Dec 6th. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=36289&page=1I don't get what he is trying to say... I thought Al did file the appeal just in case we don't get our packets, and since it has not been 30 days the appeal would be valid, no?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2011 1:28:53 GMT -5
It may mean the appeal deadline is Jan 29, 2011. Clarify if wrong.
|
|
|
Post by blu1236 on Jan 1, 2011 1:50:45 GMT -5
Any one get the feeling someone is laughing at us, along with ACCA, saying "I can't believe they're buying this crap"
|
|
|
Post by coachphilm on Jan 1, 2011 2:00:06 GMT -5
Bob, imo thats the least of your apologizes. You have jumped on this PJ and Chucky bandwagon, and for the last 12 months told all the shareholders not to believe any rumors unless Al gave us the "official announcement" of ER. now we are to ignore all your previous statements and believe this Packets in the mail. What are you going to say to these shareholders come Monday, "the info was correct when I jumped on the bandwagon" but the evil forces once again foiled our plans? Ive remained loyal to you for your efforts to help as much as you could, but this last round has really tried the patients of those who followed your ramblings. Even when I told you Al refiled you stated it wasnt true, well my friend I hope the tides havent turned on your latest pump. Because Al didnt notify us of any ER being achieved(as you have said so many times), yet you say the packets are out. The excuses come next week will not hold any value if your wrong on the packets. I hope you had a Happy New Year.
Coach SemperFi
|
|
|
Post by woutcome on Jan 1, 2011 2:15:30 GMT -5
According to various sources we are going to get .80 per share, correct.... Is this amount taxable? If .80 is taxable then I amj glad we did not get paid by Christmas. Now I/we have entire year to earn intrest/invest and not to pay tax till Jan 2012.
|
|
|
Post by delusionalgrandeur on Jan 1, 2011 7:02:26 GMT -5
According to various sources we are going to get .80 per share, correct.... Is this amount taxable? If .80 is taxable then I am glad we did not get paid by Christmas. Now I/we have entire year to earn intrest/invest and not to pay tax till Jan 2012. Yeah true, but according to the betting horse's mouth we should have already been paid as taxes were supposedly already taken out. Either way, once again we are at the mercy of a silent lawyer, and plaintiffs continually spewing baseless rumors as fact. Belle coppo!
|
|
|
Post by georgie18 on Jan 1, 2011 7:07:11 GMT -5
Re: My take on bob's post « Reply #16 Today at 9:22pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My apology for the appeal filed mistake. The MTD was on Dec 6th. When I read the 29th Dec, I read it as Attorney Hodges filed it in time because he had 30 days from the MTD, which was Dec 6th. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=36289&page=1I don't get what he is trying to say... I thought Al did file the appeal just in case we don't get our packets, and since it has not been 30 days the appeal would be valid, no? Wyatt wrote...."A copy of the Notice of Appeal is attached for your info and will be timely filed unless packages including a first payment have been previously received. The appeal is to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and will be filed in the District Court. Please note that the Order of Dismissal was not filed until December 29; that is what starts the running of the 30 days." BHollenegg wrote......"Attorney Hodges filed an appeal to ensure that all payment packages are delivered." BHollenegg stated that the appeal was filed....then Wyatt made the proper clarification...that it was prepared but not filed.....BHollenegg was apologizing for that error... Hope that answered your question....LD
|
|
|
Post by delusionalgrandeur on Jan 1, 2011 7:12:43 GMT -5
Always the gentleman, DG. Little wonder you are so well liked, here. And what? Should I feel bad because you don't like me? Please. Don't you have a boat to rig out or something? It's little wonder why you're so pompous. When you can walk a mile in my shoes maybe I'll pay attention to what you have to say. Until then, well, please shut your mouth. I've nothing to prove to you, nor did I invest in this to make friends. However I've forged plenty of friendships in and around these parts which will surely last a lifetime. Just because I'm tired of getting jerked around, and I voice that displeasure doesn't give you the right to judge me. Pull the stick out of your own eye before you come messing with the splinter in my eye.
|
|
|
Post by georgie18 on Jan 1, 2011 8:02:31 GMT -5
bhollenegg DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD *****
[avatar]
Member Info Status: offline Joined: Dec 2010 Gender: Male Posts: 5,690 Reputation: 296
[ Cool | Not Cool ]
Contact Icons [send pm]
Re: My take on bob's post « Reply #49 Today at 7:05am »
|
|
|
Post by georgie18 on Jan 1, 2011 8:24:47 GMT -5
harvscorvette DIAMOND JEDI ***
Member Info Status: online Joined: Mar 2010 Gender: Male Posts: 548 Location: Phillippines Reputation: 45
[ Cool | Not Cool ]
Contact Icons [send pm]
Re: My take on bob's post « Reply #71 Today at 8:12am »
|
|